3 women manipulative behaviors

Résultat de recherche d'images pour "manipulative woman"

It is for a fact that women are inherently manipulative. In fact, in our society, almost all women are mentally sick, and totally unable to handle normal relationships with anyone; even women.

Evolutionary process or complementarity from the creation, it doesn’t relieve the psychological burden that the modern woman adds on a man’s mind. In every situation, they tend to maximize their own benefits and to demonize their man – the famous guilt trick. Here I want to highlight few techniques that women use to manipulate men within a relationship, so that men can step back from their shit tests, put some perspective and see that a whole forest can actually hide the same trees.

Case study

She didn’t/doesn’t want to cook anything; even if she stayed the whole day at home while you worked 12 hours. Instead of being frank, she will say “we never go out to restaurant together, and you go with your colleagues. You don’t care for us!”. As such, she tries to make you feel guilty for not paying her a restaurant today, while depicting herself as a poor victim. You may not answer, laugh, agree and amplify, or whatever, but you will quickly notice that this game is just exhausting.

Your girl will usually alternate between a combination of these techniques:

  1. Negation and guilt trick: you answer straight “yeah, we never go, but where is the meal today”. She replies “you never understand anything”, starts ignoring you, and maybe texting with her “friends” just to make you feel bad.
  2. Aggressiveness: you keep standing and ignore her. Since no other men would be there to pay her what she wants, she has no other option but to push for it with you. She becomes aggressive verbally and/or physically. She insults you, shouts, hits you, or bites you. She is looking for “physical dominance“.
  3. Sudden calmness and caring: she comes to you nicely, maybe asking for apologies for her behavior. It seems that everything is gone. She hugs you and then she asks again what she wants. That step is the most important. She is now testing your true resilience. If you answer “no”, she will switch to one of the other strategies and give you another cycle, or accept her fate in sign of resignation.

Usually, these 3 strategies are combined over a more or less long period of time. It can last between 10 min to a couple of days depending on her emotional stability (or psycho score). Just note that you do not have to win all the battles to win the war, just the most important ones.

When it comes to women, knowing when and how to lose is also part of the art of winning.

What techniques can you use against this?

The answer is tricky. On one side, I would like to tell you that “agreeing and amplifying alike” techniques are good, but on the other side I want to point out the fact that any behavior that is not natural for you will eventually result in an outburst on your side. I believe that the most important is to remember that women communicate through “shit testing”, and that nothing is really serious. And if it is serious enough, she will leave you. But what is serious for her?

That is only serious if she believes that her sexual value enables her to get better without paying any price for it (social, emotional or material).

That leaves you with only one option: remain calm and do not give too much importance because your fate is already decided – unconsciously. Try not to take it personally, but remember that modern women are not reliable for most of them. They are all ready to leave you under whatever circumstance, should it maximize her well-being (social, emotional, financial or material). So, unfortunately, the sad truth is that whether she will or not stay with you is already communicated in her behavior. If she is not into you, or has better, she will leave you, and tell everyone how a poor guy you are.

That is why my belief is that the best option any man has today is to invest in what he does. Your value as a man is the only thing that will retain her. If you give it away to her, she will leave you. Also remember that any woman will try to take away your value, because if she is with you, it is foremost because she thinks that you are worth more than her. So, she also believes that all women think and feel the same. She projects her insecurity into jealousy and in fine into a “ball cutting” exercise – if she lowers your value under hers, then she can keep you with her, but unfortunately she will then want another man.

The sad paradox of women is that their happiness must always be controlled, always keeping them one step away from their true liberation.

Sophie Tanner, a typical SJW idiot

Sophie Tanner is one those women who has been corrupted by the political agenda of the Left.

Christian values are very clear: one man, one woman. But for SJWs, this is too easy (or probably too difficult). For this reason,  for  a free and emancipated woman, what is the ultimate goal? To boast your own self until you believe – as does every SJW – that your words are higher than the Word of God.

“When asked if divorce would ever be on the cards, Sophie said: ‘Marrying yourself is a lifelong commitment to be responsible for your own happiness, so divorce is not an option.’”

How Laughable, divorcing yourself.

And God has a way of punishing them. He turns them into eternally unsatisfied crybabies, waiting for big daddy to give them a slap on the face. Worse even, into crazy psychotic people, zombies. Yup, SJWs have much in common with zombies: ugly dwellers looking for the next host to infect and exploit, barely speaking anything understandable.

Sophie, you are an example of what women should not be. Thank you for leading by example.

SJWs Hypocrisy: The list.

This statement is obvious but the list just keep going on and on. When an ideology is based on lies, its followers cannot help but being a bunch of hypocrites. So without further ado here is the non exhaustive list of their hypocritical statements:

Feel free to submit more hypocritical SJWs statements to @patriargate on Twitter, GAB and Minds.

Does feminism have 2 faces?

What conservatives and liberals mostly fail to identify is: what is a true feminist? Some will say it is a “business woman”, some others a “gold digger”.

Trials after trials, The manosphere tries to define what is a “good girl“. As Vox and the Alpha Game say:

Alpha Game: And … as feminism pushes … to ever more absurd levels, as ever more restrictions are placed on normal masculine behavior, ever more insane definitions of ‘rape’, ‘assault’, and ‘aggression’ are drafted into law in increasingly desperate attempts to somehow, anyhow, cast women as perpetual victims … The sound of the final battle between the sexes will not be heard in the streets or legislatures. It will not be televised or reported. There will be no flags hoisted or victory parades. Because it is already in progress.

Vox: It’s pretty simple, women. Either abandon feminism or abandon all hope of being wives and mothers.

The origin of feminism resides in the concept of “oppressor – oppressed”. Its goal is to win a pseudo sex war, where men and women are in competition for power and resources; in opposition with the Christian principle of sexual complementary. The weapons of men are clear: strength and intelligence. The ones of women: guilt and beauty. As it is a quest for power and resources, there are two means to obtain these: sex and so called “rights”. Conservatism and liberalism.

The spectrum of true feminism is spread from the feminine conservative solipsistic girl to the sexually ostracized LGBT working woman:

  • The hyper feminine, sexy and apparently conservative woman uses the traditional roles of men and women to maximize her profits. Instead of taking full responsibility for her role (keeping the house in check, support of the husband, taking care of children etc.), she will tend to divide the house work with her man whilst also requesting all the “conservative advantages” of a traditional relationship. Hence she will wake up late, go to parties with “girls”, request a breakfast, ask you to clean the house but also to pay most of the expenditures. She could also be that single woman who sells conservative values while partying, having casual sex and even engaging in inter-racial relationships (e.g. Lauren Southern or Maga Pegowska). This type of girl uses men to access resources and openly uses her charm to get them. She cannot commit to a relationship unless it maximizes her hypergamic odds. She is a feminist because she doesn’t accept her female role in society but rather aims at getting resources for herself. She needs feminism and women privileges to exist, and therefore she is a feminist.
  • The working LGTB woman demanding more privileges is in a direct confrontation with the patriarchal model. She acts out of frustration and fear, and probably the absence of a good father. The societal model has convinced her that she is oppressed and that being an independent women is the way to be.

Sometimes these two models are in one woman, that is the ultimate woman you have to either set her straight either avoid her.

Hence our job (as men) is not only to discourage the “obvious feminists” (of the left) but also to set straight the so called conservative women using their charm to manipulate men. We can’t afford more loss for our kind. Men and women are only one when they are united. And feminism is the cancer that destroys trust, families and society.

So, which is to be considered the most dangerous? The working, blue hair overweight “I am not sure about my gender” feminist or the conservative “more vicious type” feminist?

Why does my baby look like an alien?

Don’t be like this English mother, nor like Magda Pegowska. The English mother says:

“She’s getting very dark, isn’t she?” This is what one of my friends recently said about my much adored – 12-week-old daughter.

She didn’t mean to be rude. But it was a comment that struck me with the force of a jab to the stomach. Immediately, I was overwhelmed by a confusion of emotions. I felt protective, insulted, worried, ashamed, guilty, all at once. The reason? My lovely, wriggly, smiley baby is mixed race. Now, I think of myself as pretty ‘right on’. My home is on the border of the London Republic of Hackney. I’ve been to the Notting Hill Carnival, even if I found the music a bit loud. Yet now I realise what a ‘white’ world I inhabit. I am white and I have two sons from my first marriage who are both milky complexioned and golden haired. My twin sister, who I spend a lot of time with, has a Danish partner. As a consequence, she has two boys who are also pale skinned and flaxen haired. Into this positively Scandinavian next generation, I have now injected a tiny, dark-skinned, dark-haired girl. To say she stands out is an understatement. My colouring and that of my children has never really been an issue before. However, three years ago I met the man who became my second husband and who is the father of my daughter. Although born in the UK, his parents came from India in the Sixties. This makes him British-Asian and our daughter mixed race. There is another more PC term for the plump little bundle I strap to my front. She is ‘dual heritage’. It’s a bit trendy, but I quite like it. It implies a pride in coming from two cultures, rather than the less attractive connotations of ‘mixed race’. The usual time something is labelled ‘mixed’ is when it’s a packet of nuts and they’ve bulked out the luxury cashews with cheaper peanuts. I’m not sure I want my daughter to be regarded as an adulterated version of some pure original. Still, it is the most accepted description. The truth is, whatever the label, the fact there is a label proves that my daughter’s conflicting parentage matters. At the more frothy end of the scale, mixed-race children are regarded as pretty dolls — white kids with a nice tan. When I was pregnant and people asked me about the child I was having, and I explained her father was Indian, they would often coo something along the lines of: “Ooh, she’s going to be beautiful!” as if I was discussing a new rose, made from an exotic cross-breeding programme. On a less benevolent level, mixed-race children can receive a hostile welcome from both white and black communities. Being neither one thing nor another may get you on the cover of Vogue, but it isn’t an easy way to make friends. Scroll down for more… {1} But this is 2007, surely things are more enlightened than that? I hope so, but I fear not. One reason for my fear is my own mixed reactions to my daughter. Don’t get me wrong, I love her. She is the child I didn’t think I’d have after my first marriage broke up. She is the only granddaughter in our family and we all dote on her. But when I turn to the mirror in my bedroom to admire us together, I am shocked. She seems so alien. With her long, dark eyelashes and shiny, dark brown hair, she doesn’t look anything like me. I know that concentrating on how my daughter looks is shallow. She is a person in her own right, not an accessory to me. But still, I can’t shake off the feeling of unease. I didn’t realise how much her looking different would matter and, on a rational level, I know it shouldn’t. But it does. Evolution demands that we have children to pass on our genes, hence the sense of pride and validation we get when we see our features reappearing in the next generation. With my daughter, I don’t have that. Do black fathers who marry white women and then have paler-skinned children feel my sense of loss? Or maybe Chinese mothers or Middle-Eastern grandparents grieve when they see a child they know to be their own, but whose features don’t reflect that? I worry that, as my daughter doesn’t look like me, people will assume she is adopted. After all, it’s all the rage in showbiz circles. Madonna famously scooped up a black child when she wanted to be a mother again and Angelina Jolie appears to be assembling a ‘pick ‘n’ mix’ of kids from different countries. It’s all very United Colours of Benetton, isn’t it? In the real world, I fear for my daughter’s sense of self. She has a tiny foot in two cultures. How will she negotiate a path between the two? I worry that my sons will feel less of a kinship with their sister because she is different, although there is no sign of that. As for myself, there is an inescapable status issue to address. White women who have non-white children are stigmatised as ‘Tracy Towerblocks’ living on benefits, most of which they spend on lager and fags. Even if I don’t fit this profile, my daughter’s difference definitely points out the fact that my children come from two different fathers. If I wanted to pass us off as a nice, neat nuclear family, she would blow my cover at once. But it is more than that. I am frightened, frightened of others’ reactions to her, as well as my own. I didn’t think of myself as racist and yet my daughter has shown me a side of myself about which I feel deeply uncomfortable. Even admitting to having mixed feelings about her not being blonde and blue eyed, I feel disloyal and incredibly guilty. I know the obvious comment is that I must have known how a child of our union would look when I married an Indian man, but it is a wise woman who thinks that far ahead when she falls in love. I didn’t think about any of this before I got pregnant. I wanted to have a baby. Her colour and culture were immaterial then. But self-flagellation is not useful. I have more pressing concerns. I am now the mother of a ‘black’ child, even if she is more the hue of weak tea than espresso. This is a role for which I am utterly unprepared. Part of me thinks I should be playing sitar music to her in her cot, mastering pakoras and serving them dressed in a sari, but that would be fantastically fake coming from me. When she was born, pale but with lots of dark hair, I asked the midwife if her eyes would stay blue. ‘Asian genes are very strong,’ she said in what I took to be an ominous tone. No more Brady Bunch kids for me. The midwife has been proved right and every day my baby’s eyes get a little darker. Even so, when she looks up at me as I feed her, my heart melts. My love may not be colour blind, but hers is, and that is truly humbling.”

May god hear you and stop this insanity. As you see, in the absence of light, darkness prevails.

White women, more beautiful than you think

FACT: Feminism and Cultural Marxism make women ugly.

It is known for a fact that epi-genetic plays a major role in the regulation of health and weight and physical appearance (and the face in particular). It is also known that more attractive women are healthier and can give birth to healthier babies.

In this logic, it is evident that a healthier environment will “produce” more beautiful women. And what is a healthier environment?

  1. A healthy environment include lower stress, good sleep, healthy food, spending time outside regularly, low radiations, physical activity…
  2. The second point is the stress endured during childhood. It is known for a fact that a stable family and kids taken care by parents or close relative (instead of daycare) is the healthiest environment a child can have.

In white countries, these places are becoming rare as time passes by. As such western women do become uglier with time.

Beauty is to ugliness what is light to darkness. Do nothing and it flaws away.

Protect beauty, stop feminism.

IMG-20171010-WA0027.jpg

French language is sexist!

French, the great language of Molière, who brought to this world so many things is under sexist attack. In France and Belgium, the new battle for the feminists and the cultural-marxists SJWs is the so called “inclusive writing”. What the fuck?!

In French, there are 2 genders in the grammar (masculine and feminine), and the masculine is always the default one. Therefore, if you talk about a profession in general, such as “teachers”, you will say in French “les enseignants”. On the contrary, the feminine gender would be “les enseignantes”. And apparently that is sexist!

The real question asked in the Belgian newspaper is “is French sexist by nature?” (and therefore of course its roots should be dismantled). In France, the debate is more divided. The basic new way to write French would be “enseignant-e-s” instead of “enseignants”, just not to disturb angry feminist and SJW.

Some schools already started adopting the new standard, even if still not legalised. But that is just a formality in a sick world.

The real funny question will be when they will address two facts: Jew rabbies (aka newly rabbin-e-s) and Muslim Imams (aka newly Imam-e-s).

How will they say it? My guess is that there will be an exception for them. Wanna bet?

Dearcatcallers, that’s stupid

Sad, very sad. “Dearcatcallers” spends her life taking selfies with poor guys (so-called beta males).

This is what stupid women do when they are set free without any goal in life. They become feminists who do not even understand what they fight for. Anyway, I shouldn’t even bother because she doesn’t look too white to me.

Seriously, what’s the goal of taking selfies with poor guys but getting attention?! What is her achievement?! Nothing but stupidity.

At least she tells something: white men, man up and take back what is yours.

 

 

Why women are so annoying

I had a simple story from a friend. He explained me how his girlfriend is misbehaving with him. What’s happening?

He told me:

We just go for shopping as usual… And as usual, despite the fact that she promised, she makes crisis. She wants the most expensive, with zero arguments. She complains when i say no, and she tells me i am crazy. She insults me for not buying things we don’t need at home.

Interesting, and common story.

The game tells us that a woman who loves, also respects. But i would think of the opposite.

Experts in game like Vox or Chateau would simply argue this man is not an alpha, and so she has no respect for him. But that’s too easy, because even alpha have problems with their women. Any proof? Let’s take the example of Brad Pit. She divorced, said that she didn’t feel any bond with her blond kid, and finally turned him/her into a trans-sexual. What an achievement for an alpha!

Therefore, my reasoning goes a bit beyond this. His girlfriend told him something very particular:

Excuse me. Every time is the same. I try to control myself. I just don’t understand why, but every time you tell me something, I fee like I have to protect myself. I feel like I have to attack, and say or do whatever to win.

That is very interesting. Very. Why?

Everywhere I look, I see more or less the same pattern: women, Arabs, blacks, gays have the same kind of attitude. They behave as if everything was free for them, as if the world owed them everything and as if anything a white man says is an aggression.

The word she used is “protect”. She talks about being oppressed – while she is not. Her message is “whatever you do is an oppression”.

Our women have been programmed, just like us. The perspective they were given to the world is Marxist: oppressors vs oppressed. Winners vs losers. And who wants to be the one oppressed, the one losing? No one.

On one hand, women are programmed to believe that white men are oppressors, and that they will always do the worse to them and to the world. Therefore, they do not have any reason to respect us. We are bad people, pussies. We are oppressors, but we can’t even hold in front of a woman. Grow balls, be the oppressor you pretend to be – her unconscious murmurs.

On the other hand, the white men have been programmed to feel guilty. They feel like they are “white knights” who must give to others, starting with women: paying drinks, paying restaurant, shutting up, putting her choices before his, etc. Everything in a white man’s head tends to give, and not to receive.

So, my answer is simple. The “oppressor – oppressed” meta-programme running our sub-conscious is stronger than we think, and it overrules our true personality and nature.

In this scheme, unfortunately a woman can’t love long her husband. She can’t love a man she doesn’t respect. And she can’t respect a man when she has been brain washed. Add all of this on top of their selfish and childish nature, and you got what we see: a total disaster.

White, don’t make babies

Another trial to destroy our families and promote our genocide.

These things cannot be left with impunity. There are so many hypothesis in these studies – like gender equality – that are simply untrue and unscientific. I won’t list them, i have better to do. Just remember that every time you do not act, when you do not fight for your beliefs, you lose. Report, flag, hit, defend your individual rights.

Just know that it is not about science. If science tells that you sleep less with a baby, it also tells that without babies there is no future.

Life is not a pleasant journey on a boat under the sun. It is not a fairy tale. No it’s not. Life about doing what you have to do. Fight, do your best. Be a good woman, be a good man.

Take your legacy in your hands, enhance it and pass it on.

Life is past, present and future. Without doing what is right today, there is no future.