Ukrainian beauty for sale

It didn’t take too long to the globalists to destroy Ukraine. White genocide is the priority, afterall.

They instantiated a fake war in the east, recruiting thousands of young Ukrainian men to the battlefield. Killing them, demoralizing them, and leaving the rear country defenseless.

Women stay alone and pray for their man to return… Or simply gargle their ego with occidental feminist dreams, sometimes selling their body to the first pornographer coming. Men fight, women betray, that is the cultural marxist agenda for Ukraine.

One of the last unconquered country at the door of Russia is Ukraine, and the land of these people shall remain neither Christian nor White. Because to their master, their lord is the false lord, it is no doubt local blood should also be replaced.

That is why Ukraine will now take some refugees. Europe took about 0 Ukrainian refugee; these having been taken were by chance, by mistake or for sex. The UNHCR says:

More than three years of conflict has left more than two million Ukrainians displaced from their homes. 480,000 others have sought asylum in neighboring countries. Many fled with barely anything and in search for safety.

The conflict has impacted some of the most vulnerable populations in Ukraine – of the estimated 1.6 million IDPs in Ukraine, 900,000 are over the age of 60.

Never heard about that in any newspapers in Europe… But Ukraine HAS to take refugees and get more diverse if it wants to enjoy the true democratic heaven of the EU and NATO.

Ukrainian men and women, we pray for you. Don’t let them in, beat them and keep your women safe. Because these women are your true treasure and the key to your future as Ukrainians.

EU migration is a joke

The European Commission is the executing organisation of the EU. Its goal is to spend the money that the council (meeting of all EU leaders) has decided.

Every year it has about 150 bn euro to spend. It has general directorates in charge of individual policies, the one for borders and security being “home and affairs“. None of the employees were ever elected and are considered as god living since they are the key to the “golden EU funds”.

As on the picture, they had about 10 billions euros over 5 years (not a lot for protecting borders) and they already give away 7 billions euros to migrants. In any case their main goal is to have a more Open Europe, and that is rather contradictory with “borders” and “security”.

Add to this the 18 billions euros given to the Open Society by George Soros, and you feel how much money goes to the destruction of Europe and USA. If you wanna put names and faces to this process, help yourself:

Social media are breaking families

In our society, tech giants are capable of influencing our behaviors, believes, etc. They create a new reality out of thin air. With their help, any lie can become a truth. The tiniest of ideas can be seen by hundreds of millions or be used to target any specific individual in any specific region.

To do so, they select their target and adapt the content each and everyone can see. The masses are not aware of this process and hence believe that what they see is a widespread truth, even if it is an exception. In two words, virtuality has succeeded to reality.

And now the European Commission aims at coordinating with social media to control algorithms selecting what you can see. Not only tech giants will have power over you, but also the government.

One of the worse impact for the white man is on the sexual market. Example:

A European woman connects to Facebook, and her newsfeed is flooded with other cultures, other men’s achievements, etc. Not so long ago, Facebook was promoting in Eastern countries a video with the smartest people on earth… and guess what: not a single white! How come?!

They show how rich, cool, and handsome are all non white men. How Arabs from Saudi or Dubai care for animals. How black people have more feelings and are more caring. How white men are disgusting bastards who invite refugees to abuse them. They help them reaching to your girlfriend, your wife, your daughter, in your back.

Recently a girl told me that in India they don’t have toilet, and it is our fault – we are bad people. Sorry girl, but I haven’t not seen a single white man restraining Indians from building nor using toilet. And we have been building them in Europe for thousands of years.

They build an entire lie on which children and women mostly hang they beliefs. More than school, more than books, they indoctrinate our people for not making families. They promote mixity everywhere, and make us feel guilty for even existing as people. They give the tools for cheating and breaking relationships, families.

It is high time to end the tech giant dictatorship and to denounce the fraudulent leaders in Europe and the USA.

The Muslim rape love story

Since the peak of the migration crisis, a surprising and most certainly unpredictable – sarcastically – rise of rape emerged. Surprisingly, Muslims claim that women love being raped.

Let’s be serious. We are becoming sick of these Muslims raping our women. As Trump said “Our nation is a family, and every time they touch a member of our family, it is all of us that they touch”. The so called Muslim culture is just a collection of monkey behaviors rationalized under the umbrella of “Islam”. They talk about peace and respect, but this is how it looks like in practice:

One can’t just qualify of renegade any partisan of one’s religion to make accept everything. In practice, can someone remember me the last time we saw such things with white Christians? NEVER! And as Gatestoneinstitute points out, about only 10% of rape are reported. Hence this margin is likely to be still under reality. The rise of rapes has become alarming with thousands of white women officially raped every year in Europe by these “new europeans“. Guys, wake up… our women are being raped, and our authorities do nothing. Tomorrow might be your mum, your sister, your wife or your daughter. This is war!

From Gatestooneinstitute:

Police reports show that Germany’s migrant rape crisis continues unabated, although accurate statistics are notoriously non-existent, this in one of the most technologically advanced countries in the world. German authorities have repeatedly been accused of underreporting the true scale of the migrant crime problem in the country.

According to Federal Criminal Police Office (Bundeskriminalamt, BKA) data (page 14), in 2013, migrants (Zuwanderer) committed 599 sex crimes, or an average of two a day. In 2014, migrants committed 949 sex crimes, or around three per day. In 2015, migrants committed 1,683 sex crimes, or around five per day. During the first three quarters of 2016, migrants committed 2,790 sex crimes, or around ten per day.

But this doesn’t stop the leftist National Geographic to say:

Three-quarters of a century ago Germans were dispatching trains full of Jews to concentration camps in the east; now, at the Munich train station, they were greeting trains carrying Muslim refugees with food, water, stuffed animals, and smiles. On one German podcast I began tuning in to last fall, I heard a journalist from Die Zeit tell her listeners it was all right to feel “drunk” with pleasure at that transformation.

So it seems that whatever the amount of rapes, the migrants are good because we are all Nazi. Disgusting. But whatever they call us, we couldn’t care less, and foremost we can’t just let this go. Islam is a not religion, but a very concrete system. Their religion is a law, and whatever the amount of moderate out there, the proportion of (“radicals”) monkeys is way too high to tolerate any of them in our countries. Europe, if it wants to avoid the most violent war of human history, has to understand that there is only one solution to this: DEPORTATION.

A honest discussion with an SJW

SJW, Liberals, libtards… name them like you want: Those who pretend to be seeking the best for all. Every time I hear their nonsense I just can’t stand away from an argument with them – my apologies to Voxday. So, let me walk you through some of the highlights of the discussion I had with one of them recently.

417b1fb4-1382-43c9-9541-da73e65ac018

She is a young lady, 20 years old, feminist and a student in economics. She attends a great school, leveled to Harvard or MIT. Our conversation started over the subjects of drugs and gun control. I took her through the concept of equilibrium in societies and explained her how for the first time in recorded history, society now privileges laws over morality. In a nutshell, I said that societies mostly stand on morality to prevent wrong behaviors, where laws are only coercive and repressive. As a society is lowering its moral standards, the need for more laws (repression) grows. Likewise, uncivilivized behaviors can be controlled through severe repression (i.e. Islam). In any case, the only way to develop a society is to have the highest amount of behaviors aligned with the common good. Morality is necessary to develop and maintain a civilized society. And morality is also a question of intelligence – monkeys don’t appear to have morality.

quote-the-more-laws-that-are-written-the-more-criminals-are-produced-laozi-81-73-21

Hence, where a civilized white christian society could make guns and drugs available to everyone, it would be a total disaster to do the same in Turkey, Morroco, Saudi Arabia, India, etc. As I explained: if you don’t train your dog well enough and you remove the leash, do not expect him to behave correctly. The same goes for human: “social liberalism” is only achievable if population is 1) smart enough for it and 2) if this society has enough morality to support it. Surprisingly, our opinion didn’t differ on this.

Later on we finally came to the same conclusion that a homogeneous society is required to maintain stability. Then, she moved on and told me that this is why we require a homogeneous world with a single culture, language, and power to control us. As people won’t comply to this, it is required to have a strong government that pushes people to do it, against their will.

Inevitably, we moved to the racial issue. I asked her who would then replace us in the future. And the answer was that blacks, arabs or asians will simply replace us, and that is not even an issue. I couldn’t stop myself and asked if we could rather make Africa white instead of making Europe black. Yet, that apparently was not an option, since it would be considered racist.

So out of this discussion, I isolated the 3 pillars of so called liberals and social justice warriors:

1. Abolish cultures, nations and human diversity and replace it by a single world society.

2. Have elites and a central government to rule these people. Abolish individual freedom.

3. Ensure that human blood is mixed and that white people disappears.

Remember, she learned all of this in one of these big schools. And of course they are naive enough to picture themselves as the rulers…

Right wing, change your tactic

Swedish men demonstrated that are still some white men ready to sacrifice themselves to a bigger cause than their own specific interest. No-one knows their personal background, but we all know beyond a shadow of a doubt that it must be full of suffering.

d153a486-b5e5-438d-aa7b-dc3dd79e3b96

 

In any case, any right winger must understand that he will suffer and endure pain no matter what. Only solidarity and brotherhood will keep us alive and help us carry on through difficult times.

As Andrew explained in the DailyStormer, these events are also bringing us some conclusions. They shall not be repeated. But rather commented and rethought.
Up until now, many right wing events and actions have been colored by aggression and/or violence. From Richard Spencer to these North Men, it is just sad to note that neither the left, neither the camels will calm down and just accept facts and evidence. They are instrumentalized by the ruling elite for a bigger goal that is the ethnic cleansing of European bloodline.

Now the question must be asked: are these events really providing the expected results? Sadly… not really.

We do not recommend any kind of violence, but we all know that violence is not avoidable. Yet, the current strategy is not working. We are not in control, and we can’t win a fight against the majority. A minority can only win if it is united and acting in the shadow. To some extend, we should inspire ourselves from the Jewish community, who acts as a chameleon. Sadly, the alt-right values cannot be followed to win this fight. We must speak the truth and be honest, but we also must control ourselves and act behind the curtains.
Hence, our reflections led us to these conclusions:

  • We need to have a list of all right wing organizations in USA and Europe, along with their leaders. This list shouldn’t be available on internet. We must stop the exclusive internet movement and meet in the real world (we encourage anyone to show up in Charlottesville this week end, even if you are altLite).
  • Communication should be encrypted to some extend.
  • The fact that some activists will not be full red pill must be tolerated. Maybe they are just anti-Muslim, or else … It doesn’t matter, because in the end, we will all fight on the same side.
  • We must re-create our own technological infrastructure (youtube, messaging, etc.).
  • We need to stop showing: Nazi signs/uniforms, violence, etc. This is not helping nor giving us good marketing; we rather look disorganized and weak.
  • We must all train hard: join Krav Maga, Close Combat, Boxing, Karate, etc. and do it, at leas twice a week. I can tell you that 90% of Muslims do train to fight since the’re 4 years old in France, Holland, Germany, Belgium, etc.
  • We must study military tactics: modern, asian and roman
  • We must join an airsoft club and train on military tactics
  • We have to learn how to shoot (for Europeans, get a gun licence and buy a gun with enough ammo – but don’t use it!)
  • We must arm ourselves. Get other weapons (stick, kubotan, knives…) – but don’t use it!
  • We must take care of our health. Hit the gym at least twice a week to develop your strength. Eat well and take care of your health. Pray, meditate, get the stress out of your system.
  • Meet guys and train with them when possible on military techniques.
  • We must get into psychological warfare and physical warfare (when possible). We do not encourage violence, but rather working on two battlefields:
    • Information war through active posting on all left wing media (newspaper, videos, etc.)
    • Self defence: never do something illegal, but drfend yourself and your family. Actin the shadows, this is much more destabilising.

I can’t stress it enough: there is only one way for a minority to win, it is to act in the shadow, but united and organized.

Remember that the left is composed of gays, women, low-T men. On the other side, non whites are rather aggressive and well trained. Considering the size of the camps, there is no way the right can win neither democratically, neither on an open violence field. We must get weapons our enemy does not have and cannot have: strength, discipline, unity and smartness. Things must be done in a much more organized manner, while remaining legal, and behind the curtain.

Social Status (part 2): Why cucks get hot chicks

Ever wondered why these Spaniards, Blacks, Latino’s, Arabs get any tier 1 white chicks without any alpha male characteristics?

 


Well, for men, social status (or social proof) is a determining factor for success in modern society. It is a factor that became more and more prevalent in the last two or three decades. Not only it is a determining factor for succeeding in society, but it  dictates your “sexual market value” for finding a more attractive and higher quality woman. Not to trash the socio-sexual hierarchy, the social status is far more important than what usually people think. The importance of the social status will be covered in an other article (part 3).
Social status is a factor that will help to determine your position into society. Somehow it has always existed. Sometimes obvious (especially in the past), sometimes obscure and too often unspoken of, the social status has no particular science but the fashion it corresponds to.

 

 

 

In the past, it was almost entirely dictated by wealth, the family and the type of job a man would have. Trophies or medals were proudly worn. Titles were given: Dukes, Lords, Barons, Marquess, Counts, Knights, Gentlemen… All of these aspects gave a man higher value in the eyes of everyone. And rightfully so, medals, trophies and titles were hard to get and only the smartest, the bravest and strongest could obtain it.

viallon-destriers-Fig-1.jpg

Another aspect was the job. While knights and Dukes were jobs as well, it was reserved for a tiny fraction of the population. People then gave more value to jobs that required more special abilities and were essential to society (for example a black-smith). During the industrial revolution, engineers were highly regarded. As productivity was booming, so was their wealth and recognition.

These rules were true for our old societies, were people were roughly united under a common culture and a common racial background. But today it is no longer the case. The media industrial complex,  the fashion industrial complex  and the Hollywood industrial complex obtained a cleric position in a secular society. Competence is no longer the prime criteria for most of employers. Commercials have a role of propaganda. And succeeding in life is no longer exclusively entitled to making better life decisions, being smarter or a better man. It is what people see repeatedly that will determine their prejudice. Most people can’t help but fearing of being labelled “racist”, “xenophobic” or “islamophobic”… hence the “people of color” have a clear advantage over white people.

As mentioned before, white people have been taken off fashion commercial already. And if there is one, it will be a black haired Spanish looking men or at most a low sexual value white male. Men with brown, blond or red hair are almost non-existent while making the vast majority of the northern European population. International music is overwhelmingly sang by Blacks, Arabs and Latinos. And it is played in every single night club, bars and pubs all over Europe. Girls gets horny at the sound of Enrique. The black music triggers what they are programmed for: hookup. They can’t help it; like zombies brainwashed their behavior switches to the sheep being brought to the slaughter.

And what does all of this do? It makes you think that Blacks are better musicians, it makes you think that arabs or indians are better employees or engineers, it makes you think that Spanish is the most beautiful language. If all of this had any accuracy then history should have followed. Blacks would have had a 18th century compositors we still listen today. Arabs would have sent a man on the moon. Our grand-parents would listen to Spanish songs as well. But no.

15591090_1254968934546541_5272337204149669473_o.jpg

All of this did not happened. Because social status is no longer dictated by a rational view of the world (at least in the West). It is dictated by TVs, news-outlet, commercials through positive and negative emotions. Today, the social status is a pure illusion, the mirage in the middle of the desert.

The current criteria for social status:

  • Skin color: In the past, being different than white (in Europe) was a clear negative sign. It is now an asset. Colored people have much higher chance of succeeding in life without necessary having talent, commitment or hard work. These people have all kinds of tools (Anti-racist organization, laws …) on their side that white do not have. Their families, culture or community is still alive and healthy as they are not under constant fire from the media, fashion industry or Hollywood. They are constantly promoted and labeled “beautiful”, “generous”, “handsome”… while being the exact opposite.
  • Jobs: Today people sucking money of the current crony-capitalist system are portrait as heroes: Doctors, Lawyers, politicians, lobbyist, government employees… They don’t work much and make tons of money. Old noble jobs like engineers, scientist or military… are completely disregarded while being the most essential jobs for a healthy society.
  • Looks: If you ever wonder how a gamma got laid, here is your answer. He tried to look like the fashion boy you see on posters. Looks have always been part of social status. But today mainstream looks are far from being manly looks.men-what-the-hell-happened
  • Language, cultural background, nationality: This mostly depends on connotations, and where the media or the fashion industry puts its focus. In the past, indigenous people had a higher status than foreigners as a foreigners was less likely to succeed in society (language, cultural and environmental barrier). Today, being Spanish means sun, sea, sexy language (language constantly played on the radio)…, being Australian is sun and Sea, therefore and Australian has a higher status than a Scottish (while having extremely similar looks)

And here it goes… You are white, quiet handsome, hard working man with values and wonder why you could never have a date with even a tier 3 woman. Why didn’t you get a position that you suited perfectly in your company? Haven’t you met, even once in you life time, an incompetent Black or Arab that nobody dares to fire because…”racism”?  Your ugly kebab maker at the corner of your street is getting laid a lot more than you are (and it is not only about the game)… You now have your answer. Open your eyes, look around you. Who is portrait as the villain in modern culture? Who is represented as the “good guy”?

Social status makes people, especially women, believe in an illusion.It is a situation leftists have introduced in order to push their agenda for multiculturalism, their dream of egalitarian society and the inhalation of their prime enemy: The white man. If today’s leftists dreams were true, we would not be standing right here facing the collapse of European civilization: it would have never existed.

Is race mixing superior?

Race mixing, “métissage“makes people better – that’s what they say. The modern double narratives of unique race doesn’t miss an opportunity to pinpoint the superiority of race mixing. Facing this absurd bullshit, I see no option but bringing common sense to face a bunch of lies.

Image associée

Races and species are adapted to their environment. Species mixing normally does not work. In some cases, offspring can be made, but their survival or reproduction is jeopardized (e.g. mules). Therefore, we know that nature doesn’t see species mixing as something to be fostered. For races, offspring can indeed survive and reproduce themselves, hence creating a so-called new race. But if this is the way to go, why didn’t nature do it before?

There are multiple reasons to this. Race mixing implies the superiority of a race on another, at least on certain characteristics such as intelligence, physical characteristics, etc. Intrinsically, there is no race superiority; nature doesn’t care about superiority. The real parameters are time and state at a time t for a series of characteristics. The odds are played in a rather deterministic way at a certain time. Always. The term superiority relates to a series of characteristics to match with an environment at a time t. Wherever some take over others, then a talk about superiority can be done. Hence, superiority is connected to 1) time, and 2) environment. Superiority can neither be eternal neither omnipresent.

Races evolve differently in different environments. Our genetics evolved to answer problems that are commonly faced in a specific environment. Climate, resources abundance, food quality, temperature, distance, etc. are all parameters that play over a well-adapted being. Today, of course technology bypasses most of the required genetic evolution for an environment (e.g. water transformation, heating and food conservation). Genetic modifications (mutation) appear during the life of an individual (somatic), and during the creation of semen (hereditary). Generally speaking, we adapt during our life to our environment and the life process enables us to transmit it to a new offspring that will have a “white page” to adapt to the environment. Living and dying is the only process that can ensure adaptation to the environment and the survival of the species.

Saying that race mixing would bring a superior offspring implies that the offspring would be more adapted to the environment than the parents. The implication of genetic mutation and evolution necessitates the selection of the best genes at the time of the fusion of the ovary and the sperm:

  1. That would imply a consciousness of the future environment of the semen in order to select the most appropriate genes. By definition, adaptation is a post process, and therefore this scenario is mathematically impossible. In addition, genes selection has a statistical result, such as skin color for example, that also invalidates the theory of the selection of the best genes: the disparity of results implies a non superiority of the offspring.
  2. Each genetic code is the best evolutionary result for its environment matching its race characteristics. Selecting the best in two races would suppose that the best characteristics from two different environments are selected at the same time; the limited nature of selection prevents the co-existence of two opposite characteristics. This means that the resulting offspring will never be completely adapted to the environment A and B: he will have characteristics from both. The offspring is therefore constantly weaker, and if superiority appears, it should be matched with time and all parameters.

In the long run, the offspring will evolve towards the most adapted genes, hence resulting in the initial situation A or B, but not A and B. Race mixing is therefore temporary and does not provide better offspring.

If leftists say that we are all equal, then offspring cannot be superior to the parents. Superiority would go against the principle of equality.

And if we are not equal, then there is a superiority, and this superiority should be kept. Else, nature will ensure to restore it over time. That’s called evolution.

Social Status (part 1): Anti-White propaganda

This is a series of posts about the importance of social status in the sexual market. How men and women react and adapt to it? What are the roots? What are the consequences? This first part covers the anti-white propaganda.

But before developing all of this, taking a rational look of the current situation might not be a bad idea. For years now I have been living (and I grew up) in a hostile environment. What can I do… I am a simple Northern European… I never felt good when the black hero dude on TV is getting the white girl. I didn’t as a kid and frankly I still don’t. Yet it stuck me only recently. Why is that? Aren’t my hero supposed to be like me? Someone I could become one day?

As I walk through the streets, when I am on my phone, or turn on the TV here is what I see ALL THE TIME:

I live in Belgium. A country that has been white since…. well forever. Why are the alpha males portrayed by mainstream cultures always blacks or arabs? These are just a few examples but notice how this is almost entirely always a black or an arab male with a white female. Notice how white are marginalized and how “people of color” are brought to the center of the photo (alpha position).

Why is the apple helpline a black dude and a white female?

16466551_10211097987984157_1180138747_o

I ask it again: why always Black man / white female ?

Rock is music written by whites and for whites….what the hell do they stand there? Who put them there?

Science fiction is created exclusively by whites and for withes…

YET AGAIN…

Now take a look at how Han Solo, the typical white Alpha-male that use to arouse every white female vagina is getting lower on the picture.

And our kids keep on getting indoctrinated:

And when a white guy finally appears on screen:

16442847_10211098227870154_149886985_o

One could say it is all a coincidence after 1 or 2 times. But having a normal representation of white christian straight guy in popular culture is getting rare. This cannot be a coincidence. There is a call for white genocide, in Hollywood, in the Mainstream media, in the commercials and in our daily lives. Slowly they replaced us so that we would get used to it. Used to our own genocide.

More (UPDATE):

589403d8b31dc

img-20170220-wa0000img-20170212-wa0008img-20161223-wa0015img-20161107-wa0020img-20161223-wa0006

Being a normal white man is unhealthy, apparently

The crusade against white men continues.

No later than a week ago, European newspapers published an article with a identical fallacious title “being a macho would be unhealthy“. Lies, lies and more lies. A quick reading of the scientific backup reveal exactly the opposite conclusion.
Indeed, scientific seem to have finally demonstrated what we all already know, but after getting a lot of money – of course, what else? Macho men actually… prefer handling their problem on their own and not rely on a woman! Wow, that’s a hell of a breaking news! And despite the easy study and obvious conclusion, leftists could interprete that as “being macho is unhealthy”… In that case, being sick is also unhealthy – thanks for the news.

But of course stupidity would be the bright side. We now all know that this is a crusade: the evil white man must perish for all the bad things he has done. He shall never be masculine again – oh no! A white man should stand for himself and handle his life like a man. Never be like Donald Trump. That might be a problem, right? But for who?

Well, men are the defenders, the protectors of society. Women can barely fight, nor dictate and transmit strict moral values without a man on their side. They will rather follow the main stream – this is also reflected in primates’ society where females are the first to take on new habits launched by the alpha male. Break the man of a society, and you break families, values, direction, strength, defense. You leave women alone, and society will not be sustainable. I has never worked and will never  ever work. At most other males will take the place – that is what we see in Europe.

I know that many women understand this, and I seriously thank them. To the others, don’t fool yourself, feminism is dangerous. Killing the male side of a society is like melting the black and white of a photograph: in the end there is no picture.