Going to the East? Think twice.

Last night, I was reading the story of a Canadian man who left everything behind at the age of 34 to start over in Poland and ended up ruined, sick and unable to go back 16 years later. One life, gone. A victim of white genocide (may God hear his pain and help him. May his friends support him).

What is troubling is that many young white men could find themselves in the same position as they look at Eastern countries as their potential salvation, a modern day Eden. They hope to find a wife in Poland and a place of hope, a place they can call home. Somehow they see Eastern countries (in particular Poland and Russia) as the guardian of Western civilization. They believe that Eastern people have a certain understanding of what is happening in the West and that they will show compassion for what is happening there.

It seems they think that Eastern people are welcoming them waving little flags where it is written “please take my girlfriend and my job”. Or  maybe they think that Poland (or Russia) is ready to fight for the greatness of France, Germany, Belgium, England or Sweden.  They think that they will tolerate the creation of Western neighborhood in their own cities, where westerners can finally have a wife, a family and a home. While it can be true for few exception, but a big no to the rule!

They actually couldn’t be further from the truth as they fail to understand that Eastern Europeans couldn’t care less. They are, after all, nationalists. True nationalists. One blood, one soil, one culture and one language.

If you ain’t like us, you ain’t part of the crew and your children won’t either.

Why do I believe this? For two reasons:

1) no-one cares about Western people at all but Westerners,
2) there is no home but your homeland and it is your responsability to defend it. There ain’t no people but your people. Just because you are sharing the same skin color doesn’t make it otherwise.

Of course, Eastern Europeans should help us. They should consider our common ancestry, genetics, culture and religion. But they won’t and anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool. Whether it is for a job, a promotion, a bonus, you don’t stand a chance. There are exceptions, sure but you might not be one of them. You’ll always come last, even for social events.

So. To those seeking the Eastern Holy Grail, I wish you the best. But be warned that heaven might turn out to be hell.

Take care of you, and hold on. The storm will end in any case.

Sophie Tanner, a typical SJW idiot

Sophie Tanner is one those women who has been corrupted by the political agenda of the Left.

Christian values are very clear: one man, one woman. But for SJWs, this is too easy (or probably too difficult). For this reason,  for  a free and emancipated woman, what is the ultimate goal? To boast your own self until you believe – as does every SJW – that your words are higher than the Word of God.

“When asked if divorce would ever be on the cards, Sophie said: ‘Marrying yourself is a lifelong commitment to be responsible for your own happiness, so divorce is not an option.’”

How Laughable, divorcing yourself.

And God has a way of punishing them. He turns them into eternally unsatisfied crybabies, waiting for big daddy to give them a slap on the face. Worse even, into crazy psychotic people, zombies. Yup, SJWs have much in common with zombies: ugly dwellers looking for the next host to infect and exploit, barely speaking anything understandable.

Sophie, you are an example of what women should not be. Thank you for leading by example.

SJWs Hypocrisy: The list.

This statement is obvious but the list just keep going on and on. When an ideology is based on lies, its followers cannot help but being a bunch of hypocrites. So without further ado here is the non exhaustive list of their hypocritical statements:

Feel free to submit more hypocritical SJWs statements to @patriargate on Twitter, GAB and Minds.

EU migration is a joke

The European Commission is the executing organisation of the EU. Its goal is to spend the money that the council (meeting of all EU leaders) has decided.

Every year it has about 150 bn euro to spend. It has general directorates in charge of individual policies, the one for borders and security being “home and affairs“. None of the employees were ever elected and are considered as god living since they are the key to the “golden EU funds”.

As on the picture, they had about 10 billions euros over 5 years (not a lot for protecting borders) and they already give away 7 billions euros to migrants. In any case their main goal is to have a more Open Europe, and that is rather contradictory with “borders” and “security”.

Add to this the 18 billions euros given to the Open Society by George Soros, and you feel how much money goes to the destruction of Europe and USA. If you wanna put names and faces to this process, help yourself:

Jesus tells us something interesting

This is a simple story that I want to share with you.

I have nothing against Jews as a whole and this blog doesn’t support nor propagate hate. Only order, norms and justice. On the contrary, we need Jews to help Christians, today.

We, as the creation of god, must understand what Jesus told us. In the Bible (Jean 8, the truth comes from god):

And Jesus told the Jews: “you do not worship god, you do not believe. For those who believe they can’t lie. And you lie. Therefore you worship the god of lies, the evil”.

Then the Jews split between Christians and between Jews of today.

Does god allow race mixing?

God created the universe and all the creatures inhabiting it. The evolution theory has its limit in the complexity of beings. Indeed, genetic mutations do not occur so easily, nor frequently. And when they do, it is in an isolated place, a harsh environment and few tribe members; it is unlikely that the mutation will be transmitted. Let’s remember that most mutation actually cause diseases.

Therefore even a mathematical simulation of the genetic mutation from a bacteria to the gorilla and to the man doesn’t stand. Dots are missing.

On the other hand, the universe is full of constants on which everything relies on. The quantum physics ends with the hypothesis of a multi-dimensional world, or … that we all live in some sort of matrix. Add to this the miracles that have occurred and still occuring today. We all live small miracles everyday. Jesus said:

“The words of god is the life”

Traduction: the simple fact of living is the most resonating speech god can give to you. Your life is a miracle.

From science to religion, only one thing makes sense, and that is that god is the creator of all and everything. When you understand this, you also understand that god doesn’t want us to destroy what he created. On the contrary, god says to Enoch “these who do not know will be cursed”. Can we assume that god created intelligence to give him what belongs to him?

In any case, god, we assume, must be against race mixing. And the bible states:

Deuteronomy 23:2 ESV / 87

“No one born of a forbidden union may enter the assembly of the Lord. Even to the tenth generation, none of his descendants may enter the assembly of the Lord.

Deuteronomy 7:3-4 ESV / 77

You shall not intermarry with them, giving your daughters to their sons or taking their daughters for your sons, for they would turn away your sons from following me, to serve other gods. Then the anger of the Lord would be kindled against you, and he would destroy you quickly.

Leviticus 19:19 ESV / 61

“You shall keep my statutes. You shall not let your cattle breed with a different kind. You shall not sow your field with two kinds of seed, nor shall you wear a garment of cloth made of two kinds of material.

Job 14:4 ESV / 51

Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? There is not one.

Deuteronomy 7:3 ESV

You shall not intermarry with them, giving your daughters to their sons or taking their daughters for your sons,

Acts 17:26 ESV / 44

And he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place

To me, that makes it clear: race mixing is not part of Christianity. As it seems, a Christian sticks to its race, else he is not Christian, nor Jew. So that means that the key to our civilization is definitely Christianity in its full model, not the Christianity 2.0 we were sold as children and still currently being sold by the current pope.

Remember, in the absence of light, the darkness prevails.

Does feminism have 2 faces?

What conservatives and liberals mostly fail to identify is: what is a true feminist? Some will say it is a “business woman”, some others a “gold digger”.

Trials after trials, The manosphere tries to define what is a “good girl“. As Vox and the Alpha Game say:

Alpha Game: And … as feminism pushes … to ever more absurd levels, as ever more restrictions are placed on normal masculine behavior, ever more insane definitions of ‘rape’, ‘assault’, and ‘aggression’ are drafted into law in increasingly desperate attempts to somehow, anyhow, cast women as perpetual victims … The sound of the final battle between the sexes will not be heard in the streets or legislatures. It will not be televised or reported. There will be no flags hoisted or victory parades. Because it is already in progress.

Vox: It’s pretty simple, women. Either abandon feminism or abandon all hope of being wives and mothers.

The origin of feminism resides in the concept of “oppressor – oppressed”. Its goal is to win a pseudo sex war, where men and women are in competition for power and resources; in opposition with the Christian principle of sexual complementary. The weapons of men are clear: strength and intelligence. The ones of women: guilt and beauty. As it is a quest for power and resources, there are two means to obtain these: sex and so called “rights”. Conservatism and liberalism.

The spectrum of true feminism is spread from the feminine conservative solipsistic girl to the sexually ostracized LGBT working woman:

  • The hyper feminine, sexy and apparently conservative woman uses the traditional roles of men and women to maximize her profits. Instead of taking full responsibility for her role (keeping the house in check, support of the husband, taking care of children etc.), she will tend to divide the house work with her man whilst also requesting all the “conservative advantages” of a traditional relationship. Hence she will wake up late, go to parties with “girls”, request a breakfast, ask you to clean the house but also to pay most of the expenditures. She could also be that single woman who sells conservative values while partying, having casual sex and even engaging in inter-racial relationships (e.g. Lauren Southern or Maga Pegowska). This type of girl uses men to access resources and openly uses her charm to get them. She cannot commit to a relationship unless it maximizes her hypergamic odds. She is a feminist because she doesn’t accept her female role in society but rather aims at getting resources for herself. She needs feminism and women privileges to exist, and therefore she is a feminist.
  • The working LGTB woman demanding more privileges is in a direct confrontation with the patriarchal model. She acts out of frustration and fear, and probably the absence of a good father. The societal model has convinced her that she is oppressed and that being an independent women is the way to be.

Sometimes these two models are in one woman, that is the ultimate woman you have to either set her straight either avoid her.

Hence our job (as men) is not only to discourage the “obvious feminists” (of the left) but also to set straight the so called conservative women using their charm to manipulate men. We can’t afford more loss for our kind. Men and women are only one when they are united. And feminism is the cancer that destroys trust, families and society.

So, which is to be considered the most dangerous? The working, blue hair overweight “I am not sure about my gender” feminist or the conservative “more vicious type” feminist?

That race mixing…

Race mixing is seen by the left as the future, as superior. And as usual, the mere fact of questioning this statement is labelled racist, xenophobic or white supremacist. But the question is relevant. Yet it is hard to find answers as studies concerning race and genetics are forbidden in Europe.

Concerning intelligence, some studies did find that mulattoes tend to score at mid level between blacks and whites. And the more mulattoes tend to have white ancestry, the smarter they usually are. As for achievements, mulattoes are clearly underrepresented in STEM fields. And this is probably the most accurate to measure race mixing.

Concerning physical capabilities, there are basically no studies. But again, whites, asian and blacks tend to dominate their own categories of game in the Olympic games. Mulattoes don’t find or barely find their place in other sports like crossfit or MMA neither.

What is worth noting is the stubbornness of the left to push the narrative of race-mixing as superior while labeling any critic “White supremacy” and ridicule any idea of other superiority. I don’t actually believe whites are generally superior, especially if we look at disparities between white ethnicities. Colour is not everything, on this I agree with leftists – but not for the same reasons. Yet white people did build Western Civilization. And therefore it can only make sense that whites have a genetic advantage in a civilization their ancestor build and devised.

From a genetic perspective, genes have different alleles and race mixing renders difficult the selection of genes that fit. The evolutionary process created alleles that fit the environment, and overall people to find a mate that is genetically close in order to maximise this evolutionary fit.

Finally, mullatoes will have to mix with either whites or blacks. On the long run, the proportion of white or black genes reduces, until none of the other remains (about 200 years). In other words, every mullato will become black, latino or arab in the long run – less whites than others, that’s pure elementary mathematics.

So in the end, nature in its ways WILL remove mullatoes. They are just a glitch in history.

Why does my baby look like an alien?

Don’t be like this English mother, nor like Magda Pegowska. The English mother says:

“She’s getting very dark, isn’t she?” This is what one of my friends recently said about my much adored – 12-week-old daughter.

She didn’t mean to be rude. But it was a comment that struck me with the force of a jab to the stomach. Immediately, I was overwhelmed by a confusion of emotions. I felt protective, insulted, worried, ashamed, guilty, all at once. The reason? My lovely, wriggly, smiley baby is mixed race. Now, I think of myself as pretty ‘right on’. My home is on the border of the London Republic of Hackney. I’ve been to the Notting Hill Carnival, even if I found the music a bit loud. Yet now I realise what a ‘white’ world I inhabit. I am white and I have two sons from my first marriage who are both milky complexioned and golden haired. My twin sister, who I spend a lot of time with, has a Danish partner. As a consequence, she has two boys who are also pale skinned and flaxen haired. Into this positively Scandinavian next generation, I have now injected a tiny, dark-skinned, dark-haired girl. To say she stands out is an understatement. My colouring and that of my children has never really been an issue before. However, three years ago I met the man who became my second husband and who is the father of my daughter. Although born in the UK, his parents came from India in the Sixties. This makes him British-Asian and our daughter mixed race. There is another more PC term for the plump little bundle I strap to my front. She is ‘dual heritage’. It’s a bit trendy, but I quite like it. It implies a pride in coming from two cultures, rather than the less attractive connotations of ‘mixed race’. The usual time something is labelled ‘mixed’ is when it’s a packet of nuts and they’ve bulked out the luxury cashews with cheaper peanuts. I’m not sure I want my daughter to be regarded as an adulterated version of some pure original. Still, it is the most accepted description. The truth is, whatever the label, the fact there is a label proves that my daughter’s conflicting parentage matters. At the more frothy end of the scale, mixed-race children are regarded as pretty dolls — white kids with a nice tan. When I was pregnant and people asked me about the child I was having, and I explained her father was Indian, they would often coo something along the lines of: “Ooh, she’s going to be beautiful!” as if I was discussing a new rose, made from an exotic cross-breeding programme. On a less benevolent level, mixed-race children can receive a hostile welcome from both white and black communities. Being neither one thing nor another may get you on the cover of Vogue, but it isn’t an easy way to make friends. Scroll down for more… {1} But this is 2007, surely things are more enlightened than that? I hope so, but I fear not. One reason for my fear is my own mixed reactions to my daughter. Don’t get me wrong, I love her. She is the child I didn’t think I’d have after my first marriage broke up. She is the only granddaughter in our family and we all dote on her. But when I turn to the mirror in my bedroom to admire us together, I am shocked. She seems so alien. With her long, dark eyelashes and shiny, dark brown hair, she doesn’t look anything like me. I know that concentrating on how my daughter looks is shallow. She is a person in her own right, not an accessory to me. But still, I can’t shake off the feeling of unease. I didn’t realise how much her looking different would matter and, on a rational level, I know it shouldn’t. But it does. Evolution demands that we have children to pass on our genes, hence the sense of pride and validation we get when we see our features reappearing in the next generation. With my daughter, I don’t have that. Do black fathers who marry white women and then have paler-skinned children feel my sense of loss? Or maybe Chinese mothers or Middle-Eastern grandparents grieve when they see a child they know to be their own, but whose features don’t reflect that? I worry that, as my daughter doesn’t look like me, people will assume she is adopted. After all, it’s all the rage in showbiz circles. Madonna famously scooped up a black child when she wanted to be a mother again and Angelina Jolie appears to be assembling a ‘pick ‘n’ mix’ of kids from different countries. It’s all very United Colours of Benetton, isn’t it? In the real world, I fear for my daughter’s sense of self. She has a tiny foot in two cultures. How will she negotiate a path between the two? I worry that my sons will feel less of a kinship with their sister because she is different, although there is no sign of that. As for myself, there is an inescapable status issue to address. White women who have non-white children are stigmatised as ‘Tracy Towerblocks’ living on benefits, most of which they spend on lager and fags. Even if I don’t fit this profile, my daughter’s difference definitely points out the fact that my children come from two different fathers. If I wanted to pass us off as a nice, neat nuclear family, she would blow my cover at once. But it is more than that. I am frightened, frightened of others’ reactions to her, as well as my own. I didn’t think of myself as racist and yet my daughter has shown me a side of myself about which I feel deeply uncomfortable. Even admitting to having mixed feelings about her not being blonde and blue eyed, I feel disloyal and incredibly guilty. I know the obvious comment is that I must have known how a child of our union would look when I married an Indian man, but it is a wise woman who thinks that far ahead when she falls in love. I didn’t think about any of this before I got pregnant. I wanted to have a baby. Her colour and culture were immaterial then. But self-flagellation is not useful. I have more pressing concerns. I am now the mother of a ‘black’ child, even if she is more the hue of weak tea than espresso. This is a role for which I am utterly unprepared. Part of me thinks I should be playing sitar music to her in her cot, mastering pakoras and serving them dressed in a sari, but that would be fantastically fake coming from me. When she was born, pale but with lots of dark hair, I asked the midwife if her eyes would stay blue. ‘Asian genes are very strong,’ she said in what I took to be an ominous tone. No more Brady Bunch kids for me. The midwife has been proved right and every day my baby’s eyes get a little darker. Even so, when she looks up at me as I feed her, my heart melts. My love may not be colour blind, but hers is, and that is truly humbling.”

May god hear you and stop this insanity. As you see, in the absence of light, darkness prevails.