The Muslim rape love story

Since the peak of the migration crisis, a surprising and most certainly unpredictable – sarcastically – rise of rape emerged. Surprisingly, Muslims claim that women love being raped.

Let’s be serious. We are becoming sick of these Muslims raping our women. As Trump said “Our nation is a family, and every time they touch a member of our family, it is all of us that they touch”. The so called Muslim culture is just a collection of monkey behaviors rationalized under the umbrella of “Islam”. They talk about peace and respect, but this is how it looks like in practice:

One can’t just qualify of renegade any partisan of one’s religion to make accept everything. In practice, can someone remember me the last time we saw such things with white Christians? NEVER! And as Gatestoneinstitute points out, about only 10% of rape are reported. Hence this margin is likely to be still under reality. The rise of rapes has become alarming with thousands of white women officially raped every year in Europe by these “new europeans“. Guys, wake up… our women are being raped, and our authorities do nothing. Tomorrow might be your mum, your sister, your wife or your daughter. This is war!

From Gatestooneinstitute:

Police reports show that Germany’s migrant rape crisis continues unabated, although accurate statistics are notoriously non-existent, this in one of the most technologically advanced countries in the world. German authorities have repeatedly been accused of underreporting the true scale of the migrant crime problem in the country.

According to Federal Criminal Police Office (Bundeskriminalamt, BKA) data (page 14), in 2013, migrants (Zuwanderer) committed 599 sex crimes, or an average of two a day. In 2014, migrants committed 949 sex crimes, or around three per day. In 2015, migrants committed 1,683 sex crimes, or around five per day. During the first three quarters of 2016, migrants committed 2,790 sex crimes, or around ten per day.

But this doesn’t stop the leftist National Geographic to say:

Three-quarters of a century ago Germans were dispatching trains full of Jews to concentration camps in the east; now, at the Munich train station, they were greeting trains carrying Muslim refugees with food, water, stuffed animals, and smiles. On one German podcast I began tuning in to last fall, I heard a journalist from Die Zeit tell her listeners it was all right to feel “drunk” with pleasure at that transformation.

So it seems that whatever the amount of rapes, the migrants are good because we are all Nazi. Disgusting. But whatever they call us, we couldn’t care less, and foremost we can’t just let this go. Islam is a not religion, but a very concrete system. Their religion is a law, and whatever the amount of moderate out there, the proportion of (“radicals”) monkeys is way too high to tolerate any of them in our countries. Europe, if it wants to avoid the most violent war of human history, has to understand that there is only one solution to this: DEPORTATION.

The weird line between Alt-Lite and Alt-Right.

The Alt-Right and the Alt-Lite have been fighting side to side for a while. The two movements have not been facing each others except for a few skirmishes. But Hillary Clinton (who popularized the name “Alt-Right”) probably included many people who do identify with the movement. Many figures among this umbrella are more identified with the Alt-Lite: Mike Cernovich, Lauren Southern, Gavin McInnes, Milo… While the most notable figures of the Alt-Right are: VoxDay, Jared Taylor, Chateau Heartiste, Andrew Anglin…

So what is the difference between the Alt-Lite and the Alt-Right?

untitled

Voxday is probably one of the pioneer and established the 16 points of the Alt-Right. This is a good start to draw a line between the 2 movements. Both movement are fed up with the failures of modern day conservatism. They push their arguments based on empirical evidences and logic. And they prefer using good rethorics based in truth rather than try to debate their political opponents through dialectic. And that’s pretty much it for what is in common. Alt-Right and Alt-Lite agree on points 1,2,3,4,7,(10),12,15 and 16.

Where the disagreement lies is up until where the reasoning is pushed. Like Point 9: identity > culture > politics. The Alt-Lite believes that some culture are not compatible and that Culture is some sort of “social construct”. The Alt-Right doesn’t believe that. Culture is a by-product of our identity. And our identity is dictated by who we are: the influence of our community, the education of our parents but foremost our genetics. Which brings the next point that differentiate Alt-Lite and Alt-Right: Point 11: DIVERSITY + PROXIMITY = WAR. Always. The Alt-Lite believes that if people from other races or culture recognize the greatness of Western Civilization, then they may live within this civilization. The Alt-Right believes that if someone admires Western Civilization, he is free to copy it in his own country. He is welcome as a tourist. But no foreigners can be granted the right of citizenship (just like in Japan). Therefore mass deportation are currently the only solution (in order to not conflict point 11 and point 16 which promotes peaceful solution as much as possible).

Point 5 and point 15 are also essential points of the Alt-Right. The Alt-Lite will not look into the status nor the privileges of certain races or ethnicities. While the Alt-Right will treat absolutely everyone equally. In a way, the Alt-Lite believes there is still some form of political correctness.

The Alt-Lite will talk about population replacement through immigration and religion. But they will not talk about population replacement through race-mixing. Race-mixing doesn’t seems to be a problem for the Alt-Lite. While the Alt-Right believes in Point 14: we must secure the existence of white people and a future for white children. Alternatively, The Alt-Right wants to protect all races in their sovereign nations. But right now and for the foreseeable future, only whites are about to be extinct.

To resume the Alt-Right believes that Europe and North America (and a few other places) belongs to White people ONLY. And only indigenous people get to choose the destiny of their own nations. Therefore white genes, white culture and white interests have to be promoted in politics and in popular cultures. No matter how politically incorrect it may sound. No matter the solution. Just hoping it can be as peaceful as it can get.

McGregor vs Mayweahter: Here is what you need to know.

The McGregor – Mayweather boxing match was for sure a hell of an event. Mayweather is probably the best boxer that ever existed with 50 victories now and 0 defeat. Yet someone like Connor McGrgegor who is a complete outsider still hold 10 rounds in front of him. So credits goes to him as well. But despite being the “fight of century”, the results is not what where the focus should be. It is what follows…

promo324727494

While normal people just wanted to have a good time watching this boxing game, others did not have the same intention. For many this game was a political/racial game. And here are a few samples:

It useless to make the case that most of the real racism is not coming from whites but from other races. Nor it is better to point out how ridiculous this comments are. What is important to remember is that peaceful individuals do not get to choose the fight they are in. If someone self-identifies as your opponent … and that someone also decides that the reason you are in this fight is because of race… you can argue all day long, this is not someone you are going to reason. You are in a race war. And it doesn’t matter if you like or not.

This is where the difference between the Alt-Light and the Alt-Right is drawn. You don’t get to choose the world around you. Your personal experience is not relevant. It is neither love nor dialectic that will solve this issue. Either you choose to fight or you choose to surrender. This is what being Alt-Right is. And as other races keep pushing more and more, whites have less and less choice for peace. Sad, but true.

And it is also valid for the people who “do not care about politics”. Non-whites want a race war, because their parasite nature requires us to work and give to them. You don’t get to be neutral in this fight. You will have to either join force or die.

I repeat: WAR IS COMING FOR YOU. There is no way to escape it. And it is not up to you to decide it.

Social status (part4) : How the war is being played.

It is needless to say that some people have it easier than others, this is a natural phenomenon. Some lions are born next to places full of antilopes, some are born at a place and time when food is scarce. There is no point debating the nature of one’s condition, each individual has it pros and cons in terms of environment and conditions he was born in. These conditions are implemented by a force that is far greater than any man or group of men will ever become (whether you call it nature, God, Nature, Gaia… ).

And as discussed before, social status (or social proof) is nowadays mostly artificial. Rarely making sense, most of the time not at all. And it the latter case, it can actually be used as a tool or weapon. Humans usually make irrational decisions translating into meaningful results , women especially. Manipulating the social status can lead the mass to take specific decisions. Promoting Black and Arab men will push women to hook up with them. As for women, mostly blonde white women are promoted. Therefore having a white girlfriend becomes a must for a population easily susceptible to fashion and mainstream culture (aka r-selection)… who happens to be …. Blacks, Arabs and Latinos.

And this is why it cannot be said that white women are naturally attracted by these men. This push is clearly artificial. And this trend is recent (seen in the last 20 years or so). And what does it do?

 

It does the obvious: what everyone sees but refuses to acknowledge.

  1. Most of young while males are single. They are not attracted by other races and barely get any opportunity to date a white female. If you live in Western Europe, ask yourself if there is any of your normal white male friend dating a beautiful white female (and make a percentage). Normal = no big heritage, no body builder, playboy nor with a job related to the EU or a Soro’s organization.
  2. About a third of white females couples marry with a man outside of their race (last official stats in France). Genes are lost.
  3. Many white women are single. Either they can’t find a normal white straight male answering the Hollywood cliché. Either they have been trashed by dozens of Arabs, blacks and Indians and made their collection of all STDs possible; they become sexual rejects. Who wants to breed with a biological weapon?

 

It is a fact, white children are becoming as rare as polar bears. But they have no one to represent them and cry out at the United Nations. There is an international push to make sure white people don’t reproduce. And it is clearly working.

A war can be fought in many ways, and this has been understood by a few for a very long time.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.

Zun Tsu, The Art of War. VI century BCE

The social status is clearly being manipulated to exterminate the white race. The result is very clear. I challenge anyone to contradict the manipulation of the social status: Turn on the television now, go to a mall, listen to the radio… And I challenge anyone to contradict the inevitable results: go down any big cities across Western Europe or Northern America.

This is a WAR. It is not fought with guns, tanks or planes. It is fought on purely psychological level: deception, manipulation, demography. The faster white men wake up to this fact the more likely they can regain control.

And don’t expect any women to realize this, women have little or nothing to do in the business of War. This is a man-only issue.

Race-Mixing and Feminism are still a problem

I recently watch the conversation between Stefan Molyneux and Faith Goldy. Faith has some interesting insight. Her points about having NATO troops at the border armed with RPGs surely gave me a smile. But she lost part of her credibility claiming the Alt-Right wants big government to overturn population replacement. This is where she is wrong and this is where the line between the Alt-Right and the Alt-Light is drawned. The Alt-Light is not red pill.

First, Population replacement doesn’t only occur with immigration or attacks like on the Bataclan or in Brussels. It is true that whites tend to have a lot fewer children than non-Whites. It can be linked to economical reasons (transfer of wealth from Whites to Non-Whites), propaganda and biological reason (r/K selection). But the core of the problem lies in race-mixing, which makes about a quarter of all marriages in France, and it is growing rapidly. And it is for the most part Arab and Black men with a white women.

This gives us 3 problems:

  1. The average IQ of mulattoes is the average of their parents (so it is around Arab-Turkish average). It is clearly not enough in order to maintain and improve a society as advanced and complex as Western civilization. The failure of these populations is very clear in countries like the USA and South-Africa
  2. Mulattoes tend to identify with the race they have the most in common. And mulattoes look anything but white. White genes are for the most part recessive therefore they will not show up easily on the offspring of mixed-race couples. Good example: Obama is the first USA black president. His white heritage is never mentioned.
  3. As the propaganda pushes for a White-Female Arab/Black man couples. There is a lost of an entire Chromosome: The Y-Chromosome. And this probably the most important  chromosome that generates great individuals.

Second, feminism is still an issue. Feminism is not only pushing crazy women to paint their hair in blue. Feminists push white women to stop having children, or having children at a later stage of their lives (which increase exponentially the chance of these children to develop mental or physical diseases)

langfr-496px-down_syndrome_risk_by_maternal_age-semilog-svg

However Big Goverment is not needed in order to reverse all this. But some policies have to be taken in order to preserve our civilization and our way of life. Propositions have already been made on this blog. But here are some policies that could help on this subject and it doesn’t requires blowing up the size and scope of Government:

  • Reverse propaganda. (basically open up competition to the Hollywood industrial complex).
  • Cutting immediately all government benefits (from healthcare to education) to non-Whites. And eventually to everyone across the board later on. (So this is actually reducing the size of Government)
  • Discrimination by race or gender is no longer a crime.
  • Deregulation of the entire economy. This is not only a reduction of the size of Government. This will put many women out of jobs (Accountants, Lawyers, Gender Studies professors…), pushing them to seek security in men rather than government.
  • Marriage is done by the church entirely (no more Government intervention).
  • Punish pedophilia and rape with permanent castration, the death penalty or lifetime imprisonment (lying about rape gets the same punishment)
  • Extra tax on anyone who is not White and/or decrease (or abolish) taxes on Whites. This will actually benefit everybody as Whites tend to be more creative and productive. It can be a flat-tax or a tariff.
  • Benefits for couples with white Children (from the tax on Non-Whites). Adding penalties for any STDs found in child or parents blood or on the age of the mother (the older she is, the less she gets).
  • People can refuse DNA test, but won’t get benefits and will pay taxes just like any non-white.
  • Political positions can only be held by White Christians who admit that the overwhelming contribution of White Christian males to the greatness of Western Civilization.
  • Tax for adopting non white children.
  • Strong border security, financed entirely by: expensive Visas on foreigners, taxes on international travel, taxes on imports (including raw materials like food, oil and gas). Airlines companies pay their taxes like any other business.
  • Elections: one vote per white family having at least one white child. Anyone else doesn’t get to vote.
  • Free Market (with the addition of the points above) can give a clear upper edge for every white male, increasing his chance of mating with a white female and carrying an offspring.

This is not to pick on Faith Goldy, she already did a great transition. But it is needed to point out that the Alt-Lite doesn’t have the guts yet to address theses issues.  Less marketing and more self commitment would already be good start. Eventually, they will come to the Alt-Right as it is the only political system that will address, analyze and solve every single issue.

The upcoming WAR

Whether we hear about Russia, China, Western Europe or the middle-East, there is one subject everyone agrees on: “World War III is on its way, and it is not a distant future”. Where people disagree is on where and how this war will be fought and who could be the main actors. Usually people see the war in their ideal vision of the world:

  • Lefties and neo-conservatives want a war NATO vs Russia. Russia represents conservatism, economic freedom (at least in their opinion) and tolerance towards Christianity (which is for them the biggest threat to Civilization). Therefore they are the bad guys, they must be whipped off the map (no matter how suicidal this might sound).
  • Traditional conservatives want a classical war between Christians and Muslims.
  • Libertarians are still smoking pot.

70455cffaaaf792aef92e0d36132f36e1f5a875e3eab3f26ad3aafc9c6b31279

I don’t want to sound pessimistic, but there is clearly a lack information for the moment in order to know when, where and between who this war will be fought. But I do know is that almost everybody is missing the big picture. Let’s analyses region by region of the world:

Russia and China are 2 countries with significant military power. Their regime are quiet stable and think in the interest of their nation for the long run. They both suffer from a multi-ethnic or multi-racial situation, but all races have the same rights (no matter what you define as a right, no matter the level of freedom) which insure some sort of national cohesion. Their nations, even thou both ambitious, will never ignite any conflict. They just keep pushing slowly against a crumbling Europe and a more fragile America. Declaring war is not beneficial to them. They know the West is going down, they just have to wait.

India will soon be the most populated nation on Earth but it has a lot of internal problems. Most of the population live in extreme poverty (called “ants” by the rich Indians). These “ants” are illiterate and  in pretty bad health. They are clearly not fit for the battlefield. Only the Punjabis (total population of 30 millions)  are the serious muscle of the Indian army. India might go to war with Pakistan again in the future, but they will have little or no impact on the international scene.

North Korea is “over-rated” (as Donald Trump would say). Having heard an interesting opinion from South Koreans, I feel like sharing it here as it is the one that makes the most sense. Kim Jong Un, is a well educated and capable man. He grew up in Switzerland and lived a pretty normal life before becoming the ruler of his country. It is likely that he is not the madman the media portray him to be. He plays the fool. Which is a smart move. As North Korea can clearly not phase any of its enemy militarily, playing the foolish leader that could destroy the World is a smart move in order to be left alone. I don’t think North Korea is worth paying attention. And even it the worst case scenario, I doubt this will lead to a world war.

South Korea and Japan are countries that do not suffer any internal tensions. Their army are becoming bigger and purely defensive. This allow them to keep China at bay.

Taiwan, it could go either way. Europe and the USA seemed to clearly have given up on them. So the results will have little if no impact on the international scene.

South America, mostly socialist, no big military threats. I see a decline into Venezuela style or Argentina-style situations. South Americans are not warriors, they lack discipline and the will to fight. Cartels will continue to rule here and there… Unless salsa, tango or bachata is your thing, I would not look to deep into this part of the world.

Sub-Saharan Africa, same as South-America. The same shit will keep going on with the exception of South-Africa where a racial civil war could occur. China and Russia will fill the gap left by weakened western nations. Again, Black-Africans are not warriors, nothing to worry about (on an international level).

Iran… no major change in Iran. I think the USA will face serious economical and social problems before the neocons are able to complete their agenda.

North Africa and the Middle East. This is where tings are getting interesting. Israel cannot be at peace with any of its neighbor as they have a clear conflict of interest. Believing in peace whatsoever is purely naive. Arabs of course hate Israel but their prime enemy is Europe. This can be clearly demonstrated by the clear Muslim-Jewish alliance in Europe and the USA. There is no clear Christian-Muslim alliance. Turkey and Arab countries will try to intervene in Europe. It has always been their objective, there is no reason to think it would be any different today. But it is important to note that they are lacking the logistic and industry for a full scale military operation in Europe, even with a significant friendly Turk/Arab population already occupying the land. Moreover Turkey will have to phase central European countries (from Poland to Bulgaria) who will gladly meet them ferociously. So it is reasonable to think that they will promote guerrilla warfare in Europe. We have our first element of answer.

Ukraine. This is a conflict where things can get nasty even thou I personally doubt this will be the initiator of WW3. A big actor that is not reported in the news are the Jews. And this is not conspiratorial, most of the Ukrainian government is Jew, and most of those Jews consider Ukraine as a land that belongs to them. George Soros spends a lot of time and energy on Ukraine which is called, after all: “The bread basket of Europe”. The current civil war allow former Ukrainian Jews (in Israel or elsewhere) to buy land that is cheap and fertile. However true native Ukrainians have been hardened by a rough history and will not give up their land so easily. So Ukraine is worth keeping an eye on.

Central Europe. From Finland to the Balkans most of these countries have a significant number of their citizen living in Western Europe. And these expats citizen are reporting back the conditions of living in a multicultural/multiracial society to their fellow countrymen. This of course generate a lot of skepticism toward the main objective of the European Union. It is likely that they will quit the Union at some point and make one of their own. Contrary to what most people think, men from central Europe have little enthusiasm going to war against Russia (except in the Baltic states). And Russia recognize these countries as a serious military threat. Neither side want war. Their main concern is the rise of Islam in Western Europe (They served most of their history preventing Europe from Ottoman invasions). This is important as they could host Christian white refugees if the situation in the West gets ugly. They could also train soldiers and serve as backup for guerilla warfare (the same can be said about Russia).

North America: Americans (Canadians to a lesser extend) are getting more and more polarized. Only 6% trust the media, Congress approval is usually below 10%. The situation could deteriorate. Especially with a huge economical crisis like the one which is on its way. Many American patriots believe in their values, traditions and constitution. Even-thou they are a minority, they are the best trained and most clever American there is. They are not happy with politics, they will not give up without a fight. The opposing side would make the majority of the current US population. But they are undisciplined, cowards and divided among multiple races and genders. One could say they would control the US armed forces, but I really doubt that as most of the best soldiers would join the side of the patriots. It is hard to know how this would end up (huge blood bath I guess) but it will have a huge impact on the international scene. The USA is the initiator of many conflicts, but it also pacify many other conflicts. The defense budgets of all European nation are based on the capability of the USA to respond to external threat. So America is one of the main domino.

Western Europe…I kept the best for the end. This is for sure going to get messy. Currently, the defense budgets of Western European armies are ridiculous. Their armies are small, poorly equipped for full-scale operations and there is a clear lack of a will to fight. I cannot count the number of Belgian and French soldiers I met who joined the army “for traveling”, “experience”, “to help starving kids in Africa”… Most Europeans are not fit for service. A lot of men suffer of a clear lack of testosterone, plus a good portion of young men are from Arab, Black and Indian origin. Not only they lack the skills to make great warriors (Brotherhood, discipline, solidarity, physical capabilities), they do not have any sense of patriotism whatsoever. They might convince you otherwise, but they will be the first to run away after the first shot of the coming war. And I could go on and on about all the problem Europe could phase: “There isn’t enough women officers” “There is not enough Muslim officers” “There is no black women in the special forces” “I don’t fight during Ramadan” … Moreover, European countries clearly lack any infrastructure to accommodate and train conscripts. The military base where my father did his military service is now a camp for Syrian migrants.

In short, Forget Europe on the subject of military might. It is simply non-existent. But it doesn’t stop there. Western European countries clearly phase an identity challenge. The multicultural/multiracial society is on the verge of collapse. And only one of these culture will survive. But is is not that easy. Cities are over-populated. Any attack on important infrastructures can simply lead them into total chaos. I am talking about electrical plants, power grids, water purification, roads (supply of food), railways, bridges… Any failure of one of these infrastructure and it will soon be realized that even the “good Muslim”, the “good black”, the “good Indian” has not been integrated into our society. Any conversation we are having today is done with a luxury of life that is unprecedented. The day people will miss one meal, one shower or even their cellular/data connection… and they will finally realize the shit they are in. In these kind of situation humans go back to their native instinct which is tribalism. Europe therefore will be engaged in a race war that will be completely out of control. Hard to write about it as this is completely unprecedented.

To conclude this essay, even thou leftists and neocons are pushing for war with Russia, I doubt they will be able to complete their agenda before a total collapse of the West. It is likely that the next economical crash will be the one that will finally knock off the era of Cultural Marxism. It is likely Europe falls first and America second. And it is hard to see who will be the winner of this war. But I like to think that White Europeans will face this challenge and win. God shall be on our side.

Social status (part 3): Alpha, Beta… not the question

Alpha, Beta… Gamma males… does it explain everything? Why is this gamma getting a hot chick? Why are these Spaniards getting all the chicks in the bars without doing anything? Why that ugly Arabic without any style, intelligence nor game gets the hot chick?

ss

Something like that story:

There is that girl that you like and that you know for 2 years. You game her, and you do have a good game. You do sport, you behave like an real man but no matter what you can’t get her.

You get girls attention, but somehow, they leave you alone. Either you bang some destroyed white girls, either you stay alone – but the relationship is out of sight.

You want to know her before banging her, because you know what happens when you bang a girl. So, you go for a coffee. You go to a nice place to be comfortable. You want her to be at her ease. You game light, you show respect. The mother of your kids shall be that simple traditional girl.

Yet, nothing works, absolutely nothing! Despite your 10/10 confidence, your good shape and the look of all the other girls, it doesn’t work! She tells you that you are kind of perfect but that she doesn’t feel “the thing”. But what thing is she talking about?

Sometimes, she may have already kissed you many times during parties, but she will refuse to talk to you or date you – even though she likes you.

The game says it straight: you can’t bang a girl without physical touch and intimacy. Yeah, that’s kind of right, but not enough. The game fails explaining why. It says it is natural…  not exactly.

Actually, it is due to the conditioning done by the environment – it is epigenetics. Attraction is conditioned by r and K selection. In an r-selected world you can’t get the simplest girl in the world if you do not follow the r rules. You can come in a Ferrari, throw money at her, know all the people in the restaurant, be the best man ever, be a millionaire, be the hottest man on earth: she will not get wet!

Girls are technically results attracted, yes true. They are attracted by what all other wants, true. But foremost they are emotional and conditioned creatures. They confuse their emotions and for them, being in a bar drunk and grabbed by the pussy – thanks Donald – is actually connected to falling in love.

For their entire life, women have been educated for one thing. One and only one thing: r-selection. All the movies, all the music, all the advertisements constructed in their brain a specific connection towards sex and couple. Our brain only works with connections. This is how we think, how we feel. Epigenetics only emphases these concepts. I compile here a list of concept that describes the connections in the brain of women in our Western society:

Connected to sex Connected to relationship (rejection) Connected to omega male (rejection)
Travel Good restaurant Religion
South Romance Conservatism
Spain Manners Traditional
Italy Politeness Marriage
Greece Activity Relationship
Turkey Manhood Shaved
Arab Respect Classical
Black White Right wing
Exotic Classic Sober
Holidays Coffee Clever – nerd
Fun Wine place Glasses
Love Work White
Passion Malls Distance
Girl fears Shopping
Girl worries Money
Beard
Rape Boredom
Violence Trust
Adventure Serious
Alcohol Interesting
Beach Ugliness
Sun Depression
Swimming pool Distance
Sexy clothes Flower
Beauty Gift
Sun glasses Attention
Tanned Politeness
Muscle
Look
Proximity
Money (in party)

Since their young age, men and women are exposed to the cultural Marxist propaganda. All of these transport the idea of sex in the context of parties, alcohol, sun, travel, Latin music, etc. All the concepts of the table above are connected to sex in their brain. And sex biologically means couple. If you are anything close to this table, your sexual values skyrockets. The most connected concept to love is actually the skin color and the origin: southern man dark tanned with beard (i.e. Spanish, Italians, Turkish, Moroccans, etc.).

So that girl has been conditioned like any other animal, like any other biological intelligence can be conditioned. A dog can be conditioned to produce saliva  just by hearing a sound. A woman can get wet hearing Latin music or seeing an Arab beard. She doesn’t choose it, she is a victim. And she can’t understand this, because her biology prevents her from being able to rationalize that much, step back and understand what leads her instinct to mistakes. Repetition and epigenetics are the keys to conditioning.

You can’t, and you will not seduce the woman you like without exploiting these connections. She won’t love you before sleeping.

When you understand this, you know that the game works, but you also know that the game is part of this decadence. You know that any women that you game sexually will sleep with you, and fall in love. But you also know that the moment you will behave like a K selected (relationship, traditional man), she will start hating you. She will drive away from you. The moment you will leave her alone with friends in parties getting drunk, going on holidays to the beach, to the sun, she will fall. When you are out of sights, her emotions take over her rationality. Sadly, you can’t fight it. You can try to control her, but she will tell you that it is her freedom. She believes her freedom is to do what she has been conditioned to do. Freedom doesn’t exist unless you are conscious of the truth. Going to a sunny destination is not freedom, it is what you are told to do. Drinking and having sex with strangers is not freedom, it is what you are told to do. Dating a Latin man, an Arab man is not freedom, it is what you are told to do. Accepting migrants is not freedom, it is not an opinion, it is what you are told to do.

Look at what women keep seeing everywhere all the time. How you want them to be attracted – or to allow themselves to be attracted – by you?

Is race mixing superior?

Race mixing, “métissage“makes people better – that’s what they say. The modern double narratives of unique race doesn’t miss an opportunity to pinpoint the superiority of race mixing. Facing this absurd bullshit, I see no option but bringing common sense to face a bunch of lies.

Image associée

Races and species are adapted to their environment. Species mixing normally does not work. In some cases, offspring can be made, but their survival or reproduction is jeopardized (e.g. mules). Therefore, we know that nature doesn’t see species mixing as something to be fostered. For races, offspring can indeed survive and reproduce themselves, hence creating a so-called new race. But if this is the way to go, why didn’t nature do it before?

There are multiple reasons to this. Race mixing implies the superiority of a race on another, at least on certain characteristics such as intelligence, physical characteristics, etc. Intrinsically, there is no race superiority; nature doesn’t care about superiority. The real parameters are time and state at a time t for a series of characteristics. The odds are played in a rather deterministic way at a certain time. Always. The term superiority relates to a series of characteristics to match with an environment at a time t. Wherever some take over others, then a talk about superiority can be done. Hence, superiority is connected to 1) time, and 2) environment. Superiority can neither be eternal neither omnipresent.

Races evolve differently in different environments. Our genetics evolved to answer problems that are commonly faced in a specific environment. Climate, resources abundance, food quality, temperature, distance, etc. are all parameters that play over a well-adapted being. Today, of course technology bypasses most of the required genetic evolution for an environment (e.g. water transformation, heating and food conservation). Genetic modifications (mutation) appear during the life of an individual (somatic), and during the creation of semen (hereditary). Generally speaking, we adapt during our life to our environment and the life process enables us to transmit it to a new offspring that will have a “white page” to adapt to the environment. Living and dying is the only process that can ensure adaptation to the environment and the survival of the species.

Saying that race mixing would bring a superior offspring implies that the offspring would be more adapted to the environment than the parents. The implication of genetic mutation and evolution necessitates the selection of the best genes at the time of the fusion of the ovary and the sperm:

  1. That would imply a consciousness of the future environment of the semen in order to select the most appropriate genes. By definition, adaptation is a post process, and therefore this scenario is mathematically impossible. In addition, genes selection has a statistical result, such as skin color for example, that also invalidates the theory of the selection of the best genes: the disparity of results implies a non superiority of the offspring.
  2. Each genetic code is the best evolutionary result for its environment matching its race characteristics. Selecting the best in two races would suppose that the best characteristics from two different environments are selected at the same time; the limited nature of selection prevents the co-existence of two opposite characteristics. This means that the resulting offspring will never be completely adapted to the environment A and B: he will have characteristics from both. The offspring is therefore constantly weaker, and if superiority appears, it should be matched with time and all parameters.

In the long run, the offspring will evolve towards the most adapted genes, hence resulting in the initial situation A or B, but not A and B. Race mixing is therefore temporary and does not provide better offspring.

If leftists say that we are all equal, then offspring cannot be superior to the parents. Superiority would go against the principle of equality.

And if we are not equal, then there is a superiority, and this superiority should be kept. Else, nature will ensure to restore it over time. That’s called evolution.

Social Status (part 1): Anti-White propaganda

This is a series of posts about the importance of social status in the sexual market. How men and women react and adapt to it? What are the roots? What are the consequences? This first part covers the anti-white propaganda.

But before developing all of this, taking a rational look of the current situation might not be a bad idea. For years now I have been living (and I grew up) in a hostile environment. What can I do… I am a simple Northern European… I never felt good when the black hero dude on TV is getting the white girl. I didn’t as a kid and frankly I still don’t. Yet it stuck me only recently. Why is that? Aren’t my hero supposed to be like me? Someone I could become one day?

As I walk through the streets, when I am on my phone, or turn on the TV here is what I see ALL THE TIME:

I live in Belgium. A country that has been white since…. well forever. Why are the alpha males portrayed by mainstream cultures always blacks or arabs? These are just a few examples but notice how this is almost entirely always a black or an arab male with a white female. Notice how white are marginalized and how “people of color” are brought to the center of the photo (alpha position).

Why is the apple helpline a black dude and a white female?

16466551_10211097987984157_1180138747_o

I ask it again: why always Black man / white female ?

Rock is music written by whites and for whites….what the hell do they stand there? Who put them there?

Science fiction is created exclusively by whites and for withes…

YET AGAIN…

Now take a look at how Han Solo, the typical white Alpha-male that use to arouse every white female vagina is getting lower on the picture.

And our kids keep on getting indoctrinated:

And when a white guy finally appears on screen:

16442847_10211098227870154_149886985_o

One could say it is all a coincidence after 1 or 2 times. But having a normal representation of white christian straight guy in popular culture is getting rare. This cannot be a coincidence. There is a call for white genocide, in Hollywood, in the Mainstream media, in the commercials and in our daily lives. Slowly they replaced us so that we would get used to it. Used to our own genocide.

More (UPDATE):

589403d8b31dc

img-20170220-wa0000img-20170212-wa0008img-20161223-wa0015img-20161107-wa0020img-20161223-wa0006

Mad Merkel, call me maybe

This Wednesday, Obama made a visit of courtesy to Merkel’s Germany. They discussed about the current trade treaties issues (i.e. TTIP, CETA, CiSA), and their global agenda. They pushed the hypocrisy by reminding how free speech is important… hilarious when you know that anything against the migration agenda is illegal under the “hate speech” law, and considering the last anti-free speech actions in USA.

Le chef d’Etat américain et la chancelière allemande ont donné une conférence de presse commune à l’issue du dernier déplacement officiel de Barack Obama en Europe en tant que président des Etats-Unis.

As it seems, Mad Merkel, the leftist’s agenda most powerful leader, pointed out that the global agenda can’t be changed. While previously naming any “globalist plot” as conspiratorial , it seems now perfectly normal to talk about it as an evidence. That is what I call a strange “conspiratorial figure”, right? Wait, Mad Merkel has a deep conviction, we should listen to her:

Because that is my deep conviction.  Globalization — and I think we share this conviction — is that globalization needs to be shaped politically. It needs to be given a human face… The negotiations on agreements like T-TIP have been challenging, and obviously at a moment when there’s concerns about globalization and the benefits that accrue to particular people, it is important that those negotiations and channels of communication remain.

I really wonder what human face should be given to globalism, if not the culote.pngabsence of culture difference and racial differences through blood mixing. Well, after publishing
officially  under the account “Historical Pics” how people would look like by 2050 in America, nothing can be astonishing. Maybe this is the face of globalism, after all.

Surprisingly though, this globalist speech is globally limited to European ethnic nations. And even more strange to clearly state that people’s opinions do not matter in a democracy.

Later, in her speech, this ugly woman couldn’t do anything else but remind everyone of this fake and stupid disproportionate responsibility in African countries. Indeed, bringing them to the same level of development, would first require major social and cultural changes – which would be qualified as genocide under international law! And actually, how do we help them by bombing them, giving them weapons for more genocides, and then mysteriously migrating them in Europe. It rather seems we bring every day more of Africa in European civilization rather than European civilization in Africa (maybe that’d be racist). At some point, this shit has to stop. We do not want to look like that ugly woman on the picture above. We are proud of who we are, deal with it stupid leftists.

There’s another point that I wanted to mention here, particularly, the engagement and commitment to Africa.  For us Europeans, Africa as a neighboring continent is of prime importance.  The development of African countries is in our very own vested interest.  We, as Germans, but also we, as members of the European Union, will have to deal with this.  It will be at the very top of our agenda.

Germans, please don’t tell me that you really believe that crap. You are much better than this. One of the greatest nation with the greatest people. Rise up and put that Mad Witch in jail for high treason, that would be a service for humanity.