Why women act as they do

That is the brain map of a man (up). And that is the brain map of a woman (down). See the difference? Now that is what our left and right brain do:

One doesn’t need to be a genius to understand what it means…

Women do no clearly separate their thoughts. They do not separate – biologically – their emotions from their reasoning. That means that women biologically tend to see the world through their sole perception, meaning their emotion. Since emotions are always self centered (even empathy), they can only be solipsistic. Their truth is not built through reasoning, it is memorized and felt.

They are unable of separating the abstract from the sensorial… But that is the foundation of morality! One can’t build moral standards if his emotions perturbate constantly his logic. Their sole escape is therefore an emotionally memorized morality. And to be fair, this exactly what the leftist school does: showers of emotions and codes of conduct (e.g. poor black babies die in Africa, help them! Men are bad and do not respect women, take from them!)… and obviously, that works.

When women think, they think according to what they feel right now. If it feels bad, it is bad. If it feels good, it is good. There is no separation in the brain that enables sorting the reality according to a broader perspective.

Since their brain is also self and emotionally centered, they also tend to believe that everything is either black or white. It is almost impossible for them to have a negative opinion without a good emotion, nor a positive opinion with a bad emotion. Example below with their translations:

“you ALWAYS do that”, “you NEVER do that” =  right now it feels like it was always there and never ended. Do what I want, or else it means that you give me bad emotions, and so it means that you are bad.

“all MEN are bad” = right now a man did (or I was told a bad story about) something that gave me very bad emotions. Therefore, all men are the same.

“I know one good black man” = One gives me good emotions, and this person defines my entire reality about race. Therefore, they are all good.

“I know one bad black” = One gave me so bad emotions, that this persons redefines my reality towards race, and I hate them all. We must kill of them, they are all bad.

I guess you got the logic: everything comes from what they feel. That is also why they fall for assholes easily: their emotions can make them blind to anything that is morally bad – plus Hollywood and school condition them to screw up. It works that way:

Behavioral memory built on wrong moral standards + emotions = conditionned disfunctional behavior

That is why it is impossible to have a serious rational discussion with a woman. Especially about this blog post: they will never agree and most likely enter an immense rage.

Exceptions will always be rules, and rules will always be exceptions, because there is no logic to drive rules out of their emotions.

Of course men also have the same property, but they are biologically advantaged not to behave that way. Men acting like women are called gamma. They think they are bosses or secret kings, while in fact, they are just women. Most of the so called “Alpha gammers” are actually gammas: their so called self development is fully focused on developing a better understanding and adaptive behaviour to women biology, rather than their own masculine biology.

Most politicians are also gammas, Trump and Putin being more or less the only western exceptions. That is why it is impossible to talk or solve any problem at a political level nowadays: we are led by women, trapped in the body of men – probably even worse than women. We are led by intellectually castrated men, some kind of “post modernist beta transsexual male”.

Now, add to this thinking pattern feminism, and you have an individual that is convinced that her reality and her feelings are morally right, good, smart and efficient FOR EVERYONE (because all that matter is themselves – what they feel). In a nutshell, a despicable being ready to do anything for her own good. Not pretty I would say.

Let’s conclude with a positive tone. Hopefully not all women are evil, and we still love them. The bright side is that we can control them for their own good, and as they are excellent at communicating with toddlers: make nice white babies and great families.

Not all muslmims are suicide bombers! 

“Not all Muslims are terrorist!”

Thank you Einstein for the memo.
SJW and Muslmims are constantly bashing us with this phrase along with their #thisisnotaboutislam or #islamisareligionofpeace and so on…
“Not all Muslim are terrorist” is just a reframe SJW uses in order to run away from the intellectual debate. It is a rethoric,  it has no substance or basis.  No one ever suggested an “All Muslims are terrorist”. This is of course an untrue statement,  but by saying the opposite SJW are hoping to get away with this.  Knowing that no one has a clear answer against this.  (because it doesn’t make any sense in the first place).
While we are still waiting for Christians or Buddhist modern mass killing to occur,  a clear question can come out of the above statement.  How much percentage of muslims are actually terrorist? How many actively support them and how many choose to close their eyes on reality?
According to some polls 28% of all Muslims do not opposed violence against what they call “enemy of Islam” which in practical terms means “everyone who is not Muslim”.

Other polls shows that most of Muslims in Europe support ISIS.  And nearly all Muslims between the  age of 18 to 24 years old (the most relevant ones).
And I would also like to ask to all SJW,  where are all the Muslim standing against violence? Where their protest? If Islam is a religion of peace. Where the hell are the peaceful Muslims???
Well they won’t find any because  SJW always lie, lying is their intellectual foundation,  violence is their tool.

Islam is not a religion of peace,  and 1400 years of recorded history are backing this statement.  And this is all there is to acknowledge.