Christianity: respect and compromising

The duality of respect and forgiveness in Christianity raises few questions regarding the application of justice at a personal level (i.e. compromise).

So, You Want Some Respect?

On one hand, modern Christianity seems to apply by words the recommendation from the Apostle Paul “do not seek revenge but rather overcome evil with good” and “denounce evil when you meet it”. On the other hand, the advise from Jesus “turn the other cheek” seems to be a good alternative for tolerating any behaviour. So, the questions are simple: 1) is there anything in Christianity which can ensure respect and forgiveness without compromising one’s personal existence (as Nation or as an individual)?, and 2) how far should we compromise as a Christian?

Respect

The doctrine of the Christ is summarised by “love one another”; where another is any human being. As we love the Father and the Son, it becomes clearer that making the Father’s will through the Son as an individual is acting with love and respect with one another. As such, there is no dominance aspect in the doctrine of the Christ: respect is given through the act of love for another, and hence in total freedom.

On the contrary, a pagan, Muslim or Jewish perspective defines respect as a relation of dominance from an individual or community over the other. Indeed, morality is confined within the individual (at best within the principle of “non-agression”, or the community; i.e. Muslims and Jews do not owe by their God’s Law any form of respect to outsiders – Goys). Hence, the fundamental behind respect in a pagan-laic-Judaic-Muslim world is force (dominance).

Two great examples of these opposed doctrines in our secular societies are the transcription in our Laws of concepts such as islamophobia and antisemitism, which should simply be removed.

Forgiveness

The doctrine of the Christ regarding forgiveness is clearly defined:

  1. A Christian should forgive sins he committed himself (John 8:1-11):4 “Teacher,” they said to Jesus, “this woman was caught in the act of adultery. 5 The law of Moses says to stone her. What do you say?”6 They were trying to trap him into saying something they could use against him, but Jesus stooped down and wrote in the dust with his finger. 7 They kept demanding an answer, so he stood up again and said, “All right, but let the one who has never sinned throw the first stone!” 8 Then he stooped down again and wrote in the dust.
    9 When the accusers heard this, they slipped away one by one, beginning with the oldest, until only Jesus was left in the middle of the crowd with the woman. 10 Then Jesus stood up again and said to the woman, “Where are your accusers? Didn’t even one of them condemn you?”

    11 “No, Lord,” she said.

    And Jesus said, “Neither do I. Go and sin no more.”

  2. A Christian should forgive his brother if the redemption is truly from the heart: 21 Then Peter came and said to Him, “Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me and I forgive him? Up to seven times?” 22 Jesus *said to him, “I do not say to you, up to seven times, but up to seventy times seven.
  3. A Christian should leave the judgment to God:7 “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.3 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.
  4. A Christian should not give what he has from God to people following false doctrines: 6 “Don’t give what is holy to dogs or throw your pearls to pigs. Otherwise, they will trample them and then tear you to pieces.
  5. A Christian should turn the other cheek when he is guilty of not keeping his word (Bible retranslated by Johannes Greber): 37 But let [a]your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No.’ For whatever is more than these is from the evil one… 38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’[a] 39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. 40 And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well.

It is important to note that, in the Bible, the context is essential. Most Christians for instance ignore that “turning the other cheek” is within the context of keeping one’s word (but let your word be “yes, yes”, or “no, no”, for what you will add comes from the evil – i.e. a promise is either yes or no, don’t start making false excuses).

Put simply, Jesus was not a happy fool walking around and recommending to everyone to open the gates to the invaders while presenting one’s throat to be slit. Rather, he advised a very rational approach which is to:

  1. Make sure you keep (respect) your word
  2. Always try to solve your issue at individual level
  3. Repay your fault to others
  4. Forgive to others as you want to be forgiven
  5. Do not judge in place of God if you do not want to be judged the same manner

Quite on the contrary, Muslims, pagans and Jews do not have such universal rules, and apply (primarily/solely) their ethics towards their own community. This means that forgiveness for outsiders is synonym of “vengeance“. This is why Africans want repayment for colonies, Muslims for crusades and Jews for the Holocaust. The truth in fact does not even matter since the primary goal is the spoliation of other communities.

Compromising as a Christian

In accordance with the principles of the Christ and the Apostles, Christians behave politely with everyone. The line between “politeness” and “compromise” is nonetheless blur for most Christians as the modern translation of “turn the other cheek” is basically “let anyone step on you”. This being said, the translation from Johannes Greber, and the life of Christ show us that this interpretation is wrong. Indeed, Jesus told very clearly “not to be shy of him”, “to follow his words as an act of love”, and confronted evil every single time he met it. Example:

John 8:44 ESV

You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

In fact, Christ absolutely NEVER let anyone step on him. Rather, he endured persecution with courage, while he kept is word at all time and at all cost (consistency). He always spoke the truth, and defied evil wherever he met it. The Apostle Paul did exactly the same.

Christ showed us that we ought to denounce evil wherever we see it and endure persecution with courage, patience, hope and love for another, because eternal life is in any case only with him.

As such, the act of respect is simply to love another and not to sin against him (or make him sin). The act of forgiveness is to give mercy to someone requesting it. Any Christian has, not the right, but the duty to say “no” to evil. Indeed, Christ showed that there is absolutely no compromise to have with ANYONE on an amount of “acceptable level of evil”.

Related image

On the contrary, Muslims, Jews and pagans find acceptable to sin against others. Hence, the acceptable level of evil is “whatever is necessary for the community”.

A honest prayer

Our Father, who is in heaven, we pray you through your Son, Jesus Christ. We pray you with humility, sincerity and love.

For children of broken families, so that you can be their guide in a world of darkness.

For united families to remain united under God, and to live by the spirit and not by the flesh.

For the Christians under the fire from the prince of this world. Protect them, guide them, reveal to them their sins so they can wash them for eternity.

For those who live by the flesh and not the spirit. Let them see by their spirit their true self. Reveal to them the way to the truth and welcome them on their path to you.

Jesus, you died on the cross, and resurrected 3 days after as by the scripture. We pray your help for the suffering, the sicks, the poors, and all those who help them. Oh God please send them your grace and your strength to extinguish their suffering in this and the other world.

For the Saints, Martyrs, Mystics and all those Christians who bear their cross with you Jesus. Strengthen them in their way.

For the Christians persecuted for their faith. For the Christian nations under the attack of the darkness. Stengthen them, lighten their weight, make them strong, sharp, and circumcise their spirit so they can walk in the light. Help them to find your love so you can protect them. Help them to rise again for you, and only you.

For our enemies who do not know what they do. Reveal to them their sins, make your truth fall as a thunder so they fall on their knees and beg for your mercy.

Amen.

Thank you.

French revolution: from Charles Louis Müller to Denis Kardon

Art has always been a vector of transmission for the culture, history, and ideologies. The French revolution, still misconceived, is not any exception to the rule.

In fact, few know that the French revolution primary objective was not freedom, but enslavement. Indeed, the destitution of the King by the bourgeoisie and the replacement of Christianity by materialism (secularism) were the cornerstone of the revolution. It is also important to note that the people rebelled against a mercenary army from the bourgeoisie, and close to 3 millions French were slaughtered during these years. The same pattern occurred in Russia, where the Tsar family was most likely murdered in a satanic ritual. Same means, same ends: the seizure of the lands and means of production from the people for a “rich” class (the State being an intermediate in the case of Communism). The enemy within.

In that regard, the destruction of Christianity has been made clear step by step after 1789. The emancipation of the people, democracy and laicity, has to go through stepping on the Christ, literally.

The author of these painting is Charles Louis Muller, a French artist. Muller is also a name descending from “Miller”, an Ashkenazi name in Yiddish.

The emancipation of the woman as a sexual tool was already part of a very visible agenda. Mr Prudhon also relates these facts quite accurately in his book “Pornocracy”. Later, it is the Jewish author Otto Weininger who will write his book “sex and character”, in a bath of deception of a society who had already reduced the woman to a political tool of pleasure.

Feminism is the ideology by which women believe in emancipation, where in fact they deliver themselves to medias, corporations, divorce, and fornication. The emancipation of freedom for the servitude of vice, across society. The culminating point of emancipation is obviously the universal voting right, which simply transferred all the power to the corporations, banks and media.

There is no doubt, these prophetic pictures already laughed at western civilization 200 years ago. The women stepping on the foundation of Western society. The prelude and the end, in one picture.

Nowadays it the Jewish painter Denis Kardon who footprints the final stage of the French revolution at Western scale, with his pseudo revolutionary apocalyptic Freudo-Marxiat art.

When you know that apocalypse is foreseen to come from Space, and due to a decadent world, a meteorite crashing on a giant vagina has its meaning. The painter indeed seems to let us know: the decadence of society is a necessary step for the coming of the Messiah.

Christ is their enemy.

Believe in Christ. Be in Christ. Emancipate yourself, believe in Christ.

Lies lies lies

Google forgot again its own moto (“Don’t be evil”) and keep purging innocent channels out of existence. But it is not always the case of rogue right wing channels. As long as someone speaks the truth, he will be the target of SJWs.

Known for his direct manner and incisive humor, retired Senior Chief Petty Officer Don Shipley used his YouTube account, tagged Buds131, as a hammer against military imposters, specifically Navy SEAL imposters. His channel was named after the Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL training class with which Senior Chief Shipley graduated.

YouTube, which is owned by Google, said the account suspension was because Senior Chief Shipley divulged too much personal information about his targets online. However, he disagrees. In an interview with PJ Media, he said “this time I was told/emailed I was banned from a video I had posted several years ago about a phony SEAL, but after several years I doubt that caused it. If you ask me, it was because I outed Nathan Phillips. That Indian who masqueraded as a Vietnam vet. That video got a lot of attention and a lot of big lawsuits pending from it.”

Do not even bother trying to understand how lies can be considered “personal information”. His crime was just exposing phonies who happen to be occasional defenders of the narrative.

It is becoming more and more a fight between good and evil, and less of a fight between left and right: Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace is also being shadow ban by Google.

None of this should surprise true Christians. It was all predicted in the Bible. And after the all, the Prince of this World is also known for being the Father of all Lies. He is probably not too pleased with people exposing the Truth.

The seed of evil and the seed of God

Do we live in a world where the good ones pay for the bad ones?

Jesus tells us:

Mark 4:26-34 New International Version (NIV)

The Parable of the Growing Seed

26 He also said, “This is what the kingdom of God is,like. A man scatters seed on the ground. 27 Night and day, whether he sleeps or gets up, the seed sprouts and grows, though he does not know how. 28 All by itself the soil produces grain—first the stalk, then the head, then the full kernel in the head.29 As soon as the grain is ripe, he puts the sickle to it, because the harvest has come.”

The Parable of the Mustard Seed

30 Again he said, “What shall we say the kingdom of God is like, or what parable shall we use to describe it? 31 It is like a mustard seed, which is the smallest of all seeds on earth. 32 Yet when planted, it grows and becomes the largest of all garden plants, with such big branches that the birds can perch in its shade.”

The seed of God takes time to grow. It is hard work and constant attention to oneself behaviors towards himself and others. The seed of God grows slowly with the one who shows patience, strength, restraint, self control, and love.

On the contrary, the seed of evil is the one of selfishness, pride, greed, glutonery, debauchery, fornication, lie, cowardness, laziness. And in this packet of seeds, the seed of pride is the one that makes us blind to all others. There is no redemption, no forgiveness, no possible change for the one who has pride for his mistakes.

The seed of the devil is the one that emprison our spirit in the materiality of life. It is the one that reverses the truth: the father and the child, the husband and the wife, discipline and pleasure, etc. Lies do not divide, they rot! Isn’t the good crop always separated from the bad one?

The devil looks for a ground to plant his seeds, and beware the ones seeking the goods of this world. He looks for the ones who want to claim their freedom from serving. But the truth is Serve so you shall be served!

Hence the ones who seek the goods of this world find them, and nothing else. There are times where the bad ones seems to be the winners. But reassure yourself, nothing that has the bad seed leads to a good crop. Jesus told us to let them grow, to cut them and to throw them to the fire.

The selfish is alone. Debauchery leads to alcoholism, drugs, divorce. Fornication leads to sadness and loneliness. Greed leads to emptiness. Lie leads to conflict and judgement. Laziness leads to depression, and meaningless.

Be humble with your peers who do not understand these words. They are children playing with fire, it is only a matter of time before they burn. Every child has the gift of the Father and can turn to him. Nothing is more rejoicing than a child returning home.

Read the Bible, change your life, plant the good seed!

Amen.

Race mixing causes major problems

Race mixing, as Nicolas Sarkozy expressed few years ago, is a priority. The diversity of people and ideas must be replaced by a single race and ideology, in the name of tolerance. But in reality, what are the scientifically proven consequences of race mixing on people? A research quotes :

Methods. Data are derived from self-reports of race, using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), which provides a large representative national sample of adolescents in grades 7 through 12. Respondents could report more than 1 race.

Results. Mixed-race adolescents showed higher risk when compared with single-race adolescents on general health questions, school experience, smoking and drinking, and other risk variables.

Conclusions. Adolescents who self-identify as more than 1 race are at higher health and behavior risks. The findings are compatible with interpreting the elevated risk of mixed race as associated with stress.

A considerable literature attests to the emotional, health, and behavior risk problems of mixed-race adolescents. The most common explanation for the high-risk status is the struggle with identity formation, leading to lack of self-esteem, social isolation, and problems of family dynamics in mixed-race households.

Even if science attests the issues linked to race mixing for children.

Even if everyday life proves that mass immigration leads to muders, robbery and tyranny.

Even if thousands of women were raped.

Even if millions of men have to work to support non whites (including many criminals) in their own lands.

Even if white children live in fear, bullying, mistreatment from other races.

The media will diffuse the myth of the “happy mixed race family”.

Media are the enemy of the people. Before choosing a partner from another race, know what you are doing to you, your child and your country.

Merry Christmas 2018

In these times of torment, Christmas is a reminder that nothing is lost.

Today is the official day when we celebrate the birth our Savior, Jesus Christ. He came into the flesh of a man for sacrificing himself. Born with a pure spirit, Jesus would reclaim the gates to heaven from Lucifer.

His life was a constant battle against the devil. Every single second, no man that ever lived enduted what he did. And he did that for us. When he died, he went down to hell to take back from Lucifer our right for forgiveness and return to the Lord. He risked not only his life as a man, but also as a spirit. Should he lose the battle, should he fail to the commandment, shluld he fall by Lucifer, he would be cursed. There wouldn’t be any escape for us.

So let’s celebrate Jesus Christ for what he did! We are alive, and our sole purpose of life is to honor him and the Father.

I wish to all of a Merry Christmas. Never quit the Lord, he will keep you safe, here and there. Do not let the devil take you down. Fight in your heart.

Amen!

Why so many Atheists are liberals?

I don’t really care about Atheists… until they become liberals and push for more shit in society. For instance Richard Dawkins – most likely the most popular evolutionist and atheist, often subtly pushes there and there for social liberalism. Lately, he introduced – to the least careful minds – the notion of vote for children.

Voting age is arbitrary… An ideal world would make most capable children vote.

But what is a “good judgement” Richard?

You see, Richard Dawkins is a product of the marxist liberal society. A part of those who claim to follow science while being rooted in lies. His Tweet is full of doubts, Christians have clear answers.

In fact, Atheism is not progress, at all; it is a regression. It is not a question of intelligence, but a question of honesty: atheists answer no questions, starting with what was before the big bang, and what happens after death. Other scientists such as Stephen Howking argue they can explain”how the universe was created spontaneously”, but that’s not science: it is neither verified, neither reproduced. That’s just a story.

Richard Dawkins is also the one who said that Darwin “kicked God out of biology”. But it seems like he didn’t read the book. As the jewishaction notes:

Charles Darwin concludes his book by expressing his awe at the grandeur of the Creator, which he sees in the development of the animal kingdom. By contrast, Richard Dawkins thinks that the development of the animal kingdom undermines our faith and justifies the rejection of God.

NDEs, scientific evidence of the spiritual world

Near death experiences are very well documented and scientific. And if one can prove that death is not the end, God cannot be dismissed, neither his message and neither the morality given by the Bible.

In that sense, many scientists undertook this endeavour. Many were strong Atheists. After researching, they were strong believers. To those who need references, I will refer you to Melvin Morse, Jim Whinnery, Dianne Komp, Régis Dutheil, Paul Chauchard, Wilder Penfield and many other doctors, scientists, and even physics researchers. A good read is the book “Closer to the Light: Learning from the Near-Death Experiences of Children: Amazing Revelations of What It Feels Like to Die by Melvin Morse” (if you speak French, read “connexion divine”).

A step further was made by Dr Dutheil, who said that spirituality is connected to new particles named Tachyons, which would travel faster than light and could superpose two states.

Atheists are also believers

Atheists are blind to science. They lack the knowledge, observation and experience to challenge their reasoning. They are not scientists, they are priests, story tellers at best.

Unexpectedly, I noted that Atheists are believers. They have absolutely no proof of whatever they say, including the big bang and macro-evolution. As Kent Hovind says “you say what you want, but you think that we come from a stone”.

Atheists are moral relativist

Another problem is that – as Jordan Peterson points it accurately, this time – the removal of God doesn’t provide a sound and consistent moral alternative… And humans need a belief system.

Morality is not something that you take once and then put back in the cupboard. It is a set of consistent behaviors, which enables building of a society where it is nice to live in. Morality is truth, and there aren’t multiple truth.

Atheists kick God of their life to concentrate on the material aspect of life, just like liberals. How convenient to be right all the time if God doesn’t exist! No need for confession. A hidden crime is not a crime. Do like Richard, promote vote for children, it is alright! What about paedophilia? Well liberals (atheists) want to legalise it!

A more pertinent word for liberalism would in fact be nihilism. It is no surprise that most atheists tend towards multiculturalism, hedonism, divorce, fornication, etc.

Atheists are nihilists, ready to replace humanity by computers and robors, as they believe this is a proof that we evolve. Evolution for them equals death.

Conclusion

The conclusion for me is that Atheism is a religion, rooted in beliefs. It is a religion rooted in nihilism and death, just like the left. Liberalism is a natural core belief system that corresponds with Atheists, should it support their material agenda.

Absolutely no surprise to see them hanging out together so easily. Hence, before considering yourself an atheist, reflect on how much you read and how many proofs – not beliefs – you really have to explain life, morality, the universe and consciousness. Some food for thoughts:

Gilets jaunes, tools of Globalists?

For everyone, the revolt in France is from the people for the people. Tired of Globalism, they have suddenly risen against their dictator Emmanuel Macron in the name of freedom and sovereignty.

The French essayist Alain Soral summarized the revolt in Lenin’s terms “a revolution can only happen when the middle class and proletarians unite in a common economic interest against the ruling class”. The former French presidential candidate Marine Lepen rejoices at the idea of destitution of Macron; she would most likely be the next president!

Yet, let’s take a more rational approach.

It has been a long time our governments have just been facades. Replacing one by another doesn’t necessarily change anything, at all. For example, still in France, the historian Marion Sigaut, made a substantial contribution to bring light on the French revolution. And her conclusion is sharp: the French revolution against the king was a revolution from the bourgeoisie (rich merchants) against the aristocracy; it was never about the people.

Historically, the battle for the power always existed. The rich always wanted to own the State to make more profits. And France is no exception to this rule. In fact, it is the merchants who pushed the idea of liberalism. The free pass which could allow them to replace moral values by the market. This is also the time when the idea of human rights and the myth of the noble savage became popular.

But let me be straight: the objective of liberalism is not to make people free, but to take them away from the truth and divide them. Its foundation is to make people believe that truth is a point of view and that everything – from an ideological perspective – is equal and good.

As such, economic liberalism won’t acknowledge identity politics in shaping of the economic landscape (i.e. an Indian in the UK will never do his best to hire another Indian, or outsource to India, even if it is less profitable). Social liberalism won’t acknowledge differences between men and women. Spiritual liberalism won’t acknowledge one truth among religions, and in fine leads to agnosticism or atheism (e.g. science never proved that God exists, Buddhism is better than Christianity). Finally, moral liberalism doesn’t provide a clear definition of good and Evil (i.e. moral relativity, as described in Thinking fast and slow by Daniel Kahneman, Jewish).

In order to introduce liberalism to the people, it is first required to take care of two things:

1) the destitution of the ruling class;

2) the destruction of the influence of the Church.

The destitution of the ruling class

In 1789, in France, most people wanted the king to rule the country, and the armies were in fact corrupted by the bourgeoisie to manufacture a revolution. This idea – of course – is not predominant among scholars, since it clearly underpins the liberal agenda.

To seize the power in a State always requires the same steps: 1) divide the citizens using concepts such as social and economic classes, political views and leaders, race and ethnicity, sex and family, etc., 2) grow tensions between communities using mass-media and political agents (e.g. fund or close the eyes on criminality, finance or import terrorists), 3) push the country to revolt 4) take a position of saviour among the victims, and build a fake opposition to the regime.

Unsurprisingly, Ukraine, Syria, Tunisia, Lebanon, Soviet Russia all followed these steps. And most likely France as well today.

The primary objective in all revolution is to place one’s party agents at the right place at the right time. Why? Because you get the people on your side, and in these emotional times, people want to dream. Their trust is broken and any apparent insider with leader’s qualities is capable of seizing the opportunity. It is in time of despair that people can be the most easily deceived.

So, in a nutshell, the current situation in France will provide all the necessary tools for pushing a fake opposition to power and ask for more from the people.

The destruction of the influence of the Church

The Church historically always had two roles: maintain unity of the people in the country and be the guardian of moral standards.

In a country where the Church works with the State and is officially recognized as such, it unites all the people – rich or poor – under one same ruler (God). Since Biblical texts are rather explicit, and can’t change, there can’t be any Marxist propaganda to divide the people and foster a revolution. In fact, the only revolt can oppose good and evil, once again in the frame of morality defined by the Church.

Indeed, the Bible is a book given by God. Its content is fixed and the morality is clearly defined. Breaking Christianity hence enable Globalists to introduce a new one, based on materialism (i.e. The love of what is physically accessible to our senses). Let’s cite:

  • Sex, adultery, porn, prostitution and even pedophilia
  • Money, consumption
  • Individualism, power
  • Feminism, divorce
  • Mass immigration
  • Drinking, drugs, alcoholism
  • Etc.

All these elements are related to very precise Christian sins. Hence, in a Christian society, they are all forbidden. Economy is not the priority, sin is!

Conclusion

As you see, the division of the people and the breaking of the Church are complementary to control the people. The goal is to divide them and lure them into a material approach of life far away from the real battle that is between good and evil (them).

To me, it is obvious that the yellow vests have no metaphysical demands. Not a single yellow jacket is walking for God. Not a single one wants more moral values. Foremost, their main preoccupation is the amount of beer they can buy, TV show or football game, and/or holiday destination. Don’t believe me? French spend in average 3h42 in front of their TV on a daily basis.

These yellow vests want to consume and they naively still assume that democracy is the right to ask from leaders to pay less taxes and get more. They also believe that democracy is the right to choose your leaders. What a misunderstanding of the influence of education and media on people’s decision making. Hence, I see this movement as naive.

This being said, their economic claims are superficially sound and justified. But focusing on the material world is exactly the game of the Globalists. Without even knowing it, this movement serves Globalists, thus the father of lies.

The foundation of France is to take back to Clovis and Jeanne d’Arc who both submitted to the authority of God through the son Jesus Christ. Both acknowledged in the name of God the kingdom of France. Democracy is a concept that has no sense where the ruler is good and caring for his people. In fact, a good ruler is less corruptible than the masses. Democracy is – factually – easier to corrupt than a Kingdom.

Hence, if you understand the dispute above, there can be no true revolution nor counter-revolution if you limit it to materialism and relative morality. Let us not forget this is a long-going war for good against evil, and the devil is the prince of relative morality and materialism, which means he must be encountered with the Truth for he is Lie. The one and only true battle to be fought is through God and the one true Messiah Jesus Christ. France is the elder daughter of the catholic church and has a divine mission for Christianity, which means the main goal of 1789’s revolution, from a satanic prospective, was to defile France to it’s very roots. French people have forgotten that. But hopefully some of them begin to remember.

The day crosses will replace jackets, the change will appear.

French presidency is a joke

Macron became the world champion in presidency photoshooting. I just have no word for this.

For the last picture, as TheLocal.fr says:

In the photo taken on Sunday, Emmanuel Macron is seen between two bare-chested young men wearing bandanas on their heads. One of them is givingw the middle finger to the camera.

The shot was taken during the president’s visit to Saint Martin, a year after a hurricane devastated the French Caribbean island. Macron, followed by a host of photographers, was walking through the streets, meeting locals and talking to them about how they are rebuilding their lives after the tragedy.

When heavy rain started battering down, the president unexpectedly decided to take shelter in a block of social housing flats.

This could have been a good opportunity for Macron, who is struggling to shed his reputation as an arrogant leader removed from his people, to prove his critics wrong.

He met a family, and one man told him he had just come out of prison. In a firm manner which the president has been criticised for using lately in his interactions with the public, he told the former convict not to repeat the same mistakes.

“Don’t make any more mistakes, will you? Your mother deserves more than this. Stop messing around, think of your mother. Now go and rebuild the island,” Macron told the former convict and hugged him afterwards, which left the young man’s mother in tears.

What a president!