Poland is not right enough

The polish president made quiet a blunt statement recently supporting the bid of Turkey into the EU. This stab in the back of its own people shows the lack of trust that can be putted into the so called “moderate right” also know as cuckservatives. Schultz and Merkel ironically reject the adhesion of Turkey in the EU but not for the right reasons.

a8d37c82-81ba-4cd1-bfc6-0dd48bb6ad4e

Turkey is not a friend of Europe and never will be. And it is not Europe. Turkey has been at war with Western civilization since the fall of the Byzantine empire. Every value we cherish in the West is simply rejected by Turkey and its people. Not only they haven’t participated into the greatness of the modern world, they slowed down the development of the later and now they appropriate the positive outcome of it like parasites.

The goal of Turkey is to reestablish the Ottoman empire. They dislike every other nation and western nations for the most part. And their most dangereous enemies are the one living in the north-west. The ones they have never been able to beat militarily and culturally. At least in the last 500 years or so.

Which brings the final and obvious conclusion: Turkey wants to conquer Europe through gene war. The only way Turkey can actually conquer the North. Spread genes and reproduce. This is the only reasons why Turkey wants to join the EU (which they do even without joining). The President of Poland doesn’t seem to notice it. When Polish women are basically jumping at the neck of every Turkish monkey coming to Poland (as they are being told to do)… This is just sad.

Why does my baby look like an alien?

Don’t be like this English mother, nor like Magda Pegowska. The English mother says:

“She’s getting very dark, isn’t she?” This is what one of my friends recently said about my much adored – 12-week-old daughter.

She didn’t mean to be rude. But it was a comment that struck me with the force of a jab to the stomach. Immediately, I was overwhelmed by a confusion of emotions. I felt protective, insulted, worried, ashamed, guilty, all at once. The reason? My lovely, wriggly, smiley baby is mixed race. Now, I think of myself as pretty ‘right on’. My home is on the border of the London Republic of Hackney. I’ve been to the Notting Hill Carnival, even if I found the music a bit loud. Yet now I realise what a ‘white’ world I inhabit. I am white and I have two sons from my first marriage who are both milky complexioned and golden haired. My twin sister, who I spend a lot of time with, has a Danish partner. As a consequence, she has two boys who are also pale skinned and flaxen haired. Into this positively Scandinavian next generation, I have now injected a tiny, dark-skinned, dark-haired girl. To say she stands out is an understatement. My colouring and that of my children has never really been an issue before. However, three years ago I met the man who became my second husband and who is the father of my daughter. Although born in the UK, his parents came from India in the Sixties. This makes him British-Asian and our daughter mixed race. There is another more PC term for the plump little bundle I strap to my front. She is ‘dual heritage’. It’s a bit trendy, but I quite like it. It implies a pride in coming from two cultures, rather than the less attractive connotations of ‘mixed race’. The usual time something is labelled ‘mixed’ is when it’s a packet of nuts and they’ve bulked out the luxury cashews with cheaper peanuts. I’m not sure I want my daughter to be regarded as an adulterated version of some pure original. Still, it is the most accepted description. The truth is, whatever the label, the fact there is a label proves that my daughter’s conflicting parentage matters. At the more frothy end of the scale, mixed-race children are regarded as pretty dolls — white kids with a nice tan. When I was pregnant and people asked me about the child I was having, and I explained her father was Indian, they would often coo something along the lines of: “Ooh, she’s going to be beautiful!” as if I was discussing a new rose, made from an exotic cross-breeding programme. On a less benevolent level, mixed-race children can receive a hostile welcome from both white and black communities. Being neither one thing nor another may get you on the cover of Vogue, but it isn’t an easy way to make friends. Scroll down for more… {1} But this is 2007, surely things are more enlightened than that? I hope so, but I fear not. One reason for my fear is my own mixed reactions to my daughter. Don’t get me wrong, I love her. She is the child I didn’t think I’d have after my first marriage broke up. She is the only granddaughter in our family and we all dote on her. But when I turn to the mirror in my bedroom to admire us together, I am shocked. She seems so alien. With her long, dark eyelashes and shiny, dark brown hair, she doesn’t look anything like me. I know that concentrating on how my daughter looks is shallow. She is a person in her own right, not an accessory to me. But still, I can’t shake off the feeling of unease. I didn’t realise how much her looking different would matter and, on a rational level, I know it shouldn’t. But it does. Evolution demands that we have children to pass on our genes, hence the sense of pride and validation we get when we see our features reappearing in the next generation. With my daughter, I don’t have that. Do black fathers who marry white women and then have paler-skinned children feel my sense of loss? Or maybe Chinese mothers or Middle-Eastern grandparents grieve when they see a child they know to be their own, but whose features don’t reflect that? I worry that, as my daughter doesn’t look like me, people will assume she is adopted. After all, it’s all the rage in showbiz circles. Madonna famously scooped up a black child when she wanted to be a mother again and Angelina Jolie appears to be assembling a ‘pick ‘n’ mix’ of kids from different countries. It’s all very United Colours of Benetton, isn’t it? In the real world, I fear for my daughter’s sense of self. She has a tiny foot in two cultures. How will she negotiate a path between the two? I worry that my sons will feel less of a kinship with their sister because she is different, although there is no sign of that. As for myself, there is an inescapable status issue to address. White women who have non-white children are stigmatised as ‘Tracy Towerblocks’ living on benefits, most of which they spend on lager and fags. Even if I don’t fit this profile, my daughter’s difference definitely points out the fact that my children come from two different fathers. If I wanted to pass us off as a nice, neat nuclear family, she would blow my cover at once. But it is more than that. I am frightened, frightened of others’ reactions to her, as well as my own. I didn’t think of myself as racist and yet my daughter has shown me a side of myself about which I feel deeply uncomfortable. Even admitting to having mixed feelings about her not being blonde and blue eyed, I feel disloyal and incredibly guilty. I know the obvious comment is that I must have known how a child of our union would look when I married an Indian man, but it is a wise woman who thinks that far ahead when she falls in love. I didn’t think about any of this before I got pregnant. I wanted to have a baby. Her colour and culture were immaterial then. But self-flagellation is not useful. I have more pressing concerns. I am now the mother of a ‘black’ child, even if she is more the hue of weak tea than espresso. This is a role for which I am utterly unprepared. Part of me thinks I should be playing sitar music to her in her cot, mastering pakoras and serving them dressed in a sari, but that would be fantastically fake coming from me. When she was born, pale but with lots of dark hair, I asked the midwife if her eyes would stay blue. ‘Asian genes are very strong,’ she said in what I took to be an ominous tone. No more Brady Bunch kids for me. The midwife has been proved right and every day my baby’s eyes get a little darker. Even so, when she looks up at me as I feed her, my heart melts. My love may not be colour blind, but hers is, and that is truly humbling.”

May god hear you and stop this insanity. As you see, in the absence of light, darkness prevails.

Why women are so annoying

I had a simple story from a friend. He explained me how his girlfriend is misbehaving with him. What’s happening?

He told me:

We just go for shopping as usual… And as usual, despite the fact that she promised, she makes crisis. She wants the most expensive, with zero arguments. She complains when i say no, and she tells me i am crazy. She insults me for not buying things we don’t need at home.

Interesting, and common story.

The game tells us that a woman who loves, also respects. But i would think of the opposite.

Experts in game like Vox or Chateau would simply argue this man is not an alpha, and so she has no respect for him. But that’s too easy, because even alpha have problems with their women. Any proof? Let’s take the example of Brad Pit. She divorced, said that she didn’t feel any bond with her blond kid, and finally turned him/her into a trans-sexual. What an achievement for an alpha!

Therefore, my reasoning goes a bit beyond this. His girlfriend told him something very particular:

Excuse me. Every time is the same. I try to control myself. I just don’t understand why, but every time you tell me something, I fee like I have to protect myself. I feel like I have to attack, and say or do whatever to win.

That is very interesting. Very. Why?

Everywhere I look, I see more or less the same pattern: women, Arabs, blacks, gays have the same kind of attitude. They behave as if everything was free for them, as if the world owed them everything and as if anything a white man says is an aggression.

The word she used is “protect”. She talks about being oppressed – while she is not. Her message is “whatever you do is an oppression”.

Our women have been programmed, just like us. The perspective they were given to the world is Marxist: oppressors vs oppressed. Winners vs losers. And who wants to be the one oppressed, the one losing? No one.

On one hand, women are programmed to believe that white men are oppressors, and that they will always do the worse to them and to the world. Therefore, they do not have any reason to respect us. We are bad people, pussies. We are oppressors, but we can’t even hold in front of a woman. Grow balls, be the oppressor you pretend to be – her unconscious murmurs.

On the other hand, the white men have been programmed to feel guilty. They feel like they are “white knights” who must give to others, starting with women: paying drinks, paying restaurant, shutting up, putting her choices before his, etc. Everything in a white man’s head tends to give, and not to receive.

So, my answer is simple. The “oppressor – oppressed” meta-programme running our sub-conscious is stronger than we think, and it overrules our true personality and nature.

In this scheme, unfortunately a woman can’t love long her husband. She can’t love a man she doesn’t respect. And she can’t respect a man when she has been brain washed. Add all of this on top of their selfish and childish nature, and you got what we see: a total disaster.

Crime and immigration

We are told crime and immigration have nothing to do with one another. We are told race is completely unrelated, and that crime is some sort of social construct. But then how could it be that crime has never been such an issue up until recently?

WhatsApp Image 2017-08-30 at 17.20.18

To answer this question, I have gathered some data from Interpol in Europe. Analysed every single person researched, and reached the astonishing fact that about 80% of people under international mandate in Europe do not have nor share European blood.

Some may say “well guys that’s too easy! You talk about international mandate, so all normal, just chill out”. Then sorry to bring up to you, but according to studies exposed by Stefan Molyneux, there are about 70-80% of non European blood criminals in our jail. Maybe that’s just a coincidence?

These graphs highlight 2 important issues:

  1. Muslims commit more crimes,
  2. Race (as underlined by Stefan) plays a role in crime.

Stefan then looked into the data and found that there is a correlation of 0.85 between divorce rate and crime, while Muslims have a very low rate of divorce. This means that in a conservative white society, the amount of crimes should actually be very low (or else there wouldn’t be any correlation). On top of this, studies show that the relationship between crime and poverty cannot be highlighted (correlation of 0.5 only). Finally, intelligence is highly correlated to crime.

So, in practice, what conclusions can we take from these data?

  1. Race matters, and the more immigrants will be in the West, the more crimes there will be, and the more coercive measure are going to be needed (Like Islam is prescribing).
  2. Fathers matter: divorce is bad for children and leads to more crime in the society. Since about 90% are initiated by women under the “Feminist umbrella”, this means that feminism leads ineluctably to crime and violence.

The answer? Simple : Racial homogeneity, conservatism, and Christianity.

The weird line between Alt-Lite and Alt-Right.

The Alt-Right and the Alt-Lite have been fighting side to side for a while. The two movements have not been facing each others except for a few skirmishes. But Hillary Clinton (who popularized the name “Alt-Right”) probably included many people who do identify with the movement. Many figures among this umbrella are more identified with the Alt-Lite: Mike Cernovich, Lauren Southern, Gavin McInnes, Milo… While the most notable figures of the Alt-Right are: VoxDay, Jared Taylor, Chateau Heartiste, Andrew Anglin…

So what is the difference between the Alt-Lite and the Alt-Right?

untitled

Voxday is probably one of the pioneer and established the 16 points of the Alt-Right. This is a good start to draw a line between the 2 movements. Both movement are fed up with the failures of modern day conservatism. They push their arguments based on empirical evidences and logic. And they prefer using good rethorics based in truth rather than try to debate their political opponents through dialectic. And that’s pretty much it for what is in common. Alt-Right and Alt-Lite agree on points 1,2,3,4,7,(10),12,15 and 16.

Where the disagreement lies is up until where the reasoning is pushed. Like Point 9: identity > culture > politics. The Alt-Lite believes that some culture are not compatible and that Culture is some sort of “social construct”. The Alt-Right doesn’t believe that. Culture is a by-product of our identity. And our identity is dictated by who we are: the influence of our community, the education of our parents but foremost our genetics. Which brings the next point that differentiate Alt-Lite and Alt-Right: Point 11: DIVERSITY + PROXIMITY = WAR. Always. The Alt-Lite believes that if people from other races or culture recognize the greatness of Western Civilization, then they may live within this civilization. The Alt-Right believes that if someone admires Western Civilization, he is free to copy it in his own country. He is welcome as a tourist. But no foreigners can be granted the right of citizenship (just like in Japan). Therefore mass deportation are currently the only solution (in order to not conflict point 11 and point 16 which promotes peaceful solution as much as possible).

Point 5 and point 15 are also essential points of the Alt-Right. The Alt-Lite will not look into the status nor the privileges of certain races or ethnicities. While the Alt-Right will treat absolutely everyone equally. In a way, the Alt-Lite believes there is still some form of political correctness.

The Alt-Lite will talk about population replacement through immigration and religion. But they will not talk about population replacement through race-mixing. Race-mixing doesn’t seems to be a problem for the Alt-Lite. While the Alt-Right believes in Point 14: we must secure the existence of white people and a future for white children. Alternatively, The Alt-Right wants to protect all races in their sovereign nations. But right now and for the foreseeable future, only whites are about to be extinct.

To resume the Alt-Right believes that Europe and North America (and a few other places) belongs to White people ONLY. And only indigenous people get to choose the destiny of their own nations. Therefore white genes, white culture and white interests have to be promoted in politics and in popular cultures. No matter how politically incorrect it may sound. No matter the solution. Just hoping it can be as peaceful as it can get.

Trust your people

Our trust-based modern western society have been jeopardised to individualism and socialism. That is strange paradox on one hand, but much less if your doctrine is “divide and conquer”. This article aims at explaining why the alt-right must be based on trust to succeed.

WhatsApp Image 2017-08-16 at 00.09.10.jpeg

The foundation of every society is trust and without it, you need very strong laws to control it. For example, socialism and communism are concepts that are naturally opposed to trust, because they discharge the personal responsibility on the state – which hence becomes God alike. It is impossible to have socialism or communism without a central power.

Solidarity, on the other hand, derives from trust. Therefore, where solidarity lies, socialism can’t root, and vice-versa. But more than this, individualism cannot co-exist with trust. If one defends its own interest, how could he be trustworthy for any group? It is rather unlikely.

Of course, libertarians will argue that individuals are smart enough and possess enough information to make a wise decision, and will always act for the group… but nothing can be less true. Indeed, we are biologically bonded to privilege ourselves, and any form of system that will foster it will ineluctably result in a disorganised, amoral and primitive society where instincts dominate. Wanna have an example? Primitive tribes did not have any laws, and yet the only strategy that enabled them to survive was not individualism but group-centred (actually ethno-centric) strategy.

In practice, how individualism looks like? At work, any time there is an unlikely contract to be signed, the manager assigns it to you. But whenever something likely to win arises, he grabs it and puts his name on it.

Of course you may say that this kind of behaviour is aligned with the company since whatever comes, the company earns money. But is that true on the long term? Nothing can be more untrue. Indeed, this behaviour creates a huge lack of trust in the company, which results in staff turnover, and loss of contracts – would you ever support a company that used to steal your professional opportunities. In some ways, the same is happening now in Google and most big companies. Through the propagation of individualism, diversity and gender balance, they have now lost most of the confidence of their most talented employees. Tired of investing their time and money for others, they now look for an alternative political model that will restore trust, homogeneity and meritocracy.

In other terms, individualism is part of cultural Marxism. Through the maximisation of personal gain, we actually strive for less. We strive for less good people, less quality and less morality. And in the end, alone, we are all weak and easy to control.

Why do we do this article? We want the right wing to become conscious of one thing. We are all on the same side, and we ought to support and fight together. Do not blame Neo-Nazi, White supremacists or whatsoever, because if we want to win, a trust movement is required. This trust will enable our people to fight without fearing for their finance, their job, their life, etc. It will also enable us to promote a much more moral and sustainable society where people require minimal law enforcement to conduct themselves adequately. Finally, trust will make us effective. Where the left will require contracts, and heavy procedures, we will leverage on our agility. Where the left will need time, we will strike faster and sharper.

The rise of the AltRight

The call to the rally to unite the right marks a new era. It will show how committed the right is. Using good rhetorics with the truth it became the dominant ideology on the Internet. It is now time to go live and spread to the word in a peaceful manner in the real world. Libtards are giggling like chickens before being beheaded. After all, their only response is censorship. It is emotional and instinctive, whilst their argument limited to labeling their opponents. The big ideology shift nowadays makes the left tremble. Hence they fire everywhere, shooting down as well altLite figures like Sargon of Akkad or Lauren Southern, or even sometimes open leftist like Dave Rubin.

5dacddfe-3376-4d75-809a-7a45ce2b9c77.jpg

Unfortunately, this rally is only possible in the USA where the constitution protects the rights of individuals. On the contrary, Europe is muzzled, as the constitution protects the people in power,not the individuals. Such event is not conceivable unless you wanna end up in jail or beaten up by the police. At least for the moment.

Therefore, measuring the size of the right wing power in Europe is necessary to make people understand that they are not alone. Beyond any number, yet, the new right wing is the only movement that can bring a new “New-Renaissance” to Europeans and Americans

On one hand the so called “extreme right” in Europe includes the alt-Right, the Alt-Lite, some cuckservatives and even lefties. On the other hand, many people vote for other political parties, fearing of being labelled “extremist”, fired or socially exiled. But recent elections are giving us a hint on how many people are fed up with the current system.

  • Britain UKIP scored 12.1, and voted last year for Brexit (slightly above 50%).
  • France 2017 elections gave 34.7% for Marine Le Pen.
  • Austria’s Freedom pary got 35% in 2016.
  • Belgium NVA and VB had together around 25% of the vote but it was in 2014.

A good approximation tells us that slightly more than a third of European voters are voting for real conservative parties. And that is not so bad, especially considering women, gays and immigrants.

Yet, these numbers have to be adjusted due to the abstentions (around 40%), the number of whites people left (around 80% and making it most of the abstention), and the ratios of vote between men and women (men make most of the abstention as women like voting to gargle their ego). Hence, roughly 17% of the population supports a right wing party. Or about 27% of white people, and 37 % of White men.

The alt-Right is surely a minority among this group, even if most of the people are sympathising. For example PEGIDA did a protest in Dresden Germany in 2016. Police expected 15000, 8000 showed up. If the police expected 1 in 4 activist to show up. It means around the region of Free state of Saxony, there are 25 thousands AltLite/AltRight activits. The “Extreme right” party AFD got 160 thousands votes in 2014. Adjusting for 2016, let’s round it up to 200 000 votes. It means around 12.5% of the Extreme right is under the umbrella of the Alt-Right/Alt-Lite. Giving 6% to the AltRight.

We can conclude that around 2 to 3% of European white men seem to be red pilled. But that is almost large enough! The threshold of population seems to be located at 3%. If we do stick together, authorities wont be able to stand against us. We are at a turning point in history…

The problem with Alt-Right alpha males

The PUA (pickup artists) community is one of the  gate of the alt-right. Probably because most bloggers, such as The chateau, VoxDay and others treat alt-right issues such as race and women. A few years ago, I was introduced to the PUA community. I read the book “The game” from Neil Strauss and started my journey. From events to events, clubs to clubs, my focus was on opening and talking to many women. My personal goal was not to sleep with the highest number of women, but it would be lying to say that what I did was right.

900._UY400_SS400_

Hence, let’s face it, I was just a hypocrite to myself. Unfortunately I was following the mainstream agenda whilst thinking I was red pill. I thought I understood women and I thought I found a solution to my issues and society issues. I couldn’t be more wrong.

The principle of pump and dump ,”relationship free life” are prints of Cultural Marxism. While thinking I was alt-right, anti-Islam, both of feets were in the leftist agenda. Having many girls is surely fun, but it is foremost a contribution to the destruction of Western Civilization. Indeed, both men and women suffer greatly from these short term adventures. Women lose their femininity and their aptitude to love, while guys lose the love for women, seeing them as toys and trophies. Not counting the invested time with fake friends. Love, family become old fashioned child dreams; it is not just by chance that most PUA’s remain single and do not make children, nor have a stable family. In addition, through repetitive pain, women accept the myth that all white men are useless bastards, that family is not needed, and finally they become bitchier and bitchier. Ask yourself: how good is it to be altRight, conservative, but to play the cultural Marxist agenda? Look at these pictures, and tell me exactly how we will protect the western civilization from its replacement?

 

Second, the PUA’s community tells you – at subconscious level – that you are not good enough to get a good and hot women. It tells you about the myth of the alpha male. For instance, Chateau explains how alpha males get a woman to cook, do everything for them, never complain and simply succumb to his authority; forgetting her bitching nature. Beautiful. Yet, I haven’t met one self made man like that in a long – term relationship that I would describe as a model for society – EVER (that includes ZFG Alpha males who can get basically any girl). It means that reality is not as they describe it. In real life, all of us are products of 1) our biology (beauty, intelligence, emotions, etc.) and 2) the environment in which we grew and now live. So, we have little to no control over our real SMV (sexual market value), but also on our instinctive behaviors. Sure, we can increase the likelihood of meeting a good mate, and fine tune ourselves, but that’s barely it. And to do this, you don’t need to be a PUA.

So, what is an alpha for women? It is no rocket science, and all men and women know if a man can or not have sexual success. It is simply a fun guy who fits the mainstream standards. In 1940, it was the SS officer, yesterday, it was the quarterback, and today it is a Latino or an Arab. Standards just reflect what women see through Facebook, TV, music clip. Therefore, you won’t become these if you are not born like that – it is that simple. Besides, is that what a man is: adapt yourself to women’s will, have no confidence in who you are and keep trying to change? Let’s be honest, 99.9% of white males who are no “alpha” according to society standards and won’t be. It is like that.

So, the problem with the so called altRight gamer alpha males is that they make them build an illusion about themselves, their environment and the world. Their friends are superficials. Their girls are no wife. And time spent never comes back. Being a gamer is not constructive. It doesn’t make you any better at all. It barely shows you what you can already do. You are not proving anything but that you lack self confidence, moral values and determination in life.

So, what do we recommend? Be yourself and focus on what you can do. Do not focus your life on women and do not evaluate your value using the women you are with. It doesn’t matter if you have many women or not because in the end you only need one. Drink less, party less, and work more. Spend time on doing what you want, or figuring it out. And concerning women, just be a man; stand for your ideas, for your tribe and make yourself respected. You do not have to use any tricks to get a good girl, nor to lie to her and even less to change your ideas. Just be yourself and believe in what you believe. Society needs good men who build and defend moral principles as well as they build a stable family. Don’t even aim to be a father, aim to be a Grand father, because your job ends when you have grand children, meaning that you properly raised your own children. Remember that if all white males stand up against the old system, women will align and come back to us, without any game. And PUA’s will just become social rejects.

#MoreThanARefugee is a Victory of the Alt-Right, not the Alt-Lite

A few days ago YouTube with the help of Soros & Friends decided to play their part in the propaganda industry. My first reaction was “Here we go again…” but 4Chan /pol/ saw it differently.

maxresdefault

People reacted in mass and took on the battle. Despite Youtube deleting comments and dislikes : 13 millions views… they did not even bother tracking the proportions correctly…

And this reaction came from people around the World (France, Poland, UK…). It is clear now that there is a significant part of the civilized world who is completely fed up with the multiracial agenda. Being a rebel nowadays means standing against a globalized world where cultures and races mix all together. A rebel is someone therefore who stands for his ancestry, for his genetic background : his race. And this attracts many in the younger generation.

And this is why the Alt-Light cannot claim this victory. Looking at the comment section, it is clear that people are fed up about immigration all together, NOT JUST ISLAM:

rapefugees4rapefugees5rapefugees6rapefugees7rapefugees8

This is a great indicator, this shows the Alt-Light is just a temporary political movement. A trampoline  into the Alt-Right. Once you ask relatively smart people to think on their own, they all come to the same conclusion. And the Alt-Right is the only political movement which is based on Reality: Science, Skepticism, Criticism, Lessons from history …

And the solution remains : only homogeneous patriarchal white nations can build civilization and save the world.

A new far right?

Lately the terms far right and alt right became somehow closer.

And it is normal, in the end the mainstream narrative pinpoints the same characteristics, leaving aside the kike question. Google points out inaccurately:

Members of the altright use websites like Twitter and Breitbart News to convey their message. Altrightpostings generally support Republican President-elect Donald Trump, and oppose immigration, multiculturalism and political correctness. … The “altright” are not further right than the far right.

In reality far right political movements are still far from being alt right. We could even categorize some far right move to be closer to communism or socialism. As an example, let’s point out the Front National in France who is militating for a better social covering – not very alt right. Google points, inaccurately:

Farright politics are right-wing politics further on the right of the left-rightspectrum than the standard politicalrightFarright politics often involve a focus on tradition, real or imagined, as opposed to policies and customs that are regarded as reflective of modernism.

Yet some beliefs are shared, at least broadly. We both believe in nationalism and in the importance of preserving our culture. Most far right movement are still incline to immigration quotas, while the alt right talks about massive deportation in a best case scenario. The old leader of the French Front National also had concerns about the kikes.

In any case, we kind of want the same: our countries back.

Leftists argue that without European Union, Europeans will fight each other. Well, if Europeans will not fight each other, they will fight them, and hopefully the kikes, but that’s for another story. You can’t bring back order without a few loss. Left versus right, a plan designed for decades by our kikes elites undoubtedly.

Besides, Europeans would be standing for their first time together, and achieve what EU never could. That’s at least one positive point. It seems that beyond far right and alt right, we see some kind of cultural survival instinct popping up.

The left has been totally brain washed for years. Latest example would be the “he will not devide us” move in USA. Actually, most leftists do get privileges from this system. Without that, they basically end up in a life without a mean, and without a purpose. That’s simply what we call nihilism.

Leftists also say that nationalism will destroy economies and remove jobs. Well, that is a short term view, a fear argument, as they name it probably in a sense of still-non-conscious self derision.

In fact, any company making money through selling products in a country would lose by not complying to the national rules. Most production delocalized were not required, it was designed to weaken the white civilization. So, yes, nationalism would bring back jobs, a lot of jobs. Actually, deporting massively all Muslims, blacks, indians, latino who do not contribute to our civilisation would rather make full employment society, homegeneous, strong and clean. It would also be healthy from an environmental perspective, leftist Ecolo shall agree with that. Should you still have doubts, watch Donald Trump bringing back jobs.

Last, alt right is against privileges and therefore against socialism and communism. It rejects its oppressive and unfair components.

Removing welfare state would harm many white citizens at first, but would target mostly the Arabic, Latino, and black communities. They would suffer so much from it that they would become violent undoubtedly.

So, that’s true, you can fear the alt right and the far right. These leftists and the kikes created this unstable situation…and that has to be fixed somehow.