Eurovision Israël 2018: a devilish SJW hymn

The winner of Eurovision 2018 is … Israël! The song “Toy” is nothing else but an SJW anti-Christian devilish live worship. The singer, Netta Barzilai, is a failed SJW fusion of the angel of Gluttony, the angel of Sex and the angel of Death (humor). Anyway, sad to note that Israël – a country built on strong religious belief – ends up demonstrating its worship for Satan itself instead of being the leader of morality. This being said, I don’t think most Jews even realise what happened in their religion. I don’t think they are guilty, but rather the herd of sheep following the wolves. So let’s pray for them to see the light and hear those words, because after all, we do not wish them anything bad:

Romans 2:28-29 Amplified Bible, Classic Edition (AMPC)
28 For he is not a [real] Jew who is only one outwardly and publicly, nor is [true] circumcision something external and physical.

29 But he is a Jew who is one inwardly, and [true] circumcision is of the heart, a spiritual and not a literal [matter]. His praise is not from men but from God.

What for yourself the SJW devil in live:

As Haaretz notes:

Co-written by Doron Medalie and Stav Berger, “Toy” garnered an impressive following of over 17 million views on YouTube and even hit the No. 1 spot on Spotify Israel. The winning song is also featured on the iTunes hit parade at home and in Europe.

Thanking the audience for their vote, the 25-year-old singer praised their choice to accept diversity and for choosing something different. Afterwards, she proclaimed her victory by screaming: “I love my country, next year in Jerusalem,” and concluded by saying “Thank you, Europe!”

Netta from Israel celebrates after winning the Eurovision song contest in Lisbon, Portugal, Saturday, May 12, 2018 during the Eurovision Song Contest grand final.

People celebrate in Tel Aviv the winning of the Eurovision Song Contest by Israel's Netta, May 12, 2018.

The lyrics also speak for themselves, with few extracts here:

Look at me, I’m a beautiful creature
I don’t care about your “modern time preachers

Hey, I think you forgot how to play

I’m taking my Pikachu home
You’re stupid just like your smartphone

Wonder Woman don’t you ever forget
You’re divine and he’s about to regret

You stupid boy (Stupid boy)
I’ll take you down now, I’ll make you watch me

(Cululoo, cululoo) Wedding bells ringing
(Cululoo, cululoo) Money men bling-bling

I believe that the “modern time preacher” is nothing else but the followers of the Christ and/or the last standing strong conservatives who praise fidelity, temperance, respect, free will, etc. In brief, the opposite of a totalitarian SJW. I know that many of you still believe that Jesus was a hippie, precursor of SJWs and defender of modern liberalism… but not really. At least, at the level of chastity and marriage, Jesus notes:

Mark 10:2-12
Some Pharisees came up to Jesus, testing Him, and began to question Him whether it was lawful for a man to divorce a wife. And He answered and said to them, “What did Moses command you?” They said, “Moses permitted a man TO WRITE A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE AND SEND her AWAY.” read more.
But Jesus said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart he wrote you this commandment. “But from the beginning of creation, God MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE. “FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH; so they are no longer two, but one flesh. “What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.” In the house the disciples began questioning Him about this again. And He said to them, “Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery.”

‘You shall not commit adultery.

Matthew 5:27-28
“You have heard that it was said, ‘YOU SHALL NOT COMMIT ADULTERY’; but I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

Besides, the song itself is an hymn to the abuse of men – a subliminal message to all women: seduce a man, enslave him, marry him, and take his money. An hymn to sexual immorality. A representation of gluttony. And, in the middle, a waving cat – the derived Japanese representation for the goddess of mercy – most likely to avoid hell. Ironic?

As a Christian, let’s simply note that this song is the expression of Nihilist Hedonism. According to Haaretz, the song is liked (read good) because it shows how much people love “diversity“.  Should we see a subtle confession of their (successful attempt) to jeopardise a TV Show for the liberal left agenda? When looking at the second place of Eurovision 2018, maybe. But it won’t change the fact that diversity is a devilish concept that shortens the words “cultural marxism”, rooted in the division of people and dictatorship through “political correctness”.

Christian values, Christianity, how you were lied to

Most people tell me they don’t believe in religions, but what they do not understand is how they are both feets in, whatever they like or not. Mass immigration, interracial relationships, feminism, forgiveness, tolerance, fornication, drinking, etc. Major topics drawing the line in the sand between left and right, but also the shape of the new religion: Cultural Marxist Hedonism, which we could also call Nihilist Hedonism. Yet, for everyone the blame goes on the Christians. Seen as guilty, stupid or as a useful idiot, the Christian is the comfortable scapegoat of the moment, since he is the only one not to hit back.

Image result for christian cuck

Before anything, I am not a priest, nor a theologian, but it happens that I was blessed with the gift of reading, and thinking! And in any case it doesn’t take a genius to note how biblical verses have been jeopardized for political reasons. Few minutes listening to most priests in fact make me nervous for their words resonate like MSM, with a touch of liberal cherry picked Biblical bullshit. In particular, the one verse every western Christian has been repeated all his childhood:

You have heard that it was said, “An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.” But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who begs from you, and do not refuse the one who would borrow from you.

In a nutshell, taken out of context, and for useful idiots Christian 2.0: “dear devil, come and piss on my head, then fuck my wife, and that’s ok, you can piss on my other cheek now”.

Image result for christian cuck

Yet…

I know that some of you are already blabbering “go fuck yourself with your Abrahamic shit; you ain’t even a native English speaking man”. Most likely clever guys who read all Roman and Greek philosophy, the entire Bible (multiple times), speak Aramaic, Syriac, Coptic, Latin, Greek, German, French, Russian etc. Geniuses who do not write a book because it would be too much for everyone. For the rest of the common mortals who are open-minded enough to read, think and discuss, they will just agree that Jesus – in gospels and in history – was much more complex that the few sentences attributed to him in satanic Churches. Indeed, there are too many historic documents, apocryphal gospels and scriptures to judge so fast. In a nutshell, using Jesus as a complete liberal idiot to justify a cultural Marxist, hedonist, or pagan agenda is either full of ignorance, either dishonest. Neither of those is Christian, nor Greco-Roman, nor Pagan. Likely, as Bart D. Ehrman describes, Jesus was not what he was described, but who cares? Because whether you believe in god or not doesn’t really matters, even for Jesus:

Therefore I say to you, any sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven people, but blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven. “Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come.

And…

According to the Epistle to the Galatians: “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. The fruit is contrasted with the Works of the Flesh.

I let you reflect on the meaning. At least for me, it is clear that the holy spirit is the spiritual representation of god, part of us and part of the world. In short, Jesus doesn’t care for who you believe in or not, but rather for who you are and what you do. A personal philosophy before all, but nothing astonishing when you know that Christianity is an aggregate of the philosophies of the Roman and Greek heritage. As Dawkins – one of the biggest atheist and evolutionist savant, opposed to Christianity but strangely agnostic supporter of Judaism – notes:

At least, the simple fact that the most powerful people in this world are religious – but not Christian, matters. And the simple fact that numerous journalists are Jewish themselves proves that the MSM critics towards Christianity are not totally objective, else equal (if not more) amount of articles against Judaism and Islam should be produced.  Honestly, when was the last time you read in a newspaper “Judaism by default is gone”. Does it sound even a little bit anti-Semitic? This being said, I don’t blame Jews, nor Muslims. Social groups, meta-programs are what they are – memes as Howard Bloom names them.

Hence, the key question here is not god but rather the political instrumentation of a philosophy of life in order to foster a change of values in society, and centralise the power/resources of the hands of the few. I intend here to show how Christian values ARE NOT the problem, and how Christianity – a traditional version – is closer to the solution than the problem. So let’s talk about Christian core values, not spiritual beliefs.

The roots of the Christian values are called the 4 cardinal virtues and were introduced by Plato in the the Republic. They are the following:

  1. Prudence: Aristotle defined prudence as recta ratio agibilium, “right reason applied to practice.” It is the virtue that allows us to judge correctly what is right and what is wrong in any given situation. In short, before acting, you should think.
  2. Justice: while we often use justice in a negative sense (“He got what he deserved”), justice in its proper sense is positive. Injustice occurs when we as individuals or by law deprive someone of that which he is owed. Legal rights can never outweigh natural ones.
  3. Fortitude: Fortitude allows us to overcome fear and to remain steady in our will in the face of obstacles, but it is always reasoned and reasonable; the person exercising fortitude does not seek danger for danger’s sake. Prudence and justice are the virtues through which we decide what needs to be done; fortitude gives us the strength to do it.
  4. Temperance: temperance is the restraint of our desires or passions. Food, drink, and sex are all necessary for our survival, individually and as a species; yet a disordered desire for any of these goods can have disastrous consequences, physical and moral.

Already here, you note that these values are quite opposed to cultural Marxism and liberalism, which open the path to nihilism, amorality and hedonism. Unlike Marxism which primarily focuses on economic inequalities and economic classes, Cultural Marxism see culture as a main cause for many different kinds of inequalities:

  • Race (Whites/non-Whites)
  • Culture (Western/non-Western)
  • Family (nuclear family/non-nuclear family)
  • Religion (Christianity/atheism and religious minorities)
  • Gender (men/women)
  • Sexual orientation (heterosexual/LGBT)

On the other hand, liberalism leads to hedonism. The breaking of religion – Christianity only in the west, since Judaism was never attacked – without its replacement with the Greco-Roman foundations leaves the door open to what is called the “devil” in Christianity. In short:

  • Prudence is replaced by consumption and impatience
  • Justice is replaced by equality, which is itself split into race-culture-family-religion-gender-sexual orientation. A good person – the Just – is therefore a liberal, and the devil is a White-Western-Married-Christian-Man-Straight.
  • Fortitude is replaced by individualism where any reason is good enough to leave the responsibility on others, and where excuses are given for not having any discipline (e.g. obesity)
  • Temperance is replaced by over-consumption where the instant satisfaction is essential and constantly increasing (e.g. Facebook, Tinder, alcohol, drugs, obesity)

The virtues were then translated into the 7 heavenly virtues in light of the 7 sins, as showed here:

As you see, Christian virtues origin from basic sins. They are called “virtues”, and to some extent are based on Stoicism. Yes, as the German theologian Bruno Bauer shows, Christianity owes more to Greco-Roman philosophy than Judaism. Hard hit for the 19th which cost him his job at the university of Bonn.

These virtues are attributes that every real Christian tries to develop inside him in order to become a better person. So, let’s go one by one and expose how the current Christianity 2.0 is not aligned with the core Christian values, and therefore not Christian at all.

  1. Chastity: this value derives from the sexual morality in the Bible. One should focus on higher things than sex, for both men and women. Chastity is opposed to fornication, a precept in fact fostered by Freud (Jewish) and Kinsey but supported today by the universal sexual rights. I believe that today everyone can see how sexual liberation has led to a world of injustice and the disintegration of the family unit.
  2. Temperance: setting personal boundaries to your own desires. It is not based on death sentence, but on free will. It is about not abusing of our physical impulses. And today is exactly the opposite. Consumption is a goal per se for the masses. Profits, hedonism.
  3. Charity: the free and individual choice of helping other individuals. As such, it is completely opposed to a system taking by force your hard earned money. In fact, taking advantage of others, taking the benefits of someone else’s work is contrary to Christian values. The same goes for usury, and this is also where Christians split with Jewish laws, where usury is allowed, but only towards non Jews. So, our abusive financial and socialist system doesn’t derive from Christianity, but in fact, is opposed to it.
  4. Diligence: hedonism encourages de facto the minimisation of effort to satisfy one’s pleasure. You should have everything, now. The notions of investment and discipline are exactly the opposite of what the western society is today.
  5. Patience: again, our hedonistic society is not patient. Companies have no leadership, preferring diversity and pretty colourful slides to the patience required to build something strong and real. Short term gains are privileged over long term investment. Like a child cries instantly, the modern woman screams and now uses the #metoo as a tool to sue innocent men. In terms of relationships, tinder, badoo and Facebook are mere symptoms of an impatient and hedonistic society. Again, Christianity has nothing to do there.
  6. Kindness: for Christians, valuing what we have and what we receive is essential. But also showing kindness to people. Yet, that doesn’t mean supporting your own genocide, helping theft or letting anyone step on you. The Christian has a duty to oppose what is bad. Ever heard about the Just War? Our society is not based on kindness, it is based on the extraction of resources from white men to others. There is absolutely no Christianity in it, quite on the opposite.
  7. Humility: a Christian respects the achievements of others. He seeks not to take pride in what other did, nor to take advantage of the weak. How does our totalitarian leftist system show humility? Through anti-discrimination laws?

In addition, these values have to be applied with consistency. Cherry picking is what Catholicism 2.0 has been doing now and then, and I repeat it: that ain’t Christian, nor Greco-Roman.

So, I invite you, Christian or not, to reflect on these values and to decide for yourself if you agree with them values or not. Think about them, and decide for yourself if you think that they represent exactly what is missing in our society. Honestly, if these values and links can lead you to personal conclusions, I am happy. I don’t intend saying here that I have all answers. In any case, Christianity is a reflection of the Greco-Roman values, and its facets are multiple. It is a personal faith before all that is NOT RESPONSIBLE for what happens now. Its tolerance was jeopardised to change it into Nihilism and Hedonism, which ARE THE RESPONSIBLES. So, hitting on Christianity won’t solve the issue, it will make it graver. On the contrary, a return to traditional values would improve drastically our social condition, at many levels.

In any case, Christianity is a (Juedo)-Greco-Roman philosophy of life that can guide us during our personal reflections, but also when we need to choose a path. Its political usage has to be distinguished from its philosophical foundations, for opposing it drastically without a sound and self-reflected alternative might result in personal and societal nihilism.

Feminist admits publicly how she cucked her husband

The cultural Marxist shitshow “minute of truth” featured another “normal western woman”, married under the dogma of feminism. Watch for yourself:

So basically, she cheated on her husband, multiple times and she doesn’t feel sorry for it. She seems to be proud of it even! She would marry her ex boyfriend, in front of her husband. She would destroy her family, her husband, just to satisfy the temptation inside her. Sad.

Are we supposed to say “Yes” to this and forgive, even as a Christian?

Redemption comes when someone asks for forgiveness and is ready to make – profound and concrete – sacrifices not to commit AGAIN the same mistake. But here is totally the opposite. In any case, he forgiveness of the heart doesn’t prevent the strict hands of justice.

More scary, this is what society tells women to do: fuck, fuck, fuck, and get your emotional pussy aroused by any other means. And you get bored, just switch on Tinder and fuck. A feminized world without a glance of morality, nor humanity I would say.

Anyway, what really saddens me is this picture:

He tries to consolate her while she feels so “emotionally charged” by what happened. At that level of cuckery, I will just say “poor man”. I wish for him all the best, to remain strong and not to collapse under the weight of reality when he realises what happened.

And the shows rolls on.

Social media and Cocaine

People spend a lot of time on social media. Some to chat, some to watch videos, others just to get attention. It doesn’t matter what you do, it impacts your life, just like anything else.

A recent study in fact analysed the problem seriously and reached the conclusion that social media addiction is similar to the usage of hard drugs. And for a very specific reason: they create a dopamine loop in our brain, which provokes addiction. This is why Facebook, Instagram are so addictive for most people – in particular women.

Extract:

The study findings revealed that when not allowed to check their texts or emails, or connect to digital technology in any way, participants developed withdrawal symptoms typically seen in people addicted to cigarettes or other substances. Many study participants said they felt like they were trying to kick a hard drug habit or going on a strict diet.

When a person uses the stimulant cocaine, it affects the central nervous system, including the brain. It stimulates neurotransmitter receptors in the brain’s reward center with a huge surge of dopamine — an organic feel-good chemical, or neurotransmitter. This release of dopamine is much more abundant than normal, giving the user a rapid rush of energy and sensation of pleasure that radiates through their nervous system. This rewarding pleasure leads them to desire more cocaine so they can sustain or repeat the sensation. The desire for more can lead to addiction in a relatively short time.

In a similar way, smartphones and other technological devices can become addictive because they activate this same neurological reflex: Whenever a person receives a timely response to a text or an Instagram post, they feel a surge of pleasure and reward — the neurotransmitter receptors in the brain’s reward center release dopamine and make them feel good. If they repeat this behavior — compulsively posting messages or sending texts and receiving the “reward” of instant responses — their dopamine levels rise even higher and their brains send the message that this is a good activity. They don’t want to stop, or find it increasingly difficult to tear themselves away from their digital world.

So yes, social media are extremely destructive. But what no-one did is to link this dopamine cycle with its actual consequences or potential use.

In fact, dopamine is also an excellent catalyst for learning and programming behaviours. This cycle is used to train dogs, but also human without them knowing it. The reward seeking loop strengthens rewarding behaviours and sanctions non complying ones. For instance, you can reward people on their belief (likes on liberal ideas) and punish them on others (dislikes on conservative content). The study summarises:

Dopaminergic neurons of the midbrain are the main source of dopamine (DA) in the brain. DA has been shown to be involved in the control of movements, the signaling of error in prediction of reward, motivation, and cognition. Cerebral DA depletion is the hallmark of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Other pathological states have also been associated with DA dysfunction, such as schizophrenia, autism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children, as well as drug abuse. DA is closely associated with reward-seeking behaviors, such as approach, consumption, and addiction. Recent researches suggest that the firing of DA neurons is a motivational substance as a consequence of reward-anticipation. This hypothesis is based on the evidence that, when a reward is greater than expected, tthemhe firing of certain DA neurons increases, which consequently increases desire or motivation towards the reward.

Add to this the natural neural learning process which is based on message repetition: repeat the same thing all the time, and for your brain, it becomes the truth. You don’t have to be a genius to understand what an addictive platform based on dopamine can do for influencing your political views, but also your behaviour. Hence the repetition of the following political messages:

All these messages have as common root “freedom through the appeasing of one’s individual pulsions and feelings”. A feminized society in short, where freedom is the absence of choice and the slavery to one’s desire. What a freedom, indeed. What a logic, indeed.

But to the extreme, these messages become radical truth for people and derive in very real terrorism, namely Antifa, BLM and hardcore Femen. They also derive in total paranoia, for instance the TV show “handmaid’s tale“.

Extract from thinking fast and slow, Daniel Kahneman:

Our brain assesses norms on the basis of its neural programming. At neuronal level absolute truth makes no sense, hence the commonly accepted saying “the relative truth”. From a religious perspective, it would contradict free will. From an evolution perspective, we could not adapt without the possibility of programming our brain.

Yet, of course, the world has its very real truth which is there and obvious. And our shitlib society inverted the truth thanks to its abundance of resources.

For example, a wife can cheat on her husband and get away with it. In nature, the truth is that a lonely female has no chance to survive. Here, in a modern society, she can. But not for long, and not happily. The disconnection between the feminist discourse and reality generates high intensity unconscious cognitive dissonance. This practically results in hysteric disorders, anxiety, bipolarity and/or depression, addiction. Same goes for men. To assert my explanation, I attach here some statistics per gender:

As you see, our society is mentally sick. Someone who never took drugs nor alcohol and is mentally healthy is today rather rare. And these social media are for something into this, by unconsciously – or willingly – rewarding destructive behaviors before all. At least that is what we can observe, but also what Cuckenberg is accused of doing.

The more we talk, the more we understand each other

I thought that this picture reflects pretty well what is happening in the west.

The more we talk, the more we understand each other

Am I an extremist to say that conservative values and speech should be heard and considered without encountering violence?

What is wrong with what is being defended, honestly:

  • Family
  • European cultures
  • Christianity
  • Healthy lifestyle
  • Homogeneous ethnic society, like Morocco, China or India
  • Free speech
  • Biological differences between men and women
  • Peace

Really, how can anyone get offended by someone who wants peace and such elementary concepts ?

Feminists admit to condemn reality based on fiction

The website “wearyourvoicemag” published a feminist article on the basis of the TV show “the handmaid tale”. The first time I saw this TV show, I couldn’t think about anything else but the impact it would have on the women I know. I already feared the consequences on me for things I don’t do nor ever done, nor support. So, I switched it off. And I was right.

Fiction is now a solid basis for protesting against a fictive oppressor in the real word. If you are guilty in a TV show, that is apparently enough for some people to condemn you very concretely – for things that you could do in a less likely hypothetical future. Indeed, let’s remind the world that feminism and the end of slavery were brought by white Christian males.

Reproductive rights is a subject that is central to the politics of white feminism because it is the second most prominent fight that it has historically engaged with, the first being voting rights for white women. It has always been understood as advocacy for the right to birth control and access to safe, legal abortion options as part of one’s ability to plan pregnancies and families on one’s own terms. In short, for able-bodied and able-minded white people, it has been primarily about the right to not be pregnant.

Considering the historical context of eugenics, scientific racism, and certain state-sanctioned violences, reproductive justice for non-whites would largely be quite the opposite. For many, it would instead be the ability to bear and nurture one’s own children without government interference or barriers created through white supremacy and systemic oppression

Until here, even if I totally disagree with this intellectual ground which is a total fallacy and a denial of individual responsibility in life, we were still at the exit door of rationality, still building logical foundation for the next discourse on the basis of virtue signaling. Now comes the fantasy:

Distinguished by their red robes and white bonnets, Handmaids are forced into slavery, repeatedly violated, impregnated, and made to give birth to children that are immediately taken to serve the interests of others. Essentially, The Handmaid’s Taledepicts cis white women stripped of the ability to bear and nurture one’s own children without government interference or barriers created through white supremacy and systemic oppression. This is a position that they have never seen themselves depicted in, and it terrifies them.

White feminists identify so strongly with The Handmaid’s Tale because it is a show about white women in slavery. They see clear connections between its horrors and the current state of U.S. politics. They see it as an omen. As a call to action.

So, as they state clearly, a TV show is solid ground for a call action – which means violence. Today’s feminists are so mentally sick, that in order to nourish their privileges, their quest now crosses the gates of fantasy to justify violence on white males.

Put it in other words, you take a camera and pay a white woman to slap a white man and write a scene. You film it and publish it on youtube. Then, a couple of days after, the government would use your video as a “solid ground” for punishing all white women in the real world.

Besides, what worries me is the impact of fiction on people – here women. It seems here that many aren’t now capable of distinguishing reality from fiction. This means that whatever they watch on TV, Facebook, etc. is very real for them. Because let’s be clear, white women are not oppressed by white extremists, who most of the time are just traditional Christian men who want a good peaceful family ostracized by a very real totalitarian “liberal” society. Haven’t we gone too far with TV and media? Maybe reducing it and reading the bible instead would prevent much violence.

When you can start punishing people on the basis of fiction, you certainly reached some kind of dogmatic idiocratic limit. Feminism has become a religion.

Yet, Another pussy pass

They say women are persecuted.

They say women are equal to men.

They say women are not violent.

Yet, another proof to support their false narrative:

A STUDENT stabbed her boyfriend with a kitchen knife and bit a cop after a furious row over a radiator.

Emily Coldrick, from Cambridge, knifed her partner in the shoulder as they hosted a party at her house.

A STUDENT stabbed her boyfriend with a kitchen knife and bit a cop after a furious row over a radiator.

Emily Coldrick, from Cambridge, knifed her partner in the shoulder as they hosted a party at her house.

But when she appeared in court she admitted causing grievous bodily harm (GBH) without intent in relation to the stabbing, assault by beating, and resisting an officer in the execution of their duty.

The Cambridge News reports defence lawyer Claire Matthews told the court: “She was suffering from an extreme panic attack and the biting was taking place as they were trying to lift her. This wasn’t a deliberate attack.”

Yeah, so leftist women launch (sex) parties at their place in the hope of cheating once again their cucked boyfriend, and eventually they end up with a panic attack that tries to kill him. Remember that women are NEVER responsible. Cars, chocolate, knives, or even YOU, but never them.

Anyway, the hotter the girl, the more careful you should be. Treat these hotties like a 20MT nuclear bomb in your hands.

Not guilty!

White knights and gamma males, same story

A long time ago, long before Cuckenberg was put in the spot light for his abusive use of our confidence, we talked about gamma males. Now, I want to point out how white knights and gamma males are in fact the same ugly people.

Image result for hot women dominating man

White knights believe that males only purpose is to protect women, and no matter the reason, a pussy should always get a free pass. For them, God is a woman, it is very clear. And why not a black woman, as told me my cucked religion teacher when I was 18. Yes, why not?!

Image result for pussy pass

Behind these showy fake gentlemen in fact reside dirty gamma males. White knights actually strive for more equality across genders, races and anything close enough to feminism, immigration and LGBT. They want to incarnate the defenders of the righteous vagina, the sponsors of cuckery, the protectors of soy-boys. And by doing so, they neglect all virtues attributed to men, such as rationality and morality. They can’t go ahead of their vision of a sweating vagina whenever they hear the voice of a female. Nor can they go ahead of their lack of meaning in this universe. Looking for a replacement to their inherent nihilism, they find themselves a victorious identity in backstabbing real men.

Related image

This lack of self consciousness is reflected in all their actions and talks. Their normal state is to talk weak, to change their mind, to stress for nothing, to lie, to put in danger their teammates, etc. until a pussy shows up where all their weaknesses finally make sense. In a nutshell, white knights are gamma. And just like gamma males, they think and act like women. As Vox summarizes, a Gamma acts the following:

  • When you are having an argument with someone and it appears you are wrong, the most common belief and defense is that the other person simply doesn’t understand what you are saying.
  • When discussing matters with someone and you think you are maybe, possibly, being shown to be wrong, you start to get snarky, crack lame jokes, and immediately try to change the subject.
  • If someone holds an opinion contrary to yours, and you don’t think you have a good defense immediately to hand, you start to look for unrelated ways to disqualify the other person as being less than knowledgeable about the subject, even going so far as to disqualify them as being a good person or sometimes even a person at all.
  • Definitions are tenuous for you and words can be redefined at leisure during a discussion. If someone quotes the dictionary and it disagrees with your definition they are arguing unfairly and the dictionary is wrong.

White knights do not protect women, they in fact need their attention in order to exist. Just like PUAs compare the ratings of their last pickups to polish their absent ego, white knights nourish their eternal masculine identity quest through pussy-kneeling. They were often abandoned by their father. Or simply cut from him by a resource-craving single mother who can’t do anything but parasitically survive through the distillation of a castrating masculine hate of a missed father. Without a father, a son becomes the life-insurance of the mother. Raised to become a vagina-slave, he is fine-tuned to become the disposable hands of females.

Indeed, in a Testosterone-free world, it appears obvious that white knights and gamma males are the rightful swords of misandry. Despite their male appearance, they are women, and should be treated like women. They don’t have any sense of respect for their brothers, and as such deserve no respect as they continue to contribute to the agony of millions of western men who decided to quit women.

So, yes, white knights and gamma males, same story. What sentence would you give to such men?

Multiculturalism and feminism: the result

This is what happens to you in an multiracial society: your wife divorces you for a fat low iq unattractive non masculine black/latino/arabic man.

After annoying you for many years, making you believe that she will be forever there and the children, she suddenly doesn’t have “the thing” with you. She goes to her lawyer, where she is received as a veteran of war who fought 10 years to protect the country, and who deserves the highest form of respect. After all, why not decorate her with the medal of honor after having endured the humiliation of washing  the dishes from time to time or even making a meal.

Of course, in the procedure  she gets to keep the kids, get your money and destroy your children’s life. So she can get with a man ready to “bang her in front of the kids, because he does not cares”.

Yet…

Hopefully I heard my family’s history. As well I saw old happy married couples. I also know what achievements realized by Western Civilization, and that is not thanks to feminism, blacks or arabs – quite on the contrary. I just hope that all of that is just a natural reaction to an extremely toxic environment: feminism, cultural Marxism and multiculturalism lead to death. In a nutshell, more of an epigenetic hell than a deterministic world.