The upcoming WAR

Whether we hear about Russia, China, Western Europe or the middle-East, there is one subject everyone agrees on: “World War III is on its way, and it is not a distant future”. Where people disagree is on where and how this war will be fought and who could be the main actors. Usually people see the war in their ideal vision of the world:

  • Lefties and neo-conservatives want a war NATO vs Russia. Russia represents conservatism, economic freedom (at least in their opinion) and tolerance towards Christianity (which is for them the biggest threat to Civilization). Therefore they are the bad guys, they must be whipped off the map (no matter how suicidal this might sound).
  • Traditional conservatives want a classical war between Christians and Muslims.
  • Libertarians are still smoking pot.

70455cffaaaf792aef92e0d36132f36e1f5a875e3eab3f26ad3aafc9c6b31279

I don’t want to sound pessimistic, but there is clearly a lack information for the moment in order to know when, where and between who this war will be fought. But I do know is that almost everybody is missing the big picture. Let’s analyses region by region of the world:

Russia and China are 2 countries with significant military power. Their regime are quiet stable and think in the interest of their nation for the long run. They both suffer from a multi-ethnic or multi-racial situation, but all races have the same rights (no matter what you define as a right, no matter the level of freedom) which insure some sort of national cohesion. Their nations, even thou both ambitious, will never ignite any conflict. They just keep pushing slowly against a crumbling Europe and a more fragile America. Declaring war is not beneficial to them. They know the West is going down, they just have to wait.

India will soon be the most populated nation on Earth but it has a lot of internal problems. Most of the population live in extreme poverty (called “ants” by the rich Indians). These “ants” are illiterate and  in pretty bad health. They are clearly not fit for the battlefield. Only the Punjabis (total population of 30 millions)  are the serious muscle of the Indian army. India might go to war with Pakistan again in the future, but they will have little or no impact on the international scene.

North Korea is “over-rated” (as Donald Trump would say). Having heard an interesting opinion from South Koreans, I feel like sharing it here as it is the one that makes the most sense. Kim Jong Un, is a well educated and capable man. He grew up in Switzerland and lived a pretty normal life before becoming the ruler of his country. It is likely that he is not the madman the media portray him to be. He plays the fool. Which is a smart move. As North Korea can clearly not phase any of its enemy militarily, playing the foolish leader that could destroy the World is a smart move in order to be left alone. I don’t think North Korea is worth paying attention. And even it the worst case scenario, I doubt this will lead to a world war.

South Korea and Japan are countries that do not suffer any internal tensions. Their army are becoming bigger and purely defensive. This allow them to keep China at bay.

Taiwan, it could go either way. Europe and the USA seemed to clearly have given up on them. So the results will have little if no impact on the international scene.

South America, mostly socialist, no big military threats. I see a decline into Venezuela style or Argentina-style situations. South Americans are not warriors, they lack discipline and the will to fight. Cartels will continue to rule here and there… Unless salsa, tango or bachata is your thing, I would not look to deep into this part of the world.

Sub-Saharan Africa, same as South-America. The same shit will keep going on with the exception of South-Africa where a racial civil war could occur. China and Russia will fill the gap left by weakened western nations. Again, Black-Africans are not warriors, nothing to worry about (on an international level).

Iran… no major change in Iran. I think the USA will face serious economical and social problems before the neocons are able to complete their agenda.

North Africa and the Middle East. This is where tings are getting interesting. Israel cannot be at peace with any of its neighbor as they have a clear conflict of interest. Believing in peace whatsoever is purely naive. Arabs of course hate Israel but their prime enemy is Europe. This can be clearly demonstrated by the clear Muslim-Jewish alliance in Europe and the USA. There is no clear Christian-Muslim alliance. Turkey and Arab countries will try to intervene in Europe. It has always been their objective, there is no reason to think it would be any different today. But it is important to note that they are lacking the logistic and industry for a full scale military operation in Europe, even with a significant friendly Turk/Arab population already occupying the land. Moreover Turkey will have to phase central European countries (from Poland to Bulgaria) who will gladly meet them ferociously. So it is reasonable to think that they will promote guerrilla warfare in Europe. We have our first element of answer.

Ukraine. This is a conflict where things can get nasty even thou I personally doubt this will be the initiator of WW3. A big actor that is not reported in the news are the Jews. And this is not conspiratorial, most of the Ukrainian government is Jew, and most of those Jews consider Ukraine as a land that belongs to them. George Soros spends a lot of time and energy on Ukraine which is called, after all: “The bread basket of Europe”. The current civil war allow former Ukrainian Jews (in Israel or elsewhere) to buy land that is cheap and fertile. However true native Ukrainians have been hardened by a rough history and will not give up their land so easily. So Ukraine is worth keeping an eye on.

Central Europe. From Finland to the Balkans most of these countries have a significant number of their citizen living in Western Europe. And these expats citizen are reporting back the conditions of living in a multicultural/multiracial society to their fellow countrymen. This of course generate a lot of skepticism toward the main objective of the European Union. It is likely that they will quit the Union at some point and make one of their own. Contrary to what most people think, men from central Europe have little enthusiasm going to war against Russia (except in the Baltic states). And Russia recognize these countries as a serious military threat. Neither side want war. Their main concern is the rise of Islam in Western Europe (They served most of their history preventing Europe from Ottoman invasions). This is important as they could host Christian white refugees if the situation in the West gets ugly. They could also train soldiers and serve as backup for guerilla warfare (the same can be said about Russia).

North America: Americans (Canadians to a lesser extend) are getting more and more polarized. Only 6% trust the media, Congress approval is usually below 10%. The situation could deteriorate. Especially with a huge economical crisis like the one which is on its way. Many American patriots believe in their values, traditions and constitution. Even-thou they are a minority, they are the best trained and most clever American there is. They are not happy with politics, they will not give up without a fight. The opposing side would make the majority of the current US population. But they are undisciplined, cowards and divided among multiple races and genders. One could say they would control the US armed forces, but I really doubt that as most of the best soldiers would join the side of the patriots. It is hard to know how this would end up (huge blood bath I guess) but it will have a huge impact on the international scene. The USA is the initiator of many conflicts, but it also pacify many other conflicts. The defense budgets of all European nation are based on the capability of the USA to respond to external threat. So America is one of the main domino.

Western Europe…I kept the best for the end. This is for sure going to get messy. Currently, the defense budgets of Western European armies are ridiculous. Their armies are small, poorly equipped for full-scale operations and there is a clear lack of a will to fight. I cannot count the number of Belgian and French soldiers I met who joined the army “for traveling”, “experience”, “to help starving kids in Africa”… Most Europeans are not fit for service. A lot of men suffer of a clear lack of testosterone, plus a good portion of young men are from Arab, Black and Indian origin. Not only they lack the skills to make great warriors (Brotherhood, discipline, solidarity, physical capabilities), they do not have any sense of patriotism whatsoever. They might convince you otherwise, but they will be the first to run away after the first shot of the coming war. And I could go on and on about all the problem Europe could phase: “There isn’t enough women officers” “There is not enough Muslim officers” “There is no black women in the special forces” “I don’t fight during Ramadan” … Moreover, European countries clearly lack any infrastructure to accommodate and train conscripts. The military base where my father did his military service is now a camp for Syrian migrants.

In short, Forget Europe on the subject of military might. It is simply non-existent. But it doesn’t stop there. Western European countries clearly phase an identity challenge. The multicultural/multiracial society is on the verge of collapse. And only one of these culture will survive. But is is not that easy. Cities are over-populated. Any attack on important infrastructures can simply lead them into total chaos. I am talking about electrical plants, power grids, water purification, roads (supply of food), railways, bridges… Any failure of one of these infrastructure and it will soon be realized that even the “good Muslim”, the “good black”, the “good Indian” has not been integrated into our society. Any conversation we are having today is done with a luxury of life that is unprecedented. The day people will miss one meal, one shower or even their cellular/data connection… and they will finally realize the shit they are in. In these kind of situation humans go back to their native instinct which is tribalism. Europe therefore will be engaged in a race war that will be completely out of control. Hard to write about it as this is completely unprecedented.

To conclude this essay, even thou leftists and neocons are pushing for war with Russia, I doubt they will be able to complete their agenda before a total collapse of the West. It is likely that the next economical crash will be the one that will finally knock off the era of Cultural Marxism. It is likely Europe falls first and America second. And it is hard to see who will be the winner of this war. But I like to think that White Europeans will face this challenge and win. God shall be on our side.

When some SJWs make a good point…

Today the subject will be the trailer of the movie “Detroit” of Kathryn Bigelow:

This article could have been the weekly Anti-white propaganda articles but I was surprise some people did it for me (sort of). What is more surprising is that it came from SJWs themselves and not any SJWs… black women SJWs.

They actually raise a relevant point for their cause and I respect that. I wish more white women would do the same for their race and these women should be taken as examples considering this.

Their point is that black women have not been represented in movie that is supposed to represent the struggle of Black people in America in the 60s. This is of course only a trailer, but the cast list on IMDB says it all.

What they don’t realize is that there wasn’t enough opportunities for black women as the goal of any Hollywood movie is to push for a multi-racial society. Therefore it had to be slutty white women banging black men. Which is not showing the reality of the 60s. Multi-racial couples were rare as its propaganda was much weaker. And families prevented women from dating men outside of their race (as it is the case everywhere except for whites). Strong families are racists, not hateful but racist.

So the push for this Anti-BlackWoman trend is actually the will to push white women to date black men. Until the extermination of the white Y chromosome.

Cheap flights you said?

Ladies and Gentlemen, please enjoy the pleasure of cheap holidays. For less than 400€, you can enjoy 10 days all-inclusive in Turkey from many places in Europe. You can travel to Poland for 15€… Have you ever wondered if all of that make sense?

Untitled.png

I made this picture to demonstrate the real price of a flight. Traveling is nice, yes I agree. But it is also why most couples break-up, it is also why race mixing is higher than ever and it is also why social dumping is possible. Some bad effects of cheap travels?

The real cost of a flight should be around 150€ for 1000 km per passenger. These are official numbers counting end-to-end service – not just the fuel. But even, just counting the fuel between France and Poland should make the flight up to “1200 km x 4L/100 x 0.5€ = 22€” + 20€ of airport costs, so 42€ MINIMUM with free workers, free leasing, no profits and no maintenance. How come you can get it for 10€ around?!

flights.PNG

Well, cheap travels support cheap morality and race mixing. When you go on holidays, your mind tends to relax and just takes it easy on morality. Should you have a boyfriend, that Spaniard is giving you a good time… why not just doing him for one night at least? I remember that story of a Polish women who told me that she left for London and broke up with her boyfriend for an Italian… who dumped her right after. Actually, I heard this story so often that it eventually became a real pattern. Have you met one girl who never had sex in her life on holidays? In Erasmus?

So, what do we support here in Patriargate? We support the real price for everything. Prices are set to balance a market, a free market, free competition that is based on actual value and cost of resources. And today, I believe that we show you that governments are taking people’s tax money to sponsor sex trips, break families, foster race mixing much more. It is sick, amoral.

Traveling is good when it is paid by yourself for a real price and when you do it to achieve a goal. If you travel using a cheap flight to have sex with some girls, you actually destroy society. You do not build or contribute to it. And the same is for women. Any action that we do have consequences on others, but also on us. For example, any relational (love) trauma that we create with short term relationship on holidays changes slightly the way our genes are activated (epigenetic process), and it can be transmitted to our children. Really, this is not a game.

Life is not game. Civilization is not a game. Build yourself, do something and be aligned with your identity. Only then traveling will be meaningful.

Anne-Marie is fat and Ugly… Not an argument!

One of the main goal here at Patriargate is to cover a subject that very few people dare to cover: anti-white propaganda. This is something that must be understood by every white if we want to survive as a species.

Image result for white guilt

Let’s be honest, anti-white male propaganda is the explanation for most of our discomfort and attitude in modern society. Want an example? Check that video. The champion is a southern like male, and the beta a good white shaved. Why do we always depict the normal white male as the loser?

When I talk about it to people around me, they consistently reply that these are isolated cases; “nothing to worry about”… I just think they don’t dare to dive in a subject that is taboo. Anti-white propaganda is constant, insidious, pervert. It kills our energy, our time, our health, our opportunities, our relationships!

Image result for white guilt

Today we expose a music video clip. Sean Penn and Anne-Marie:

Right at the beginning, the two whites resemble anything but manly and in between is beautiful blonde girl. She looks in front of her, with seamless avoidance of the white males… and the next picture is … the nignog!

One black man. Many white women (acting as prostitutes – some could say “souls of cattle”). Polygamy … r-selection at its best:

Other white males are old, and look like pervert. How many times do you heard a brown one treated “pervert”? Never. It doesn’t fit the image and here is why:

And of course the mulatto kid: the little modern hero of a decadent society:

annmar9

What are we gonna do with the kid? This mulatto is just little fool. He will always identify himself as black. He does not belong in Europe or North America. He belongs to Africa. Worse, on the long genetic run there mulatto will always become either black, either Southern Spaniard/Arab like.

It is sad to see other races enjoying a successful modern society that was built by Christian White Males. And in return we are not getting a “Thank you” but a “I fuck your wife”.

Last but not least. I often hear  the argument “it is OK, relax! They only get our ugly chicks”. Well big news, that’s not an argument! All white women matter! First,a majority of beta white males are ready to go with a Jane. Anne-Marie looks ugly in this clip and a bit fat. But the reason men don’t find her attractive is because she is a mudshark. It is clearly written on her face. She could be a feminine, cute white girl. Or she could have been like this… In my opinion, almost every white girl has the opportunity to become a beautiful feminine woman. This lost of femininity  is clear red flag for all descent white males.

If you have children (no matter what is your race) it is time to throw your TV by the window. Because all I see is death, hate and a lot of loneliness.

Is race mixing superior?

Race mixing, “métissage“makes people better – that’s what they say. The modern double narratives of unique race doesn’t miss an opportunity to pinpoint the superiority of race mixing. Facing this absurd bullshit, I see no option but bringing common sense to face a bunch of lies.

Image associée

Races and species are adapted to their environment. Species mixing normally does not work. In some cases, offspring can be made, but their survival or reproduction is jeopardized (e.g. mules). Therefore, we know that nature doesn’t see species mixing as something to be fostered. For races, offspring can indeed survive and reproduce themselves, hence creating a so-called new race. But if this is the way to go, why didn’t nature do it before?

There are multiple reasons to this. Race mixing implies the superiority of a race on another, at least on certain characteristics such as intelligence, physical characteristics, etc. Intrinsically, there is no race superiority; nature doesn’t care about superiority. The real parameters are time and state at a time t for a series of characteristics. The odds are played in a rather deterministic way at a certain time. Always. The term superiority relates to a series of characteristics to match with an environment at a time t. Wherever some take over others, then a talk about superiority can be done. Hence, superiority is connected to 1) time, and 2) environment. Superiority can neither be eternal neither omnipresent.

Races evolve differently in different environments. Our genetics evolved to answer problems that are commonly faced in a specific environment. Climate, resources abundance, food quality, temperature, distance, etc. are all parameters that play over a well-adapted being. Today, of course technology bypasses most of the required genetic evolution for an environment (e.g. water transformation, heating and food conservation). Genetic modifications (mutation) appear during the life of an individual (somatic), and during the creation of semen (hereditary). Generally speaking, we adapt during our life to our environment and the life process enables us to transmit it to a new offspring that will have a “white page” to adapt to the environment. Living and dying is the only process that can ensure adaptation to the environment and the survival of the species.

Saying that race mixing would bring a superior offspring implies that the offspring would be more adapted to the environment than the parents. The implication of genetic mutation and evolution necessitates the selection of the best genes at the time of the fusion of the ovary and the sperm:

  1. That would imply a consciousness of the future environment of the semen in order to select the most appropriate genes. By definition, adaptation is a post process, and therefore this scenario is mathematically impossible. In addition, genes selection has a statistical result, such as skin color for example, that also invalidates the theory of the selection of the best genes: the disparity of results implies a non superiority of the offspring.
  2. Each genetic code is the best evolutionary result for its environment matching its race characteristics. Selecting the best in two races would suppose that the best characteristics from two different environments are selected at the same time; the limited nature of selection prevents the co-existence of two opposite characteristics. This means that the resulting offspring will never be completely adapted to the environment A and B: he will have characteristics from both. The offspring is therefore constantly weaker, and if superiority appears, it should be matched with time and all parameters.

In the long run, the offspring will evolve towards the most adapted genes, hence resulting in the initial situation A or B, but not A and B. Race mixing is therefore temporary and does not provide better offspring.

If leftists say that we are all equal, then offspring cannot be superior to the parents. Superiority would go against the principle of equality.

And if we are not equal, then there is a superiority, and this superiority should be kept. Else, nature will ensure to restore it over time. That’s called evolution.

Social Status (part 1): Anti-White propaganda

This is a series of posts about the importance of social status in the sexual market. How men and women react and adapt to it? What are the roots? What are the consequences? This first part covers the anti-white propaganda.

But before developing all of this, taking a rational look of the current situation might not be a bad idea. For years now I have been living (and I grew up) in a hostile environment. What can I do… I am a simple Northern European… I never felt good when the black hero dude on TV is getting the white girl. I didn’t as a kid and frankly I still don’t. Yet it stuck me only recently. Why is that? Aren’t my hero supposed to be like me? Someone I could become one day?

As I walk through the streets, when I am on my phone, or turn on the TV here is what I see ALL THE TIME:

I live in Belgium. A country that has been white since…. well forever. Why are the alpha males portrayed by mainstream cultures always blacks or arabs? These are just a few examples but notice how this is almost entirely always a black or an arab male with a white female. Notice how white are marginalized and how “people of color” are brought to the center of the photo (alpha position).

Why is the apple helpline a black dude and a white female?

16466551_10211097987984157_1180138747_o

I ask it again: why always Black man / white female ?

Rock is music written by whites and for whites….what the hell do they stand there? Who put them there?

Science fiction is created exclusively by whites and for withes…

YET AGAIN…

Now take a look at how Han Solo, the typical white Alpha-male that use to arouse every white female vagina is getting lower on the picture.

And our kids keep on getting indoctrinated:

And when a white guy finally appears on screen:

16442847_10211098227870154_149886985_o

One could say it is all a coincidence after 1 or 2 times. But having a normal representation of white christian straight guy in popular culture is getting rare. This cannot be a coincidence. There is a call for white genocide, in Hollywood, in the Mainstream media, in the commercials and in our daily lives. Slowly they replaced us so that we would get used to it. Used to our own genocide.

More (UPDATE):

589403d8b31dc

img-20170220-wa0000img-20170212-wa0008img-20161223-wa0015img-20161107-wa0020img-20161223-wa0006

A new far right?

Lately the terms far right and alt right became somehow closer.

And it is normal, in the end the mainstream narrative pinpoints the same characteristics, leaving aside the kike question. Google points out inaccurately:

Members of the altright use websites like Twitter and Breitbart News to convey their message. Altrightpostings generally support Republican President-elect Donald Trump, and oppose immigration, multiculturalism and political correctness. … The “altright” are not further right than the far right.

In reality far right political movements are still far from being alt right. We could even categorize some far right move to be closer to communism or socialism. As an example, let’s point out the Front National in France who is militating for a better social covering – not very alt right. Google points, inaccurately:

Farright politics are right-wing politics further on the right of the left-rightspectrum than the standard politicalrightFarright politics often involve a focus on tradition, real or imagined, as opposed to policies and customs that are regarded as reflective of modernism.

Yet some beliefs are shared, at least broadly. We both believe in nationalism and in the importance of preserving our culture. Most far right movement are still incline to immigration quotas, while the alt right talks about massive deportation in a best case scenario. The old leader of the French Front National also had concerns about the kikes.

In any case, we kind of want the same: our countries back.

Leftists argue that without European Union, Europeans will fight each other. Well, if Europeans will not fight each other, they will fight them, and hopefully the kikes, but that’s for another story. You can’t bring back order without a few loss. Left versus right, a plan designed for decades by our kikes elites undoubtedly.

Besides, Europeans would be standing for their first time together, and achieve what EU never could. That’s at least one positive point. It seems that beyond far right and alt right, we see some kind of cultural survival instinct popping up.

The left has been totally brain washed for years. Latest example would be the “he will not devide us” move in USA. Actually, most leftists do get privileges from this system. Without that, they basically end up in a life without a mean, and without a purpose. That’s simply what we call nihilism.

Leftists also say that nationalism will destroy economies and remove jobs. Well, that is a short term view, a fear argument, as they name it probably in a sense of still-non-conscious self derision.

In fact, any company making money through selling products in a country would lose by not complying to the national rules. Most production delocalized were not required, it was designed to weaken the white civilization. So, yes, nationalism would bring back jobs, a lot of jobs. Actually, deporting massively all Muslims, blacks, indians, latino who do not contribute to our civilisation would rather make full employment society, homegeneous, strong and clean. It would also be healthy from an environmental perspective, leftist Ecolo shall agree with that. Should you still have doubts, watch Donald Trump bringing back jobs.

Last, alt right is against privileges and therefore against socialism and communism. It rejects its oppressive and unfair components.

Removing welfare state would harm many white citizens at first, but would target mostly the Arabic, Latino, and black communities. They would suffer so much from it that they would become violent undoubtedly.

So, that’s true, you can fear the alt right and the far right. These leftists and the kikes created this unstable situation…and that has to be fixed somehow.

Mad Merkel, call me maybe

This Wednesday, Obama made a visit of courtesy to Merkel’s Germany. They discussed about the current trade treaties issues (i.e. TTIP, CETA, CiSA), and their global agenda. They pushed the hypocrisy by reminding how free speech is important… hilarious when you know that anything against the migration agenda is illegal under the “hate speech” law, and considering the last anti-free speech actions in USA.

Le chef d’Etat américain et la chancelière allemande ont donné une conférence de presse commune à l’issue du dernier déplacement officiel de Barack Obama en Europe en tant que président des Etats-Unis.

As it seems, Mad Merkel, the leftist’s agenda most powerful leader, pointed out that the global agenda can’t be changed. While previously naming any “globalist plot” as conspiratorial , it seems now perfectly normal to talk about it as an evidence. That is what I call a strange “conspiratorial figure”, right? Wait, Mad Merkel has a deep conviction, we should listen to her:

Because that is my deep conviction.  Globalization — and I think we share this conviction — is that globalization needs to be shaped politically. It needs to be given a human face… The negotiations on agreements like T-TIP have been challenging, and obviously at a moment when there’s concerns about globalization and the benefits that accrue to particular people, it is important that those negotiations and channels of communication remain.

I really wonder what human face should be given to globalism, if not the culote.pngabsence of culture difference and racial differences through blood mixing. Well, after publishing
officially  under the account “Historical Pics” how people would look like by 2050 in America, nothing can be astonishing. Maybe this is the face of globalism, after all.

Surprisingly though, this globalist speech is globally limited to European ethnic nations. And even more strange to clearly state that people’s opinions do not matter in a democracy.

Later, in her speech, this ugly woman couldn’t do anything else but remind everyone of this fake and stupid disproportionate responsibility in African countries. Indeed, bringing them to the same level of development, would first require major social and cultural changes – which would be qualified as genocide under international law! And actually, how do we help them by bombing them, giving them weapons for more genocides, and then mysteriously migrating them in Europe. It rather seems we bring every day more of Africa in European civilization rather than European civilization in Africa (maybe that’d be racist). At some point, this shit has to stop. We do not want to look like that ugly woman on the picture above. We are proud of who we are, deal with it stupid leftists.

There’s another point that I wanted to mention here, particularly, the engagement and commitment to Africa.  For us Europeans, Africa as a neighboring continent is of prime importance.  The development of African countries is in our very own vested interest.  We, as Germans, but also we, as members of the European Union, will have to deal with this.  It will be at the very top of our agenda.

Germans, please don’t tell me that you really believe that crap. You are much better than this. One of the greatest nation with the greatest people. Rise up and put that Mad Witch in jail for high treason, that would be a service for humanity.

 

Dominant genes vs natural selection

I often hear that blacks and Arabs have dominant genes. The common assumption made by Mudsharks and Camelfuckers is that their genes are stronger, superior to those of white people, hypocritically covering their abnormal sexual affinities.

Dominance in biology means that a gene overrun another statistically. Just like putting shit on you makes you very likely to smell like shit, mixing with blacks or Arabs makes white people like them (physically and personality wise – due to genetic impact of brain constitution). But does it mean that the result is more adapted from a natural selection point of view?

To find the answer, I refer to the past. Between 50000 and 25000 years ago the Homo Sapiens came in Europe and mixed with the Neanderthal. The homo sapiens was 100% black, as Africans are today. Nonetheless, Europeans are white, and if Camelfuckers hadn’t mixed them throughout extensive conquest and women slavery/rape, they would still be white from the north to the south, and the west to east.

What does it tell us exactly? It tells us that naturally, the white color and white European biological constitution emerged as the only evolution, disqualifying black color and African customs. This also draws a line between statistics and evolution.

Genes transmission are statistical while evolution is selective. Anyone can reproduce, but the most adapted survives, and that is a big difference.