Race-Mixing and Feminism are still a problem

I recently watch the conversation between Stefan Molyneux and Faith Goldy. Faith has some interesting insight. Her points about having NATO troops at the border armed with RPGs surely gave me a smile. But she lost part of her credibility claiming the Alt-Right wants big government to overturn population replacement. This is where she is wrong and this is where the line between the Alt-Right and the Alt-Light is drawned. The Alt-Light is not red pill.

First, Population replacement doesn’t only occur with immigration or attacks like on the Bataclan or in Brussels. It is true that whites tend to have a lot fewer children than non-Whites. It can be linked to economical reasons (transfer of wealth from Whites to Non-Whites), propaganda and biological reason (r/K selection). But the core of the problem lies in race-mixing, which makes about a quarter of all marriages in France, and it is growing rapidly. And it is for the most part Arab and Black men with a white women.

This gives us 3 problems:

  1. The average IQ of mulattoes is the average of their parents (so it is around Arab-Turkish average). It is clearly not enough in order to maintain and improve a society as advanced and complex as Western civilization. The failure of these populations is very clear in countries like the USA and South-Africa
  2. Mulattoes tend to identify with the race they have the most in common. And mulattoes look anything but white. White genes are for the most part recessive therefore they will not show up easily on the offspring of mixed-race couples. Good example: Obama is the first USA black president. His white heritage is never mentioned.
  3. As the propaganda pushes for a White-Female Arab/Black man couples. There is a lost of an entire Chromosome: The Y-Chromosome. And this probably the most important  chromosome that generates great individuals.

Second, feminism is still an issue. Feminism is not only pushing crazy women to paint their hair in blue. Feminists push white women to stop having children, or having children at a later stage of their lives (which increase exponentially the chance of these children to develop mental or physical diseases)

langfr-496px-down_syndrome_risk_by_maternal_age-semilog-svg

However Big Goverment is not needed in order to reverse all this. But some policies have to be taken in order to preserve our civilization and our way of life. Propositions have already been made on this blog. But here are some policies that could help on this subject and it doesn’t requires blowing up the size and scope of Government:

  • Reverse propaganda. (basically open up competition to the Hollywood industrial complex).
  • Cutting immediately all government benefits (from healthcare to education) to non-Whites. And eventually to everyone across the board later on. (So this is actually reducing the size of Government)
  • Discrimination by race or gender is no longer a crime.
  • Deregulation of the entire economy. This is not only a reduction of the size of Government. This will put many women out of jobs (Accountants, Lawyers, Gender Studies professors…), pushing them to seek security in men rather than government.
  • Marriage is done by the church entirely (no more Government intervention).
  • Punish pedophilia and rape with permanent castration, the death penalty or lifetime imprisonment (lying about rape gets the same punishment)
  • Extra tax on anyone who is not White and/or decrease (or abolish) taxes on Whites. This will actually benefit everybody as Whites tend to be more creative and productive. It can be a flat-tax or a tariff.
  • Benefits for couples with white Children (from the tax on Non-Whites). Adding penalties for any STDs found in child or parents blood or on the age of the mother (the older she is, the less she gets).
  • People can refuse DNA test, but won’t get benefits and will pay taxes just like any non-white.
  • Political positions can only be held by White Christians who admit that the overwhelming contribution of White Christian males to the greatness of Western Civilization.
  • Tax for adopting non white children.
  • Strong border security, financed entirely by: expensive Visas on foreigners, taxes on international travel, taxes on imports (including raw materials like food, oil and gas). Airlines companies pay their taxes like any other business.
  • Elections: one vote per white family having at least one white child. Anyone else doesn’t get to vote.
  • Free Market (with the addition of the points above) can give a clear upper edge for every white male, increasing his chance of mating with a white female and carrying an offspring.

This is not to pick on Faith Goldy, she already did a great transition. But it is needed to point out that the Alt-Lite doesn’t have the guts yet to address theses issues.  Less marketing and more self commitment would already be good start. Eventually, they will come to the Alt-Right as it is the only political system that will address, analyze and solve every single issue.

Is race mixing superior?

Race mixing, “métissage“makes people better – that’s what they say. The modern double narratives of unique race doesn’t miss an opportunity to pinpoint the superiority of race mixing. Facing this absurd bullshit, I see no option but bringing common sense to face a bunch of lies.

Image associée

Races and species are adapted to their environment. Species mixing normally does not work. In some cases, offspring can be made, but their survival or reproduction is jeopardized (e.g. mules). Therefore, we know that nature doesn’t see species mixing as something to be fostered. For races, offspring can indeed survive and reproduce themselves, hence creating a so-called new race. But if this is the way to go, why didn’t nature do it before?

There are multiple reasons to this. Race mixing implies the superiority of a race on another, at least on certain characteristics such as intelligence, physical characteristics, etc. Intrinsically, there is no race superiority; nature doesn’t care about superiority. The real parameters are time and state at a time t for a series of characteristics. The odds are played in a rather deterministic way at a certain time. Always. The term superiority relates to a series of characteristics to match with an environment at a time t. Wherever some take over others, then a talk about superiority can be done. Hence, superiority is connected to 1) time, and 2) environment. Superiority can neither be eternal neither omnipresent.

Races evolve differently in different environments. Our genetics evolved to answer problems that are commonly faced in a specific environment. Climate, resources abundance, food quality, temperature, distance, etc. are all parameters that play over a well-adapted being. Today, of course technology bypasses most of the required genetic evolution for an environment (e.g. water transformation, heating and food conservation). Genetic modifications (mutation) appear during the life of an individual (somatic), and during the creation of semen (hereditary). Generally speaking, we adapt during our life to our environment and the life process enables us to transmit it to a new offspring that will have a “white page” to adapt to the environment. Living and dying is the only process that can ensure adaptation to the environment and the survival of the species.

Saying that race mixing would bring a superior offspring implies that the offspring would be more adapted to the environment than the parents. The implication of genetic mutation and evolution necessitates the selection of the best genes at the time of the fusion of the ovary and the sperm:

  1. That would imply a consciousness of the future environment of the semen in order to select the most appropriate genes. By definition, adaptation is a post process, and therefore this scenario is mathematically impossible. In addition, genes selection has a statistical result, such as skin color for example, that also invalidates the theory of the selection of the best genes: the disparity of results implies a non superiority of the offspring.
  2. Each genetic code is the best evolutionary result for its environment matching its race characteristics. Selecting the best in two races would suppose that the best characteristics from two different environments are selected at the same time; the limited nature of selection prevents the co-existence of two opposite characteristics. This means that the resulting offspring will never be completely adapted to the environment A and B: he will have characteristics from both. The offspring is therefore constantly weaker, and if superiority appears, it should be matched with time and all parameters.

In the long run, the offspring will evolve towards the most adapted genes, hence resulting in the initial situation A or B, but not A and B. Race mixing is therefore temporary and does not provide better offspring.

If leftists say that we are all equal, then offspring cannot be superior to the parents. Superiority would go against the principle of equality.

And if we are not equal, then there is a superiority, and this superiority should be kept. Else, nature will ensure to restore it over time. That’s called evolution.

Social Status (part 1): Anti-White propaganda

This is a series of posts about the importance of social status in the sexual market. How men and women react and adapt to it? What are the roots? What are the consequences? This first part covers the anti-white propaganda.

But before developing all of this, taking a rational look of the current situation might not be a bad idea. For years now I have been living (and I grew up) in a hostile environment. What can I do… I am a simple Northern European… I never felt good when the black hero dude on TV is getting the white girl. I didn’t as a kid and frankly I still don’t. Yet it stuck me only recently. Why is that? Aren’t my hero supposed to be like me? Someone I could become one day?

As I walk through the streets, when I am on my phone, or turn on the TV here is what I see ALL THE TIME:

I live in Belgium. A country that has been white since…. well forever. Why are the alpha males portrayed by mainstream cultures always blacks or arabs? These are just a few examples but notice how this is almost entirely always a black or an arab male with a white female. Notice how white are marginalized and how “people of color” are brought to the center of the photo (alpha position).

Why is the apple helpline a black dude and a white female?

16466551_10211097987984157_1180138747_o

I ask it again: why always Black man / white female ?

Rock is music written by whites and for whites….what the hell do they stand there? Who put them there?

Science fiction is created exclusively by whites and for withes…

YET AGAIN…

Now take a look at how Han Solo, the typical white Alpha-male that use to arouse every white female vagina is getting lower on the picture.

And our kids keep on getting indoctrinated:

And when a white guy finally appears on screen:

16442847_10211098227870154_149886985_o

One could say it is all a coincidence after 1 or 2 times. But having a normal representation of white christian straight guy in popular culture is getting rare. This cannot be a coincidence. There is a call for white genocide, in Hollywood, in the Mainstream media, in the commercials and in our daily lives. Slowly they replaced us so that we would get used to it. Used to our own genocide.

More (UPDATE):

589403d8b31dc

img-20170220-wa0000img-20170212-wa0008img-20161223-wa0015img-20161107-wa0020img-20161223-wa0006