In the God Emperor we trust

Contrary to what some voice of the Alt-Right might suggest, President Trump is doing a pretty good job. In his latest speech in Phoenix, AZ, he reassured the American patriots that he is working on their side and actively supporting them. And in the recent events since the Charlottesville rally the God-Emperor choose the fulfill his role of president of the United States by taking measured decisions and defending the right fullness and morality before all.

As a sympathiser of the Alt-Right I don’t consider myself defended by “moderates”, nor feel like that President Trump is defending it. But I am appeased to see people defending basics rights and common sense. And in his first speech, the President did exactly that. He conflicted with the ideology of the left, and that is not a small thing. When he was asked to comment on Charlottevilles, he walked out, and asked for facts. Dear liberals, yes, this is what a man does, president or not: he puts facts before feeling, and before his interest.

The liberals just jumped up and down and started whining like children. They know what is happening but they are too stupid to see it. They are too indoctrinated to see facts and to react as adults. Hence, they intent shutting down any voice opposing theirs. Their agenda is their Quran, and the media their imams. Either you accept all of it, either you are persecuted. Infidels are not welcome to the liberal pit.

The second speech of the God emperor about Charlottevilles was a perfect continuation of the first one. He pointed out rightfully the misbehaviors of the alt-right and accused the left for what they are: bullies, thugs, cowards… the “alt-left”. The Alt-Left is a label that has been around for a while and President Trump mainstreamed it in the most clever way. That was pure genius!

Now onwards the mainstream media that have been providing fake news to cover the liberal debility will find harder to cover up their madness. The altleft is now a label that we can use to insult them. We don’t need to scream our sympathy for the alt-right, but we can label them at the same level, using their own game. Genius! We believe in ideas, they believe in labels. In any case, if one thing is sure, it is that they will keep pushing their message anyhow and despite any inconsistencies.

Second law of SJWs: SJWs always double down.

Vox Day

Yet, President Trump is right. There are abuse on all sides. Thugs shouldn’t be used as ambassadors of a movement. That’s not serious. The problem is not violence, the problem is aggression. And by pointing this out the Right keeps on pushing the left in the corner. This is how people join our ranks, this is how real changes are made.

Thanks Donald. Please make America so great that all whites can finally unite for a better world of theirs, in the respect of all.

Trust your people

Our trust-based modern western society have been jeopardised to individualism and socialism. That is strange paradox on one hand, but much less if your doctrine is “divide and conquer”. This article aims at explaining why the alt-right must be based on trust to succeed.

WhatsApp Image 2017-08-16 at 00.09.10.jpeg

The foundation of every society is trust and without it, you need very strong laws to control it. For example, socialism and communism are concepts that are naturally opposed to trust, because they discharge the personal responsibility on the state – which hence becomes God alike. It is impossible to have socialism or communism without a central power.

Solidarity, on the other hand, derives from trust. Therefore, where solidarity lies, socialism can’t root, and vice-versa. But more than this, individualism cannot co-exist with trust. If one defends its own interest, how could he be trustworthy for any group? It is rather unlikely.

Of course, libertarians will argue that individuals are smart enough and possess enough information to make a wise decision, and will always act for the group… but nothing can be less true. Indeed, we are biologically bonded to privilege ourselves, and any form of system that will foster it will ineluctably result in a disorganised, amoral and primitive society where instincts dominate. Wanna have an example? Primitive tribes did not have any laws, and yet the only strategy that enabled them to survive was not individualism but group-centred (actually ethno-centric) strategy.

In practice, how individualism looks like? At work, any time there is an unlikely contract to be signed, the manager assigns it to you. But whenever something likely to win arises, he grabs it and puts his name on it.

Of course you may say that this kind of behaviour is aligned with the company since whatever comes, the company earns money. But is that true on the long term? Nothing can be more untrue. Indeed, this behaviour creates a huge lack of trust in the company, which results in staff turnover, and loss of contracts – would you ever support a company that used to steal your professional opportunities. In some ways, the same is happening now in Google and most big companies. Through the propagation of individualism, diversity and gender balance, they have now lost most of the confidence of their most talented employees. Tired of investing their time and money for others, they now look for an alternative political model that will restore trust, homogeneity and meritocracy.

In other terms, individualism is part of cultural Marxism. Through the maximisation of personal gain, we actually strive for less. We strive for less good people, less quality and less morality. And in the end, alone, we are all weak and easy to control.

Why do we do this article? We want the right wing to become conscious of one thing. We are all on the same side, and we ought to support and fight together. Do not blame Neo-Nazi, White supremacists or whatsoever, because if we want to win, a trust movement is required. This trust will enable our people to fight without fearing for their finance, their job, their life, etc. It will also enable us to promote a much more moral and sustainable society where people require minimal law enforcement to conduct themselves adequately. Finally, trust will make us effective. Where the left will require contracts, and heavy procedures, we will leverage on our agility. Where the left will need time, we will strike faster and sharper.

A honest discussion with an SJW

SJW, Liberals, libtards… name them like you want: Those who pretend to be seeking the best for all. Every time I hear their nonsense I just can’t stand away from an argument with them – my apologies to Voxday. So, let me walk you through some of the highlights of the discussion I had with one of them recently.


She is a young lady, 20 years old, feminist and a student in economics. She attends a great school, leveled to Harvard or MIT. Our conversation started over the subjects of drugs and gun control. I took her through the concept of equilibrium in societies and explained her how for the first time in recorded history, society now privileges laws over morality. In a nutshell, I said that societies mostly stand on morality to prevent wrong behaviors, where laws are only coercive and repressive. As a society is lowering its moral standards, the need for more laws (repression) grows. Likewise, uncivilivized behaviors can be controlled through severe repression (i.e. Islam). In any case, the only way to develop a society is to have the highest amount of behaviors aligned with the common good. Morality is necessary to develop and maintain a civilized society. And morality is also a question of intelligence – monkeys don’t appear to have morality.


Hence, where a civilized white christian society could make guns and drugs available to everyone, it would be a total disaster to do the same in Turkey, Morroco, Saudi Arabia, India, etc. As I explained: if you don’t train your dog well enough and you remove the leash, do not expect him to behave correctly. The same goes for human: “social liberalism” is only achievable if population is 1) smart enough for it and 2) if this society has enough morality to support it. Surprisingly, our opinion didn’t differ on this.

Later on we finally came to the same conclusion that a homogeneous society is required to maintain stability. Then, she moved on and told me that this is why we require a homogeneous world with a single culture, language, and power to control us. As people won’t comply to this, it is required to have a strong government that pushes people to do it, against their will.

Inevitably, we moved to the racial issue. I asked her who would then replace us in the future. And the answer was that blacks, arabs or asians will simply replace us, and that is not even an issue. I couldn’t stop myself and asked if we could rather make Africa white instead of making Europe black. Yet, that apparently was not an option, since it would be considered racist.

So out of this discussion, I isolated the 3 pillars of so called liberals and social justice warriors:

1. Abolish cultures, nations and human diversity and replace it by a single world society.

2. Have elites and a central government to rule these people. Abolish individual freedom.

3. Ensure that human blood is mixed and that white people disappears.

Remember, she learned all of this in one of these big schools. And of course they are naive enough to picture themselves as the rulers…

The rise of the AltRight

The call to the rally to unite the right marks a new era. It will show how committed the right is. Using good rhetorics with the truth it became the dominant ideology on the Internet. It is now time to go live and spread to the word in a peaceful manner in the real world. Libtards are giggling like chickens before being beheaded. After all, their only response is censorship. It is emotional and instinctive, whilst their argument limited to labeling their opponents. The big ideology shift nowadays makes the left tremble. Hence they fire everywhere, shooting down as well altLite figures like Sargon of Akkad or Lauren Southern, or even sometimes open leftist like Dave Rubin.


Unfortunately, this rally is only possible in the USA where the constitution protects the rights of individuals. On the contrary, Europe is muzzled, as the constitution protects the people in power,not the individuals. Such event is not conceivable unless you wanna end up in jail or beaten up by the police. At least for the moment.

Therefore, measuring the size of the right wing power in Europe is necessary to make people understand that they are not alone. Beyond any number, yet, the new right wing is the only movement that can bring a new “New-Renaissance” to Europeans and Americans

On one hand the so called “extreme right” in Europe includes the alt-Right, the Alt-Lite, some cuckservatives and even lefties. On the other hand, many people vote for other political parties, fearing of being labelled “extremist”, fired or socially exiled. But recent elections are giving us a hint on how many people are fed up with the current system.

  • Britain UKIP scored 12.1, and voted last year for Brexit (slightly above 50%).
  • France 2017 elections gave 34.7% for Marine Le Pen.
  • Austria’s Freedom pary got 35% in 2016.
  • Belgium NVA and VB had together around 25% of the vote but it was in 2014.

A good approximation tells us that slightly more than a third of European voters are voting for real conservative parties. And that is not so bad, especially considering women, gays and immigrants.

Yet, these numbers have to be adjusted due to the abstentions (around 40%), the number of whites people left (around 80% and making it most of the abstention), and the ratios of vote between men and women (men make most of the abstention as women like voting to gargle their ego). Hence, roughly 17% of the population supports a right wing party. Or about 27% of white people, and 37 % of White men.

The alt-Right is surely a minority among this group, even if most of the people are sympathising. For example PEGIDA did a protest in Dresden Germany in 2016. Police expected 15000, 8000 showed up. If the police expected 1 in 4 activist to show up. It means around the region of Free state of Saxony, there are 25 thousands AltLite/AltRight activits. The “Extreme right” party AFD got 160 thousands votes in 2014. Adjusting for 2016, let’s round it up to 200 000 votes. It means around 12.5% of the Extreme right is under the umbrella of the Alt-Right/Alt-Lite. Giving 6% to the AltRight.

We can conclude that around 2 to 3% of European white men seem to be red pilled. But that is almost large enough! The threshold of population seems to be located at 3%. If we do stick together, authorities wont be able to stand against us. We are at a turning point in history…

Sweden: the end of an argument.

The event that happened recently in Sweden surprised me in a way… it was a surprise to many people. Anyone with a sound mind saw this coming. It is not big news, it is now part of the usual Western European life. I wouldn’t be surprise seeing these types of events elsewhere in countries like Lithuania or Slovakia and I wonder if they will still consider Putin as enemy number one.

So if I saw this event coming miles away why is it worth covering it here?


Because commies, socialists, liberals and libertarians ran for decades with the argument “it is payback/blow-back for American and European imperialism”. And it is the end of it. Sweden has been the model of non-interventionism and neutrality for decades. Sweden barely had any colonies. Sweden was a prosperous country that ruined itself by giving away it’s wealth, freedom and genetic background. The argument of the “religion of peace” or “peaceful race” is OVER. If this teaches us one thing:


And here is a big thank you for all our SJWs friends for their cynical jokes:

Gamma males are the problem

I have been thinking a lot about the socio-sexual hierarchy and its impact on society. Over time I could not help but start despising gamma males. The lack of clear literature, and the importance of their role in today society made me think about digging more into the subject. The three typical gamma males:

gamma scale 3.png

There is no unique gamma male, just like there is no unique alpha male. Normally, in a healthy society, gamma males are simply disqualified by other males, and hence rejected by women. But who are they?

Gamma males typically represent the opposite of an alpha male. They certainly have alpha qualities, but they lack the self-confidence, direction, structure and identity that an alpha  male has. They think they are bosses on the right track, but they are not. Therefore, the way they communicate, manage relationships, and handle stress is extremely different.

The following type of gamma males can be identified:

  • The useful idiot: this gamma is a typical SJW in lack of identity, but who wants to take a lead in defending cultural Marxism. He makes a point by virtue signaling at defending multiculturalism, feminism, etc. Despite his attempt of defending women’s right, he is a total sexual reject – women would rather commit suicide rather than having babies with them. By being a useful idiot, he goes where the wind goes and believes that it should bring him all the chicks and success. His masculinity is the weakest of all males. He will either hate either gratify women, but at no time he can grasp their nature.
  • The opportunist: he has money, he has a very good position in a company and uses it to promote shit values. Like any gamma, he does not accept any argument and simply gets frustrated. He can’t argue and uses violence to win an argument. He will try to break your will, attack you personally, censor you, humiliate you, etc. This category also encompasses the colleagues which seem to be cool, but stab you in te back at every opportunity. They want to teach you how to respect women, they want to lead, … but it is a total failure! Their lack of identity makes them poor leaders – they do not inspire. They are extremely irritable; especially when they drink. They bully constantly other males to try to look like an alpha male, and seek attention. This gamma is the most dangerous because he is a pure hypocrite, and usually knows what he does. Usually, they can pick up women, but have sexual problems in relationships. Since they don’t understand why, they become frustrated and start annoying their woman until she leaves them or simply cheats on them.
  • The outsider: he is part of some kind of trend like hipster, or whatever. Most Arabic men are part of this category. They surf on the “status wave” like having a beard, skin color, interracial propaganda, etc. Since women usually go where the wind blows – the trend – they usually confuse them with alpha/sigma males. They recognize in them the masculine model spread by the media. But don’t be mistaken, everything is about appearance. Deep inside, their status is everything they have, and if you remove this, they are simple gamma. They are very emotional and think like women. For example, hipster look abrupt but spent more time to look manly than women do to look feminine – being rough and looking rough is not the same thing!

Unfortunately, today society sets trends towards gamma males. Whether you are a total useful idiots, some kind of protected minority or an opportunist, the society protects you. When you speak the truth, society rejects you – that’s the goal of cultural Marxism, after all. Most power positions are in the hands of gamma males. Example? Take most of politicians, civil servants, directors, etc. The problem is that these people use the power for themselves or to serve other people as sick as them. This results in a loss of values and a feminization of the society. Indeed, true alpha males would stop women, put limits, set direction, inspire, lead… look at Trump.

Next time you see some gamma, just remember that they are sick people who should not be tolerated. Your biggest weapons against them are their own weapons: social rejection and humiliation. What makes them strong is the power in place, the trend and their weak followers. Break this and you will break them.

The truth behind the post trump riots

Last week has seen both the uprising of democracy and kinder-garden fascism. Trump demonstrated that with less money, but alpha male qualities and moral values, you stand a chance against tyranny.Afficher l'image d'origine

And tyranny, these leftists kids know a lot about that! They couldn’t stop themselves from starting riots in the streets… to protest against and for democracy at the same time. Funny right? Or consterning, my feelings are mixed. In a way, these useful idiots are the kind of funny cute, the kind you wanna slap just to hear them crying, then give them some sugar (they are mostly vegan, but they love sugar, like my dog).

The most surprising is to discover unsurprisingly the endorsement and sponsoring of George Soros, the same pig face who financed Hitlary. It seems that he was not happy with the results, and neither Hilary. The school class is in big trouble, the big smart guy won, and the Gamma’s are pissed off.

George Soros is a bad man. After being involved in Balkans war, Ukrainian revolution, and many others, he is now sponsoring the riots through funding

As you see on the front page, this movement calls for a revolution in America to despot Trump, and update the law. Their saying: “constitution should be updated to elect through the popular vote”.

Well I don’t think these scumbags would fight the same if Hitlary was elected. Hypocrisy, lies, and hate. Funny that they promote hate fighting and democracy… through hate and violence.

Dear leftist, be ready, the war is only starting, and you will lose.

The leftist debate

Discussing with a leftist always reaches a point where any argument seem to be vain. And if not, they won’t hesitate to show violence. Usually their goal is not to debate facts but rather to compromise the credibility of the speaker in order to end the conversion with their only opinion.

Since leftist are hard to debate, I usually prefer to let it go and speak with interesting people. 9 common tactics:

  1. Personnal attack:
    • Tackle your credibility: they will use one of your sentence, your background, your ennemies, … take it out of context and try to discredit everything that say based on one made up false argument
    • Racism: a leftist will always treat you of racist when you talk.
    • Demonization: a leftist always defines two sides – his and the others. As such, if you are against him, you are a demon, and they will literally tell you – “crazy extreme right neonazi ultraliberal!”.
    • Any other personal argument like “you did this 5 years ago”, or “you are frustrated”, etc.
  2. Burn the hypothesis: as a logical person you will talk about facts which you will articulate logically. On their side, instead they will rather say that your facts are not accurate.
    • Science: they will deny science. Example: they will deny natural law like Gaussian curves or exponential curves, they will deny the importance of genetics in human behaviors
    • Data: they’ll discredit the source of your data, or simply say that they don’t agree with data.
  3. Make an exception a rule: they will often take on exception and use it as a rule. They will refuse any discussion on the 99% of the subject, focusing on a particular exception which goes in their sense. Example: “they are not all the same”
  4. Victimization: they will play on the feelings of the people. Example: “these people are running away from war, they are suffering” – whilst not saying that 80% are not from countries at war.
  5. Half lies: they will take half of a sentence and change the context to demonize you and make it appear stupid. Example: trump wants to limit Muslim immigration until the situation is clarified, they said “trump does not want any Muslim in the USA, he is racist” (btw, a religion is not a race).
  6. Lies: leftists lie openly. It is normal, when your speech is not coherent you must lie to make the pieces stand together. Example: “homo sapiens replaced Neanderthal, so we are all equal” – in fact, 5-10% of genetic code in Europe is from Neanderthal, while Africans have 0%.
  7. Propaganda: leftists need huge propaganda to keep others under control. It is simply normal, because the biggest the shit, and the more you need to cover the smell! At a personal level, they will try to discredit you from your friends and isolate you, or even try to get you fired.
  8. Emotions: leftist will show clear outburst and poor emotional control. They could even invent a pseudo situation in which you attacked them. Example: a woman might simple say that you sexually harassed her – and the debate is closed.
  9. Violence: when threats and emotions did not work, leftists will eventually become violent. Example: put in jail your opponents (Manifestationin France), and don’t forget to forbid them to have any weapon – they could fight back!

Best answers? Ignore, laugh, agree and amplify, turn into derision, reply with their usual rhetoric, make them answer your questions, etc. Just note that any mathematical reasoning from yourself will be destroyed.

In conclusion, leftists do not play fair, and do not show restrain in their behaviors. They are capable of the worse things, and will use any means to destroy their opponents. Their inner void renders them frustrated, unable to control themselves, and certainly not to show respect or even pity.  Don’t be mistaken, leftist are really racist, intolerant, narrow minded, manipulative, greedy, robbers, and violent. They do all of that because deep deep down they do not love their own-self. Hence, how could they truly love someone who looks like them, but accepts himself?

Bonus: leftist propaganda video