SJWs on intelligence and genetics

This typical leftist video shows us that SJWs clearly don’t live in the real world. Frankly I don’t even understand how some people can take them seriously – even using only half of a brain.

They claim that intelligence and genetics are proven to be unrelated so far. Wrong. And LIES!!!

Let’s dive in their arguments one by one:

  • “No Genes have been found correlated to Intelligence”. HOW IRONIC! The left has been pushing for laws forbidding racial profiling, eugenics and even IQ tests for job interviews. Never mind China is considering cherry picking embryos to get an “IQ boost” in their already high IQ society… And if genes are found linked to mental retardation (IQ below 70…) then correcting those would already bring a boost in the national IQ average.
  • “People believe science is something reliable, that we can put a flag on… but Science is massively disorganized”. First, Science is not disorganized; the head of a leftist is. Second, Science gives models that explain the world the best as it can, following strict rules. Every model, every explanation has limits. It does not mean they are wrong, it means it gives rules or a trend within the boundaries of the hypothesis. Science is reliable as long as you use it correctly – which a SJW can’t.
  • “If one’s look from one perspective only then one’s can say that melanin and Intelligence are correlated”. There is not only one study in the World that finds Africans score lower in IQ test than white or North-East Asians, … Let’s add to this that in Europe it is forbidden to profile people based on their skin color (policy pushed by the same leftists…again… HOW IRONIC)

This simple argument of the “science is not settled” is easy to win the minds of a dumb or average person. For an SJW, science doesn’t fit when it does not meet their cultural marxist agenda (i.e. race and sex equality)… BUT Science is god if it even weakly correlate one of their stupid beliefs (e.g.: man made Global warming).

What science tells on intelligence and genetics :

Genetic influences on brain morphology and IQ are well studied. A variety of sophisticated brain-mapping approaches relating genetic influences on brain structure and intelligence establishes a regional distribution for this relationship that is consistent with behavioral studies. We highlight those studies that illustrate the complex cortical patterns associated with measures of cognitive ability. A measure of cognitive ability, known as g, has been shown highly heritable across many studies. We argue that these genetic links are partly mediated by brain structure that is likewise under strong genetic control. Other factors, such as the environment, obviously play a role, but the predominant determinant appears to be genetic.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/15651931/

In addition, studies on twins seem to demonstrate factually the interdependence. Also, historically Nordic and Asian countries have out performed Africans, Indians and Arabs for thousands of years. And as described in this Stefan Molyneux expert interview, science is not focusing on any particular genes but more on a set of genes (combination of hundreds of genes).

SJWs, stop talking shit, and let the good men handle the game for you. Your time is over.

Why does my baby look like an alien?

Don’t be like this English mother, nor like Magda Pegowska. The English mother says:

“She’s getting very dark, isn’t she?” This is what one of my friends recently said about my much adored – 12-week-old daughter.

She didn’t mean to be rude. But it was a comment that struck me with the force of a jab to the stomach. Immediately, I was overwhelmed by a confusion of emotions. I felt protective, insulted, worried, ashamed, guilty, all at once. The reason? My lovely, wriggly, smiley baby is mixed race. Now, I think of myself as pretty ‘right on’. My home is on the border of the London Republic of Hackney. I’ve been to the Notting Hill Carnival, even if I found the music a bit loud. Yet now I realise what a ‘white’ world I inhabit. I am white and I have two sons from my first marriage who are both milky complexioned and golden haired. My twin sister, who I spend a lot of time with, has a Danish partner. As a consequence, she has two boys who are also pale skinned and flaxen haired. Into this positively Scandinavian next generation, I have now injected a tiny, dark-skinned, dark-haired girl. To say she stands out is an understatement. My colouring and that of my children has never really been an issue before. However, three years ago I met the man who became my second husband and who is the father of my daughter. Although born in the UK, his parents came from India in the Sixties. This makes him British-Asian and our daughter mixed race. There is another more PC term for the plump little bundle I strap to my front. She is ‘dual heritage’. It’s a bit trendy, but I quite like it. It implies a pride in coming from two cultures, rather than the less attractive connotations of ‘mixed race’. The usual time something is labelled ‘mixed’ is when it’s a packet of nuts and they’ve bulked out the luxury cashews with cheaper peanuts. I’m not sure I want my daughter to be regarded as an adulterated version of some pure original. Still, it is the most accepted description. The truth is, whatever the label, the fact there is a label proves that my daughter’s conflicting parentage matters. At the more frothy end of the scale, mixed-race children are regarded as pretty dolls — white kids with a nice tan. When I was pregnant and people asked me about the child I was having, and I explained her father was Indian, they would often coo something along the lines of: “Ooh, she’s going to be beautiful!” as if I was discussing a new rose, made from an exotic cross-breeding programme. On a less benevolent level, mixed-race children can receive a hostile welcome from both white and black communities. Being neither one thing nor another may get you on the cover of Vogue, but it isn’t an easy way to make friends. Scroll down for more… {1} But this is 2007, surely things are more enlightened than that? I hope so, but I fear not. One reason for my fear is my own mixed reactions to my daughter. Don’t get me wrong, I love her. She is the child I didn’t think I’d have after my first marriage broke up. She is the only granddaughter in our family and we all dote on her. But when I turn to the mirror in my bedroom to admire us together, I am shocked. She seems so alien. With her long, dark eyelashes and shiny, dark brown hair, she doesn’t look anything like me. I know that concentrating on how my daughter looks is shallow. She is a person in her own right, not an accessory to me. But still, I can’t shake off the feeling of unease. I didn’t realise how much her looking different would matter and, on a rational level, I know it shouldn’t. But it does. Evolution demands that we have children to pass on our genes, hence the sense of pride and validation we get when we see our features reappearing in the next generation. With my daughter, I don’t have that. Do black fathers who marry white women and then have paler-skinned children feel my sense of loss? Or maybe Chinese mothers or Middle-Eastern grandparents grieve when they see a child they know to be their own, but whose features don’t reflect that? I worry that, as my daughter doesn’t look like me, people will assume she is adopted. After all, it’s all the rage in showbiz circles. Madonna famously scooped up a black child when she wanted to be a mother again and Angelina Jolie appears to be assembling a ‘pick ‘n’ mix’ of kids from different countries. It’s all very United Colours of Benetton, isn’t it? In the real world, I fear for my daughter’s sense of self. She has a tiny foot in two cultures. How will she negotiate a path between the two? I worry that my sons will feel less of a kinship with their sister because she is different, although there is no sign of that. As for myself, there is an inescapable status issue to address. White women who have non-white children are stigmatised as ‘Tracy Towerblocks’ living on benefits, most of which they spend on lager and fags. Even if I don’t fit this profile, my daughter’s difference definitely points out the fact that my children come from two different fathers. If I wanted to pass us off as a nice, neat nuclear family, she would blow my cover at once. But it is more than that. I am frightened, frightened of others’ reactions to her, as well as my own. I didn’t think of myself as racist and yet my daughter has shown me a side of myself about which I feel deeply uncomfortable. Even admitting to having mixed feelings about her not being blonde and blue eyed, I feel disloyal and incredibly guilty. I know the obvious comment is that I must have known how a child of our union would look when I married an Indian man, but it is a wise woman who thinks that far ahead when she falls in love. I didn’t think about any of this before I got pregnant. I wanted to have a baby. Her colour and culture were immaterial then. But self-flagellation is not useful. I have more pressing concerns. I am now the mother of a ‘black’ child, even if she is more the hue of weak tea than espresso. This is a role for which I am utterly unprepared. Part of me thinks I should be playing sitar music to her in her cot, mastering pakoras and serving them dressed in a sari, but that would be fantastically fake coming from me. When she was born, pale but with lots of dark hair, I asked the midwife if her eyes would stay blue. ‘Asian genes are very strong,’ she said in what I took to be an ominous tone. No more Brady Bunch kids for me. The midwife has been proved right and every day my baby’s eyes get a little darker. Even so, when she looks up at me as I feed her, my heart melts. My love may not be colour blind, but hers is, and that is truly humbling.”

May god hear you and stop this insanity. As you see, in the absence of light, darkness prevails.

Crime and immigration

We are told crime and immigration have nothing to do with one another. We are told race is completely unrelated, and that crime is some sort of social construct. But then how could it be that crime has never been such an issue up until recently?

WhatsApp Image 2017-08-30 at 17.20.18

To answer this question, I have gathered some data from Interpol in Europe. Analysed every single person researched, and reached the astonishing fact that about 80% of people under international mandate in Europe do not have nor share European blood.

Some may say “well guys that’s too easy! You talk about international mandate, so all normal, just chill out”. Then sorry to bring up to you, but according to studies exposed by Stefan Molyneux, there are about 70-80% of non European blood criminals in our jail. Maybe that’s just a coincidence?

These graphs highlight 2 important issues:

  1. Muslims commit more crimes,
  2. Race (as underlined by Stefan) plays a role in crime.

Stefan then looked into the data and found that there is a correlation of 0.85 between divorce rate and crime, while Muslims have a very low rate of divorce. This means that in a conservative white society, the amount of crimes should actually be very low (or else there wouldn’t be any correlation). On top of this, studies show that the relationship between crime and poverty cannot be highlighted (correlation of 0.5 only). Finally, intelligence is highly correlated to crime.

So, in practice, what conclusions can we take from these data?

  1. Race matters, and the more immigrants will be in the West, the more crimes there will be, and the more coercive measure are going to be needed (Like Islam is prescribing).
  2. Fathers matter: divorce is bad for children and leads to more crime in the society. Since about 90% are initiated by women under the “Feminist umbrella”, this means that feminism leads ineluctably to crime and violence.

The answer? Simple : Racial homogeneity, conservatism, and Christianity.

Dear Muslims: eternal victims

budist
Victims of Buddhist monks.

I don’t like to beat on Muslims for the sake of Islam. I believe the immigration issue is related to race rather than culture nor religion. But wherever they are, Muslims always play the victim card, and that’s just pissing me off. Now, they even reached to the innocent Buddhist monks… really?!

Dear Muslims,

  1. You are not a minority. You are the biggest religion on EARTH and by far.
  2. You are infiltrated in almost every single successful civilization and sucking the life blood out of it. EVERYWHERE. You haven’t contribute to anything at any place nor any time.
  3. You possesses (yes you do) huge amount of wealth; much more than Europe all together with your oil fields and other natural resources.

Yet, you play the victim. Yet, you pretend to deserve pity for a hard life THAT YOU CREATED. Listening to you, you happen to be victims absolutely everywhere, even in your own countries… now even by Buddhist monks. You bash constantly on others which you name “racists”, or infidel depending on the best speech you have.  You pretend to be “moderates” until you are a majority – systematically. You pretend to accept others, but you take all the place. You pretend to be hard worker, but you never work for another community. You ask for the help from the Jews, yet you want to exterminate them. Is that even serious?

Less and less I believe in a dialogue with the Muslim community. Race or not, religion or not, you can’t discuss with a bunch or liars. We ought to get them out, and they don’t get a word in it. They had a chance for 40 years, 3 generations, and they screw it up every time, everywhere.

 

The Muslim rape love story

Since the peak of the migration crisis, a surprising and most certainly unpredictable – sarcastically – rise of rape emerged. Surprisingly, Muslims claim that women love being raped.

Let’s be serious. We are becoming sick of these Muslims raping our women. As Trump said “Our nation is a family, and every time they touch a member of our family, it is all of us that they touch”. The so called Muslim culture is just a collection of monkey behaviors rationalized under the umbrella of “Islam”. They talk about peace and respect, but this is how it looks like in practice:

One can’t just qualify of renegade any partisan of one’s religion to make accept everything. In practice, can someone remember me the last time we saw such things with white Christians? NEVER! And as Gatestoneinstitute points out, about only 10% of rape are reported. Hence this margin is likely to be still under reality. The rise of rapes has become alarming with thousands of white women officially raped every year in Europe by these “new europeans“. Guys, wake up… our women are being raped, and our authorities do nothing. Tomorrow might be your mum, your sister, your wife or your daughter. This is war!

From Gatestooneinstitute:

Police reports show that Germany’s migrant rape crisis continues unabated, although accurate statistics are notoriously non-existent, this in one of the most technologically advanced countries in the world. German authorities have repeatedly been accused of underreporting the true scale of the migrant crime problem in the country.

According to Federal Criminal Police Office (Bundeskriminalamt, BKA) data (page 14), in 2013, migrants (Zuwanderer) committed 599 sex crimes, or an average of two a day. In 2014, migrants committed 949 sex crimes, or around three per day. In 2015, migrants committed 1,683 sex crimes, or around five per day. During the first three quarters of 2016, migrants committed 2,790 sex crimes, or around ten per day.

But this doesn’t stop the leftist National Geographic to say:

Three-quarters of a century ago Germans were dispatching trains full of Jews to concentration camps in the east; now, at the Munich train station, they were greeting trains carrying Muslim refugees with food, water, stuffed animals, and smiles. On one German podcast I began tuning in to last fall, I heard a journalist from Die Zeit tell her listeners it was all right to feel “drunk” with pleasure at that transformation.

So it seems that whatever the amount of rapes, the migrants are good because we are all Nazi. Disgusting. But whatever they call us, we couldn’t care less, and foremost we can’t just let this go. Islam is a not religion, but a very concrete system. Their religion is a law, and whatever the amount of moderate out there, the proportion of (“radicals”) monkeys is way too high to tolerate any of them in our countries. Europe, if it wants to avoid the most violent war of human history, has to understand that there is only one solution to this: DEPORTATION.

Being a normal white man is unhealthy, apparently

The crusade against white men continues.

No later than a week ago, European newspapers published an article with a identical fallacious title “being a macho would be unhealthy“. Lies, lies and more lies. A quick reading of the scientific backup reveal exactly the opposite conclusion.
Indeed, scientific seem to have finally demonstrated what we all already know, but after getting a lot of money – of course, what else? Macho men actually… prefer handling their problem on their own and not rely on a woman! Wow, that’s a hell of a breaking news! And despite the easy study and obvious conclusion, leftists could interprete that as “being macho is unhealthy”… In that case, being sick is also unhealthy – thanks for the news.

But of course stupidity would be the bright side. We now all know that this is a crusade: the evil white man must perish for all the bad things he has done. He shall never be masculine again – oh no! A white man should stand for himself and handle his life like a man. Never be like Donald Trump. That might be a problem, right? But for who?

Well, men are the defenders, the protectors of society. Women can barely fight, nor dictate and transmit strict moral values without a man on their side. They will rather follow the main stream – this is also reflected in primates’ society where females are the first to take on new habits launched by the alpha male. Break the man of a society, and you break families, values, direction, strength, defense. You leave women alone, and society will not be sustainable. I has never worked and will never  ever work. At most other males will take the place – that is what we see in Europe.

I know that many women understand this, and I seriously thank them. To the others, don’t fool yourself, feminism is dangerous. Killing the male side of a society is like melting the black and white of a photograph: in the end there is no picture.

Mad Merkel, call me maybe

This Wednesday, Obama made a visit of courtesy to Merkel’s Germany. They discussed about the current trade treaties issues (i.e. TTIP, CETA, CiSA), and their global agenda. They pushed the hypocrisy by reminding how free speech is important… hilarious when you know that anything against the migration agenda is illegal under the “hate speech” law, and considering the last anti-free speech actions in USA.

Le chef d’Etat américain et la chancelière allemande ont donné une conférence de presse commune à l’issue du dernier déplacement officiel de Barack Obama en Europe en tant que président des Etats-Unis.

As it seems, Mad Merkel, the leftist’s agenda most powerful leader, pointed out that the global agenda can’t be changed. While previously naming any “globalist plot” as conspiratorial , it seems now perfectly normal to talk about it as an evidence. That is what I call a strange “conspiratorial figure”, right? Wait, Mad Merkel has a deep conviction, we should listen to her:

Because that is my deep conviction.  Globalization — and I think we share this conviction — is that globalization needs to be shaped politically. It needs to be given a human face… The negotiations on agreements like T-TIP have been challenging, and obviously at a moment when there’s concerns about globalization and the benefits that accrue to particular people, it is important that those negotiations and channels of communication remain.

I really wonder what human face should be given to globalism, if not the culote.pngabsence of culture difference and racial differences through blood mixing. Well, after publishing
officially  under the account “Historical Pics” how people would look like by 2050 in America, nothing can be astonishing. Maybe this is the face of globalism, after all.

Surprisingly though, this globalist speech is globally limited to European ethnic nations. And even more strange to clearly state that people’s opinions do not matter in a democracy.

Later, in her speech, this ugly woman couldn’t do anything else but remind everyone of this fake and stupid disproportionate responsibility in African countries. Indeed, bringing them to the same level of development, would first require major social and cultural changes – which would be qualified as genocide under international law! And actually, how do we help them by bombing them, giving them weapons for more genocides, and then mysteriously migrating them in Europe. It rather seems we bring every day more of Africa in European civilization rather than European civilization in Africa (maybe that’d be racist). At some point, this shit has to stop. We do not want to look like that ugly woman on the picture above. We are proud of who we are, deal with it stupid leftists.

There’s another point that I wanted to mention here, particularly, the engagement and commitment to Africa.  For us Europeans, Africa as a neighboring continent is of prime importance.  The development of African countries is in our very own vested interest.  We, as Germans, but also we, as members of the European Union, will have to deal with this.  It will be at the very top of our agenda.

Germans, please don’t tell me that you really believe that crap. You are much better than this. One of the greatest nation with the greatest people. Rise up and put that Mad Witch in jail for high treason, that would be a service for humanity.

 

Dominant genes vs natural selection

I often hear that blacks and Arabs have dominant genes. The common assumption made by Mudsharks and Camelfuckers is that their genes are stronger, superior to those of white people, hypocritically covering their abnormal sexual affinities.

Dominance in biology means that a gene overrun another statistically. Just like putting shit on you makes you very likely to smell like shit, mixing with blacks or Arabs makes white people like them (physically and personality wise – due to genetic impact of brain constitution). But does it mean that the result is more adapted from a natural selection point of view?

To find the answer, I refer to the past. Between 50000 and 25000 years ago the Homo Sapiens came in Europe and mixed with the Neanderthal. The homo sapiens was 100% black, as Africans are today. Nonetheless, Europeans are white, and if Camelfuckers hadn’t mixed them throughout extensive conquest and women slavery/rape, they would still be white from the north to the south, and the west to east.

What does it tell us exactly? It tells us that naturally, the white color and white European biological constitution emerged as the only evolution, disqualifying black color and African customs. This also draws a line between statistics and evolution.

Genes transmission are statistical while evolution is selective. Anyone can reproduce, but the most adapted survives, and that is a big difference.