SJWs on intelligence and genetics

This typical leftist video shows us that SJWs clearly don’t live in the real world. Frankly I don’t even understand how some people can take them seriously – even using only half of a brain.

They claim that intelligence and genetics are proven to be unrelated so far. Wrong. And LIES!!!

Let’s dive in their arguments one by one:

  • “No Genes have been found correlated to Intelligence”. HOW IRONIC! The left has been pushing for laws forbidding racial profiling, eugenics and even IQ tests for job interviews. Never mind China is considering cherry picking embryos to get an “IQ boost” in their already high IQ society… And if genes are found linked to mental retardation (IQ below 70…) then correcting those would already bring a boost in the national IQ average.
  • “People believe science is something reliable, that we can put a flag on… but Science is massively disorganized”. First, Science is not disorganized; the head of a leftist is. Second, Science gives models that explain the world the best as it can, following strict rules. Every model, every explanation has limits. It does not mean they are wrong, it means it gives rules or a trend within the boundaries of the hypothesis. Science is reliable as long as you use it correctly – which a SJW can’t.
  • “If one’s look from one perspective only then one’s can say that melanin and Intelligence are correlated”. There is not only one study in the World that finds Africans score lower in IQ test than white or North-East Asians, … Let’s add to this that in Europe it is forbidden to profile people based on their skin color (policy pushed by the same leftists…again… HOW IRONIC)

This simple argument of the “science is not settled” is easy to win the minds of a dumb or average person. For an SJW, science doesn’t fit when it does not meet their cultural marxist agenda (i.e. race and sex equality)… BUT Science is god if it even weakly correlate one of their stupid beliefs (e.g.: man made Global warming).

What science tells on intelligence and genetics :

Genetic influences on brain morphology and IQ are well studied. A variety of sophisticated brain-mapping approaches relating genetic influences on brain structure and intelligence establishes a regional distribution for this relationship that is consistent with behavioral studies. We highlight those studies that illustrate the complex cortical patterns associated with measures of cognitive ability. A measure of cognitive ability, known as g, has been shown highly heritable across many studies. We argue that these genetic links are partly mediated by brain structure that is likewise under strong genetic control. Other factors, such as the environment, obviously play a role, but the predominant determinant appears to be genetic.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/15651931/

In addition, studies on twins seem to demonstrate factually the interdependence. Also, historically Nordic and Asian countries have out performed Africans, Indians and Arabs for thousands of years. And as described in this Stefan Molyneux expert interview, science is not focusing on any particular genes but more on a set of genes (combination of hundreds of genes).

SJWs, stop talking shit, and let the good men handle the game for you. Your time is over.

What SJWs did to IQ and education

It seems like everyone today can get a university degree. What was reserved for the intellectual elites is now common bread for anyone. But how far does that go?

Note: This is the best case scenario…

There is clearly no concrete, non politically correct answer on the internet. So, we made the analysis ourselves, based on officials numbers from the OECD and the IQ research+ website.

When comparing the average national IQ with the percentage of undergraduate students (2 years or more with a diploma obtained from a university). Indeed, in order to succeed, it can be assumed that the population succeeding has an IQ higher than the minimum required to succeed in average. It is not completely true, but it should follow the global trend. This just gives us the best case scenario. If anything the average IQ of Bachelor degree holders is slightly less than represented on the chart.

The results are shocking. In most countries, an average IQ of 100 is enough to finish university, and in some Eastern countries (such as Russia), an IQ of about 90 is sufficient to succeed!

Of course, for SJW’s and liberals, that’s simply perfect. Everyone can finally enjoy education – at a huge cost for the rest of the population- and … well be basically unemployable! Everyone is equal against a world of lies where the dumbest asshole equates the smartest good guy. So in the end, at equal shit, no doubt corruption and network matters more than actual skills, knowledge and intelligence.

Once again, equality doesn’t exist, and these modern Bolshevists do not seem to understand it, even when the message is very clear.

That is just outrageous. That is an insult for all those who study hard to get STEMs degrees (mostly white and Asian men obviously). Because if the average is as mentioned above, and taking into account that some smart people do not study, then the average “African studies” or “gender studies” degree doesn’t require more than 80 to finish. Well, great, finally Africans and sick feminists can have their own degrees to attest their supposedly higher intellect.

So, after all, as Stefan Molyneux says, it might better not to go to college at all and educate yourself. If the best that a country can produce is average or below, how do you create top performers, leaders and good people?

Hardly.

Sophie Tanner, a typical SJW idiot

Sophie Tanner is one those women who has been corrupted by the political agenda of the Left.

Christian values are very clear: one man, one woman. But for SJWs, this is too easy (or probably too difficult). For this reason,  for  a free and emancipated woman, what is the ultimate goal? To boast your own self until you believe – as does every SJW – that your words are higher than the Word of God.

“When asked if divorce would ever be on the cards, Sophie said: ‘Marrying yourself is a lifelong commitment to be responsible for your own happiness, so divorce is not an option.’”

How Laughable, divorcing yourself.

And God has a way of punishing them. He turns them into eternally unsatisfied crybabies, waiting for big daddy to give them a slap on the face. Worse even, into crazy psychotic people, zombies. Yup, SJWs have much in common with zombies: ugly dwellers looking for the next host to infect and exploit, barely speaking anything understandable.

Sophie, you are an example of what women should not be. Thank you for leading by example.

Why does my baby look like an alien?

Don’t be like this English mother, nor like Magda Pegowska. The English mother says:

“She’s getting very dark, isn’t she?” This is what one of my friends recently said about my much adored – 12-week-old daughter.

She didn’t mean to be rude. But it was a comment that struck me with the force of a jab to the stomach. Immediately, I was overwhelmed by a confusion of emotions. I felt protective, insulted, worried, ashamed, guilty, all at once. The reason? My lovely, wriggly, smiley baby is mixed race. Now, I think of myself as pretty ‘right on’. My home is on the border of the London Republic of Hackney. I’ve been to the Notting Hill Carnival, even if I found the music a bit loud. Yet now I realise what a ‘white’ world I inhabit. I am white and I have two sons from my first marriage who are both milky complexioned and golden haired. My twin sister, who I spend a lot of time with, has a Danish partner. As a consequence, she has two boys who are also pale skinned and flaxen haired. Into this positively Scandinavian next generation, I have now injected a tiny, dark-skinned, dark-haired girl. To say she stands out is an understatement. My colouring and that of my children has never really been an issue before. However, three years ago I met the man who became my second husband and who is the father of my daughter. Although born in the UK, his parents came from India in the Sixties. This makes him British-Asian and our daughter mixed race. There is another more PC term for the plump little bundle I strap to my front. She is ‘dual heritage’. It’s a bit trendy, but I quite like it. It implies a pride in coming from two cultures, rather than the less attractive connotations of ‘mixed race’. The usual time something is labelled ‘mixed’ is when it’s a packet of nuts and they’ve bulked out the luxury cashews with cheaper peanuts. I’m not sure I want my daughter to be regarded as an adulterated version of some pure original. Still, it is the most accepted description. The truth is, whatever the label, the fact there is a label proves that my daughter’s conflicting parentage matters. At the more frothy end of the scale, mixed-race children are regarded as pretty dolls — white kids with a nice tan. When I was pregnant and people asked me about the child I was having, and I explained her father was Indian, they would often coo something along the lines of: “Ooh, she’s going to be beautiful!” as if I was discussing a new rose, made from an exotic cross-breeding programme. On a less benevolent level, mixed-race children can receive a hostile welcome from both white and black communities. Being neither one thing nor another may get you on the cover of Vogue, but it isn’t an easy way to make friends. Scroll down for more… {1} But this is 2007, surely things are more enlightened than that? I hope so, but I fear not. One reason for my fear is my own mixed reactions to my daughter. Don’t get me wrong, I love her. She is the child I didn’t think I’d have after my first marriage broke up. She is the only granddaughter in our family and we all dote on her. But when I turn to the mirror in my bedroom to admire us together, I am shocked. She seems so alien. With her long, dark eyelashes and shiny, dark brown hair, she doesn’t look anything like me. I know that concentrating on how my daughter looks is shallow. She is a person in her own right, not an accessory to me. But still, I can’t shake off the feeling of unease. I didn’t realise how much her looking different would matter and, on a rational level, I know it shouldn’t. But it does. Evolution demands that we have children to pass on our genes, hence the sense of pride and validation we get when we see our features reappearing in the next generation. With my daughter, I don’t have that. Do black fathers who marry white women and then have paler-skinned children feel my sense of loss? Or maybe Chinese mothers or Middle-Eastern grandparents grieve when they see a child they know to be their own, but whose features don’t reflect that? I worry that, as my daughter doesn’t look like me, people will assume she is adopted. After all, it’s all the rage in showbiz circles. Madonna famously scooped up a black child when she wanted to be a mother again and Angelina Jolie appears to be assembling a ‘pick ‘n’ mix’ of kids from different countries. It’s all very United Colours of Benetton, isn’t it? In the real world, I fear for my daughter’s sense of self. She has a tiny foot in two cultures. How will she negotiate a path between the two? I worry that my sons will feel less of a kinship with their sister because she is different, although there is no sign of that. As for myself, there is an inescapable status issue to address. White women who have non-white children are stigmatised as ‘Tracy Towerblocks’ living on benefits, most of which they spend on lager and fags. Even if I don’t fit this profile, my daughter’s difference definitely points out the fact that my children come from two different fathers. If I wanted to pass us off as a nice, neat nuclear family, she would blow my cover at once. But it is more than that. I am frightened, frightened of others’ reactions to her, as well as my own. I didn’t think of myself as racist and yet my daughter has shown me a side of myself about which I feel deeply uncomfortable. Even admitting to having mixed feelings about her not being blonde and blue eyed, I feel disloyal and incredibly guilty. I know the obvious comment is that I must have known how a child of our union would look when I married an Indian man, but it is a wise woman who thinks that far ahead when she falls in love. I didn’t think about any of this before I got pregnant. I wanted to have a baby. Her colour and culture were immaterial then. But self-flagellation is not useful. I have more pressing concerns. I am now the mother of a ‘black’ child, even if she is more the hue of weak tea than espresso. This is a role for which I am utterly unprepared. Part of me thinks I should be playing sitar music to her in her cot, mastering pakoras and serving them dressed in a sari, but that would be fantastically fake coming from me. When she was born, pale but with lots of dark hair, I asked the midwife if her eyes would stay blue. ‘Asian genes are very strong,’ she said in what I took to be an ominous tone. No more Brady Bunch kids for me. The midwife has been proved right and every day my baby’s eyes get a little darker. Even so, when she looks up at me as I feed her, my heart melts. My love may not be colour blind, but hers is, and that is truly humbling.”

May god hear you and stop this insanity. As you see, in the absence of light, darkness prevails.

Dearcatcallers, that’s stupid

Sad, very sad. “Dearcatcallers” spends her life taking selfies with poor guys (so-called beta males).

This is what stupid women do when they are set free without any goal in life. They become feminists who do not even understand what they fight for. Anyway, I shouldn’t even bother because she doesn’t look too white to me.

Seriously, what’s the goal of taking selfies with poor guys but getting attention?! What is her achievement?! Nothing but stupidity.

At least she tells something: white men, man up and take back what is yours.

 

 

Social media are breaking families

In our society, tech giants are capable of influencing our behaviors, believes, etc. They create a new reality out of thin air. With their help, any lie can become a truth. The tiniest of ideas can be seen by hundreds of millions or be used to target any specific individual in any specific region.

To do so, they select their target and adapt the content each and everyone can see. The masses are not aware of this process and hence believe that what they see is a widespread truth, even if it is an exception. In two words, virtuality has succeeded to reality.

And now the European Commission aims at coordinating with social media to control algorithms selecting what you can see. Not only tech giants will have power over you, but also the government.

One of the worse impact for the white man is on the sexual market. Example:

A European woman connects to Facebook, and her newsfeed is flooded with other cultures, other men’s achievements, etc. Not so long ago, Facebook was promoting in Eastern countries a video with the smartest people on earth… and guess what: not a single white! How come?!

They show how rich, cool, and handsome are all non white men. How Arabs from Saudi or Dubai care for animals. How black people have more feelings and are more caring. How white men are disgusting bastards who invite refugees to abuse them. They help them reaching to your girlfriend, your wife, your daughter, in your back.

Recently a girl told me that in India they don’t have toilet, and it is our fault – we are bad people. Sorry girl, but I haven’t not seen a single white man restraining Indians from building nor using toilet. And we have been building them in Europe for thousands of years.

They build an entire lie on which children and women mostly hang they beliefs. More than school, more than books, they indoctrinate our people for not making families. They promote mixity everywhere, and make us feel guilty for even existing as people. They give the tools for cheating and breaking relationships, families.

It is high time to end the tech giant dictatorship and to denounce the fraudulent leaders in Europe and the USA.

McGregor vs Mayweahter: Here is what you need to know.

The McGregor – Mayweather boxing match was for sure a hell of an event. Mayweather is probably the best boxer that ever existed with 50 victories now and 0 defeat. Yet someone like Connor McGrgegor who is a complete outsider still hold 10 rounds in front of him. So credits goes to him as well. But despite being the “fight of century”, the results is not what where the focus should be. It is what follows…

promo324727494

While normal people just wanted to have a good time watching this boxing game, others did not have the same intention. For many this game was a political/racial game. And here are a few samples:

It useless to make the case that most of the real racism is not coming from whites but from other races. Nor it is better to point out how ridiculous this comments are. What is important to remember is that peaceful individuals do not get to choose the fight they are in. If someone self-identifies as your opponent … and that someone also decides that the reason you are in this fight is because of race… you can argue all day long, this is not someone you are going to reason. You are in a race war. And it doesn’t matter if you like or not.

This is where the difference between the Alt-Light and the Alt-Right is drawn. You don’t get to choose the world around you. Your personal experience is not relevant. It is neither love nor dialectic that will solve this issue. Either you choose to fight or you choose to surrender. This is what being Alt-Right is. And as other races keep pushing more and more, whites have less and less choice for peace. Sad, but true.

And it is also valid for the people who “do not care about politics”. Non-whites want a race war, because their parasite nature requires us to work and give to them. You don’t get to be neutral in this fight. You will have to either join force or die.

I repeat: WAR IS COMING FOR YOU. There is no way to escape it. And it is not up to you to decide it.

In the God Emperor we trust

Contrary to what some voice of the Alt-Right might suggest, President Trump is doing a pretty good job. In his latest speech in Phoenix, AZ, he reassured the American patriots that he is working on their side and actively supporting them. And in the recent events since the Charlottesville rally the God-Emperor choose the fulfill his role of president of the United States by taking measured decisions and defending the right fullness and morality before all.

As a sympathiser of the Alt-Right I don’t consider myself defended by “moderates”, nor feel like that President Trump is defending it. But I am appeased to see people defending basics rights and common sense. And in his first speech, the President did exactly that. He conflicted with the ideology of the left, and that is not a small thing. When he was asked to comment on Charlottevilles, he walked out, and asked for facts. Dear liberals, yes, this is what a man does, president or not: he puts facts before feeling, and before his interest.

The liberals just jumped up and down and started whining like children. They know what is happening but they are too stupid to see it. They are too indoctrinated to see facts and to react as adults. Hence, they intent shutting down any voice opposing theirs. Their agenda is their Quran, and the media their imams. Either you accept all of it, either you are persecuted. Infidels are not welcome to the liberal pit.

The second speech of the God emperor about Charlottevilles was a perfect continuation of the first one. He pointed out rightfully the misbehaviors of the alt-right and accused the left for what they are: bullies, thugs, cowards… the “alt-left”. The Alt-Left is a label that has been around for a while and President Trump mainstreamed it in the most clever way. That was pure genius!

Now onwards the mainstream media that have been providing fake news to cover the liberal debility will find harder to cover up their madness. The altleft is now a label that we can use to insult them. We don’t need to scream our sympathy for the alt-right, but we can label them at the same level, using their own game. Genius! We believe in ideas, they believe in labels. In any case, if one thing is sure, it is that they will keep pushing their message anyhow and despite any inconsistencies.

Second law of SJWs: SJWs always double down.

Vox Day

Yet, President Trump is right. There are abuse on all sides. Thugs shouldn’t be used as ambassadors of a movement. That’s not serious. The problem is not violence, the problem is aggression. And by pointing this out the Right keeps on pushing the left in the corner. This is how people join our ranks, this is how real changes are made.

Thanks Donald. Please make America so great that all whites can finally unite for a better world of theirs, in the respect of all.

Trust your people

Our trust-based modern western society have been jeopardised to individualism and socialism. That is strange paradox on one hand, but much less if your doctrine is “divide and conquer”. This article aims at explaining why the alt-right must be based on trust to succeed.

WhatsApp Image 2017-08-16 at 00.09.10.jpeg

The foundation of every society is trust and without it, you need very strong laws to control it. For example, socialism and communism are concepts that are naturally opposed to trust, because they discharge the personal responsibility on the state – which hence becomes God alike. It is impossible to have socialism or communism without a central power.

Solidarity, on the other hand, derives from trust. Therefore, where solidarity lies, socialism can’t root, and vice-versa. But more than this, individualism cannot co-exist with trust. If one defends its own interest, how could he be trustworthy for any group? It is rather unlikely.

Of course, libertarians will argue that individuals are smart enough and possess enough information to make a wise decision, and will always act for the group… but nothing can be less true. Indeed, we are biologically bonded to privilege ourselves, and any form of system that will foster it will ineluctably result in a disorganised, amoral and primitive society where instincts dominate. Wanna have an example? Primitive tribes did not have any laws, and yet the only strategy that enabled them to survive was not individualism but group-centred (actually ethno-centric) strategy.

In practice, how individualism looks like? At work, any time there is an unlikely contract to be signed, the manager assigns it to you. But whenever something likely to win arises, he grabs it and puts his name on it.

Of course you may say that this kind of behaviour is aligned with the company since whatever comes, the company earns money. But is that true on the long term? Nothing can be more untrue. Indeed, this behaviour creates a huge lack of trust in the company, which results in staff turnover, and loss of contracts – would you ever support a company that used to steal your professional opportunities. In some ways, the same is happening now in Google and most big companies. Through the propagation of individualism, diversity and gender balance, they have now lost most of the confidence of their most talented employees. Tired of investing their time and money for others, they now look for an alternative political model that will restore trust, homogeneity and meritocracy.

In other terms, individualism is part of cultural Marxism. Through the maximisation of personal gain, we actually strive for less. We strive for less good people, less quality and less morality. And in the end, alone, we are all weak and easy to control.

Why do we do this article? We want the right wing to become conscious of one thing. We are all on the same side, and we ought to support and fight together. Do not blame Neo-Nazi, White supremacists or whatsoever, because if we want to win, a trust movement is required. This trust will enable our people to fight without fearing for their finance, their job, their life, etc. It will also enable us to promote a much more moral and sustainable society where people require minimal law enforcement to conduct themselves adequately. Finally, trust will make us effective. Where the left will require contracts, and heavy procedures, we will leverage on our agility. Where the left will need time, we will strike faster and sharper.

A honest discussion with an SJW

SJW, Liberals, libtards… name them like you want: Those who pretend to be seeking the best for all. Every time I hear their nonsense I just can’t stand away from an argument with them – my apologies to Voxday. So, let me walk you through some of the highlights of the discussion I had with one of them recently.

417b1fb4-1382-43c9-9541-da73e65ac018

She is a young lady, 20 years old, feminist and a student in economics. She attends a great school, leveled to Harvard or MIT. Our conversation started over the subjects of drugs and gun control. I took her through the concept of equilibrium in societies and explained her how for the first time in recorded history, society now privileges laws over morality. In a nutshell, I said that societies mostly stand on morality to prevent wrong behaviors, where laws are only coercive and repressive. As a society is lowering its moral standards, the need for more laws (repression) grows. Likewise, uncivilivized behaviors can be controlled through severe repression (i.e. Islam). In any case, the only way to develop a society is to have the highest amount of behaviors aligned with the common good. Morality is necessary to develop and maintain a civilized society. And morality is also a question of intelligence – monkeys don’t appear to have morality.

quote-the-more-laws-that-are-written-the-more-criminals-are-produced-laozi-81-73-21

Hence, where a civilized white christian society could make guns and drugs available to everyone, it would be a total disaster to do the same in Turkey, Morroco, Saudi Arabia, India, etc. As I explained: if you don’t train your dog well enough and you remove the leash, do not expect him to behave correctly. The same goes for human: “social liberalism” is only achievable if population is 1) smart enough for it and 2) if this society has enough morality to support it. Surprisingly, our opinion didn’t differ on this.

Later on we finally came to the same conclusion that a homogeneous society is required to maintain stability. Then, she moved on and told me that this is why we require a homogeneous world with a single culture, language, and power to control us. As people won’t comply to this, it is required to have a strong government that pushes people to do it, against their will.

Inevitably, we moved to the racial issue. I asked her who would then replace us in the future. And the answer was that blacks, arabs or asians will simply replace us, and that is not even an issue. I couldn’t stop myself and asked if we could rather make Africa white instead of making Europe black. Yet, that apparently was not an option, since it would be considered racist.

So out of this discussion, I isolated the 3 pillars of so called liberals and social justice warriors:

1. Abolish cultures, nations and human diversity and replace it by a single world society.

2. Have elites and a central government to rule these people. Abolish individual freedom.

3. Ensure that human blood is mixed and that white people disappears.

Remember, she learned all of this in one of these big schools. And of course they are naive enough to picture themselves as the rulers…