That race mixing…

Race mixing is seen by the left as the future, as superior. And as usual, the mere fact of questioning this statement is labelled racist, xenophobic or white supremacist. But the question is relevant. Yet it is hard to find answers as studies concerning race and genetics are forbidden in Europe.

Concerning intelligence, some studies did find that mulattoes tend to score at mid level between blacks and whites. And the more mulattoes tend to have white ancestry, the smarter they usually are. As for achievements, mulattoes are clearly underrepresented in STEM fields. And this is probably the most accurate to measure race mixing.

Concerning physical capabilities, there are basically no studies. But again, whites, asian and blacks tend to dominate their own categories of game in the Olympic games. Mulattoes don’t find or barely find their place in other sports like crossfit or MMA neither.

What is worth noting is the stubbornness of the left to push the narrative of race-mixing as superior while labeling any critic “White supremacy” and ridicule any idea of other superiority. I don’t actually believe whites are generally superior, especially if we look at disparities between white ethnicities. Colour is not everything, on this I agree with leftists – but not for the same reasons. Yet white people did build Western Civilization. And therefore it can only make sense that whites have a genetic advantage in a civilization their ancestor build and devised.

From a genetic perspective, genes have different alleles and race mixing renders difficult the selection of genes that fit. The evolutionary process created alleles that fit the environment, and overall people to find a mate that is genetically close in order to maximise this evolutionary fit.

Finally, mullatoes will have to mix with either whites or blacks. On the long run, the proportion of white or black genes reduces, until none of the other remains (about 200 years). In other words, every mullato will become black, latino or arab in the long run – less whites than others, that’s pure elementary mathematics.

So in the end, nature in its ways WILL remove mullatoes. They are just a glitch in history.

Why does my baby look like an alien?

Don’t be like this English mother, nor like Magda Pegowska. The English mother says:

“She’s getting very dark, isn’t she?” This is what one of my friends recently said about my much adored – 12-week-old daughter.

She didn’t mean to be rude. But it was a comment that struck me with the force of a jab to the stomach. Immediately, I was overwhelmed by a confusion of emotions. I felt protective, insulted, worried, ashamed, guilty, all at once. The reason? My lovely, wriggly, smiley baby is mixed race. Now, I think of myself as pretty ‘right on’. My home is on the border of the London Republic of Hackney. I’ve been to the Notting Hill Carnival, even if I found the music a bit loud. Yet now I realise what a ‘white’ world I inhabit. I am white and I have two sons from my first marriage who are both milky complexioned and golden haired. My twin sister, who I spend a lot of time with, has a Danish partner. As a consequence, she has two boys who are also pale skinned and flaxen haired. Into this positively Scandinavian next generation, I have now injected a tiny, dark-skinned, dark-haired girl. To say she stands out is an understatement. My colouring and that of my children has never really been an issue before. However, three years ago I met the man who became my second husband and who is the father of my daughter. Although born in the UK, his parents came from India in the Sixties. This makes him British-Asian and our daughter mixed race. There is another more PC term for the plump little bundle I strap to my front. She is ‘dual heritage’. It’s a bit trendy, but I quite like it. It implies a pride in coming from two cultures, rather than the less attractive connotations of ‘mixed race’. The usual time something is labelled ‘mixed’ is when it’s a packet of nuts and they’ve bulked out the luxury cashews with cheaper peanuts. I’m not sure I want my daughter to be regarded as an adulterated version of some pure original. Still, it is the most accepted description. The truth is, whatever the label, the fact there is a label proves that my daughter’s conflicting parentage matters. At the more frothy end of the scale, mixed-race children are regarded as pretty dolls — white kids with a nice tan. When I was pregnant and people asked me about the child I was having, and I explained her father was Indian, they would often coo something along the lines of: “Ooh, she’s going to be beautiful!” as if I was discussing a new rose, made from an exotic cross-breeding programme. On a less benevolent level, mixed-race children can receive a hostile welcome from both white and black communities. Being neither one thing nor another may get you on the cover of Vogue, but it isn’t an easy way to make friends. Scroll down for more… {1} But this is 2007, surely things are more enlightened than that? I hope so, but I fear not. One reason for my fear is my own mixed reactions to my daughter. Don’t get me wrong, I love her. She is the child I didn’t think I’d have after my first marriage broke up. She is the only granddaughter in our family and we all dote on her. But when I turn to the mirror in my bedroom to admire us together, I am shocked. She seems so alien. With her long, dark eyelashes and shiny, dark brown hair, she doesn’t look anything like me. I know that concentrating on how my daughter looks is shallow. She is a person in her own right, not an accessory to me. But still, I can’t shake off the feeling of unease. I didn’t realise how much her looking different would matter and, on a rational level, I know it shouldn’t. But it does. Evolution demands that we have children to pass on our genes, hence the sense of pride and validation we get when we see our features reappearing in the next generation. With my daughter, I don’t have that. Do black fathers who marry white women and then have paler-skinned children feel my sense of loss? Or maybe Chinese mothers or Middle-Eastern grandparents grieve when they see a child they know to be their own, but whose features don’t reflect that? I worry that, as my daughter doesn’t look like me, people will assume she is adopted. After all, it’s all the rage in showbiz circles. Madonna famously scooped up a black child when she wanted to be a mother again and Angelina Jolie appears to be assembling a ‘pick ‘n’ mix’ of kids from different countries. It’s all very United Colours of Benetton, isn’t it? In the real world, I fear for my daughter’s sense of self. She has a tiny foot in two cultures. How will she negotiate a path between the two? I worry that my sons will feel less of a kinship with their sister because she is different, although there is no sign of that. As for myself, there is an inescapable status issue to address. White women who have non-white children are stigmatised as ‘Tracy Towerblocks’ living on benefits, most of which they spend on lager and fags. Even if I don’t fit this profile, my daughter’s difference definitely points out the fact that my children come from two different fathers. If I wanted to pass us off as a nice, neat nuclear family, she would blow my cover at once. But it is more than that. I am frightened, frightened of others’ reactions to her, as well as my own. I didn’t think of myself as racist and yet my daughter has shown me a side of myself about which I feel deeply uncomfortable. Even admitting to having mixed feelings about her not being blonde and blue eyed, I feel disloyal and incredibly guilty. I know the obvious comment is that I must have known how a child of our union would look when I married an Indian man, but it is a wise woman who thinks that far ahead when she falls in love. I didn’t think about any of this before I got pregnant. I wanted to have a baby. Her colour and culture were immaterial then. But self-flagellation is not useful. I have more pressing concerns. I am now the mother of a ‘black’ child, even if she is more the hue of weak tea than espresso. This is a role for which I am utterly unprepared. Part of me thinks I should be playing sitar music to her in her cot, mastering pakoras and serving them dressed in a sari, but that would be fantastically fake coming from me. When she was born, pale but with lots of dark hair, I asked the midwife if her eyes would stay blue. ‘Asian genes are very strong,’ she said in what I took to be an ominous tone. No more Brady Bunch kids for me. The midwife has been proved right and every day my baby’s eyes get a little darker. Even so, when she looks up at me as I feed her, my heart melts. My love may not be colour blind, but hers is, and that is truly humbling.”

May god hear you and stop this insanity. As you see, in the absence of light, darkness prevails.

White women, more beautiful than you think

FACT: Feminism and Cultural Marxism make women ugly.

It is known for a fact that epi-genetic plays a major role in the regulation of health and weight and physical appearance (and the face in particular). It is also known that more attractive women are healthier and can give birth to healthier babies.

In this logic, it is evident that a healthier environment will “produce” more beautiful women. And what is a healthier environment?

  1. A healthy environment include lower stress, good sleep, healthy food, spending time outside regularly, low radiations, physical activity…
  2. The second point is the stress endured during childhood. It is known for a fact that a stable family and kids taken care by parents or close relative (instead of daycare) is the healthiest environment a child can have.

In white countries, these places are becoming rare as time passes by. As such western women do become uglier with time.

Beauty is to ugliness what is light to darkness. Do nothing and it flaws away.

Protect beauty, stop feminism.

IMG-20171010-WA0027.jpg

French language is sexist!

French, the great language of Molière, who brought to this world so many things is under sexist attack. In France and Belgium, the new battle for the feminists and the cultural-marxists SJWs is the so called “inclusive writing”. What the fuck?!

In French, there are 2 genders in the grammar (masculine and feminine), and the masculine is always the default one. Therefore, if you talk about a profession in general, such as “teachers”, you will say in French “les enseignants”. On the contrary, the feminine gender would be “les enseignantes”. And apparently that is sexist!

The real question asked in the Belgian newspaper is “is French sexist by nature?” (and therefore of course its roots should be dismantled). In France, the debate is more divided. The basic new way to write French would be “enseignant-e-s” instead of “enseignants”, just not to disturb angry feminist and SJW.

Some schools already started adopting the new standard, even if still not legalised. But that is just a formality in a sick world.

The real funny question will be when they will address two facts: Jew rabbies (aka newly rabbin-e-s) and Muslim Imams (aka newly Imam-e-s).

How will they say it? My guess is that there will be an exception for them. Wanna bet?

Dearcatcallers, that’s stupid

Sad, very sad. “Dearcatcallers” spends her life taking selfies with poor guys (so-called beta males).

This is what stupid women do when they are set free without any goal in life. They become feminists who do not even understand what they fight for. Anyway, I shouldn’t even bother because she doesn’t look too white to me.

Seriously, what’s the goal of taking selfies with poor guys but getting attention?! What is her achievement?! Nothing but stupidity.

At least she tells something: white men, man up and take back what is yours.

 

 

Catalonia, the first domino?

I usually look at news with a very distant perspective. I came to realize that most of it is completely irrelevant. I see it as a tool that was designed to waste my time. But from time to time there are some things worth paying attention to.

Europe right now is a tinderbox ready to explode, just a few sparks and the fire can spread from Spain to Norway in no time. Europe is just facing the perfect storm: ethnic tension, social tensions, economic collapse, automation… you name it. The question is not about knowing if Europe will implode. But when and where?

20170524_cat_0.jpg

90% of the Catalonians want independence from Spain. Whether for or against the independence of this region, the process is entirely democratic. I usually stand with independenctist movements and I do encourage the people of Catalonia to pursue their will. However, this movement does neither oppose immigration, multiculturalism nor the EU. So in the end, they stand for most most part as a bunch of useful idiots.

This week Madrid decided to send in the army to halt the will of the of the Catalonian people. And this is why I think the situation can turn out the be very interesting. First because it sends a clear signals to other part of Europe seeking for autonomy. But most importantly it sends a clear message to the average European that their countries and their super-government based in Brussels have little care about their opinion let alone their freedom and right to be represented.

If the fire starts in Catalonia, I don’t see why it wouldn’t spread outside of Spain. And in as such tensely politicized Europe, it can turn out to be pretty ugly.

Las Vegas parano…

Mass murder!!! Gun control!!

That’s what the left calls for anytime a white man does something. More control, less freedom. More immigration. Remember: WHITES ARE BAD!

Leftists are just a bunch of hypocrites, ready to take advantage of ANY event to push their religious agenda. When they heard it was mostly whites who were murdered, they played both arguments: gun control and white supremacy. They celebrated the death of 50 people, because they are white conservatives and at the same time they use the tragedy to ask for gun control. Can they even imagine how much they make no sense?! My cat, surprisingly, does.

When it is a Muslim with a car or a knife, that’s much less of an issue. Anyway for the left these people are sons of god, don’t you dare whip their reputation with the truth.

Let’s wait for the conclusions. We just highly doubt it was an act of white supremacy…

Social media are breaking families

In our society, tech giants are capable of influencing our behaviors, believes, etc. They create a new reality out of thin air. With their help, any lie can become a truth. The tiniest of ideas can be seen by hundreds of millions or be used to target any specific individual in any specific region.

To do so, they select their target and adapt the content each and everyone can see. The masses are not aware of this process and hence believe that what they see is a widespread truth, even if it is an exception. In two words, virtuality has succeeded to reality.

And now the European Commission aims at coordinating with social media to control algorithms selecting what you can see. Not only tech giants will have power over you, but also the government.

One of the worse impact for the white man is on the sexual market. Example:

A European woman connects to Facebook, and her newsfeed is flooded with other cultures, other men’s achievements, etc. Not so long ago, Facebook was promoting in Eastern countries a video with the smartest people on earth… and guess what: not a single white! How come?!

They show how rich, cool, and handsome are all non white men. How Arabs from Saudi or Dubai care for animals. How black people have more feelings and are more caring. How white men are disgusting bastards who invite refugees to abuse them. They help them reaching to your girlfriend, your wife, your daughter, in your back.

Recently a girl told me that in India they don’t have toilet, and it is our fault – we are bad people. Sorry girl, but I haven’t not seen a single white man restraining Indians from building nor using toilet. And we have been building them in Europe for thousands of years.

They build an entire lie on which children and women mostly hang they beliefs. More than school, more than books, they indoctrinate our people for not making families. They promote mixity everywhere, and make us feel guilty for even existing as people. They give the tools for cheating and breaking relationships, families.

It is high time to end the tech giant dictatorship and to denounce the fraudulent leaders in Europe and the USA.

Why women are so annoying

I had a simple story from a friend. He explained me how his girlfriend is misbehaving with him. What’s happening?

He told me:

We just go for shopping as usual… And as usual, despite the fact that she promised, she makes crisis. She wants the most expensive, with zero arguments. She complains when i say no, and she tells me i am crazy. She insults me for not buying things we don’t need at home.

Interesting, and common story.

The game tells us that a woman who loves, also respects. But i would think of the opposite.

Experts in game like Vox or Chateau would simply argue this man is not an alpha, and so she has no respect for him. But that’s too easy, because even alpha have problems with their women. Any proof? Let’s take the example of Brad Pit. She divorced, said that she didn’t feel any bond with her blond kid, and finally turned him/her into a trans-sexual. What an achievement for an alpha!

Therefore, my reasoning goes a bit beyond this. His girlfriend told him something very particular:

Excuse me. Every time is the same. I try to control myself. I just don’t understand why, but every time you tell me something, I fee like I have to protect myself. I feel like I have to attack, and say or do whatever to win.

That is very interesting. Very. Why?

Everywhere I look, I see more or less the same pattern: women, Arabs, blacks, gays have the same kind of attitude. They behave as if everything was free for them, as if the world owed them everything and as if anything a white man says is an aggression.

The word she used is “protect”. She talks about being oppressed – while she is not. Her message is “whatever you do is an oppression”.

Our women have been programmed, just like us. The perspective they were given to the world is Marxist: oppressors vs oppressed. Winners vs losers. And who wants to be the one oppressed, the one losing? No one.

On one hand, women are programmed to believe that white men are oppressors, and that they will always do the worse to them and to the world. Therefore, they do not have any reason to respect us. We are bad people, pussies. We are oppressors, but we can’t even hold in front of a woman. Grow balls, be the oppressor you pretend to be – her unconscious murmurs.

On the other hand, the white men have been programmed to feel guilty. They feel like they are “white knights” who must give to others, starting with women: paying drinks, paying restaurant, shutting up, putting her choices before his, etc. Everything in a white man’s head tends to give, and not to receive.

So, my answer is simple. The “oppressor – oppressed” meta-programme running our sub-conscious is stronger than we think, and it overrules our true personality and nature.

In this scheme, unfortunately a woman can’t love long her husband. She can’t love a man she doesn’t respect. And she can’t respect a man when she has been brain washed. Add all of this on top of their selfish and childish nature, and you got what we see: a total disaster.