The game, that imposture…

The paradox of man is that the better you become, the more choice you have, the least you care for women.

A few years ago I met the community of the Game. I read Neil Strauss’ book, and eventually got confused.

I saw many men, between 20 and 30 for most, meeting up only to pick up girls. As Neil describes it, it appears to them that picking up women is an art and a symbol of masculinity. But is it?

Game describes fairly well what women wants, and tries to give an answer to what a man is. It is told that women are emotional, hypergamic, and it is simpler to shortcut true masculinity and pretending being a so called “alpha”.

But it seems to me that this is a wrong question. Men should know what a man is, and not look at women to find it. According to me, that is a total scam on weak men searching for a path, a way of life.

To be honest, Neil, like many gamers, has a feminine energy. They look and feel gay. Even the gamer I like the most like Tyler, for his motivational and purpose focus couldn’t escape this rule.

A true man doesn’t look for who he is through women appreciation. Comparing the amount of phone numbers is a mere reflection of a lack of self confidence and identity. Self amusement is not a proof of personal development, it is a proof of submission and despair. That is not freedom, this is not what men are meant to be. Every man knows that.

Starting a hobby to look cooler doesn’t make one cooler, it is the perfect continuation of whom this man should be: a man looking for  identity. Get the right girl, and everything vanishes. Is that what a man is supposed to do?

Men are not made for a daily sexual intercourse with a different woman, just like women are not made to switch from males to males. These behaviors actually undermine our society and break the required trust between sexes. These behaviors are the line between animals and humanity. Which side do you want to take?

By taking women for granted, lie to them, dumping them and selling them the dream of the best time of their life, the “gamers” are not bastards. They are just a bunch of useful idiots in a decadent world. All of that because they did not grasp their true masculinity, nor have what it takes for building a civilization.

So what do I have in mind? It is rather simple. Instead on focusing on pleasing women (for sex in exchange) start doing what you like, for yourself. Meet people through hobbies and work. Avoid wing men, but rather look for true brother.

Build something bigger than you. Realise that you are part of a bigger family. Realise that your cilivisation needs you as a man of value. That your nation needs you. That your people (especially within your race) and your religion need you.

Be honest with yourself. Work on your knowledge and your skills. Focus on yourself and on helping others. Build and give.

When you will truly internalise that you only need one woman to make a family, when you will be of total indifference for a so called “10”, when you will feel that you are on your right way, then you’ll have reached the man that you truly are. And at that moment, you will have much more value in the eyes of every single women.

SJWs, disobedient children

We tried to help SJWs on reddit to improve their knowledge on crime and immigration. Education is very important for us, and it shouldn’t be left in the hands of toxic people!

Their answer was firm and quiet. Within minutes, the post has been removed, we have bee blocked… And they muted us to make sure we can’t even reply to them.

These children are really funny. If anything contradicts their beliefs or simply brings facts, they censor speech. Just like kids.

Actually, one of the pioneer of the censure is the father of our sexually deprived society, Sigmund Freud. Sexually frustrated man, part of these people, he saw sex everywhere. Apparently, for him pedophilia is natural… but is it?!

His only argument to support his sick theories was: “if you don’t accept that children want sex with adults and that adults want sex with children, it is because you know that you are like that, but too dishonest to say it loud”.

Well, we got the same kind of argument today. I am afraid that a big slap in the face is the only cure for a SJW.

Ukrainian beauty for sale

It didn’t take too long to the globalists to destroy Ukraine. White genocide is the priority, afterall.

They instantiated a fake war in the east, recruiting thousands of young Ukrainian men to the battlefield. Killing them, demoralizing them, and leaving the rear country defenseless.

Women stay alone and pray for their man to return… Or simply gargle their ego with occidental feminist dreams, sometimes selling their body to the first pornographer coming. Men fight, women betray, that is the cultural marxist agenda for Ukraine.

One of the last unconquered country at the door of Russia is Ukraine, and the land of these people shall remain neither Christian nor White. Because to their master, their lord is the false lord, it is no doubt local blood should also be replaced.

That is why Ukraine will now take some refugees. Europe took about 0 Ukrainian refugee; these having been taken were by chance, by mistake or for sex. The UNHCR says:

More than three years of conflict has left more than two million Ukrainians displaced from their homes. 480,000 others have sought asylum in neighboring countries. Many fled with barely anything and in search for safety.

The conflict has impacted some of the most vulnerable populations in Ukraine – of the estimated 1.6 million IDPs in Ukraine, 900,000 are over the age of 60.

Never heard about that in any newspapers in Europe… But Ukraine HAS to take refugees and get more diverse if it wants to enjoy the true democratic heaven of the EU and NATO.

Ukrainian men and women, we pray for you. Don’t let them in, beat them and keep your women safe. Because these women are your true treasure and the key to your future as Ukrainians.

Sophie Tanner, a typical SJW idiot

Sophie Tanner is one those women who has been corrupted by the political agenda of the Left.

Christian values are very clear: one man, one woman. But for SJWs, this is too easy (or probably too difficult). For this reason,  for  a free and emancipated woman, what is the ultimate goal? To boast your own self until you believe – as does every SJW – that your words are higher than the Word of God.

“When asked if divorce would ever be on the cards, Sophie said: ‘Marrying yourself is a lifelong commitment to be responsible for your own happiness, so divorce is not an option.’”

How Laughable, divorcing yourself.

And God has a way of punishing them. He turns them into eternally unsatisfied crybabies, waiting for big daddy to give them a slap on the face. Worse even, into crazy psychotic people, zombies. Yup, SJWs have much in common with zombies: ugly dwellers looking for the next host to infect and exploit, barely speaking anything understandable.

Sophie, you are an example of what women should not be. Thank you for leading by example.

Does feminism have 2 faces?

What conservatives and liberals mostly fail to identify is: what is a true feminist? Some will say it is a “business woman”, some others a “gold digger”.

Trials after trials, The manosphere tries to define what is a “good girl“. As Vox and the Alpha Game say:

Alpha Game: And … as feminism pushes … to ever more absurd levels, as ever more restrictions are placed on normal masculine behavior, ever more insane definitions of ‘rape’, ‘assault’, and ‘aggression’ are drafted into law in increasingly desperate attempts to somehow, anyhow, cast women as perpetual victims … The sound of the final battle between the sexes will not be heard in the streets or legislatures. It will not be televised or reported. There will be no flags hoisted or victory parades. Because it is already in progress.

Vox: It’s pretty simple, women. Either abandon feminism or abandon all hope of being wives and mothers.

The origin of feminism resides in the concept of “oppressor – oppressed”. Its goal is to win a pseudo sex war, where men and women are in competition for power and resources; in opposition with the Christian principle of sexual complementary. The weapons of men are clear: strength and intelligence. The ones of women: guilt and beauty. As it is a quest for power and resources, there are two means to obtain these: sex and so called “rights”. Conservatism and liberalism.

The spectrum of true feminism is spread from the feminine conservative solipsistic girl to the sexually ostracized LGBT working woman:

  • The hyper feminine, sexy and apparently conservative woman uses the traditional roles of men and women to maximize her profits. Instead of taking full responsibility for her role (keeping the house in check, support of the husband, taking care of children etc.), she will tend to divide the house work with her man whilst also requesting all the “conservative advantages” of a traditional relationship. Hence she will wake up late, go to parties with “girls”, request a breakfast, ask you to clean the house but also to pay most of the expenditures. She could also be that single woman who sells conservative values while partying, having casual sex and even engaging in inter-racial relationships (e.g. Lauren Southern or Maga Pegowska). This type of girl uses men to access resources and openly uses her charm to get them. She cannot commit to a relationship unless it maximizes her hypergamic odds. She is a feminist because she doesn’t accept her female role in society but rather aims at getting resources for herself. She needs feminism and women privileges to exist, and therefore she is a feminist.
  • The working LGTB woman demanding more privileges is in a direct confrontation with the patriarchal model. She acts out of frustration and fear, and probably the absence of a good father. The societal model has convinced her that she is oppressed and that being an independent women is the way to be.

Sometimes these two models are in one woman, that is the ultimate woman you have to either set her straight either avoid her.

Hence our job (as men) is not only to discourage the “obvious feminists” (of the left) but also to set straight the so called conservative women using their charm to manipulate men. We can’t afford more loss for our kind. Men and women are only one when they are united. And feminism is the cancer that destroys trust, families and society.

So, which is to be considered the most dangerous? The working, blue hair overweight “I am not sure about my gender” feminist or the conservative “more vicious type” feminist?

Why does my baby look like an alien?

Don’t be like this English mother, nor like Magda Pegowska. The English mother says:

“She’s getting very dark, isn’t she?” This is what one of my friends recently said about my much adored – 12-week-old daughter.

She didn’t mean to be rude. But it was a comment that struck me with the force of a jab to the stomach. Immediately, I was overwhelmed by a confusion of emotions. I felt protective, insulted, worried, ashamed, guilty, all at once. The reason? My lovely, wriggly, smiley baby is mixed race. Now, I think of myself as pretty ‘right on’. My home is on the border of the London Republic of Hackney. I’ve been to the Notting Hill Carnival, even if I found the music a bit loud. Yet now I realise what a ‘white’ world I inhabit. I am white and I have two sons from my first marriage who are both milky complexioned and golden haired. My twin sister, who I spend a lot of time with, has a Danish partner. As a consequence, she has two boys who are also pale skinned and flaxen haired. Into this positively Scandinavian next generation, I have now injected a tiny, dark-skinned, dark-haired girl. To say she stands out is an understatement. My colouring and that of my children has never really been an issue before. However, three years ago I met the man who became my second husband and who is the father of my daughter. Although born in the UK, his parents came from India in the Sixties. This makes him British-Asian and our daughter mixed race. There is another more PC term for the plump little bundle I strap to my front. She is ‘dual heritage’. It’s a bit trendy, but I quite like it. It implies a pride in coming from two cultures, rather than the less attractive connotations of ‘mixed race’. The usual time something is labelled ‘mixed’ is when it’s a packet of nuts and they’ve bulked out the luxury cashews with cheaper peanuts. I’m not sure I want my daughter to be regarded as an adulterated version of some pure original. Still, it is the most accepted description. The truth is, whatever the label, the fact there is a label proves that my daughter’s conflicting parentage matters. At the more frothy end of the scale, mixed-race children are regarded as pretty dolls — white kids with a nice tan. When I was pregnant and people asked me about the child I was having, and I explained her father was Indian, they would often coo something along the lines of: “Ooh, she’s going to be beautiful!” as if I was discussing a new rose, made from an exotic cross-breeding programme. On a less benevolent level, mixed-race children can receive a hostile welcome from both white and black communities. Being neither one thing nor another may get you on the cover of Vogue, but it isn’t an easy way to make friends. Scroll down for more… {1} But this is 2007, surely things are more enlightened than that? I hope so, but I fear not. One reason for my fear is my own mixed reactions to my daughter. Don’t get me wrong, I love her. She is the child I didn’t think I’d have after my first marriage broke up. She is the only granddaughter in our family and we all dote on her. But when I turn to the mirror in my bedroom to admire us together, I am shocked. She seems so alien. With her long, dark eyelashes and shiny, dark brown hair, she doesn’t look anything like me. I know that concentrating on how my daughter looks is shallow. She is a person in her own right, not an accessory to me. But still, I can’t shake off the feeling of unease. I didn’t realise how much her looking different would matter and, on a rational level, I know it shouldn’t. But it does. Evolution demands that we have children to pass on our genes, hence the sense of pride and validation we get when we see our features reappearing in the next generation. With my daughter, I don’t have that. Do black fathers who marry white women and then have paler-skinned children feel my sense of loss? Or maybe Chinese mothers or Middle-Eastern grandparents grieve when they see a child they know to be their own, but whose features don’t reflect that? I worry that, as my daughter doesn’t look like me, people will assume she is adopted. After all, it’s all the rage in showbiz circles. Madonna famously scooped up a black child when she wanted to be a mother again and Angelina Jolie appears to be assembling a ‘pick ‘n’ mix’ of kids from different countries. It’s all very United Colours of Benetton, isn’t it? In the real world, I fear for my daughter’s sense of self. She has a tiny foot in two cultures. How will she negotiate a path between the two? I worry that my sons will feel less of a kinship with their sister because she is different, although there is no sign of that. As for myself, there is an inescapable status issue to address. White women who have non-white children are stigmatised as ‘Tracy Towerblocks’ living on benefits, most of which they spend on lager and fags. Even if I don’t fit this profile, my daughter’s difference definitely points out the fact that my children come from two different fathers. If I wanted to pass us off as a nice, neat nuclear family, she would blow my cover at once. But it is more than that. I am frightened, frightened of others’ reactions to her, as well as my own. I didn’t think of myself as racist and yet my daughter has shown me a side of myself about which I feel deeply uncomfortable. Even admitting to having mixed feelings about her not being blonde and blue eyed, I feel disloyal and incredibly guilty. I know the obvious comment is that I must have known how a child of our union would look when I married an Indian man, but it is a wise woman who thinks that far ahead when she falls in love. I didn’t think about any of this before I got pregnant. I wanted to have a baby. Her colour and culture were immaterial then. But self-flagellation is not useful. I have more pressing concerns. I am now the mother of a ‘black’ child, even if she is more the hue of weak tea than espresso. This is a role for which I am utterly unprepared. Part of me thinks I should be playing sitar music to her in her cot, mastering pakoras and serving them dressed in a sari, but that would be fantastically fake coming from me. When she was born, pale but with lots of dark hair, I asked the midwife if her eyes would stay blue. ‘Asian genes are very strong,’ she said in what I took to be an ominous tone. No more Brady Bunch kids for me. The midwife has been proved right and every day my baby’s eyes get a little darker. Even so, when she looks up at me as I feed her, my heart melts. My love may not be colour blind, but hers is, and that is truly humbling.”

May god hear you and stop this insanity. As you see, in the absence of light, darkness prevails.

White women, more beautiful than you think

FACT: Feminism and Cultural Marxism make women ugly.

It is known for a fact that epi-genetic plays a major role in the regulation of health and weight and physical appearance (and the face in particular). It is also known that more attractive women are healthier and can give birth to healthier babies.

In this logic, it is evident that a healthier environment will “produce” more beautiful women. And what is a healthier environment?

  1. A healthy environment include lower stress, good sleep, healthy food, spending time outside regularly, low radiations, physical activity…
  2. The second point is the stress endured during childhood. It is known for a fact that a stable family and kids taken care by parents or close relative (instead of daycare) is the healthiest environment a child can have.

In white countries, these places are becoming rare as time passes by. As such western women do become uglier with time.

Beauty is to ugliness what is light to darkness. Do nothing and it flaws away.

Protect beauty, stop feminism.

IMG-20171010-WA0027.jpg

French language is sexist!

French, the great language of Molière, who brought to this world so many things is under sexist attack. In France and Belgium, the new battle for the feminists and the cultural-marxists SJWs is the so called “inclusive writing”. What the fuck?!

In French, there are 2 genders in the grammar (masculine and feminine), and the masculine is always the default one. Therefore, if you talk about a profession in general, such as “teachers”, you will say in French “les enseignants”. On the contrary, the feminine gender would be “les enseignantes”. And apparently that is sexist!

The real question asked in the Belgian newspaper is “is French sexist by nature?” (and therefore of course its roots should be dismantled). In France, the debate is more divided. The basic new way to write French would be “enseignant-e-s” instead of “enseignants”, just not to disturb angry feminist and SJW.

Some schools already started adopting the new standard, even if still not legalised. But that is just a formality in a sick world.

The real funny question will be when they will address two facts: Jew rabbies (aka newly rabbin-e-s) and Muslim Imams (aka newly Imam-e-s).

How will they say it? My guess is that there will be an exception for them. Wanna bet?

Dearcatcallers, that’s stupid

Sad, very sad. “Dearcatcallers” spends her life taking selfies with poor guys (so-called beta males).

This is what stupid women do when they are set free without any goal in life. They become feminists who do not even understand what they fight for. Anyway, I shouldn’t even bother because she doesn’t look too white to me.

Seriously, what’s the goal of taking selfies with poor guys but getting attention?! What is her achievement?! Nothing but stupidity.

At least she tells something: white men, man up and take back what is yours.

 

 

Social media are breaking families

In our society, tech giants are capable of influencing our behaviors, believes, etc. They create a new reality out of thin air. With their help, any lie can become a truth. The tiniest of ideas can be seen by hundreds of millions or be used to target any specific individual in any specific region.

To do so, they select their target and adapt the content each and everyone can see. The masses are not aware of this process and hence believe that what they see is a widespread truth, even if it is an exception. In two words, virtuality has succeeded to reality.

And now the European Commission aims at coordinating with social media to control algorithms selecting what you can see. Not only tech giants will have power over you, but also the government.

One of the worse impact for the white man is on the sexual market. Example:

A European woman connects to Facebook, and her newsfeed is flooded with other cultures, other men’s achievements, etc. Not so long ago, Facebook was promoting in Eastern countries a video with the smartest people on earth… and guess what: not a single white! How come?!

They show how rich, cool, and handsome are all non white men. How Arabs from Saudi or Dubai care for animals. How black people have more feelings and are more caring. How white men are disgusting bastards who invite refugees to abuse them. They help them reaching to your girlfriend, your wife, your daughter, in your back.

Recently a girl told me that in India they don’t have toilet, and it is our fault – we are bad people. Sorry girl, but I haven’t not seen a single white man restraining Indians from building nor using toilet. And we have been building them in Europe for thousands of years.

They build an entire lie on which children and women mostly hang they beliefs. More than school, more than books, they indoctrinate our people for not making families. They promote mixity everywhere, and make us feel guilty for even existing as people. They give the tools for cheating and breaking relationships, families.

It is high time to end the tech giant dictatorship and to denounce the fraudulent leaders in Europe and the USA.