Does feminism have 2 faces?

What conservatives and liberals mostly fail to identify is: what is a true feminist? Some will say it is a “business woman”, some others a “gold digger”.

Trials after trials, The manosphere tries to define what is a “good girl“. As Vox and the Alpha Game say:

Alpha Game: And … as feminism pushes … to ever more absurd levels, as ever more restrictions are placed on normal masculine behavior, ever more insane definitions of ‘rape’, ‘assault’, and ‘aggression’ are drafted into law in increasingly desperate attempts to somehow, anyhow, cast women as perpetual victims … The sound of the final battle between the sexes will not be heard in the streets or legislatures. It will not be televised or reported. There will be no flags hoisted or victory parades. Because it is already in progress.

Vox: It’s pretty simple, women. Either abandon feminism or abandon all hope of being wives and mothers.

The origin of feminism resides in the concept of “oppressor – oppressed”. Its goal is to win a pseudo sex war, where men and women are in competition for power and resources; in opposition with the Christian principle of sexual complementary. The weapons of men are clear: strength and intelligence. The ones of women: guilt and beauty. As it is a quest for power and resources, there are two means to obtain these: sex and so called “rights”. Conservatism and liberalism.

The spectrum of true feminism is spread from the feminine conservative solipsistic girl to the sexually ostracized LGBT working woman:

  • The hyper feminine, sexy and apparently conservative woman uses the traditional roles of men and women to maximize her profits. Instead of taking full responsibility for her role (keeping the house in check, support of the husband, taking care of children etc.), she will tend to divide the house work with her man whilst also requesting all the “conservative advantages” of a traditional relationship. Hence she will wake up late, go to parties with “girls”, request a breakfast, ask you to clean the house but also to pay most of the expenditures. She could also be that single woman who sells conservative values while partying, having casual sex and even engaging in inter-racial relationships (e.g. Lauren Southern or Maga Pegowska). This type of girl uses men to access resources and openly uses her charm to get them. She cannot commit to a relationship unless it maximizes her hypergamic odds. She is a feminist because she doesn’t accept her female role in society but rather aims at getting resources for herself. She needs feminism and women privileges to exist, and therefore she is a feminist.
  • The working LGTB woman demanding more privileges is in a direct confrontation with the patriarchal model. She acts out of frustration and fear, and probably the absence of a good father. The societal model has convinced her that she is oppressed and that being an independent women is the way to be.

Sometimes these two models are in one woman, that is the ultimate woman you have to either set her straight either avoid her.

Hence our job (as men) is not only to discourage the “obvious feminists” (of the left) but also to set straight the so called conservative women using their charm to manipulate men. We can’t afford more loss for our kind. Men and women are only one when they are united. And feminism is the cancer that destroys trust, families and society.

So, which is to be considered the most dangerous? The working, blue hair overweight “I am not sure about my gender” feminist or the conservative “more vicious type” feminist?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *