Simple and effective. This is the tactics that work best:

Posters proclaiming “IT’S OKAY TO BE WHITE” have been appearing on college campuses and on city streets across the country this week, prompted by an anonymous chat-room comment that suggested the message would feed social unrest and sway white Americans to far-right ideologies.

The episode is indicative of the efforts white-nationalist groups have made to recruit in and around the nation’s college campuses and other mainstream settings with claims of growing white maltreatment and expanding anti-white discrimination. The white victim construct is one that experts say, not so long ago, only had traction in avowed white supremacists, segregationists and neo-Nazi circles. But today, it animates open and anonymous public discussions of race and shapes the nation’s politics.


One kid (or more) threw a few flyers and the establishment is in shambles. Who knows, they maybe were printed within the school. COST $0, effect: a Swiming pool of SJW tears and thousands of mix-raced couple prevented. Saving the white race is saving the world.

It is effective, spend 50$ on stickers or flyers and get the word out.

SJWs Hypocrisy: The list.

This statement is obvious but the list just keep going on and on. When an ideology is based on lies, its followers cannot help but being a bunch of hypocrites. So without further ado here is the non exhaustive list of their hypocritical statements:

Feel free to submit more hypocritical SJWs statements to @patriargate on Twitter, GAB and Minds.

Trust your people

Our trust-based modern western society have been jeopardised to individualism and socialism. That is strange paradox on one hand, but much less if your doctrine is “divide and conquer”. This article aims at explaining why the alt-right must be based on trust to succeed.

WhatsApp Image 2017-08-16 at 00.09.10.jpeg

The foundation of every society is trust and without it, you need very strong laws to control it. For example, socialism and communism are concepts that are naturally opposed to trust, because they discharge the personal responsibility on the state – which hence becomes God alike. It is impossible to have socialism or communism without a central power.

Solidarity, on the other hand, derives from trust. Therefore, where solidarity lies, socialism can’t root, and vice-versa. But more than this, individualism cannot co-exist with trust. If one defends its own interest, how could he be trustworthy for any group? It is rather unlikely.

Of course, libertarians will argue that individuals are smart enough and possess enough information to make a wise decision, and will always act for the group… but nothing can be less true. Indeed, we are biologically bonded to privilege ourselves, and any form of system that will foster it will ineluctably result in a disorganised, amoral and primitive society where instincts dominate. Wanna have an example? Primitive tribes did not have any laws, and yet the only strategy that enabled them to survive was not individualism but group-centred (actually ethno-centric) strategy.

In practice, how individualism looks like? At work, any time there is an unlikely contract to be signed, the manager assigns it to you. But whenever something likely to win arises, he grabs it and puts his name on it.

Of course you may say that this kind of behaviour is aligned with the company since whatever comes, the company earns money. But is that true on the long term? Nothing can be more untrue. Indeed, this behaviour creates a huge lack of trust in the company, which results in staff turnover, and loss of contracts – would you ever support a company that used to steal your professional opportunities. In some ways, the same is happening now in Google and most big companies. Through the propagation of individualism, diversity and gender balance, they have now lost most of the confidence of their most talented employees. Tired of investing their time and money for others, they now look for an alternative political model that will restore trust, homogeneity and meritocracy.

In other terms, individualism is part of cultural Marxism. Through the maximisation of personal gain, we actually strive for less. We strive for less good people, less quality and less morality. And in the end, alone, we are all weak and easy to control.

Why do we do this article? We want the right wing to become conscious of one thing. We are all on the same side, and we ought to support and fight together. Do not blame Neo-Nazi, White supremacists or whatsoever, because if we want to win, a trust movement is required. This trust will enable our people to fight without fearing for their finance, their job, their life, etc. It will also enable us to promote a much more moral and sustainable society where people require minimal law enforcement to conduct themselves adequately. Finally, trust will make us effective. Where the left will require contracts, and heavy procedures, we will leverage on our agility. Where the left will need time, we will strike faster and sharper.

A honest discussion with an SJW

SJW, Liberals, libtards… name them like you want: Those who pretend to be seeking the best for all. Every time I hear their nonsense I just can’t stand away from an argument with them – my apologies to Voxday. So, let me walk you through some of the highlights of the discussion I had with one of them recently.


She is a young lady, 20 years old, feminist and a student in economics. She attends a great school, leveled to Harvard or MIT. Our conversation started over the subjects of drugs and gun control. I took her through the concept of equilibrium in societies and explained her how for the first time in recorded history, society now privileges laws over morality. In a nutshell, I said that societies mostly stand on morality to prevent wrong behaviors, where laws are only coercive and repressive. As a society is lowering its moral standards, the need for more laws (repression) grows. Likewise, uncivilivized behaviors can be controlled through severe repression (i.e. Islam). In any case, the only way to develop a society is to have the highest amount of behaviors aligned with the common good. Morality is necessary to develop and maintain a civilized society. And morality is also a question of intelligence – monkeys don’t appear to have morality.


Hence, where a civilized white christian society could make guns and drugs available to everyone, it would be a total disaster to do the same in Turkey, Morroco, Saudi Arabia, India, etc. As I explained: if you don’t train your dog well enough and you remove the leash, do not expect him to behave correctly. The same goes for human: “social liberalism” is only achievable if population is 1) smart enough for it and 2) if this society has enough morality to support it. Surprisingly, our opinion didn’t differ on this.

Later on we finally came to the same conclusion that a homogeneous society is required to maintain stability. Then, she moved on and told me that this is why we require a homogeneous world with a single culture, language, and power to control us. As people won’t comply to this, it is required to have a strong government that pushes people to do it, against their will.

Inevitably, we moved to the racial issue. I asked her who would then replace us in the future. And the answer was that blacks, arabs or asians will simply replace us, and that is not even an issue. I couldn’t stop myself and asked if we could rather make Africa white instead of making Europe black. Yet, that apparently was not an option, since it would be considered racist.

So out of this discussion, I isolated the 3 pillars of so called liberals and social justice warriors:

1. Abolish cultures, nations and human diversity and replace it by a single world society.

2. Have elites and a central government to rule these people. Abolish individual freedom.

3. Ensure that human blood is mixed and that white people disappears.

Remember, she learned all of this in one of these big schools. And of course they are naive enough to picture themselves as the rulers…

The leftist debate

Discussing with a leftist always reaches a point where any argument seem to be vain. And if not, they won’t hesitate to show violence. Usually their goal is not to debate facts but rather to compromise the credibility of the speaker in order to end the conversion with their only opinion.

Since leftist are hard to debate, I usually prefer to let it go and speak with interesting people. 9 common tactics:

  1. Personnal attack:
    • Tackle your credibility: they will use one of your sentence, your background, your ennemies, … take it out of context and try to discredit everything that say based on one made up false argument
    • Racism: a leftist will always treat you of racist when you talk.
    • Demonization: a leftist always defines two sides – his and the others. As such, if you are against him, you are a demon, and they will literally tell you – “crazy extreme right neonazi ultraliberal!”.
    • Any other personal argument like “you did this 5 years ago”, or “you are frustrated”, etc.
  2. Burn the hypothesis: as a logical person you will talk about facts which you will articulate logically. On their side, instead they will rather say that your facts are not accurate.
    • Science: they will deny science. Example: they will deny natural law like Gaussian curves or exponential curves, they will deny the importance of genetics in human behaviors
    • Data: they’ll discredit the source of your data, or simply say that they don’t agree with data.
  3. Make an exception a rule: they will often take on exception and use it as a rule. They will refuse any discussion on the 99% of the subject, focusing on a particular exception which goes in their sense. Example: “they are not all the same”
  4. Victimization: they will play on the feelings of the people. Example: “these people are running away from war, they are suffering” – whilst not saying that 80% are not from countries at war.
  5. Half lies: they will take half of a sentence and change the context to demonize you and make it appear stupid. Example: trump wants to limit Muslim immigration until the situation is clarified, they said “trump does not want any Muslim in the USA, he is racist” (btw, a religion is not a race).
  6. Lies: leftists lie openly. It is normal, when your speech is not coherent you must lie to make the pieces stand together. Example: “homo sapiens replaced Neanderthal, so we are all equal” – in fact, 5-10% of genetic code in Europe is from Neanderthal, while Africans have 0%.
  7. Propaganda: leftists need huge propaganda to keep others under control. It is simply normal, because the biggest the shit, and the more you need to cover the smell! At a personal level, they will try to discredit you from your friends and isolate you, or even try to get you fired.
  8. Emotions: leftist will show clear outburst and poor emotional control. They could even invent a pseudo situation in which you attacked them. Example: a woman might simple say that you sexually harassed her – and the debate is closed.
  9. Violence: when threats and emotions did not work, leftists will eventually become violent. Example: put in jail your opponents (Manifestationin France), and don’t forget to forbid them to have any weapon – they could fight back!

Best answers? Ignore, laugh, agree and amplify, turn into derision, reply with their usual rhetoric, make them answer your questions, etc. Just note that any mathematical reasoning from yourself will be destroyed.

In conclusion, leftists do not play fair, and do not show restrain in their behaviors. They are capable of the worse things, and will use any means to destroy their opponents. Their inner void renders them frustrated, unable to control themselves, and certainly not to show respect or even pity.  Don’t be mistaken, leftist are really racist, intolerant, narrow minded, manipulative, greedy, robbers, and violent. They do all of that because deep deep down they do not love their own-self. Hence, how could they truly love someone who looks like them, but accepts himself?

Bonus: leftist propaganda video