Why so many Atheists are liberals?

I don’t really care about Atheists… until they become liberals and push for more shit in society. For instance Richard Dawkins – most likely the most popular evolutionist and atheist, often subtly pushes there and there for social liberalism. Lately, he introduced – to the least careful minds – the notion of vote for children.

Voting age is arbitrary… An ideal world would make most capable children vote.

But what is a “good judgement” Richard?

You see, Richard Dawkins is a product of the marxist liberal society. A part of those who claim to follow science while being rooted in lies. His Tweet is full of doubts, Christians have clear answers.

In fact, Atheism is not progress, at all; it is a regression. It is not a question of intelligence, but a question of honesty: atheists answer no questions, starting with what was before the big bang, and what happens after death. Other scientists such as Stephen Howking argue they can explain”how the universe was created spontaneously”, but that’s not science: it is neither verified, neither reproduced. That’s just a story.

Richard Dawkins is also the one who said that Darwin “kicked God out of biology”. But it seems like he didn’t read the book. As the jewishaction notes:

Charles Darwin concludes his book by expressing his awe at the grandeur of the Creator, which he sees in the development of the animal kingdom. By contrast, Richard Dawkins thinks that the development of the animal kingdom undermines our faith and justifies the rejection of God.

NDEs, scientific evidence of the spiritual world

Near death experiences are very well documented and scientific. And if one can prove that death is not the end, God cannot be dismissed, neither his message and neither the morality given by the Bible.

In that sense, many scientists undertook this endeavour. Many were strong Atheists. After researching, they were strong believers. To those who need references, I will refer you to Melvin Morse, Jim Whinnery, Dianne Komp, Régis Dutheil, Paul Chauchard, Wilder Penfield and many other doctors, scientists, and even physics researchers. A good read is the book “Closer to the Light: Learning from the Near-Death Experiences of Children: Amazing Revelations of What It Feels Like to Die by Melvin Morse” (if you speak French, read “connexion divine”).

A step further was made by Dr Dutheil, who said that spirituality is connected to new particles named Tachyons, which would travel faster than light and could superpose two states.

Atheists are also believers

Atheists are blind to science. They lack the knowledge, observation and experience to challenge their reasoning. They are not scientists, they are priests, story tellers at best.

Unexpectedly, I noted that Atheists are believers. They have absolutely no proof of whatever they say, including the big bang and macro-evolution. As Kent Hovind says “you say what you want, but you think that we come from a stone”.

Atheists are moral relativist

Another problem is that – as Jordan Peterson points it accurately, this time – the removal of God doesn’t provide a sound and consistent moral alternative… And humans need a belief system.

Morality is not something that you take once and then put back in the cupboard. It is a set of consistent behaviors, which enables building of a society where it is nice to live in. Morality is truth, and there aren’t multiple truth.

Atheists kick God of their life to concentrate on the material aspect of life, just like liberals. How convenient to be right all the time if God doesn’t exist! No need for confession. A hidden crime is not a crime. Do like Richard, promote vote for children, it is alright! What about paedophilia? Well liberals (atheists) want to legalise it!

A more pertinent word for liberalism would in fact be nihilism. It is no surprise that most atheists tend towards multiculturalism, hedonism, divorce, fornication, etc.

Atheists are nihilists, ready to replace humanity by computers and robors, as they believe this is a proof that we evolve. Evolution for them equals death.

Conclusion

The conclusion for me is that Atheism is a religion, rooted in beliefs. It is a religion rooted in nihilism and death, just like the left. Liberalism is a natural core belief system that corresponds with Atheists, should it support their material agenda.

Absolutely no surprise to see them hanging out together so easily. Hence, before considering yourself an atheist, reflect on how much you read and how many proofs – not beliefs – you really have to explain life, morality, the universe and consciousness. Some food for thoughts:

Gilets jaunes, tools of Globalists?

For everyone, the revolt in France is from the people for the people. Tired of Globalism, they have suddenly risen against their dictator Emmanuel Macron in the name of freedom and sovereignty.

The French essayist Alain Soral summarized the revolt in Lenin’s terms “a revolution can only happen when the middle class and proletarians unite in a common economic interest against the ruling class”. The former French presidential candidate Marine Lepen rejoices at the idea of destitution of Macron; she would most likely be the next president!

Yet, let’s take a more rational approach.

It has been a long time our governments have just been facades. Replacing one by another doesn’t necessarily change anything, at all. For example, still in France, the historian Marion Sigaut, made a substantial contribution to bring light on the French revolution. And her conclusion is sharp: the French revolution against the king was a revolution from the bourgeoisie (rich merchants) against the aristocracy; it was never about the people.

Historically, the battle for the power always existed. The rich always wanted to own the State to make more profits. And France is no exception to this rule. In fact, it is the merchants who pushed the idea of liberalism. The free pass which could allow them to replace moral values by the market. This is also the time when the idea of human rights and the myth of the noble savage became popular.

But let me be straight: the objective of liberalism is not to make people free, but to take them away from the truth and divide them. Its foundation is to make people believe that truth is a point of view and that everything – from an ideological perspective – is equal and good.

As such, economic liberalism won’t acknowledge identity politics in shaping of the economic landscape (i.e. an Indian in the UK will never do his best to hire another Indian, or outsource to India, even if it is less profitable). Social liberalism won’t acknowledge differences between men and women. Spiritual liberalism won’t acknowledge one truth among religions, and in fine leads to agnosticism or atheism (e.g. science never proved that God exists, Buddhism is better than Christianity). Finally, moral liberalism doesn’t provide a clear definition of good and Evil (i.e. moral relativity, as described in Thinking fast and slow by Daniel Kahneman, Jewish).

In order to introduce liberalism to the people, it is first required to take care of two things:

1) the destitution of the ruling class;

2) the destruction of the influence of the Church.

The destitution of the ruling class

In 1789, in France, most people wanted the king to rule the country, and the armies were in fact corrupted by the bourgeoisie to manufacture a revolution. This idea – of course – is not predominant among scholars, since it clearly underpins the liberal agenda.

To seize the power in a State always requires the same steps: 1) divide the citizens using concepts such as social and economic classes, political views and leaders, race and ethnicity, sex and family, etc., 2) grow tensions between communities using mass-media and political agents (e.g. fund or close the eyes on criminality, finance or import terrorists), 3) push the country to revolt 4) take a position of saviour among the victims, and build a fake opposition to the regime.

Unsurprisingly, Ukraine, Syria, Tunisia, Lebanon, Soviet Russia all followed these steps. And most likely France as well today.

The primary objective in all revolution is to place one’s party agents at the right place at the right time. Why? Because you get the people on your side, and in these emotional times, people want to dream. Their trust is broken and any apparent insider with leader’s qualities is capable of seizing the opportunity. It is in time of despair that people can be the most easily deceived.

So, in a nutshell, the current situation in France will provide all the necessary tools for pushing a fake opposition to power and ask for more from the people.

The destruction of the influence of the Church

The Church historically always had two roles: maintain unity of the people in the country and be the guardian of moral standards.

In a country where the Church works with the State and is officially recognized as such, it unites all the people – rich or poor – under one same ruler (God). Since Biblical texts are rather explicit, and can’t change, there can’t be any Marxist propaganda to divide the people and foster a revolution. In fact, the only revolt can oppose good and evil, once again in the frame of morality defined by the Church.

Indeed, the Bible is a book given by God. Its content is fixed and the morality is clearly defined. Breaking Christianity hence enable Globalists to introduce a new one, based on materialism (i.e. The love of what is physically accessible to our senses). Let’s cite:

  • Sex, adultery, porn, prostitution and even pedophilia
  • Money, consumption
  • Individualism, power
  • Feminism, divorce
  • Mass immigration
  • Drinking, drugs, alcoholism
  • Etc.

All these elements are related to very precise Christian sins. Hence, in a Christian society, they are all forbidden. Economy is not the priority, sin is!

Conclusion

As you see, the division of the people and the breaking of the Church are complementary to control the people. The goal is to divide them and lure them into a material approach of life far away from the real battle that is between good and evil (them).

To me, it is obvious that the yellow vests have no metaphysical demands. Not a single yellow jacket is walking for God. Not a single one wants more moral values. Foremost, their main preoccupation is the amount of beer they can buy, TV show or football game, and/or holiday destination. Don’t believe me? French spend in average 3h42 in front of their TV on a daily basis.

These yellow vests want to consume and they naively still assume that democracy is the right to ask from leaders to pay less taxes and get more. They also believe that democracy is the right to choose your leaders. What a misunderstanding of the influence of education and media on people’s decision making. Hence, I see this movement as naive.

This being said, their economic claims are superficially sound and justified. But focusing on the material world is exactly the game of the Globalists. Without even knowing it, this movement serves Globalists, thus the father of lies.

The foundation of France is to take back to Clovis and Jeanne d’Arc who both submitted to the authority of God through the son Jesus Christ. Both acknowledged in the name of God the kingdom of France. Democracy is a concept that has no sense where the ruler is good and caring for his people. In fact, a good ruler is less corruptible than the masses. Democracy is – factually – easier to corrupt than a Kingdom.

Hence, if you understand the dispute above, there can be no true revolution nor counter-revolution if you limit it to materialism and relative morality. Let us not forget this is a long-going war for good against evil, and the devil is the prince of relative morality and materialism, which means he must be encountered with the Truth for he is Lie. The one and only true battle to be fought is through God and the one true Messiah Jesus Christ. France is the elder daughter of the catholic church and has a divine mission for Christianity, which means the main goal of 1789’s revolution, from a satanic prospective, was to defile France to it’s very roots. French people have forgotten that. But hopefully some of them begin to remember.

The day crosses will replace jackets, the change will appear.

French presidency is a joke

Macron became the world champion in presidency photoshooting. I just have no word for this.

For the last picture, as TheLocal.fr says:

In the photo taken on Sunday, Emmanuel Macron is seen between two bare-chested young men wearing bandanas on their heads. One of them is givingw the middle finger to the camera.

The shot was taken during the president’s visit to Saint Martin, a year after a hurricane devastated the French Caribbean island. Macron, followed by a host of photographers, was walking through the streets, meeting locals and talking to them about how they are rebuilding their lives after the tragedy.

When heavy rain started battering down, the president unexpectedly decided to take shelter in a block of social housing flats.

This could have been a good opportunity for Macron, who is struggling to shed his reputation as an arrogant leader removed from his people, to prove his critics wrong.

He met a family, and one man told him he had just come out of prison. In a firm manner which the president has been criticised for using lately in his interactions with the public, he told the former convict not to repeat the same mistakes.

“Don’t make any more mistakes, will you? Your mother deserves more than this. Stop messing around, think of your mother. Now go and rebuild the island,” Macron told the former convict and hugged him afterwards, which left the young man’s mother in tears.

What a president!

How will Europe demography look like in the near future?

To any westerner in the EU, it is no doubt that something is going wrong. The leftists/SJW media keep saying that immigration is close to zero and that whites are simply racists, while at the same time cities like Paris and Brussels seem to have more foreigners than locals. Something is wrong and the media are lying.

In this context, we decided to make a real study over the population of some western and eastern countries. We took official numbers from the countries, hence everything that you see here is based on what is communicated. Reality might be worse. In any case, this had to be done so please share so that people start to understand the emergency for themselves and their family. Indeed, demography is an exponential concept, not linear. This means that numbers grow fast, very fast, even if at first unnoticed. Your brain reacts linearly to its environment, while reality is exponential (compare this to the sound which is heard as linear while its power is logarithmic). That means that you are going to be shocked, literally.

As you will see, we made a population growth model for few European countries taking into account the official intake of migrants, the actual fertility rate for whites and migrants, and the actual non-european population. Roughly, western European countries usually take around 1% of their population in (African) migrants a year. Eastern countries on their side take a lot of Asians (in particular Indians), at a rate increasing up to 104% a year (case of Indians in Poland). Nonetheless we limited the intake of non-europeans in Eastern countries to a maximum of 0,5%, as the current numbers – let’s call that a positive scenario.

We also chose to neglect race mixing, even if it can account for up to 20%-30% of couples in some countries such as France.

We recalculated the fertility rate of Western countries taking into account the proportion of migrants and the age pyramid. Briefly, white western women in the west have now a fertility rate of around 0.7. If you add race mixing, that means that only 1 white woman in 2 makes 1 white baby. In Eastern countries, the fertility rate is not much brighter, with usually less than a 1.5 per woman.

The population growth is therefore an aggregate of a linear increase of population due to constant migration, and an exponential growth for autochtones and non-ethnically europeans born in Europe. General formula:

P’=P0 x e^(r x t)

To approximate “r”, we took into account the fertility rate of foreign population and made an exponential regression over 40 years. The equation was solved using logarithms and existing data to verify the model ex-post (20 years).

Now, over with theory, let’s get to the results.

The results

In these graphics, which I consider to be the most likely scenarios for the moment, it is important to note few things:

  • Eastern countries are not immune to immigration, nor feminism. Their low fertility rate (less than 2 for all of them) is reducing their population fast. Also, they have a high emigration, which I didn’t add, because I believe this will stop soon enough.
  • Poland – the biggest eastern country –  will reach western situation (15-20% of immigrant population) in around 15 years. In 5 years, they will start noticing the first taste of enrichment.
  • Hungary is the most immune country to immigration, today.
  • The first important threshold of 40% of population will be reached around or after 2030.
  • The second threshold of 60% of population will be reached after 2035.

If the error margin had to be quantified, we would say that a range of 5 years can be added to these scenario. This means that the situation could become worse 5 years earlier or 5 years later. In any case, that means that you are going to live it, and it will take a big part of your life (around 20 years, if it doesn’t kill you before).

The 40% threshold

Most Islamic countries were once Christians (and whites). That was a long time ago, before Muhammad decided to start the Djihad.

Overall, when 40% of the population will be indigenous, they will control most of the cities, having there about 80% of the population in average. This implies that they will own provincial politics, rule a certain amount of public institutions and most likely have about 20-50% of the national political power.

In schools, about 8 children out of 10 will be non-white in cities. In the country side, about 20-40% will be non white.

At that stage, they will take a stand on more and more things, which will result in:

  • Reconversion of empty Churches to Mosques
  • Introduction of Arabic language at school 
  • Islamic / Arabic schools where Islam is thought
  • Introduction of respect for prayer at work
  • Initiation to Islam to all students
  • More immigration and facilitation of exchange with Muslim countries
  • More conflicts with black Africans (and return to slavery slowly)
  • Identity politics
  • Discrimination of whites for recruitment, health, money, work, public services, etc.
  • Rising unemployment of whites
  • Rising of taxes for whites

At this stage, no political solution will ever be able to change the situation.

When? Between 2025 and 2035.

The 60% threshold

The next (and final) threshold is 60%. This is when non-whites will have in control the media, most of public institutions, the politics at all levels and will detain most of position of power in the private and public sector.

At that stage, whites will face huge difficulties to find a real job (much higher than now); they will be considered openly as slaves. They will have been robbed by the financial crisis coming in the next 5 years and they won’t have recovered from it. Many whites will become poor and extremely vulnerable, just like in South Africa.

There won’t be any place to go to avoid seeing non-whites. There won’t be any place to walk quietly and in security for whites.

Violence will be omnipresent and non-whites will control close to half of the police and at least a third of the military. In particular, they will:

  • Vote law to get more privileges
  • Enslave a part of the population – but will not say it, because it would sound “bad”
  • Fight each other intensively, with ghettos and/or mini realms appearing.
  • Start seizing/buy cheap white goods, lands and houses (usage of Islamic banks and social welfare laws)
  • Take the last places of power for themselves
  • Pass deals with their home countries to increase immigration
  • Adopt Islam as national religion
  • Kill or lock white opponents
  • Restore a modern form of polygamy and make sure that whites have no wife
  • Rape, beat white women
  • Beat white children at school, teach them Islam and Arabic
  • Kill white men extensively (crime will be much higher than today)
  • Consider or establish an “Islamic Western Caliphate”

At that stage, the last stage of the white genocide will have started. The only solution will be total war.

When? Between 2035 and 2045.

Conclusion

The hatred brainwashing of leftists media all around the world to genocide whites has been going on for decades now. The West is in such a situation that no political solution seems to be possible. To reach 50% of a very moderate right wing party (civil activists), almost 90% of white men and women should vote for the labelled “extreme neo Nazi far right fascists” political parties in the next 10 years. Hence, it is no doubt for us that the situation will not find any peaceful (political) solution. An apocalyptic (South-African 2.0) Europe seems to be coming by 2035, with a situation degrading rapidly after the next financial crisis, and at maximum by 2025.

At this point, turn to God, read the Bible and love one another. Remember that Jeanne d’Arc saved France, and cross your finger for it to happen again.

Related image

Get use to see black faces, even if it’s fake

A French art school changed photo to picture students darker than they are. This goes in line with the Globalists ruling France, who basically want Christianity and the white French to disappear through race mixing. Let’s also remind that Nicolas Sarkozy said that race mixing is an obligation.

Still believing there is no anti white agenda?

The truth about Swedish election

The Swedish election happened on Sunday September 9th and the right wing parties Sweden Democrats and the Alternative for Sweden parties (both Alt Lite or civic nationalist) have under performed. Many black pilled allies might moan about how this is a defeat compared to the 25% expected. But they did gain ground compared to 2014. And considering the change in demographics, this score is actually not too bad.

Znalezione obrazy dla zapytania sweden elections

First, it must be remembered that a ruling right wing party cannot do much once in power. Most corporations and multi Nationals are converged and are ready to sacrifice profits in order to destroy a country. And immigrants will not decide to either start working or peacefully go back where they came from. They are invaders and they are ready to be violent. Therefore any attempt to “avoid the civil war” (put correctly: delay the civil war) will results in left wing politics.

Second, those so called “right wing parties” (in Sweden and elsewhere) and most of their followers don’t seem to grasp the importance of Christianity. They don’t understand this is one of the fundamental ingredient to the success of their civilization. For example: Sweden was NOTHING before becoming Christian. And there will not be a complete consistency in the arguments put forward by right-wing politicians, as long as they don’t embrace their Christian heritage and moral values. Only after such a commitment will the light shine on the lies perpetrated by the left and haters of Jesus Christ.

And last but not least: The Swedish people just brought the day of reckoning slightly closer to us. While the civic nationalist, the Alt-lite and the Anti-Christian Alt-Right don’t really bring solutions or are just looking to buy time before the inevitable. What the left actually does is sinking the ship even faster. They will open the gates of Sweden broader, bringing instability and chaos much faster.

If you are an Alt-Right Christian in Sweden. I wish all the best, and I pray for you. The times ahead are going to be rough. But Jesus warned us about it (Matthew 24) and do not be afraid. Love God, love your country and love your family. For only the good people will see the end of this conflict.

What does the Quran really say about Jesus?

One the major argument of Muslims against Christians to demonstrate their tolerance is the recognotion of Jesus Christ as a prophet. But is that really true?

What do they say about the Christ? Do they relate his message and precepts?

And finally, most importantly, do Muslims follow the Christ or Muhammad, and as such, can we really put Christianity and Islam at the same level, or rather should we oppose them completely?

SURAH REFERENCE

2:87 We gave Jesus the son of Mary Clear (Signs) and strengthened him with the holy spirit.

2:136 We believe in Allah, and the revelation given to us, and to Abraham, Isma’il, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and that given to Moses and Jesus, and that given to (all) prophets from their Lord: We make no difference between one and another of them . . .

2:253 . . . To Jesus the son of Mary We gave clear (Signs), and strengthened him with the holy spirit.

3:45 O Mary! Allah giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honour in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to Allah.

3:46 “He shall speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. And he shall be (of the company) of the righteous.”

3:48 And Allah will teach him the Book and Wisdom, the Law and the Gospel.

3:49 And (appoint him) a messenger to the Children of Israel, (with this message): “I have come to you, with a Sign from your Lord, in that I make for you out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, and breathe into it, and it becomes a bird by Allah’s leave: And I heal those born blind, and the lepers, and I quicken the dead, by Allah’s leave; and I declare to you what ye eat, and what ye store in your houses. Surely therein is a Sign for you if ye did believe.”

3:50 (I have come to you), to attest the Law which was before me. And to make lawful to you part of what was (Before) forbidden to you; I have come to you with a Sign from your Lord. So fear Allah, and obey me.

3:52 When Jesus found Unbelief on their part He said: “Who will be My helpers to (the work of) Allah?”

3:55 Behold! Allah said: “O Jesus! I will take thee and raise thee to Myself and clear thee (of the falsehoods) of those who blaspheme; I will make those who follow thee superior to those who reject faith, to the Day of Resurrection: Then shall ye all return unto me, and I will judge between you of the matters wherein ye dispute.”

3:59 The similitude of Jesus before Allah is as that of Adam . . .

3:84 . . . and in (the Books) given to Moses, Jesus, and the prophets, from their Lord.

4:157 That they said (in boast), “We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah”;-but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not.

4:163 We have sent thee inspiration, as We sent it to Noah and the Messengers after him: we sent inspiration to Abraham, Isma’il, Isaac, Jacob and the Tribes, to Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon, and to David We gave the Psalms.

4:171 O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion: Nor say of Allah aught but the truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was (no more than) a messenger of Allah, and His Word, which He bestowed on Mary, and a spirit proceeding from Him: so believe in Allah and His messengers. Say not “Trinity”: desist: it will be better for you: for Allah is one Allah: Glory be to Him: (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth.

4:172 Christ disdaineth nor to serve and worship Allah . . .

5:17 In blasphemy indeed are those that say that Allah is Christ the son of Mary.

5:46 And in their footsteps We sent Jesus the son of Mary, confirming the Law that had come before him: We sent him the Gospel: therein was guidance and light, and confirmation of the Law that had come before him: a guidance and an admonition to those who fear Allah.

5:72 They do blaspheme who say: “Allah is Christ the son of Mary.” But said Christ: “O Children of Israel! worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.” Whoever joins other gods with Allah,- Allah will forbid him the garden, and the Fire will be his abode.

5:75 Christ the son of Mary was no more than a messenger; many were the messengers that passed away before him. His mother was a woman of truth. They had both to eat their (daily) food.

5:78 Curses were pronounced on those among the Children of Israel who rejected Faith, by the tongue of David and of Jesus the son of Mary: because they disobeyed and persisted in excesses.

5:110 O Jesus the son of Mary! Recount My favour to thee and to thy mother. Behold! I strengthened thee with the holy spirit, so that thou didst speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. Behold! I taught thee the Book and Wisdom, the Law and the Gospel and behold! thou makest out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, by My leave, and thou breathest into it and it becometh a bird by My leave, and thou healest those born blind, and the lepers, by My leave. And behold! thou bringest forth the dead by My leave. And behold! I did restrain the Children of Israel from (violence to) thee when thou didst show them the clear Signs, and the unbelievers among them said: ‘This is nothing but evident magic.’

5:112 Behold! the disciples, said: “O Jesus the son of Mary! can thy Lord send down to us a table set (with viands) from heaven?” Said Jesus: “Fear Allah, if ye have faith.”

5:114 Said Jesus the son of Mary: “O Allah our Lord! Send us from heaven a table set (with viands), that there may be for us-for the first and the last of us-a solemn festival and a sign from thee; and provide for our sustenance, for thou art the best Sustainer (of our needs).”

5:116 Allah will say: “O Jesus the son of Mary! Didst thou say unto men, worship me and my mother as gods in derogation of Allah’?” He will say: “Glory to Thee! never could I say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, thou wouldst indeed have known it. Thou knowest what is in my heart . . .”

6:85 And Zakariya and John, and Jesus and Elias: all in the ranks of the righteous.

9:30 The Jews call ‘Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah.

9:31 They take their priests and their anchorites to be their lords in derogation of Allah, and (they take as their Lord) Christ the son of Mary; yet they were commanded to worship but One Allah: there is no god but He. Praise and glory to Him: (Far is He) from having the partners they associate (with Him).

19:19 He said: “Nay, I am only a messenger from thy Lord, (to announce) to thee the gift of a holy son.”

19:20 She said: “How shall I have a son, seeing that no man has touched me, and I am not unchaste?”

19:21 He said: “So (it will be): Thy Lord saith, ‘that is easy for Me: and (We wish) to appoint him as a Sign unto men and a Mercy from Us’: It is a matter (so) decreed.”

19:22 So she conceived him, and she retired with him to a remote place.

19:27 At length she brought the (babe) to her people, carrying him (in her arms). They said: “O Mary! truly an amazing thing hast thou brought!”

19:30 He said: “I am indeed a servant of Allah: He hath given me revelation and made me a prophet.”

19:31 “And He hath made me blessed wheresoever I be, and hath enjoined on me Prayer and Charity as long as I live.”

19:32 “(He) hath made me kind to my mother, and not overbearing or miserable.”

19:33 “So peace is on me the day I was born, the day that I die, and the day that I shall be raised up to life (again)!”

19:34 Such (was) Jesus the son of Mary: (it is) a statement of truth, about which they (vainly) dispute.

19:88 They say: “(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!”

19:91 That they should invoke a son for (Allah) Most Gracious.

19:92 For it is not consonant with the majesty of (Allah) Most Gracious that He should beget a son.

21:91 And (remember) her who guarded her chastity: We breathed into her of Our spirit, and We made her and her son a sign for all peoples.

23:50 And We made the son of Mary and his mother as a Sign: We gave them both shelter on high ground, affording rest and security and furnished with springs.

33:7 And remember We took from the prophets their covenant: As (We did) from thee: from Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Jesus the son of Mary: We took from them a solemn covenant.

42:13 The same religion has He established for you as that which He enjoined on Noah-the which We have sent by inspiration to thee-and that which We enjoined on Abraham, Moses, and Jesus: Namely, that ye should remain steadfast in religion, and make no divisions therein: to those who worship other things than Allah, hard is the (way) to which thou callest them. Allah chooses to Himself those whom He pleases, and guides to Himself those who turn (to Him).

43:57 When (Jesus) the son of Mary is held up as an example, behold, thy people raise a clamour thereat (in ridicule)!

43:61 And (Jesus) shall be a Sign (for the coming of) the Hour (of Judgment): therefore have no doubt about the (Hour), but follow ye Me: this is a Straight Way.

43:63 When Jesus came with Clear Signs, he said: “Now have I come to you with Wisdom, and in order to make clear to you some of the (points) on which ye dispute: therefore fear Allah and obey me.”

57:27 We sent after them Jesus the son of Mary, and bestowed on him the Gospel; and We ordained in the hearts of those who followed him Compassion and Mercy . . .

61:6 And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: “O Children of Israel! I am the messenger of Allah (sent) to you, confirming the Law (which came) before me, and giving Glad Tidings of a Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad.” But when he came to them with Clear Signs, they said, “this is evident sorcery!”

61:14 O ye who believe! Be ye helpers of Allah: As said Jesus the son of Mary to the Disciples, “Who will be my helpers to (the work of) Allah?” Said the disciples, “We are Allah’s helpers!” then a portion of the Children of Israel believed, and a portion disbelieved: But We gave power to those who believed, against their enemies, and they became the ones that prevailed.

Sadly, but surely, Muslims do not believe in Jesus as the Christ, the son of God. This has at least 3 implications:
1. The Injil (Gospels for Muslims) are important but not reliable. The teachings of Jesus as described in the Gospels are corrupted; it is a subtile way to say that the Bible has to be burned because it is – for them – full of lies.
2. Only Muhammad is reliable. You shall follow Muhammad and fight against anyone who believes either in the Torah or New Testament as the truth (the three elements are opposed, the Torah being closer to the New Testament).
3. Believing in Jesus is not a blaspheme, but believing in Jesus Christ is a blaspheme. Wearing a cross is a blaspheme, because it represents the death of the Christ. Besides, for Muslims, Jesus was not crucified (the Christ never came and was never crucified). Therefore, Muslims do not believe in a possible redemption through following Jesus, but Muhammad, who gives opposite indications to life. The first and most important message of the Christ being “love one another”.

I will finish with some quotes from the Bible, so that everyone can estimate the discrepancy between the Christian and the Muslim belief. Keep in mind that belief determines behaviors, not the other way around.

John 3:7 Little children, let no one deceive you. Whoever practices righteousness is righteous, as he is righteous.
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.
John 14:16 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
John 3:36 Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him.
John 8:24 ESV / 56 helpful votes
I told you that you would die in your sins, for unless you believe that I am he you will die in your sins.

Buzzfeed: kill the white man

Buzzfeed is known to be a political left propagandist. They often write shitty article painted half of truth, half of shit. Lately, they stood up out of the crowd with two things.

The first one is their analysis of testosterone, which revealed that their journalist have a health condition regarding testosterone. And they are proud of it.

The second, more shocking, or perhaps a direct consequence of the above, is the incitation of killing a white man each day, for everyone. Just like you would kill a mosquito.

Replace this sentence by:

“Kill a jew tomorrow on your way to work”

“Kill a black man tomorrow on your way to work”

“Kill a Muslim tomorrow on your way to work”

Sick, right?

White genocide is not real, most likely, don’t bother even thinking about it.

Fake news shooting fake migrants drowning

By pure coincidence a tourist in Crete fell in front of the production of a mini film picturing migrants drowning. We downloaded the footage to make sure it wouldn’t go away so easily (youtube link) :

As Voiceofeurope.com states:

This follows a history of supposed migrant drownings filmed by television crews which are then broadcast by the mainstream media. Pictures and clips of migrants have been shared widely to manipulate public opinion and generate sympathy. This is one of the first times such a piece of fake footage has been captured by a member of the public as it was happening.

The question that arises therefore is how much we should trust the narrative from the mainstream media when it seems they are willing to distribute fake news stories such as these.

I don’t know if you remember, but a bit more than a year ago, they were also making a small “journalistic reportage” (read Fake News) about muslims protesting against Islam.

Funnily enough, they denied it, even with the video released. They really think we are that stupid. Maybe we should try to tell tax authorities we never received any money, even when they show the proof. Same rules for everyone after all.

So, no agenda for White Genocide?