Is race mixing superior?

Race mixing, “métissage“makes people better – that’s what they say. The modern double narratives of unique race doesn’t miss an opportunity to pinpoint the superiority of race mixing. Facing this absurd bullshit, I see no option but bringing common sense to face a bunch of lies.

Image associée

Races and species are adapted to their environment. Species mixing normally does not work. In some cases, offspring can be made, but their survival or reproduction is jeopardized (e.g. mules). Therefore, we know that nature doesn’t see species mixing as something to be fostered. For races, offspring can indeed survive and reproduce themselves, hence creating a so-called new race. But if this is the way to go, why didn’t nature do it before?

There are multiple reasons to this. Race mixing implies the superiority of a race on another, at least on certain characteristics such as intelligence, physical characteristics, etc. Intrinsically, there is no race superiority; nature doesn’t care about superiority. The real parameters are time and state at a time t for a series of characteristics. The odds are played in a rather deterministic way at a certain time. Always. The term superiority relates to a series of characteristics to match with an environment at a time t. Wherever some take over others, then a talk about superiority can be done. Hence, superiority is connected to 1) time, and 2) environment. Superiority can neither be eternal neither omnipresent.

Races evolve differently in different environments. Our genetics evolved to answer problems that are commonly faced in a specific environment. Climate, resources abundance, food quality, temperature, distance, etc. are all parameters that play over a well-adapted being. Today, of course technology bypasses most of the required genetic evolution for an environment (e.g. water transformation, heating and food conservation). Genetic modifications (mutation) appear during the life of an individual (somatic), and during the creation of semen (hereditary). Generally speaking, we adapt during our life to our environment and the life process enables us to transmit it to a new offspring that will have a “white page” to adapt to the environment. Living and dying is the only process that can ensure adaptation to the environment and the survival of the species.

Saying that race mixing would bring a superior offspring implies that the offspring would be more adapted to the environment than the parents. The implication of genetic mutation and evolution necessitates the selection of the best genes at the time of the fusion of the ovary and the sperm:

  1. That would imply a consciousness of the future environment of the semen in order to select the most appropriate genes. By definition, adaptation is a post process, and therefore this scenario is mathematically impossible. In addition, genes selection has a statistical result, such as skin color for example, that also invalidates the theory of the selection of the best genes: the disparity of results implies a non superiority of the offspring.
  2. Each genetic code is the best evolutionary result for its environment matching its race characteristics. Selecting the best in two races would suppose that the best characteristics from two different environments are selected at the same time; the limited nature of selection prevents the co-existence of two opposite characteristics. This means that the resulting offspring will never be completely adapted to the environment A and B: he will have characteristics from both. The offspring is therefore constantly weaker, and if superiority appears, it should be matched with time and all parameters.

In the long run, the offspring will evolve towards the most adapted genes, hence resulting in the initial situation A or B, but not A and B. Race mixing is therefore temporary and does not provide better offspring.

If leftists say that we are all equal, then offspring cannot be superior to the parents. Superiority would go against the principle of equality.

And if we are not equal, then there is a superiority, and this superiority should be kept. Else, nature will ensure to restore it over time. That’s called evolution.

Leave a Reply