SJW French president enjoys trans

This is what multiculturalism looks like in France.

Apparently sponsored by the SJW president himself. It could be a joke, but it’s not.

Obviously we can rejoice that the far right anti semitic homophobic transphobic islamophobic extremists neo Nazi didn’t win. Look what is considered to be a Nazi in the west today:

Dangerous people! Imagine a world where you can’t use the Holocaust to justify mass immigration and LGBT movement. I am scared just thinking, about thinking about it!

Man gave his heart for his son

This video is viral on Facebook, the second one doesn’t appear – at all.

And in the beginning God blessed this man…

Until…

… Until he knew it was an act. Then it becomes just despicable how the left uses fake sacrifice of men to promote very real sacrifice in the name of feminism. Sick.

Sjws always lie

To make it short, a woman came to me to show me what she saw on Facebook – the women’s/leftist bible. Of course she would never bother looking deeper to understand that is was fake. She wanted me to listen to what he was saying – implying that I should follow his example with her: “always listen to your mum… Treat women like princesses”, etc. It made me sick…

Using the sacrifice of a man for your own little comfort and to secure your little princess privileges is so egoistic, so amoral, so disgusting. Anyway, up to you to decide what kind of person would use lies to push men to give away everything for them.

Gamma males, value and virtue signaling

You certainly heard about these males behaving and thinking like women: the gamma males. You certainly also heard about the concept of virtue signalling, but what about value signaling?

Image result for virtue signaling

Image result for hot classy girl work

To illustrate these concept, let me take a concrete example:

Three persons have an important meeting with a client. There is one manager, one woman and an expert, whose official status (and salary) is lower than the manager. The woman usually wears nice dresses at work, while the manager always suits up, even when no-one does. Right before the meeting, the manager asks the expert: what do you think we should talk about during this meeting? The expert answers with a full agenda, the key points to discuss and main output to extract. After all, he wants the meeting and the project to be successful. The woman acknowledges everything, and the manager adds no words. At the time of the meeting, the manager takes the lead and repeats everything that the expert said. The woman emphasizes whatever the manager says to show her presence, and also highlights the “diversity” and “environmental policy” of the company. The manager only makes one allusion to the expert at the beginning saying that he will be assisting them during the project. The expert has nothing to add to the conversation as the content was already his own thinking; he barely corrects politely when his colleagues show their lack of understanding the problem.

During the project, the manager shows absolutely no leadership, no skills, puts the blame on everyone but him, and avoids any rational talks. He lies, changes the topic, ignores, etc. The woman handles very little tasks, and often requires more time in support than the added value she provides in the project. As such, the expert ends up telling exactly what to do, when, and doing everything. He is not invited to any further meeting, even though the woman is, and even after mentioning the fact that he should be present. He mentions that the woman is not very helpful on this project, but gets shuts down for “sexism”.

In the end of the project, the manager gives a review to him, stating that his technical skills are “satisfying”, but that he should show “more initiatives”, “more leadership”, “more care for clients”, “develop relationships with clients”, etc. He also points his “sexism” and lack of “ethics”, hence blocking him for promotion or a salary increase. Later, he gets to know that all mistakes that happened during the project were put on him; when he was not present nor responsible. The manager and the woman both get a good bonus on the project, and he gets nothing.

What just happened? Does it sound familiar?

In case you hadn’t noticed, the manager is what we call a Gamma male. He has no leadership, but refuses to accept his position and his limits. He uses virtue signalling and value signalling to compensate his lack of masculinity and competences. On the other side, the woman is typical. She lacks, like most, technical skills and need to use someone else to go through. She won’t face nor challenge the manager, but rather stick on his side and use the expert knowledge for her to shine.

To me the best examples of Gamma males are Trudeau and Macron.

In short, virtue signalling was:

  • Take the expert at the meeting and mention him, showing care for the team (message: “hey, look how a good manager I am”)
  • Label the expert as “sexist”, signalling his support for feminism in general (message: “hey, look how a good person I am”)
  • Mentioning the “diversity” and “environmental policy” in the company in order to setup a high moral ground where in fact, all the remaining is badImage result for virtue signaling jobImage result for macron old wife

Value signaling was:

  • The manager repeats everything that the expert said in order to look smarter than he is
  • The woman always dresses sexy and classy, but doesn’t do much. She is more about “showing” than “being” or “doing”.
  • The manager always suits up, even when not necessary, showing that he wants to assert his status

Image result for trudeau suit

Image result for macron suit

What could he do?

Well, in fact the expert can’t do much in this situation. The game is setup in the company for him to be blamed. He is already checkmate since the beginning. Hence the only way not to lose the game is to get out of it. He should have left the company or the team as early as possible. Of course, the manager/the company might try to fuck his reputation up, but they will do it in any case sooner or later.

Gamma males are the real problem of our society, and today they are in control of most of the positions of power. In order to win this war, good men have to stand up together and start doing something to get this power back. It doesn’t necessarily imply violence. The crucial point to understand is that a company ruled by Gamma males, women and high diversity is doomed to collapse under its own weight. You know, in the end someone gotta do the job!

So, if the good men refuse to work these companies and instead go their own way, allying with good people, the power will naturally come back to them. Why? Because the real power is the core value that we bring to this world. Never be mistaken by who is strong. Bad people are always weak; shortly summarized by Vox in “SJWs always lie”.

What would an alpha do?

The alpha would show leadership and support both the members of his team. He would give the credits where they have to be, challenge the client when required, and put back his team member in place if necessary. He would show understanding, but also discipline, competences and honesty. He would value the work of everyone, and reward adequately each of the member. Wanna have an example? Putin when he faces billionaires and tell them how bad they are to screw honest poor people:

Virtue signalling is about pretending to be a good person in order to do something bad.

Vale signalling is about pretending have a higher value than you have in order to parasite others.

Companies offshoring is more expensive, not less

I was traveling in Belgium a few years ago and came across an article from “Test achat” a customer review magazine. It was pointing out the poor condition of Chinese and other Asian workers. Yet they failed to realize they uncovered an inconvenient truth.

SCN_0001.jpg

Translation (for the total price of 15 EUR) :

  • Sales, Dividend to shareholders, shipping, marketing and advertisements: 12 EUR
  • Chinese boss, shipping within China: 1.5 EUR
  • Raw material : 1 EUR
  • Customs: 0.38 EUR
  • Chinese Worker: 0.12 EUR

You can point out as an excuse the wage of the Chinese worker all you want (roughly $500 monthly), I see that a European worker can be paid 20 times the wage of a Chinese worker without taking a dime from shareholders (which cost are also way too high). Simple numbers and calculations proves that not only offshoring is not financially profitable… but that companies are actually paying more to go abroad.

So YES, products can be produced in the West with higher quality while remaining cheaper. Giving well paid jobs to the needy, saving social security without immigration. The key issue of course for anyone is to brave the legal framework, access the financial resources and try to enter the network of the globalist.

Call it conspiracy. In fact, call it whatever you want… But some sectors seem to be immune to this offshoring: Hollywood, the media, Jewelry, the medical sector, Banking…

Food for thoughts.

Diversity doesn’t seem to like classical music

I just came across this concert, and I was stunned by the lack of diversity:

Yet, to this day, I NEVER heard there was any discrimination in music. If I open my TV, I would in fact have the impression that whites are discriminated and not the opposite.

Therefore, the only reasonable conclusion I can make is that Africans / Arabs do not care for our music. They care not for our history, our culture unless it is in their interest (i.e. colonies, crusades).

You may say it is a question of education. So then, how much is a surgeon educated? Is that a level that is considered sufficient to dismiss any discriminatory hypothesis?

How could they send a clearer message than their total absence in the perpetuation of our culture, tastes and traditions?

I hope all of that doesn’t sound racist, because that is not my intention. If you ever feel stressed about multiculturalism, look at the peaceful side of diversity:

Three lessons from the Genesis

In this post, I will go through some of the verses of the Genesis in the Bible and share with you few of my reflections.

The Fall

3 Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?”

2 The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden,

3 but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’”

4 “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman.

5 “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

6 When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.

7 Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.

13 Then the Lord God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?” The woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.”

14 So the Lord God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this,

“Cursed are you above all livestock
and all wild animals!
You will crawl on your belly
and you will eat dust
all the days of your life.
15 And I will put enmity
between you and the woman,
and between your offspring[a] and hers;
he will crush[b] your head,
and you will strike his heel.”

16 To the woman he said,

“I will make your pains in childbearing very severe;
with painful labor you will give birth to children.
Your desire will be for your husband,
and he will rule over you.”

17 To Adam he said, “Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat from it,’

“Cursed is the ground because of you;
through painful toil you will eat food from it
all the days of your life.
18 It will produce thorns and thistles for you,
and you will eat the plants of the field.
19 By the sweat of your brow
you will eat your food
until you return to the ground,
since from it you were taken;
for dust you are
and to dust you will return.”

Our belief dictates our behaviours

Did God really say this? indeed.
Despite what we have been told since childhood, people do have an intense natural need of belief and spirituality; and no this is not a weakness, nor a disease. As The Guardian states, researches have proved that spirituality is highly connected with happiness. But also, the NLP showed us that our belief system defines our identity and hence influences our behaviours. These mechanisms also derive the notion of natural “Optimitism bias”, published in the Time. Therefore, it is safe to assert that faith instantly influences our behaviors – for better or worse.

In this context, the Bible starts strong, and illustrates metaphorically the original human weakness. The snake is the voice that awakes the doubt in the absolute truth. The sin originates from the lack of strength to resist our natural tendency to hedonism. Faith compounds identity, and identity directs our behaviours. Nihilism is therefore the gate to sin. Cultural Marxism is nihilism, so don’t be astonished by what you see around you.

When the common narrative tends to make us believe that Jesus never existed (which is a documented lie), the instant conclusion – for most – is that all religions are worthless, and that there is no God. As Nietzsche said in 1883: “God is dead”. In such a context, many will find an escape-spirituality in a hypocrite sympathy for atheism, paganism and/or Buddhism; i.e. a superficial attachment to a human morality that camouflages nihilism, ego-centrism or hedonism. To name them briefly, I would mention the “alt-right pagan”, the “modern attention whore” and the “environmentalist”. Nonetheless, the conclusion remains the same. The failure to believe in our own God reflects the work of Cultural Marxism, destroying the roots of our identity, which translates directly in our failure of evaluating good and evil, and in the constant questioning of the non-questionable (e.g. genders, immigration, money etc.).

Image result for nlp belief behavior
NLP pyramid

There are consequences for our actions, even if we think there aren’t

Adam and Eve do eat the fruit; they listen to the snake who tells them not to worry. They do so because 1) they doubt the God’s command, 2) they do not believe in the consequences of their actions, and finally 3) because they want it.

In a post-modernist era, this is exactly is the definition of “carpe diem” and “hedonist” philosophies: “don’t worry, everything will be alright. Your only worry should be not to have enjoyed even more.”. And in fact, Christianity 2.0 emphasizes these behaviors, hypocritically claiming the absence of punishment thanks to the sacrifice of Jesus. In short, there is no need for redemption. And who cares? What is the difference between a world where there is no God (Atheism), and a world where God forgives everything (Christianity 2.0)?

But the Genesis is clear. It highlights the essentiality of these elements: 1) punishment exists, 2) redemption is not always granted. In short, justice before all (another pillar of Christianity)

What you do in your life will influence your future, and eventually destroy you in some cases. This being said, injustice also exists, and it is the duty of every man to seek justice.

Image result for quote Jefferson if a law is unfair

It is easier to influence women than men

This sentence might already be too much in a feminised world like ours. Never criticise women, that is oppression – I suppose this is what I should understand in the Marxist terms “political correctness”. But to those hypocrites minds, could you please explain me then why most advertisements are directed towards women? Why fashion is something that impacts more women than men?
Well, in fact, the truth is that women are more sensitive to their urges than men. Where the woman owns the territory of beauty and emotionalism, the man owns the physical and the intellectual/emotional strength.

The Bible in fact is very clear here, and shows that to manipulate the people, to control the families, you shall first target women for they have a weaker mind and will use her charm to perpetrate your plots. Would anyone even argue today against the correlation between feminism, divorce, women suicide, mental illness and decreased birth rate?

In a democracy, control the women, and you will control the State. Control the women, and you will control the men, for they will not fear to lose their love, but also their children and everything they fought for.

Image result for women fashion show

An hymn to the good wife

A good woman is hard to find,
and worth far more than diamonds.
Her husband trusts her without reserve,
and never has reason to regret it.
Never spiteful, she treats him generously
all her life long.
She shops around for the best yarns and cottons,
and enjoys knitting and sewing.
She’s like a trading ship that sails to faraway places
and brings back exotic surprises.
She’s up before dawn, preparing breakfast
for her family and organizing her day.
She looks over a field and buys it,
then, with money she’s put aside, plants a garden.
First thing in the morning, she dresses for work,
rolls up her sleeves, eager to get started.
She senses the worth of her work,
is in no hurry to call it quits for the day.
She’s skilled in the crafts of home and hearth,
diligent in homemaking.
She’s quick to assist anyone in need,
reaches out to help the poor.
She doesn’t worry about her family when it snows;
their winter clothes are all mended and ready to wear.
She makes her own clothing,
and dresses in colorful linens and silks.
Her husband is greatly respected
when he deliberates with the city fathers.
She designs gowns and sells them,
brings the sweaters she knits to the dress shops.
Her clothes are well-made and elegant,
and she always faces tomorrow with a smile.
When she speaks she has something worthwhile to say,
and she always says it kindly.
She keeps an eye on everyone in her household,
and keeps them all busy and productive.
Her children respect and bless her;
her husband joins in with words of praise:
“Many women have done wonderful things,
but you’ve outclassed them all!”
Charm can mislead and beauty soon fades.
The woman to be admired and praised
is the woman who lives in the Fear-of-God.
Give her everything she deserves!
Festoon her life with praises!

Proverbs 31:10 – 31

 

Pornocracy, he warned us

In the 19th, he wrote:

To support than the woman can express in the people’s assembly her disagreement with her husband; it is to imply their latent disagreement and prepare them for divorce. To suppose that the reason from the first can balance the one of the second is to go against the wish of nature, and to degrade virility. To admit, finally, to public functions a person that nature and the conjugal law have, to say, dedicated naturally to solely domestic functions, is to alter the family chastity, to make a woman a public figure, to proclaim the confusion of genders, the community of loves, the abolition of family, the absolutism of the State, the servitude of the people and the infeodation of properties.

Change, modify, or intervene, in any manner, this rapport between sexes, and you destroy marriage in its essence; from a society predominated by justice you create a society predominated by love; you fall back to concubines and flutters; you can still have fathers and mothers, as you have lovers, but you won’t have families; and without family, your political constitution, of families and free cities, will become a communistic theocracy or pornocracy, the worse of tyranny.

Mystics say that, one day, there won’t be males nor females; which nowadays seems to be, even for a crowd of educated people, the unique manner for destroying the antagonism, and therefore for extinguishing crime and misery. But would such a society survive? I would argue that this society would function a 100 times worse than ours; and, if you allow me to clarify, I support the fact that it would radically be impossible.

Society subsists by the subordination of all forces and human faculties, individual and collective, to justice.

Every woman who dreams of emancipation already lost, ipso facto, the health of her soul, the lucidity of her spirit, and the virginity of her heart: she is already on the course of sins.

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, Pornocracy or the modern woman, ed1875

And this is what happened.

Eurovision Israël 2018: a devilish SJW hymn

The winner of Eurovision 2018 is … Israël! The song “Toy” is nothing else but an SJW anti-Christian devilish live worship. The singer, Netta Barzilai, is a failed SJW fusion of the angel of Gluttony, the angel of Sex and the angel of Death (humor). Anyway, sad to note that Israël – a country built on strong religious belief – ends up demonstrating its worship for Satan itself instead of being the leader of morality. This being said, I don’t think most Jews even realise what happened in their religion. I don’t think they are guilty, but rather the herd of sheep following the wolves. So let’s pray for them to see the light and hear those words, because after all, we do not wish them anything bad:

Romans 2:28-29 Amplified Bible, Classic Edition (AMPC)
28 For he is not a [real] Jew who is only one outwardly and publicly, nor is [true] circumcision something external and physical.

29 But he is a Jew who is one inwardly, and [true] circumcision is of the heart, a spiritual and not a literal [matter]. His praise is not from men but from God.

What for yourself the SJW devil in live:

As Haaretz notes:

Co-written by Doron Medalie and Stav Berger, “Toy” garnered an impressive following of over 17 million views on YouTube and even hit the No. 1 spot on Spotify Israel. The winning song is also featured on the iTunes hit parade at home and in Europe.

Thanking the audience for their vote, the 25-year-old singer praised their choice to accept diversity and for choosing something different. Afterwards, she proclaimed her victory by screaming: “I love my country, next year in Jerusalem,” and concluded by saying “Thank you, Europe!”

Netta from Israel celebrates after winning the Eurovision song contest in Lisbon, Portugal, Saturday, May 12, 2018 during the Eurovision Song Contest grand final.

People celebrate in Tel Aviv the winning of the Eurovision Song Contest by Israel's Netta, May 12, 2018.

The lyrics also speak for themselves, with few extracts here:

Look at me, I’m a beautiful creature
I don’t care about your “modern time preachers

Hey, I think you forgot how to play

I’m taking my Pikachu home
You’re stupid just like your smartphone

Wonder Woman don’t you ever forget
You’re divine and he’s about to regret

You stupid boy (Stupid boy)
I’ll take you down now, I’ll make you watch me

(Cululoo, cululoo) Wedding bells ringing
(Cululoo, cululoo) Money men bling-bling

I believe that the “modern time preacher” is nothing else but the followers of the Christ and/or the last standing strong conservatives who praise fidelity, temperance, respect, free will, etc. In brief, the opposite of a totalitarian SJW. I know that many of you still believe that Jesus was a hippie, precursor of SJWs and defender of modern liberalism… but not really. At least, at the level of chastity and marriage, Jesus notes:

Mark 10:2-12
Some Pharisees came up to Jesus, testing Him, and began to question Him whether it was lawful for a man to divorce a wife. And He answered and said to them, “What did Moses command you?” They said, “Moses permitted a man TO WRITE A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE AND SEND her AWAY.” read more.
But Jesus said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart he wrote you this commandment. “But from the beginning of creation, God MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE. “FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH; so they are no longer two, but one flesh. “What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.” In the house the disciples began questioning Him about this again. And He said to them, “Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery.”

‘You shall not commit adultery.

Matthew 5:27-28
“You have heard that it was said, ‘YOU SHALL NOT COMMIT ADULTERY’; but I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

Besides, the song itself is an hymn to the abuse of men – a subliminal message to all women: seduce a man, enslave him, marry him, and take his money. An hymn to sexual immorality. A representation of gluttony. And, in the middle, a waving cat – the derived Japanese representation for the goddess of mercy – most likely to avoid hell. Ironic?

As a Christian, let’s simply note that this song is the expression of Nihilist Hedonism. According to Haaretz, the song is liked (read good) because it shows how much people love “diversity“.  Should we see a subtle confession of their (successful attempt) to jeopardise a TV Show for the liberal left agenda? When looking at the second place of Eurovision 2018, maybe. But it won’t change the fact that diversity is a devilish concept that shortens the words “cultural marxism”, rooted in the division of people and dictatorship through “political correctness”.

Christian values, Christianity, how you were lied to

Most people tell me they don’t believe in religions, but what they do not understand is how they are both feets in, whatever they like or not. Mass immigration, interracial relationships, feminism, forgiveness, tolerance, fornication, drinking, etc. Major topics drawing the line in the sand between left and right, but also the shape of the new religion: Cultural Marxist Hedonism, which we could also call Nihilist Hedonism. Yet, for everyone the blame goes on the Christians. Seen as guilty, stupid or as a useful idiot, the Christian is the comfortable scapegoat of the moment, since he is the only one not to hit back.

Image result for christian cuck

Before anything, I am not a priest, nor a theologian, but it happens that I was blessed with the gift of reading, and thinking! And in any case it doesn’t take a genius to note how biblical verses have been jeopardized for political reasons. Few minutes listening to most priests in fact make me nervous for their words resonate like MSM, with a touch of liberal cherry picked Biblical bullshit. In particular, the one verse every western Christian has been repeated all his childhood:

You have heard that it was said, “An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.” But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who begs from you, and do not refuse the one who would borrow from you.

In a nutshell, taken out of context, and for useful idiots Christian 2.0: “dear devil, come and piss on my head, then fuck my wife, and that’s ok, you can piss on my other cheek now”.

Image result for christian cuck

Yet…

I know that some of you are already blabbering “go fuck yourself with your Abrahamic shit; you ain’t even a native English speaking man”. Most likely clever guys who read all Roman and Greek philosophy, the entire Bible (multiple times), speak Aramaic, Syriac, Coptic, Latin, Greek, German, French, Russian etc. Geniuses who do not write a book because it would be too much for everyone. For the rest of the common mortals who are open-minded enough to read, think and discuss, they will just agree that Jesus – in gospels and in history – was much more complex that the few sentences attributed to him in satanic Churches. Indeed, there are too many historic documents, apocryphal gospels and scriptures to judge so fast. In a nutshell, using Jesus as a complete liberal idiot to justify a cultural Marxist, hedonist, or pagan agenda is either full of ignorance, either dishonest. Neither of those is Christian, nor Greco-Roman, nor Pagan. Likely, as Bart D. Ehrman describes, Jesus was not what he was described, but who cares? Because whether you believe in god or not doesn’t really matters, even for Jesus:

Therefore I say to you, any sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven people, but blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven. “Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come.

And…

According to the Epistle to the Galatians: “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. The fruit is contrasted with the Works of the Flesh.

I let you reflect on the meaning. At least for me, it is clear that the holy spirit is the spiritual representation of god, part of us and part of the world. In short, Jesus doesn’t care for who you believe in or not, but rather for who you are and what you do. A personal philosophy before all, but nothing astonishing when you know that Christianity is an aggregate of the philosophies of the Roman and Greek heritage. As Dawkins – one of the biggest atheist and evolutionist savant, opposed to Christianity but strangely agnostic supporter of Judaism – notes:

At least, the simple fact that the most powerful people in this world are religious – but not Christian, matters. And the simple fact that numerous journalists are Jewish themselves proves that the MSM critics towards Christianity are not totally objective, else equal (if not more) amount of articles against Judaism and Islam should be produced.  Honestly, when was the last time you read in a newspaper “Judaism by default is gone”. Does it sound even a little bit anti-Semitic? This being said, I don’t blame Jews, nor Muslims. Social groups, meta-programs are what they are – memes as Howard Bloom names them.

Hence, the key question here is not god but rather the political instrumentation of a philosophy of life in order to foster a change of values in society, and centralise the power/resources of the hands of the few. I intend here to show how Christian values ARE NOT the problem, and how Christianity – a traditional version – is closer to the solution than the problem. So let’s talk about Christian core values, not spiritual beliefs.

The roots of the Christian values are called the 4 cardinal virtues and were introduced by Plato in the the Republic. They are the following:

  1. Prudence: Aristotle defined prudence as recta ratio agibilium, “right reason applied to practice.” It is the virtue that allows us to judge correctly what is right and what is wrong in any given situation. In short, before acting, you should think.
  2. Justice: while we often use justice in a negative sense (“He got what he deserved”), justice in its proper sense is positive. Injustice occurs when we as individuals or by law deprive someone of that which he is owed. Legal rights can never outweigh natural ones.
  3. Fortitude: Fortitude allows us to overcome fear and to remain steady in our will in the face of obstacles, but it is always reasoned and reasonable; the person exercising fortitude does not seek danger for danger’s sake. Prudence and justice are the virtues through which we decide what needs to be done; fortitude gives us the strength to do it.
  4. Temperance: temperance is the restraint of our desires or passions. Food, drink, and sex are all necessary for our survival, individually and as a species; yet a disordered desire for any of these goods can have disastrous consequences, physical and moral.

Already here, you note that these values are quite opposed to cultural Marxism and liberalism, which open the path to nihilism, amorality and hedonism. Unlike Marxism which primarily focuses on economic inequalities and economic classes, Cultural Marxism see culture as a main cause for many different kinds of inequalities:

  • Race (Whites/non-Whites)
  • Culture (Western/non-Western)
  • Family (nuclear family/non-nuclear family)
  • Religion (Christianity/atheism and religious minorities)
  • Gender (men/women)
  • Sexual orientation (heterosexual/LGBT)

On the other hand, liberalism leads to hedonism. The breaking of religion – Christianity only in the west, since Judaism was never attacked – without its replacement with the Greco-Roman foundations leaves the door open to what is called the “devil” in Christianity. In short:

  • Prudence is replaced by consumption and impatience
  • Justice is replaced by equality, which is itself split into race-culture-family-religion-gender-sexual orientation. A good person – the Just – is therefore a liberal, and the devil is a White-Western-Married-Christian-Man-Straight.
  • Fortitude is replaced by individualism where any reason is good enough to leave the responsibility on others, and where excuses are given for not having any discipline (e.g. obesity)
  • Temperance is replaced by over-consumption where the instant satisfaction is essential and constantly increasing (e.g. Facebook, Tinder, alcohol, drugs, obesity)

The virtues were then translated into the 7 heavenly virtues in light of the 7 sins, as showed here:

As you see, Christian virtues origin from basic sins. They are called “virtues”, and to some extent are based on Stoicism. Yes, as the German theologian Bruno Bauer shows, Christianity owes more to Greco-Roman philosophy than Judaism. Hard hit for the 19th which cost him his job at the university of Bonn.

These virtues are attributes that every real Christian tries to develop inside him in order to become a better person. So, let’s go one by one and expose how the current Christianity 2.0 is not aligned with the core Christian values, and therefore not Christian at all.

  1. Chastity: this value derives from the sexual morality in the Bible. One should focus on higher things than sex, for both men and women. Chastity is opposed to fornication, a precept in fact fostered by Freud (Jewish) and Kinsey but supported today by the universal sexual rights. I believe that today everyone can see how sexual liberation has led to a world of injustice and the disintegration of the family unit.
  2. Temperance: setting personal boundaries to your own desires. It is not based on death sentence, but on free will. It is about not abusing of our physical impulses. And today is exactly the opposite. Consumption is a goal per se for the masses. Profits, hedonism.
  3. Charity: the free and individual choice of helping other individuals. As such, it is completely opposed to a system taking by force your hard earned money. In fact, taking advantage of others, taking the benefits of someone else’s work is contrary to Christian values. The same goes for usury, and this is also where Christians split with Jewish laws, where usury is allowed, but only towards non Jews. So, our abusive financial and socialist system doesn’t derive from Christianity, but in fact, is opposed to it.
  4. Diligence: hedonism encourages de facto the minimisation of effort to satisfy one’s pleasure. You should have everything, now. The notions of investment and discipline are exactly the opposite of what the western society is today.
  5. Patience: again, our hedonistic society is not patient. Companies have no leadership, preferring diversity and pretty colourful slides to the patience required to build something strong and real. Short term gains are privileged over long term investment. Like a child cries instantly, the modern woman screams and now uses the #metoo as a tool to sue innocent men. In terms of relationships, tinder, badoo and Facebook are mere symptoms of an impatient and hedonistic society. Again, Christianity has nothing to do there.
  6. Kindness: for Christians, valuing what we have and what we receive is essential. But also showing kindness to people. Yet, that doesn’t mean supporting your own genocide, helping theft or letting anyone step on you. The Christian has a duty to oppose what is bad. Ever heard about the Just War? Our society is not based on kindness, it is based on the extraction of resources from white men to others. There is absolutely no Christianity in it, quite on the opposite.
  7. Humility: a Christian respects the achievements of others. He seeks not to take pride in what other did, nor to take advantage of the weak. How does our totalitarian leftist system show humility? Through anti-discrimination laws?

In addition, these values have to be applied with consistency. Cherry picking is what Catholicism 2.0 has been doing now and then, and I repeat it: that ain’t Christian, nor Greco-Roman.

So, I invite you, Christian or not, to reflect on these values and to decide for yourself if you agree with them values or not. Think about them, and decide for yourself if you think that they represent exactly what is missing in our society. Honestly, if these values and links can lead you to personal conclusions, I am happy. I don’t intend saying here that I have all answers. In any case, Christianity is a reflection of the Greco-Roman values, and its facets are multiple. It is a personal faith before all that is NOT RESPONSIBLE for what happens now. Its tolerance was jeopardised to change it into Nihilism and Hedonism, which ARE THE RESPONSIBLES. So, hitting on Christianity won’t solve the issue, it will make it graver. On the contrary, a return to traditional values would improve drastically our social condition, at many levels.

In any case, Christianity is a (Juedo)-Greco-Roman philosophy of life that can guide us during our personal reflections, but also when we need to choose a path. Its political usage has to be distinguished from its philosophical foundations, for opposing it drastically without a sound and self-reflected alternative might result in personal and societal nihilism.