Why women act as they do

That is the brain map of a man (up). And that is the brain map of a woman (down). See the difference? Now that is what our left and right brain do:

One doesn’t need to be a genius to understand what it means…

Women do no clearly separate their thoughts. They do not separate – biologically – their emotions from their reasoning. That means that women biologically tend to see the world through their sole perception, meaning their emotion. Since emotions are always self centered (even empathy), they can only be solipsistic. Their truth is not built through reasoning, it is memorized and felt.

They are unable of separating the abstract from the sensorial… But that is the foundation of morality! One can’t build moral standards if his emotions perturbate constantly his logic. Their sole escape is therefore an emotionally memorized morality. And to be fair, this exactly what the leftist school does: showers of emotions and codes of conduct (e.g. poor black babies die in Africa, help them! Men are bad and do not respect women, take from them!)… and obviously, that works.

When women think, they think according to what they feel right now. If it feels bad, it is bad. If it feels good, it is good. There is no separation in the brain that enables sorting the reality according to a broader perspective.

Since their brain is also self and emotionally centered, they also tend to believe that everything is either black or white. It is almost impossible for them to have a negative opinion without a good emotion, nor a positive opinion with a bad emotion. Example below with their translations:

“you ALWAYS do that”, “you NEVER do that” =  right now it feels like it was always there and never ended. Do what I want, or else it means that you give me bad emotions, and so it means that you are bad.

“all MEN are bad” = right now a man did (or I was told a bad story about) something that gave me very bad emotions. Therefore, all men are the same.

“I know one good black man” = One gives me good emotions, and this person defines my entire reality about race. Therefore, they are all good.

“I know one bad black” = One gave me so bad emotions, that this persons redefines my reality towards race, and I hate them all. We must kill of them, they are all bad.

I guess you got the logic: everything comes from what they feel. That is also why they fall for assholes easily: their emotions can make them blind to anything that is morally bad – plus Hollywood and school condition them to screw up. It works that way:

Behavioral memory built on wrong moral standards + emotions = conditionned disfunctional behavior

That is why it is impossible to have a serious rational discussion with a woman. Especially about this blog post: they will never agree and most likely enter an immense rage.

Exceptions will always be rules, and rules will always be exceptions, because there is no logic to drive rules out of their emotions.

Of course men also have the same property, but they are biologically advantaged not to behave that way. Men acting like women are called gamma. They think they are bosses or secret kings, while in fact, they are just women. Most of the so called “Alpha gammers” are actually gammas: their so called self development is fully focused on developing a better understanding and adaptive behaviour to women biology, rather than their own masculine biology.

Most politicians are also gammas, Trump and Putin being more or less the only western exceptions. That is why it is impossible to talk or solve any problem at a political level nowadays: we are led by women, trapped in the body of men – probably even worse than women. We are led by intellectually castrated men, some kind of “post modernist beta transsexual male”.

Now, add to this thinking pattern feminism, and you have an individual that is convinced that her reality and her feelings are morally right, good, smart and efficient FOR EVERYONE (because all that matter is themselves – what they feel). In a nutshell, a despicable being ready to do anything for her own good. Not pretty I would say.

Let’s conclude with a positive tone. Hopefully not all women are evil, and we still love them. The bright side is that we can control them for their own good, and as they are excellent at communicating with toddlers: make nice white babies and great families.

3 women manipulative behaviors

Résultat de recherche d'images pour "manipulative woman"

It is for a fact that women are inherently manipulative. In fact, in our society, almost all women are mentally sick, and totally unable to handle normal relationships with anyone; even women.

Evolutionary process or complementarity from the creation, it doesn’t relieve the psychological burden that the modern woman adds on a man’s mind. In every situation, they tend to maximize their own benefits and to demonize their man – the famous guilt trick. Here I want to highlight few techniques that women use to manipulate men within a relationship, so that men can step back from their shit tests, put some perspective and see that a whole forest can actually hide the same trees.

Case study

She didn’t/doesn’t want to cook anything; even if she stayed the whole day at home while you worked 12 hours. Instead of being frank, she will say “we never go out to restaurant together, and you go with your colleagues. You don’t care for us!”. As such, she tries to make you feel guilty for not paying her a restaurant today, while depicting herself as a poor victim. You may not answer, laugh, agree and amplify, or whatever, but you will quickly notice that this game is just exhausting.

Your girl will usually alternate between a combination of these techniques:

  1. Negation and guilt trick: you answer straight “yeah, we never go, but where is the meal today”. She replies “you never understand anything”, starts ignoring you, and maybe texting with her “friends” just to make you feel bad.
  2. Aggressiveness: you keep standing and ignore her. Since no other men would be there to pay her what she wants, she has no other option but to push for it with you. She becomes aggressive verbally and/or physically. She insults you, shouts, hits you, or bites you. She is looking for “physical dominance“.
  3. Sudden calmness and caring: she comes to you nicely, maybe asking for apologies for her behavior. It seems that everything is gone. She hugs you and then she asks again what she wants. That step is the most important. She is now testing your true resilience. If you answer “no”, she will switch to one of the other strategies and give you another cycle, or accept her fate in sign of resignation.

Usually, these 3 strategies are combined over a more or less long period of time. It can last between 10 min to a couple of days depending on her emotional stability (or psycho score). Just note that you do not have to win all the battles to win the war, just the most important ones.

When it comes to women, knowing when and how to lose is also part of the art of winning.

What techniques can you use against this?

The answer is tricky. On one side, I would like to tell you that “agreeing and amplifying alike” techniques are good, but on the other side I want to point out the fact that any behavior that is not natural for you will eventually result in an outburst on your side. I believe that the most important is to remember that women communicate through “shit testing”, and that nothing is really serious. And if it is serious enough, she will leave you. But what is serious for her?

That is only serious if she believes that her sexual value enables her to get better without paying any price for it (social, emotional or material).

That leaves you with only one option: remain calm and do not give too much importance because your fate is already decided – unconsciously. Try not to take it personally, but remember that modern women are not reliable for most of them. They are all ready to leave you under whatever circumstance, should it maximize her well-being (social, emotional, financial or material). So, unfortunately, the sad truth is that whether she will or not stay with you is already communicated in her behavior. If she is not into you, or has better, she will leave you, and tell everyone how a poor guy you are.

That is why my belief is that the best option any man has today is to invest in what he does. Your value as a man is the only thing that will retain her. If you give it away to her, she will leave you. Also remember that any woman will try to take away your value, because if she is with you, it is foremost because she thinks that you are worth more than her. So, she also believes that all women think and feel the same. She projects her insecurity into jealousy and in fine into a “ball cutting” exercise – if she lowers your value under hers, then she can keep you with her, but unfortunately she will then want another man.

The sad paradox of women is that their happiness must always be controlled, always keeping them one step away from their true liberation.

The game, that imposture…

The paradox of man is that the better you become, the more choice you have, the least you care for women.

A few years ago I met the community of the Game. I read Neil Strauss’ book, and eventually got confused.

I saw many men, between 20 and 30 for most, meeting up only to pick up girls. As Neil describes it, it appears to them that picking up women is an art and a symbol of masculinity. But is it?

Game describes fairly well what women wants, and tries to give an answer to what a man is. It is told that women are emotional, hypergamic, and it is simpler to shortcut true masculinity and pretending being a so called “alpha”.

But it seems to me that this is a wrong question. Men should know what a man is, and not look at women to find it. According to me, that is a total scam on weak men searching for a path, a way of life.

To be honest, Neil, like many gamers, has a feminine energy. They look and feel gay. Even the gamer I like the most like Tyler, for his motivational and purpose focus couldn’t escape this rule.

A true man doesn’t look for who he is through women appreciation. Comparing the amount of phone numbers is a mere reflection of a lack of self confidence and identity. Self amusement is not a proof of personal development, it is a proof of submission and despair. That is not freedom, this is not what men are meant to be. Every man knows that.

Starting a hobby to look cooler doesn’t make one cooler, it is the perfect continuation of whom this man should be: a man looking for  identity. Get the right girl, and everything vanishes. Is that what a man is supposed to do?

Men are not made for a daily sexual intercourse with a different woman, just like women are not made to switch from males to males. These behaviors actually undermine our society and break the required trust between sexes. These behaviors are the line between animals and humanity. Which side do you want to take?

By taking women for granted, lie to them, dumping them and selling them the dream of the best time of their life, the “gamers” are not bastards. They are just a bunch of useful idiots in a decadent world. All of that because they did not grasp their true masculinity, nor have what it takes for building a civilization.

So what do I have in mind? It is rather simple. Instead on focusing on pleasing women (for sex in exchange) start doing what you like, for yourself. Meet people through hobbies and work. Avoid wing men, but rather look for true brother.

Build something bigger than you. Realise that you are part of a bigger family. Realise that your cilivisation needs you as a man of value. That your nation needs you. That your people (especially within your race) and your religion need you.

Be honest with yourself. Work on your knowledge and your skills. Focus on yourself and on helping others. Build and give.

When you will truly internalise that you only need one woman to make a family, when you will be of total indifference for a so called “10”, when you will feel that you are on your right way, then you’ll have reached the man that you truly are. And at that moment, you will have much more value in the eyes of every single women.

Does feminism have 2 faces?

What conservatives and liberals mostly fail to identify is: what is a true feminist? Some will say it is a “business woman”, some others a “gold digger”.

Trials after trials, The manosphere tries to define what is a “good girl“. As Vox and the Alpha Game say:

Alpha Game: And … as feminism pushes … to ever more absurd levels, as ever more restrictions are placed on normal masculine behavior, ever more insane definitions of ‘rape’, ‘assault’, and ‘aggression’ are drafted into law in increasingly desperate attempts to somehow, anyhow, cast women as perpetual victims … The sound of the final battle between the sexes will not be heard in the streets or legislatures. It will not be televised or reported. There will be no flags hoisted or victory parades. Because it is already in progress.

Vox: It’s pretty simple, women. Either abandon feminism or abandon all hope of being wives and mothers.

The origin of feminism resides in the concept of “oppressor – oppressed”. Its goal is to win a pseudo sex war, where men and women are in competition for power and resources; in opposition with the Christian principle of sexual complementary. The weapons of men are clear: strength and intelligence. The ones of women: guilt and beauty. As it is a quest for power and resources, there are two means to obtain these: sex and so called “rights”. Conservatism and liberalism.

The spectrum of true feminism is spread from the feminine conservative solipsistic girl to the sexually ostracized LGBT working woman:

  • The hyper feminine, sexy and apparently conservative woman uses the traditional roles of men and women to maximize her profits. Instead of taking full responsibility for her role (keeping the house in check, support of the husband, taking care of children etc.), she will tend to divide the house work with her man whilst also requesting all the “conservative advantages” of a traditional relationship. Hence she will wake up late, go to parties with “girls”, request a breakfast, ask you to clean the house but also to pay most of the expenditures. She could also be that single woman who sells conservative values while partying, having casual sex and even engaging in inter-racial relationships (e.g. Lauren Southern or Maga Pegowska). This type of girl uses men to access resources and openly uses her charm to get them. She cannot commit to a relationship unless it maximizes her hypergamic odds. She is a feminist because she doesn’t accept her female role in society but rather aims at getting resources for herself. She needs feminism and women privileges to exist, and therefore she is a feminist.
  • The working LGTB woman demanding more privileges is in a direct confrontation with the patriarchal model. She acts out of frustration and fear, and probably the absence of a good father. The societal model has convinced her that she is oppressed and that being an independent women is the way to be.

Sometimes these two models are in one woman, that is the ultimate woman you have to either set her straight either avoid her.

Hence our job (as men) is not only to discourage the “obvious feminists” (of the left) but also to set straight the so called conservative women using their charm to manipulate men. We can’t afford more loss for our kind. Men and women are only one when they are united. And feminism is the cancer that destroys trust, families and society.

So, which is to be considered the most dangerous? The working, blue hair overweight “I am not sure about my gender” feminist or the conservative “more vicious type” feminist?