Feminism = divorce

Feminism was invented to destroy families and the core identity of women. Like the snake whispering the wrongs, feminism is disguised as a friend of the women, where it is in fact the devil itself. The only aim of feminism is to make out every woman a slut, using her sexuality either to climb the ladders of work, either to steal wealth from men. The sole goal is to render men useless to women: financially, intellectually, socially and emotionally. Feminism is the personification of hypergamic, animal and amoral behaviors. And almost all women – even conservatives – firmly believes that this is good.

Feminism is a humiliation for women today, but also for all the good mothers and wives who gave their life to bring us to the world today. Feminism makes women ugly, amoral and despicable beings, caring for nothing else than themselves and their little privileges.

Alt-Right, alt-light or liberals, they eventually think the same: that politics is something they can participate in. But no. Their contribution is limited to their pretty faces on a screen, opening their mouth to repeat what a man told them. If only they would realise that supporting a man who fights is more effective, natural and constructive than to fight. No, they don’t, they even prefer detracting the males already doing the job, bringing an overall negative contributions to the cause. No-one asks them to take positions or get involved in politics, on the contrary.

On the verge of our extermination through cultural marxism, feminism is still in the head of the right wing women. We shall repeal everything but not their privileges. On the verge of death, they still think about themselves. That says a lot about feminism and female nature. This is why feminism works as it was designed for, revealing women as incapable of seeing the elephant in the room. Introspection, a quality redeemed void in their head – does it seem.

Feminism absolutely never had another objective but to humiliate women in their duty of child carers and family cornerstone. Because what is a family without a true mother, mistress, and house keeper? Nothing.

How a boy could become a man, and a girl a woman if the mother is no more? They can’t. The boy will be half a man, and the girl half a woman. What an opportunity for the enemy not to have any resistance, don’t you think?

Judge for yourself what all your girls had all their life in their mind. This is what they saw, what they became, whatever they like it or not. Otto W. said that women become hysteric when confronted to their nature, a way to say that women do not handle criticism – at all. Well, how do you expect your girls to respect men when they were raised like that for 18-30 years?

Why women act as they do

That is the brain map of a man (up). And that is the brain map of a woman (down). See the difference? Now that is what our left and right brain do:

One doesn’t need to be a genius to understand what it means…

Women do no clearly separate their thoughts. They do not separate – biologically – their emotions from their reasoning. That means that women biologically tend to see the world through their sole perception, meaning their emotion. Since emotions are always self centered (even empathy), they can only be solipsistic. Their truth is not built through reasoning, it is memorized and felt.

They are unable of separating the abstract from the sensorial… But that is the foundation of morality! One can’t build moral standards if his emotions perturbate constantly his logic. Their sole escape is therefore an emotionally memorized morality. And to be fair, this exactly what the leftist school does: showers of emotions and codes of conduct (e.g. poor black babies die in Africa, help them! Men are bad and do not respect women, take from them!)… and obviously, that works.

When women think, they think according to what they feel right now. If it feels bad, it is bad. If it feels good, it is good. There is no separation in the brain that enables sorting the reality according to a broader perspective.

Since their brain is also self and emotionally centered, they also tend to believe that everything is either black or white. It is almost impossible for them to have a negative opinion without a good emotion, nor a positive opinion with a bad emotion. Example below with their translations:

“you ALWAYS do that”, “you NEVER do that” =  right now it feels like it was always there and never ended. Do what I want, or else it means that you give me bad emotions, and so it means that you are bad.

“all MEN are bad” = right now a man did (or I was told a bad story about) something that gave me very bad emotions. Therefore, all men are the same.

“I know one good black man” = One gives me good emotions, and this person defines my entire reality about race. Therefore, they are all good.

“I know one bad black” = One gave me so bad emotions, that this persons redefines my reality towards race, and I hate them all. We must kill of them, they are all bad.

I guess you got the logic: everything comes from what they feel. That is also why they fall for assholes easily: their emotions can make them blind to anything that is morally bad – plus Hollywood and school condition them to screw up. It works that way:

Behavioral memory built on wrong moral standards + emotions = conditionned disfunctional behavior

That is why it is impossible to have a serious rational discussion with a woman. Especially about this blog post: they will never agree and most likely enter an immense rage.

Exceptions will always be rules, and rules will always be exceptions, because there is no logic to drive rules out of their emotions.

Of course men also have the same property, but they are biologically advantaged not to behave that way. Men acting like women are called gamma. They think they are bosses or secret kings, while in fact, they are just women. Most of the so called “Alpha gammers” are actually gammas: their so called self development is fully focused on developing a better understanding and adaptive behaviour to women biology, rather than their own masculine biology.

Most politicians are also gammas, Trump and Putin being more or less the only western exceptions. That is why it is impossible to talk or solve any problem at a political level nowadays: we are led by women, trapped in the body of men – probably even worse than women. We are led by intellectually castrated men, some kind of “post modernist beta transsexual male”.

Now, add to this thinking pattern feminism, and you have an individual that is convinced that her reality and her feelings are morally right, good, smart and efficient FOR EVERYONE (because all that matter is themselves – what they feel). In a nutshell, a despicable being ready to do anything for her own good. Not pretty I would say.

Let’s conclude with a positive tone. Hopefully not all women are evil, and we still love them. The bright side is that we can control them for their own good, and as they are excellent at communicating with toddlers: make nice white babies and great families.

3 women manipulative behaviors

Résultat de recherche d'images pour "manipulative woman"

It is for a fact that women are inherently manipulative. In fact, in our society, almost all women are mentally sick, and totally unable to handle normal relationships with anyone; even women.

Evolutionary process or complementarity from the creation, it doesn’t relieve the psychological burden that the modern woman adds on a man’s mind. In every situation, they tend to maximize their own benefits and to demonize their man – the famous guilt trick. Here I want to highlight few techniques that women use to manipulate men within a relationship, so that men can step back from their shit tests, put some perspective and see that a whole forest can actually hide the same trees.

Case study

She didn’t/doesn’t want to cook anything; even if she stayed the whole day at home while you worked 12 hours. Instead of being frank, she will say “we never go out to restaurant together, and you go with your colleagues. You don’t care for us!”. As such, she tries to make you feel guilty for not paying her a restaurant today, while depicting herself as a poor victim. You may not answer, laugh, agree and amplify, or whatever, but you will quickly notice that this game is just exhausting.

Your girl will usually alternate between a combination of these techniques:

  1. Negation and guilt trick: you answer straight “yeah, we never go, but where is the meal today”. She replies “you never understand anything”, starts ignoring you, and maybe texting with her “friends” just to make you feel bad.
  2. Aggressiveness: you keep standing and ignore her. Since no other men would be there to pay her what she wants, she has no other option but to push for it with you. She becomes aggressive verbally and/or physically. She insults you, shouts, hits you, or bites you. She is looking for “physical dominance“.
  3. Sudden calmness and caring: she comes to you nicely, maybe asking for apologies for her behavior. It seems that everything is gone. She hugs you and then she asks again what she wants. That step is the most important. She is now testing your true resilience. If you answer “no”, she will switch to one of the other strategies and give you another cycle, or accept her fate in sign of resignation.

Usually, these 3 strategies are combined over a more or less long period of time. It can last between 10 min to a couple of days depending on her emotional stability (or psycho score). Just note that you do not have to win all the battles to win the war, just the most important ones.

When it comes to women, knowing when and how to lose is also part of the art of winning.

What techniques can you use against this?

The answer is tricky. On one side, I would like to tell you that “agreeing and amplifying alike” techniques are good, but on the other side I want to point out the fact that any behavior that is not natural for you will eventually result in an outburst on your side. I believe that the most important is to remember that women communicate through “shit testing”, and that nothing is really serious. And if it is serious enough, she will leave you. But what is serious for her?

That is only serious if she believes that her sexual value enables her to get better without paying any price for it (social, emotional or material).

That leaves you with only one option: remain calm and do not give too much importance because your fate is already decided – unconsciously. Try not to take it personally, but remember that modern women are not reliable for most of them. They are all ready to leave you under whatever circumstance, should it maximize her well-being (social, emotional, financial or material). So, unfortunately, the sad truth is that whether she will or not stay with you is already communicated in her behavior. If she is not into you, or has better, she will leave you, and tell everyone how a poor guy you are.

That is why my belief is that the best option any man has today is to invest in what he does. Your value as a man is the only thing that will retain her. If you give it away to her, she will leave you. Also remember that any woman will try to take away your value, because if she is with you, it is foremost because she thinks that you are worth more than her. So, she also believes that all women think and feel the same. She projects her insecurity into jealousy and in fine into a “ball cutting” exercise – if she lowers your value under hers, then she can keep you with her, but unfortunately she will then want another man.

The sad paradox of women is that their happiness must always be controlled, always keeping them one step away from their true liberation.

The game, that imposture…

The paradox of man is that the better you become, the more choice you have, the least you care for women.

A few years ago I met the community of the Game. I read Neil Strauss’ book, and eventually got confused.

I saw many men, between 20 and 30 for most, meeting up only to pick up girls. As Neil describes it, it appears to them that picking up women is an art and a symbol of masculinity. But is it?

Game describes fairly well what women wants, and tries to give an answer to what a man is. It is told that women are emotional, hypergamic, and it is simpler to shortcut true masculinity and pretending being a so called “alpha”.

But it seems to me that this is a wrong question. Men should know what a man is, and not look at women to find it. According to me, that is a total scam on weak men searching for a path, a way of life.

To be honest, Neil, like many gamers, has a feminine energy. They look and feel gay. Even the gamer I like the most like Tyler, for his motivational and purpose focus couldn’t escape this rule.

A true man doesn’t look for who he is through women appreciation. Comparing the amount of phone numbers is a mere reflection of a lack of self confidence and identity. Self amusement is not a proof of personal development, it is a proof of submission and despair. That is not freedom, this is not what men are meant to be. Every man knows that.

Starting a hobby to look cooler doesn’t make one cooler, it is the perfect continuation of whom this man should be: a man looking for  identity. Get the right girl, and everything vanishes. Is that what a man is supposed to do?

Men are not made for a daily sexual intercourse with a different woman, just like women are not made to switch from males to males. These behaviors actually undermine our society and break the required trust between sexes. These behaviors are the line between animals and humanity. Which side do you want to take?

By taking women for granted, lie to them, dumping them and selling them the dream of the best time of their life, the “gamers” are not bastards. They are just a bunch of useful idiots in a decadent world. All of that because they did not grasp their true masculinity, nor have what it takes for building a civilization.

So what do I have in mind? It is rather simple. Instead on focusing on pleasing women (for sex in exchange) start doing what you like, for yourself. Meet people through hobbies and work. Avoid wing men, but rather look for true brother.

Build something bigger than you. Realise that you are part of a bigger family. Realise that your cilivisation needs you as a man of value. That your nation needs you. That your people (especially within your race) and your religion need you.

Be honest with yourself. Work on your knowledge and your skills. Focus on yourself and on helping others. Build and give.

When you will truly internalise that you only need one woman to make a family, when you will be of total indifference for a so called “10”, when you will feel that you are on your right way, then you’ll have reached the man that you truly are. And at that moment, you will have much more value in the eyes of every single women.

Does feminism have 2 faces?

What conservatives and liberals mostly fail to identify is: what is a true feminist? Some will say it is a “business woman”, some others a “gold digger”.

Trials after trials, The manosphere tries to define what is a “good girl“. As Vox and the Alpha Game say:

Alpha Game: And … as feminism pushes … to ever more absurd levels, as ever more restrictions are placed on normal masculine behavior, ever more insane definitions of ‘rape’, ‘assault’, and ‘aggression’ are drafted into law in increasingly desperate attempts to somehow, anyhow, cast women as perpetual victims … The sound of the final battle between the sexes will not be heard in the streets or legislatures. It will not be televised or reported. There will be no flags hoisted or victory parades. Because it is already in progress.

Vox: It’s pretty simple, women. Either abandon feminism or abandon all hope of being wives and mothers.

The origin of feminism resides in the concept of “oppressor – oppressed”. Its goal is to win a pseudo sex war, where men and women are in competition for power and resources; in opposition with the Christian principle of sexual complementary. The weapons of men are clear: strength and intelligence. The ones of women: guilt and beauty. As it is a quest for power and resources, there are two means to obtain these: sex and so called “rights”. Conservatism and liberalism.

The spectrum of true feminism is spread from the feminine conservative solipsistic girl to the sexually ostracized LGBT working woman:

  • The hyper feminine, sexy and apparently conservative woman uses the traditional roles of men and women to maximize her profits. Instead of taking full responsibility for her role (keeping the house in check, support of the husband, taking care of children etc.), she will tend to divide the house work with her man whilst also requesting all the “conservative advantages” of a traditional relationship. Hence she will wake up late, go to parties with “girls”, request a breakfast, ask you to clean the house but also to pay most of the expenditures. She could also be that single woman who sells conservative values while partying, having casual sex and even engaging in inter-racial relationships (e.g. Lauren Southern or Maga Pegowska). This type of girl uses men to access resources and openly uses her charm to get them. She cannot commit to a relationship unless it maximizes her hypergamic odds. She is a feminist because she doesn’t accept her female role in society but rather aims at getting resources for herself. She needs feminism and women privileges to exist, and therefore she is a feminist.
  • The working LGTB woman demanding more privileges is in a direct confrontation with the patriarchal model. She acts out of frustration and fear, and probably the absence of a good father. The societal model has convinced her that she is oppressed and that being an independent women is the way to be.

Sometimes these two models are in one woman, that is the ultimate woman you have to either set her straight either avoid her.

Hence our job (as men) is not only to discourage the “obvious feminists” (of the left) but also to set straight the so called conservative women using their charm to manipulate men. We can’t afford more loss for our kind. Men and women are only one when they are united. And feminism is the cancer that destroys trust, families and society.

So, which is to be considered the most dangerous? The working, blue hair overweight “I am not sure about my gender” feminist or the conservative “more vicious type” feminist?

Social media are breaking families

In our society, tech giants are capable of influencing our behaviors, believes, etc. They create a new reality out of thin air. With their help, any lie can become a truth. The tiniest of ideas can be seen by hundreds of millions or be used to target any specific individual in any specific region.

To do so, they select their target and adapt the content each and everyone can see. The masses are not aware of this process and hence believe that what they see is a widespread truth, even if it is an exception. In two words, virtuality has succeeded to reality.

And now the European Commission aims at coordinating with social media to control algorithms selecting what you can see. Not only tech giants will have power over you, but also the government.

One of the worse impact for the white man is on the sexual market. Example:

A European woman connects to Facebook, and her newsfeed is flooded with other cultures, other men’s achievements, etc. Not so long ago, Facebook was promoting in Eastern countries a video with the smartest people on earth… and guess what: not a single white! How come?!

They show how rich, cool, and handsome are all non white men. How Arabs from Saudi or Dubai care for animals. How black people have more feelings and are more caring. How white men are disgusting bastards who invite refugees to abuse them. They help them reaching to your girlfriend, your wife, your daughter, in your back.

Recently a girl told me that in India they don’t have toilet, and it is our fault – we are bad people. Sorry girl, but I haven’t not seen a single white man restraining Indians from building nor using toilet. And we have been building them in Europe for thousands of years.

They build an entire lie on which children and women mostly hang they beliefs. More than school, more than books, they indoctrinate our people for not making families. They promote mixity everywhere, and make us feel guilty for even existing as people. They give the tools for cheating and breaking relationships, families.

It is high time to end the tech giant dictatorship and to denounce the fraudulent leaders in Europe and the USA.

Why women are so annoying

I had a simple story from a friend. He explained me how his girlfriend is misbehaving with him. What’s happening?

He told me:

We just go for shopping as usual… And as usual, despite the fact that she promised, she makes crisis. She wants the most expensive, with zero arguments. She complains when i say no, and she tells me i am crazy. She insults me for not buying things we don’t need at home.

Interesting, and common story.

The game tells us that a woman who loves, also respects. But i would think of the opposite.

Experts in game like Vox or Chateau would simply argue this man is not an alpha, and so she has no respect for him. But that’s too easy, because even alpha have problems with their women. Any proof? Let’s take the example of Brad Pit. She divorced, said that she didn’t feel any bond with her blond kid, and finally turned him/her into a trans-sexual. What an achievement for an alpha!

Therefore, my reasoning goes a bit beyond this. His girlfriend told him something very particular:

Excuse me. Every time is the same. I try to control myself. I just don’t understand why, but every time you tell me something, I fee like I have to protect myself. I feel like I have to attack, and say or do whatever to win.

That is very interesting. Very. Why?

Everywhere I look, I see more or less the same pattern: women, Arabs, blacks, gays have the same kind of attitude. They behave as if everything was free for them, as if the world owed them everything and as if anything a white man says is an aggression.

The word she used is “protect”. She talks about being oppressed – while she is not. Her message is “whatever you do is an oppression”.

Our women have been programmed, just like us. The perspective they were given to the world is Marxist: oppressors vs oppressed. Winners vs losers. And who wants to be the one oppressed, the one losing? No one.

On one hand, women are programmed to believe that white men are oppressors, and that they will always do the worse to them and to the world. Therefore, they do not have any reason to respect us. We are bad people, pussies. We are oppressors, but we can’t even hold in front of a woman. Grow balls, be the oppressor you pretend to be – her unconscious murmurs.

On the other hand, the white men have been programmed to feel guilty. They feel like they are “white knights” who must give to others, starting with women: paying drinks, paying restaurant, shutting up, putting her choices before his, etc. Everything in a white man’s head tends to give, and not to receive.

So, my answer is simple. The “oppressor – oppressed” meta-programme running our sub-conscious is stronger than we think, and it overrules our true personality and nature.

In this scheme, unfortunately a woman can’t love long her husband. She can’t love a man she doesn’t respect. And she can’t respect a man when she has been brain washed. Add all of this on top of their selfish and childish nature, and you got what we see: a total disaster.

Let's talk about sex

The Kinsey report released in 1940 was a preamble to modern fornication. Starting from insects, Alfred Kinsey drew the conclusion that all individuals are primarily sexual. To support his enlightening conclusions, he assessed babies, sexually deprived women, mentally sick individuals, and criminals. In a nutshell, he biased his statistical sample to reach his pre-determined conclusions. He was trying to make a shortcut between “a sexual liberated society” and civilization. Nothing could be more hypocritical. In fact, the real and central question to all of this is not the pleasure given during sex, but rather the importance of sexual restriction – as discussed in the article about chastity.

White people (especially Christians and Alt-Right) do not support rape. They have never endorsed “sexual freedom”. Rather, they believe in intimacy: sex should be monogamous and restricted to the marital life from a social perspective. This is the only way to maintain a balanced, happy society. As such, the abundance of research on sexual behavior cannot be endorsed (porn, pedophilia, homosexuality, adultery, gang rape, etc.). Is it really worth researching if children experience pleasure while they are sexually abused?

Morality and feelings are two very distinct concepts, and one can’t build a civilization on the basis of instant gratification solely. We cannot accept asking ourselves questions that make us act like beasts. Not everything has to be put in question. Sexual depravity destroys families and jeopardizes individual energy. Sexual restriction is required to build a civilization (or a nation), to raise children and to defend its people.

This is also where the line is drawn between “We the Christians” and the Muslim world. When these instinctive low IQ males try to justify what is good (morality) based on their own feelings and religion, this CANNOT BE TOLERATED. This cannot be negotiated. Their behavior is not much more than animals behavior. Jews got it right: “what makes a man is his ability to restrict his animal instincts”. On this point, I totally agree with them, and I encourage them to fight cultural marxism instead of pushing for it.

The problem with Alt-Right alpha males

The PUA (pickup artists) community is one of the  gate of the alt-right. Probably because most bloggers, such as The chateau, VoxDay and others treat alt-right issues such as race and women. A few years ago, I was introduced to the PUA community. I read the book “The game” from Neil Strauss and started my journey. From events to events, clubs to clubs, my focus was on opening and talking to many women. My personal goal was not to sleep with the highest number of women, but it would be lying to say that what I did was right.

900._UY400_SS400_

Hence, let’s face it, I was just a hypocrite to myself. Unfortunately I was following the mainstream agenda whilst thinking I was red pill. I thought I understood women and I thought I found a solution to my issues and society issues. I couldn’t be more wrong.

The principle of pump and dump ,”relationship free life” are prints of Cultural Marxism. While thinking I was alt-right, anti-Islam, both of feets were in the leftist agenda. Having many girls is surely fun, but it is foremost a contribution to the destruction of Western Civilization. Indeed, both men and women suffer greatly from these short term adventures. Women lose their femininity and their aptitude to love, while guys lose the love for women, seeing them as toys and trophies. Not counting the invested time with fake friends. Love, family become old fashioned child dreams; it is not just by chance that most PUA’s remain single and do not make children, nor have a stable family. In addition, through repetitive pain, women accept the myth that all white men are useless bastards, that family is not needed, and finally they become bitchier and bitchier. Ask yourself: how good is it to be altRight, conservative, but to play the cultural Marxist agenda? Look at these pictures, and tell me exactly how we will protect the western civilization from its replacement?

 

Second, the PUA’s community tells you – at subconscious level – that you are not good enough to get a good and hot women. It tells you about the myth of the alpha male. For instance, Chateau explains how alpha males get a woman to cook, do everything for them, never complain and simply succumb to his authority; forgetting her bitching nature. Beautiful. Yet, I haven’t met one self made man like that in a long – term relationship that I would describe as a model for society – EVER (that includes ZFG Alpha males who can get basically any girl). It means that reality is not as they describe it. In real life, all of us are products of 1) our biology (beauty, intelligence, emotions, etc.) and 2) the environment in which we grew and now live. So, we have little to no control over our real SMV (sexual market value), but also on our instinctive behaviors. Sure, we can increase the likelihood of meeting a good mate, and fine tune ourselves, but that’s barely it. And to do this, you don’t need to be a PUA.

So, what is an alpha for women? It is no rocket science, and all men and women know if a man can or not have sexual success. It is simply a fun guy who fits the mainstream standards. In 1940, it was the SS officer, yesterday, it was the quarterback, and today it is a Latino or an Arab. Standards just reflect what women see through Facebook, TV, music clip. Therefore, you won’t become these if you are not born like that – it is that simple. Besides, is that what a man is: adapt yourself to women’s will, have no confidence in who you are and keep trying to change? Let’s be honest, 99.9% of white males who are no “alpha” according to society standards and won’t be. It is like that.

So, the problem with the so called altRight gamer alpha males is that they make them build an illusion about themselves, their environment and the world. Their friends are superficials. Their girls are no wife. And time spent never comes back. Being a gamer is not constructive. It doesn’t make you any better at all. It barely shows you what you can already do. You are not proving anything but that you lack self confidence, moral values and determination in life.

So, what do we recommend? Be yourself and focus on what you can do. Do not focus your life on women and do not evaluate your value using the women you are with. It doesn’t matter if you have many women or not because in the end you only need one. Drink less, party less, and work more. Spend time on doing what you want, or figuring it out. And concerning women, just be a man; stand for your ideas, for your tribe and make yourself respected. You do not have to use any tricks to get a good girl, nor to lie to her and even less to change your ideas. Just be yourself and believe in what you believe. Society needs good men who build and defend moral principles as well as they build a stable family. Don’t even aim to be a father, aim to be a Grand father, because your job ends when you have grand children, meaning that you properly raised your own children. Remember that if all white males stand up against the old system, women will align and come back to us, without any game. And PUA’s will just become social rejects.

The alpha myth

Are you an alpha male? Do you think you are worth enough to be part of the myth?

Having been introduced to the PUA community, I had time to notice the adulation of this community for the myth of the alpha male. Just like Christians believe in god, they believe in their own divinity: the Alpha male, the man every women want.

Yet this myth is profoundly unhealthy for anyone out there. Sure it enables Neil Strauss, Roosh, RSD and other groups to make a living, but beyond this I would like to point out the truth and the lies in the so called “game”: To reduce manhood to the modern cultural Marxism definition. These superficial concepts are dangerous for both people and society.

Entering the PUA’s community is more or less thinking that you are some kind of loser who needs a guru to get a good woman. It is to assume that you can change your entire personality and become a Casanova. It is to assume that the problem is YOU. This couldn’t be further than the truth. What would a woman thinks of you if she knew that you need to become better to get her?

You can certainly evolve a bit, learn some tricks, but not much more. Your brain is hard wired after 25 years old and there is no way you can acquire significant behavioral changes. Before starting to think you are a piece of garbage, get some self confidence and do something with your life. Undertaking a life project is much more important than picking up girls in mass. PUAs are just another establishment’s concept of cultural Marxism which is meant to destroy the last remains of masculinity in European societies. By hanging out in clubs looking for the next bimbo you  are actually both destroying yourself and women. Think about it: is it really worth going out? drinking? Partying and getting laid? Do you think this is your man purpose? Or it rather is remains of some reptilian, primitive and uncivilized instinct?

The truth is that “the person who you are” is already enough. Women have 2 purpose: make / raise babies and support civilization. Chastity of women and preservation of  female duty are necessary not only to maintain a healthy society but also assuring the evolution of the latter. Of course don’t be a full out beta male: Don’t flatter women relentlessly and try to demonstrate your social skills, or show the last Neil Strauss magic trick: be a Man. Stands for what a man stands: identity, family, Western values, society, religion… Be a builder, a protector. Be sharp, be smart, be strong and more importantly put those who mess around back to where they belong (starting from PUAs).

In modern society an alpha is just a myth. Women actually tend to do what they are told to do. If it is to fuck latino’s, and get horny on Enrique, they will. Society tells them blacks are fun and honest people, they will believe it no matter what. And it has nothing to do with you. So your only purpose is to be a reference, to lead by example, to be strong enough to shake  and wake those girls up. All else doesn’t matter.

Some women are fucked up and you cant do nothing about it. Your mission is to find a good young healthy one, make children with her and become a good grand father. Protect her, raise your kids, and stop trying to pick up girls massively. Once you know what you want and what you need, just go and take it. The rest will just get you lost into delusions.