What you need to know about nazis

Nazis are all over the news today, they are everywhere except in pictures and in actual real life. I have attended a few Alt-Right meeting, I talked to hundreds of people in my life (enough to know their political position) and I have never met one in person who describe himself as a nazi or heard of anyone who actually met a nazi. Yet a mainstream news paper like the Independent is telling that 9% of Americans are actually Nazis. And yet, open up their source and it is quiet obvious that their claims are complete rubbish. The fact they have to actually lie about it shows that Nazis are just like the new iphone: Pushing for an artificial problem and then offering scapegoat.


Indeed, just like the next generation iPhone, the demand in the news for Nazis did not exist. It had to be fabricated. There is a need for a bogey man, people to reject the fault on. The media need to give credibility to the Nazi label in order to be able to use it. And it works, both the AltLite and the Left are constantly bashing an almost non-existent ideology. This is why they did it.

And instead for looking for actual nazis, they labelled anyone who disagree with their globalist-Marxist agenda Nazi. An agenda that has caused a lot more damage and far more lives even by official WW II numbers. Their polls are completely bias and ask very subjective questions. They could instead ask question about the true Nazi ideology or even ask people if they describe themselves as Nazis. National-Socialism is a very specific ideology. It is not taught is schools nor universities. So someone will not become national socialist by mistake, that person knows what he is doing, no matter how strong you disagree with him. Therefore the polls questions can be straight forward.

The conclusion is that National Socialism is just as relevant as the people calling back the rise of a New Napoleon. If you are an intellectual have at least half a brain, you don’t waste your time on a dead ideology.

German elections: there’s no middle ground

The German elections results came as no surprise. The most common sence party, AFD, did better than expected with 12.1%. Yet, how to make more when Women and non-whites tend to vote a lot more left than the ethnical German men now on the verge of suicide (Without identity, you are simply nobody).

So no big news by looking at the map of the votes: East Germany having less immigrants, voted more for AFD. The anti-white propaganda is losing ground among white males.

But the important take away is the hysterical reaction of the left, with almost all media outlets condemning (and here) the modest results of the AFD. This party is of course labeled “Extreme right” , “white supremacist”, “Naxi-leaning“, “Racist” and “Islamophobe“. Alright, let’s dive in the policies advocated by the AFD with the official programme of the AFD:

We turn against centralism, uniformity, and uniformity. Strong, independent federal states, regions and municipalities in a sovereign Germany correspond to the ideal of free peoples and diverse cultural identities. Unity in diversity rather than self-abandonment in the collective is the origin and goal of German self-determination.

The AfD is committed to the values of the Charter of the United Nations and international law. We are committed to a foreign policy oriented towards German interests.
The AfD advocates reforming the United Nations to take account of the changed weightings in the world. We strive for a permanent seat of Germany in the Security Council, as well as the abolition of the host country clause directed against Germany in the United Nations Charter.

According to the left, these points are deemed “Extreme”. And they don’t want to hear any of this. Therefore:


One doesn’t have to agree with all the points mentioned above, but any common sense person can negotiate a policy in exchange of another. The left cannot. Therefore it is better to push for Alt-Right policies right away without any compromise.

The weird line between Alt-Lite and Alt-Right.

The Alt-Right and the Alt-Lite have been fighting side to side for a while. The two movements have not been facing each others except for a few skirmishes. But Hillary Clinton (who popularized the name “Alt-Right”) probably included many people who do identify with the movement. Many figures among this umbrella are more identified with the Alt-Lite: Mike Cernovich, Lauren Southern, Gavin McInnes, Milo… While the most notable figures of the Alt-Right are: VoxDay, Jared Taylor, Chateau Heartiste, Andrew Anglin…

So what is the difference between the Alt-Lite and the Alt-Right?


Voxday is probably one of the pioneer and established the 16 points of the Alt-Right. This is a good start to draw a line between the 2 movements. Both movement are fed up with the failures of modern day conservatism. They push their arguments based on empirical evidences and logic. And they prefer using good rethorics based in truth rather than try to debate their political opponents through dialectic. And that’s pretty much it for what is in common. Alt-Right and Alt-Lite agree on points 1,2,3,4,7,(10),12,15 and 16.

Where the disagreement lies is up until where the reasoning is pushed. Like Point 9: identity > culture > politics. The Alt-Lite believes that some culture are not compatible and that Culture is some sort of “social construct”. The Alt-Right doesn’t believe that. Culture is a by-product of our identity. And our identity is dictated by who we are: the influence of our community, the education of our parents but foremost our genetics. Which brings the next point that differentiate Alt-Lite and Alt-Right: Point 11: DIVERSITY + PROXIMITY = WAR. Always. The Alt-Lite believes that if people from other races or culture recognize the greatness of Western Civilization, then they may live within this civilization. The Alt-Right believes that if someone admires Western Civilization, he is free to copy it in his own country. He is welcome as a tourist. But no foreigners can be granted the right of citizenship (just like in Japan). Therefore mass deportation are currently the only solution (in order to not conflict point 11 and point 16 which promotes peaceful solution as much as possible).

Point 5 and point 15 are also essential points of the Alt-Right. The Alt-Lite will not look into the status nor the privileges of certain races or ethnicities. While the Alt-Right will treat absolutely everyone equally. In a way, the Alt-Lite believes there is still some form of political correctness.

The Alt-Lite will talk about population replacement through immigration and religion. But they will not talk about population replacement through race-mixing. Race-mixing doesn’t seems to be a problem for the Alt-Lite. While the Alt-Right believes in Point 14: we must secure the existence of white people and a future for white children. Alternatively, The Alt-Right wants to protect all races in their sovereign nations. But right now and for the foreseeable future, only whites are about to be extinct.

To resume the Alt-Right believes that Europe and North America (and a few other places) belongs to White people ONLY. And only indigenous people get to choose the destiny of their own nations. Therefore white genes, white culture and white interests have to be promoted in politics and in popular cultures. No matter how politically incorrect it may sound. No matter the solution. Just hoping it can be as peaceful as it can get.

The rise of the AltRight

The call to the rally to unite the right marks a new era. It will show how committed the right is. Using good rhetorics with the truth it became the dominant ideology on the Internet. It is now time to go live and spread to the word in a peaceful manner in the real world. Libtards are giggling like chickens before being beheaded. After all, their only response is censorship. It is emotional and instinctive, whilst their argument limited to labeling their opponents. The big ideology shift nowadays makes the left tremble. Hence they fire everywhere, shooting down as well altLite figures like Sargon of Akkad or Lauren Southern, or even sometimes open leftist like Dave Rubin.


Unfortunately, this rally is only possible in the USA where the constitution protects the rights of individuals. On the contrary, Europe is muzzled, as the constitution protects the people in power,not the individuals. Such event is not conceivable unless you wanna end up in jail or beaten up by the police. At least for the moment.

Therefore, measuring the size of the right wing power in Europe is necessary to make people understand that they are not alone. Beyond any number, yet, the new right wing is the only movement that can bring a new “New-Renaissance” to Europeans and Americans

On one hand the so called “extreme right” in Europe includes the alt-Right, the Alt-Lite, some cuckservatives and even lefties. On the other hand, many people vote for other political parties, fearing of being labelled “extremist”, fired or socially exiled. But recent elections are giving us a hint on how many people are fed up with the current system.

  • Britain UKIP scored 12.1, and voted last year for Brexit (slightly above 50%).
  • France 2017 elections gave 34.7% for Marine Le Pen.
  • Austria’s Freedom pary got 35% in 2016.
  • Belgium NVA and VB had together around 25% of the vote but it was in 2014.

A good approximation tells us that slightly more than a third of European voters are voting for real conservative parties. And that is not so bad, especially considering women, gays and immigrants.

Yet, these numbers have to be adjusted due to the abstentions (around 40%), the number of whites people left (around 80% and making it most of the abstention), and the ratios of vote between men and women (men make most of the abstention as women like voting to gargle their ego). Hence, roughly 17% of the population supports a right wing party. Or about 27% of white people, and 37 % of White men.

The alt-Right is surely a minority among this group, even if most of the people are sympathising. For example PEGIDA did a protest in Dresden Germany in 2016. Police expected 15000, 8000 showed up. If the police expected 1 in 4 activist to show up. It means around the region of Free state of Saxony, there are 25 thousands AltLite/AltRight activits. The “Extreme right” party AFD got 160 thousands votes in 2014. Adjusting for 2016, let’s round it up to 200 000 votes. It means around 12.5% of the Extreme right is under the umbrella of the Alt-Right/Alt-Lite. Giving 6% to the AltRight.

We can conclude that around 2 to 3% of European white men seem to be red pilled. But that is almost large enough! The threshold of population seems to be located at 3%. If we do stick together, authorities wont be able to stand against us. We are at a turning point in history…

Race-Mixing and Feminism are still a problem

I recently watch the conversation between Stefan Molyneux and Faith Goldy. Faith has some interesting insight. Her points about having NATO troops at the border armed with RPGs surely gave me a smile. But she lost part of her credibility claiming the Alt-Right wants big government to overturn population replacement. This is where she is wrong and this is where the line between the Alt-Right and the Alt-Light is drawned. The Alt-Light is not red pill.

First, Population replacement doesn’t only occur with immigration or attacks like on the Bataclan or in Brussels. It is true that whites tend to have a lot fewer children than non-Whites. It can be linked to economical reasons (transfer of wealth from Whites to Non-Whites), propaganda and biological reason (r/K selection). But the core of the problem lies in race-mixing, which makes about a quarter of all marriages in France, and it is growing rapidly. And it is for the most part Arab and Black men with a white women.

This gives us 3 problems:

  1. The average IQ of mulattoes is the average of their parents (so it is around Arab-Turkish average). It is clearly not enough in order to maintain and improve a society as advanced and complex as Western civilization. The failure of these populations is very clear in countries like the USA and South-Africa
  2. Mulattoes tend to identify with the race they have the most in common. And mulattoes look anything but white. White genes are for the most part recessive therefore they will not show up easily on the offspring of mixed-race couples. Good example: Obama is the first USA black president. His white heritage is never mentioned.
  3. As the propaganda pushes for a White-Female Arab/Black man couples. There is a lost of an entire Chromosome: The Y-Chromosome. And this probably the most important  chromosome that generates great individuals.

Second, feminism is still an issue. Feminism is not only pushing crazy women to paint their hair in blue. Feminists push white women to stop having children, or having children at a later stage of their lives (which increase exponentially the chance of these children to develop mental or physical diseases)


However Big Goverment is not needed in order to reverse all this. But some policies have to be taken in order to preserve our civilization and our way of life. Propositions have already been made on this blog. But here are some policies that could help on this subject and it doesn’t requires blowing up the size and scope of Government:

  • Reverse propaganda. (basically open up competition to the Hollywood industrial complex).
  • Cutting immediately all government benefits (from healthcare to education) to non-Whites. And eventually to everyone across the board later on. (So this is actually reducing the size of Government)
  • Discrimination by race or gender is no longer a crime.
  • Deregulation of the entire economy. This is not only a reduction of the size of Government. This will put many women out of jobs (Accountants, Lawyers, Gender Studies professors…), pushing them to seek security in men rather than government.
  • Marriage is done by the church entirely (no more Government intervention).
  • Punish pedophilia and rape with permanent castration, the death penalty or lifetime imprisonment (lying about rape gets the same punishment)
  • Extra tax on anyone who is not White and/or decrease (or abolish) taxes on Whites. This will actually benefit everybody as Whites tend to be more creative and productive. It can be a flat-tax or a tariff.
  • Benefits for couples with white Children (from the tax on Non-Whites). Adding penalties for any STDs found in child or parents blood or on the age of the mother (the older she is, the less she gets).
  • People can refuse DNA test, but won’t get benefits and will pay taxes just like any non-white.
  • Political positions can only be held by White Christians who admit that the overwhelming contribution of White Christian males to the greatness of Western Civilization.
  • Tax for adopting non white children.
  • Strong border security, financed entirely by: expensive Visas on foreigners, taxes on international travel, taxes on imports (including raw materials like food, oil and gas). Airlines companies pay their taxes like any other business.
  • Elections: one vote per white family having at least one white child. Anyone else doesn’t get to vote.
  • Free Market (with the addition of the points above) can give a clear upper edge for every white male, increasing his chance of mating with a white female and carrying an offspring.

This is not to pick on Faith Goldy, she already did a great transition. But it is needed to point out that the Alt-Lite doesn’t have the guts yet to address theses issues.  Less marketing and more self commitment would already be good start. Eventually, they will come to the Alt-Right as it is the only political system that will address, analyze and solve every single issue.

#MoreThanARefugee is a Victory of the Alt-Right, not the Alt-Lite

A few days ago YouTube with the help of Soros & Friends decided to play their part in the propaganda industry. My first reaction was “Here we go again…” but 4Chan /pol/ saw it differently.


People reacted in mass and took on the battle. Despite Youtube deleting comments and dislikes : 13 millions views… they did not even bother tracking the proportions correctly…

And this reaction came from people around the World (France, Poland, UK…). It is clear now that there is a significant part of the civilized world who is completely fed up with the multiracial agenda. Being a rebel nowadays means standing against a globalized world where cultures and races mix all together. A rebel is someone therefore who stands for his ancestry, for his genetic background : his race. And this attracts many in the younger generation.

And this is why the Alt-Light cannot claim this victory. Looking at the comment section, it is clear that people are fed up about immigration all together, NOT JUST ISLAM:


This is a great indicator, this shows the Alt-Light is just a temporary political movement. A trampoline  into the Alt-Right. Once you ask relatively smart people to think on their own, they all come to the same conclusion. And the Alt-Right is the only political movement which is based on Reality: Science, Skepticism, Criticism, Lessons from history …

And the solution remains : only homogeneous patriarchal white nations can build civilization and save the world.