University of California is racist, against whites

The plan to ostracise and financially break the white Americans and Europeans continues. The Swedish model of education, hereafter, illustrates the Globalist model at an advanced stage.

The second picture, hereafter, illustrates an advanced stage of white genocide in England:

The last picture, hereafter, illustrates the #diversity programme completed (coming soon) :

In the USA, in University of California, just like in many other institutions, they state openly that their goal is to discriminate white people, hiring first people of colours and other minorities. Funny enough they state “minorities” when whites account only for 39%, and therefore already constitute a minority. Their own logic, if it was not racial hatred, would reach the exact opposite conclusion. Whatever. RedIce wrote:

Cal Poly San Luis Obispo recently released a 30-page report outlining plans to “improve diversity” via a series of initiatives.

One goal is to increase the number of people of color on campus beyond the increases that have already occurred over the past few years, as “applications from underrepresented minority students doubled between 2008 and 2018.”

{snip}

The public research institution states it wishes to get those numbers more in line with the state’s percentage of white people, which recent polls hold at 39.7 percent of the population.

{snip}

For students, the school plans on recruiting applicants more heavily based on race. For instance, the school has recently implemented several new scholarships “aimed at recruiting more African-American and other underrepresented minorities.” It’s also working to recruit low-income and first-generation students by partnering with high schools that enroll a high percentage of these students, according to the report.

Cal Poly SLO has eliminated applicants’ ability to apply to the school in Early Decision since the process, according to the report, “disadvantaged low-income students.”

{snip}

And the college announced its intention of forcibly increasing diversity in “traditionally male-dominated majors” such as STEM and Architecture and Environmental Design, according to the document.

What are the consequences? Well… Far beyond STEM studies or imbalance at University.
By having less opportunities to study real value studies (mathematics, science, engineering, etc.) whites will in fact lose their grasp on the middle class and also have much less opportunities to reach top positions in companies. Indeed, the combination of a broken network, a Marxist and Hedonist psychological indoctrination, the loss of financial power, and in fine the loss of hard skills will guillotine the last heads of the white communities and hand over the power to 1) Globalists, 2) their infinite baskets of low/average IQ controllable minorities. Of course, a necessary step will be the destruction of Islam and Christianity: the Globalist need broken slaves, lobotomised of any metaphysical concept, vaccinated against moral values, and worshippers of individualism; they don’t want a united bunch of savages, or worse good people.

In particular, new white generations will have more and more difficulties studying, getting a job and earning money. The inflation and debt model will ensure that their money flies away to warmer places, leaving their children in poverty. Of course, at short term, individualism will be the easy excuse; in such a free and perfect liberal world, people are responsible for their own shit.

Symptoms of these elements are for instance men quitting studies, MGTOW quitting women, etc. Somehow they believe that there is a way to avoid the problem, but it is all a lie. The shit is right here, and we have very concrete people who launched a war against the white race more than a hundred years ago.

What do I propose in this?

One thing can save us: physical and spiritual unity, also named Christianity.

Iranian feminist sent to jail

A woman was arrested in Iran… because she danced sexy on Instagram.

This raises two questions in my mind:

  1. Why do Muslims want to keep their woman far from sexual liberation?
  2. Why do feminists take this as an example when there are thousands of less sexual ones?

Well, looking at west, things become pretty clear. Under the umbrella of liberation, women slowly get tempted by the evil and start ruining society. Muslims (and Christians) do understand this very well and value more the family unit than the abundance of prostitutes. Because as a matter of facts, the last building modern whores did fell apart the first day, while cathedrals are still standing.

Feminism is the destruction of the family unit. The deception of society. The corruption of children. The enslavement of the bodies and the souls of men and women. The end of reason, equality, honesty, sincerity and the beginning of falsehood, hypocrisy and superficiality.

Feminism is evil, not for what it defends, but for what it results in, inexorably.

Besides, there is nothing more sellable than pussy. Sex is the strongest pulsion of human being, and the evil (if we can say so) knows how to play with it. In fact, sex is to our ancestry tree what is survival instinct to our life. So, no doubt feminism would jump on this.

Never forget that what Iran does is just a trial to stop this before it starts:

The myth of colonialism

One of the most controversial thing in Western Europe is its colonial past. As taught at school, white (Christians) Europeans came to Africa and massacred local populations to enslave them and steal their money. Not that I want to say that evil shouldn’t be condemned, but what if history taught at school was exaggerated to promote racial hatred towards white people? What if racism was taught at school under the umbrella antiracist values? What if most of the stories told were lies built to divide and conquer our (Christian) Western societies?

I let you reflect on those questions. Here I intend to provide few facts for you to take into consideration.

These few pictures are there to foster your personal reflection. But let’s say few words.

In the early 19th century, the population of Europe was about 150M and Africa 90M, at best. The size of Africa is about 10 times the size of Europe, and its lands are more fertile. If you consider the density of population, Africa had around 3.5 persons per km2, and Europe had about 60 persons per km2. Compare this to today’s France, who has about 120 inhabitants per km2, or Belgium who has 360 inhabitants per km2. In Southern Africa, the density was even around 0.5 inhabitant per km2! Compare once again this to today (around 240 persons per km2). Now, take into consideration that Africa was mostly a land divided in tribes, with very few kingdoms (if we can name it that way). The notion of Nation State didn’t exist, ID cards, passports, and digital footprint neither. This means that borders didn’t exist – we created them, artificially. The abundance of resources made it also extremely easy to move.

So basically, when whites came, they had to walk kilometers before finding a tribe. Sometimes dozens, if not hundreds of kilometers.

Furthermore, how could European genocide populations if factually colonialism more than doubled life expectancy, and their population exploded under “Occupation”? Indeed, while the European population did not explode under modern society, others did. This shows that these cilivisations could not grow by themselves, and demonstrate that the western world had a positive impact on them in terms of population growth. Where is the genocide there?

Also, another point goes to the level of development in Africa when Europeans came. Were there roads, trains, hospitals, schools, etc.? If so, why do we still need to fund projects to develop these elements in Africa?

Last, these are the words of the belgian “colonialist” Albert Thys :

“The creation of the Congo State is, as I said above, an absolutely new colonial conception and, strictly speaking, it is not a colony, the latter dispossessing the native of his soil and considering the native as the conquered race. In fact, here the natives are the citizens of the new state and the whites sent to Congo by the government will be temporary guardians to the black population who will be called to the management of public affairs only when his education will be sufficiently done. So far, until now, all colonial occupation has resulted, not only in the enslavement of the aboriginal race, but also, and almost inevitably, in the suppression of this race and its replacement by the conquering race. This is especially what happened in the Americas and even more or less in the British and Dutch Indies. Here, it can not for a moment be a question of doing so. The Negro is the citizen of the Congo Free State; we must not enslave it, but educate and elevate it, socially speaking, until it can govern itself, even if it is even flanked at the door by the Negroes of the future.

Letter to his wife written during his first trip to Congo on December 6, 1887.

Baptism and circumcision, your choice

They say that Christians are barbaric people, whose faith is blind to violence. They say that Christians priests are pedophiles, that Churches are lost places, unnecessary. They say that faith doesn’t impact behaviours, that good and bad are relative. They say we are all equal, that all opinions are worth the same.

John 7:17
17 Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on my own.

Hopefully, you are always welcome to believe or not, and to follow the religion that you want.

Romans 2:28-29 King James Version (KJV)

28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:

29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

SJW French president enjoys trans

This is what multiculturalism looks like in France.

Apparently sponsored by the SJW president himself. It could be a joke, but it’s not.

Obviously we can rejoice that the far right anti semitic homophobic transphobic islamophobic extremists neo Nazi didn’t win. Look what is considered to be a Nazi in the west today:

Dangerous people! Imagine a world where you can’t use the Holocaust to justify mass immigration and LGBT movement. I am scared just thinking, about thinking about it!

Man gave his heart for his son

This video is viral on Facebook, the second one doesn’t appear – at all.

And in the beginning God blessed this man…

Until…

… Until he knew it was an act. Then it becomes just despicable how the left uses fake sacrifice of men to promote very real sacrifice in the name of feminism. Sick.

Sjws always lie

To make it short, a woman came to me to show me what she saw on Facebook – the women’s/leftist bible. Of course she would never bother looking deeper to understand that is was fake. She wanted me to listen to what he was saying – implying that I should follow his example with her: “always listen to your mum… Treat women like princesses”, etc. It made me sick…

Using the sacrifice of a man for your own little comfort and to secure your little princess privileges is so egoistic, so amoral, so disgusting. Anyway, up to you to decide what kind of person would use lies to push men to give away everything for them.

Gamma males, value and virtue signaling

You certainly heard about these males behaving and thinking like women: the gamma males. You certainly also heard about the concept of virtue signalling, but what about value signaling?

Image result for virtue signaling

Image result for hot classy girl work

To illustrate these concept, let me take a concrete example:

Three persons have an important meeting with a client. There is one manager, one woman and an expert, whose official status (and salary) is lower than the manager. The woman usually wears nice dresses at work, while the manager always suits up, even when no-one does. Right before the meeting, the manager asks the expert: what do you think we should talk about during this meeting? The expert answers with a full agenda, the key points to discuss and main output to extract. After all, he wants the meeting and the project to be successful. The woman acknowledges everything, and the manager adds no words. At the time of the meeting, the manager takes the lead and repeats everything that the expert said. The woman emphasizes whatever the manager says to show her presence, and also highlights the “diversity” and “environmental policy” of the company. The manager only makes one allusion to the expert at the beginning saying that he will be assisting them during the project. The expert has nothing to add to the conversation as the content was already his own thinking; he barely corrects politely when his colleagues show their lack of understanding the problem.

During the project, the manager shows absolutely no leadership, no skills, puts the blame on everyone but him, and avoids any rational talks. He lies, changes the topic, ignores, etc. The woman handles very little tasks, and often requires more time in support than the added value she provides in the project. As such, the expert ends up telling exactly what to do, when, and doing everything. He is not invited to any further meeting, even though the woman is, and even after mentioning the fact that he should be present. He mentions that the woman is not very helpful on this project, but gets shuts down for “sexism”.

In the end of the project, the manager gives a review to him, stating that his technical skills are “satisfying”, but that he should show “more initiatives”, “more leadership”, “more care for clients”, “develop relationships with clients”, etc. He also points his “sexism” and lack of “ethics”, hence blocking him for promotion or a salary increase. Later, he gets to know that all mistakes that happened during the project were put on him; when he was not present nor responsible. The manager and the woman both get a good bonus on the project, and he gets nothing.

What just happened? Does it sound familiar?

In case you hadn’t noticed, the manager is what we call a Gamma male. He has no leadership, but refuses to accept his position and his limits. He uses virtue signalling and value signalling to compensate his lack of masculinity and competences. On the other side, the woman is typical. She lacks, like most, technical skills and need to use someone else to go through. She won’t face nor challenge the manager, but rather stick on his side and use the expert knowledge for her to shine.

To me the best examples of Gamma males are Trudeau and Macron.

In short, virtue signalling was:

  • Take the expert at the meeting and mention him, showing care for the team (message: “hey, look how a good manager I am”)
  • Label the expert as “sexist”, signalling his support for feminism in general (message: “hey, look how a good person I am”)
  • Mentioning the “diversity” and “environmental policy” in the company in order to setup a high moral ground where in fact, all the remaining is badImage result for virtue signaling jobImage result for macron old wife

Value signaling was:

  • The manager repeats everything that the expert said in order to look smarter than he is
  • The woman always dresses sexy and classy, but doesn’t do much. She is more about “showing” than “being” or “doing”.
  • The manager always suits up, even when not necessary, showing that he wants to assert his status

Image result for trudeau suit

Image result for macron suit

What could he do?

Well, in fact the expert can’t do much in this situation. The game is setup in the company for him to be blamed. He is already checkmate since the beginning. Hence the only way not to lose the game is to get out of it. He should have left the company or the team as early as possible. Of course, the manager/the company might try to fuck his reputation up, but they will do it in any case sooner or later.

Gamma males are the real problem of our society, and today they are in control of most of the positions of power. In order to win this war, good men have to stand up together and start doing something to get this power back. It doesn’t necessarily imply violence. The crucial point to understand is that a company ruled by Gamma males, women and high diversity is doomed to collapse under its own weight. You know, in the end someone gotta do the job!

So, if the good men refuse to work these companies and instead go their own way, allying with good people, the power will naturally come back to them. Why? Because the real power is the core value that we bring to this world. Never be mistaken by who is strong. Bad people are always weak; shortly summarized by Vox in “SJWs always lie”.

What would an alpha do?

The alpha would show leadership and support both the members of his team. He would give the credits where they have to be, challenge the client when required, and put back his team member in place if necessary. He would show understanding, but also discipline, competences and honesty. He would value the work of everyone, and reward adequately each of the member. Wanna have an example? Putin when he faces billionaires and tell them how bad they are to screw honest poor people:

Virtue signalling is about pretending to be a good person in order to do something bad.

Vale signalling is about pretending have a higher value than you have in order to parasite others.

Companies offshoring is more expensive, not less

I was traveling in Belgium a few years ago and came across an article from “Test achat” a customer review magazine. It was pointing out the poor condition of Chinese and other Asian workers. Yet they failed to realize they uncovered an inconvenient truth.

SCN_0001.jpg

Translation (for the total price of 15 EUR) :

  • Sales, Dividend to shareholders, shipping, marketing and advertisements: 12 EUR
  • Chinese boss, shipping within China: 1.5 EUR
  • Raw material : 1 EUR
  • Customs: 0.38 EUR
  • Chinese Worker: 0.12 EUR

You can point out as an excuse the wage of the Chinese worker all you want (roughly $500 monthly), I see that a European worker can be paid 20 times the wage of a Chinese worker without taking a dime from shareholders (which cost are also way too high). Simple numbers and calculations proves that not only offshoring is not financially profitable… but that companies are actually paying more to go abroad.

So YES, products can be produced in the West with higher quality while remaining cheaper. Giving well paid jobs to the needy, saving social security without immigration. The key issue of course for anyone is to brave the legal framework, access the financial resources and try to enter the network of the globalist.

Call it conspiracy. In fact, call it whatever you want… But some sectors seem to be immune to this offshoring: Hollywood, the media, Jewelry, the medical sector, Banking…

Food for thoughts.

Diversity doesn’t seem to like classical music

I just came across this concert, and I was stunned by the lack of diversity:

Yet, to this day, I NEVER heard there was any discrimination in music. If I open my TV, I would in fact have the impression that whites are discriminated and not the opposite.

Therefore, the only reasonable conclusion I can make is that Africans / Arabs do not care for our music. They care not for our history, our culture unless it is in their interest (i.e. colonies, crusades).

You may say it is a question of education. So then, how much is a surgeon educated? Is that a level that is considered sufficient to dismiss any discriminatory hypothesis?

How could they send a clearer message than their total absence in the perpetuation of our culture, tastes and traditions?

I hope all of that doesn’t sound racist, because that is not my intention. If you ever feel stressed about multiculturalism, look at the peaceful side of diversity:

Three lessons from the Genesis

In this post, I will go through some of the verses of the Genesis in the Bible and share with you few of my reflections.

The Fall

3 Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?”

2 The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden,

3 but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’”

4 “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman.

5 “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

6 When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.

7 Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.

13 Then the Lord God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?” The woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.”

14 So the Lord God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this,

“Cursed are you above all livestock
and all wild animals!
You will crawl on your belly
and you will eat dust
all the days of your life.
15 And I will put enmity
between you and the woman,
and between your offspring[a] and hers;
he will crush[b] your head,
and you will strike his heel.”

16 To the woman he said,

“I will make your pains in childbearing very severe;
with painful labor you will give birth to children.
Your desire will be for your husband,
and he will rule over you.”

17 To Adam he said, “Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat from it,’

“Cursed is the ground because of you;
through painful toil you will eat food from it
all the days of your life.
18 It will produce thorns and thistles for you,
and you will eat the plants of the field.
19 By the sweat of your brow
you will eat your food
until you return to the ground,
since from it you were taken;
for dust you are
and to dust you will return.”

Our belief dictates our behaviours

Did God really say this? indeed.
Despite what we have been told since childhood, people do have an intense natural need of belief and spirituality; and no this is not a weakness, nor a disease. As The Guardian states, researches have proved that spirituality is highly connected with happiness. But also, the NLP showed us that our belief system defines our identity and hence influences our behaviours. These mechanisms also derive the notion of natural “Optimitism bias”, published in the Time. Therefore, it is safe to assert that faith instantly influences our behaviors – for better or worse.

In this context, the Bible starts strong, and illustrates metaphorically the original human weakness. The snake is the voice that awakes the doubt in the absolute truth. The sin originates from the lack of strength to resist our natural tendency to hedonism. Faith compounds identity, and identity directs our behaviours. Nihilism is therefore the gate to sin. Cultural Marxism is nihilism, so don’t be astonished by what you see around you.

When the common narrative tends to make us believe that Jesus never existed (which is a documented lie), the instant conclusion – for most – is that all religions are worthless, and that there is no God. As Nietzsche said in 1883: “God is dead”. In such a context, many will find an escape-spirituality in a hypocrite sympathy for atheism, paganism and/or Buddhism; i.e. a superficial attachment to a human morality that camouflages nihilism, ego-centrism or hedonism. To name them briefly, I would mention the “alt-right pagan”, the “modern attention whore” and the “environmentalist”. Nonetheless, the conclusion remains the same. The failure to believe in our own God reflects the work of Cultural Marxism, destroying the roots of our identity, which translates directly in our failure of evaluating good and evil, and in the constant questioning of the non-questionable (e.g. genders, immigration, money etc.).

Image result for nlp belief behavior
NLP pyramid

There are consequences for our actions, even if we think there aren’t

Adam and Eve do eat the fruit; they listen to the snake who tells them not to worry. They do so because 1) they doubt the God’s command, 2) they do not believe in the consequences of their actions, and finally 3) because they want it.

In a post-modernist era, this is exactly is the definition of “carpe diem” and “hedonist” philosophies: “don’t worry, everything will be alright. Your only worry should be not to have enjoyed even more.”. And in fact, Christianity 2.0 emphasizes these behaviors, hypocritically claiming the absence of punishment thanks to the sacrifice of Jesus. In short, there is no need for redemption. And who cares? What is the difference between a world where there is no God (Atheism), and a world where God forgives everything (Christianity 2.0)?

But the Genesis is clear. It highlights the essentiality of these elements: 1) punishment exists, 2) redemption is not always granted. In short, justice before all (another pillar of Christianity)

What you do in your life will influence your future, and eventually destroy you in some cases. This being said, injustice also exists, and it is the duty of every man to seek justice.

Image result for quote Jefferson if a law is unfair

It is easier to influence women than men

This sentence might already be too much in a feminised world like ours. Never criticise women, that is oppression – I suppose this is what I should understand in the Marxist terms “political correctness”. But to those hypocrites minds, could you please explain me then why most advertisements are directed towards women? Why fashion is something that impacts more women than men?
Well, in fact, the truth is that women are more sensitive to their urges than men. Where the woman owns the territory of beauty and emotionalism, the man owns the physical and the intellectual/emotional strength.

The Bible in fact is very clear here, and shows that to manipulate the people, to control the families, you shall first target women for they have a weaker mind and will use her charm to perpetrate your plots. Would anyone even argue today against the correlation between feminism, divorce, women suicide, mental illness and decreased birth rate?

In a democracy, control the women, and you will control the State. Control the women, and you will control the men, for they will not fear to lose their love, but also their children and everything they fought for.

Image result for women fashion show