SJW, Liberals, libtards… name them like you want: Those who pretend to be seeking the best for all. Every time I hear their nonsense I just can’t stand away from an argument with them – my apologies to Voxday. So, let me walk you through some of the highlights of the discussion I had with one of them recently.
She is a young lady, 20 years old, feminist and a student in economics. She attends a great school, leveled to Harvard or MIT. Our conversation started over the subjects of drugs and gun control. I took her through the concept of equilibrium in societies and explained her how for the first time in recorded history, society now privileges laws over morality. In a nutshell, I said that societies mostly stand on morality to prevent wrong behaviors, where laws are only coercive and repressive. As a society is lowering its moral standards, the need for more laws (repression) grows. Likewise, uncivilivized behaviors can be controlled through severe repression (i.e. Islam). In any case, the only way to develop a society is to have the highest amount of behaviors aligned with the common good. Morality is necessary to develop and maintain a civilized society. And morality is also a question of intelligence – monkeys don’t appear to have morality.
Hence, where a civilized white christian society could make guns and drugs available to everyone, it would be a total disaster to do the same in Turkey, Morroco, Saudi Arabia, India, etc. As I explained: if you don’t train your dog well enough and you remove the leash, do not expect him to behave correctly. The same goes for human: “social liberalism” is only achievable if population is 1) smart enough for it and 2) if this society has enough morality to support it. Surprisingly, our opinion didn’t differ on this.
Later on we finally came to the same conclusion that a homogeneous society is required to maintain stability. Then, she moved on and told me that this is why we require a homogeneous world with a single culture, language, and power to control us. As people won’t comply to this, it is required to have a strong government that pushes people to do it, against their will.
Inevitably, we moved to the racial issue. I asked her who would then replace us in the future. And the answer was that blacks, arabs or asians will simply replace us, and that is not even an issue. I couldn’t stop myself and asked if we could rather make Africa white instead of making Europe black. Yet, that apparently was not an option, since it would be considered racist.
So out of this discussion, I isolated the 3 pillars of so called liberals and social justice warriors:
1. Abolish cultures, nations and human diversity and replace it by a single world society.
2. Have elites and a central government to rule these people. Abolish individual freedom.
3. Ensure that human blood is mixed and that white people disappears.
Remember, she learned all of this in one of these big schools. And of course they are naive enough to picture themselves as the rulers…