SJWs on intelligence and genetics

This typical leftist video shows us that SJWs clearly don’t live in the real world. Frankly I don’t even understand how some people can take them seriously – even using only half of a brain.

They claim that intelligence and genetics are proven to be unrelated so far. Wrong. And LIES!!!

Let’s dive in their arguments one by one:

  • “No Genes have been found correlated to Intelligence”. HOW IRONIC! The left has been pushing for laws forbidding racial profiling, eugenics and even IQ tests for job interviews. Never mind China is considering cherry picking embryos to get an “IQ boost” in their already high IQ society… And if genes are found linked to mental retardation (IQ below 70…) then correcting those would already bring a boost in the national IQ average.
  • “People believe science is something reliable, that we can put a flag on… but Science is massively disorganized”. First, Science is not disorganized; the head of a leftist is. Second, Science gives models that explain the world the best as it can, following strict rules. Every model, every explanation has limits. It does not mean they are wrong, it means it gives rules or a trend within the boundaries of the hypothesis. Science is reliable as long as you use it correctly – which a SJW can’t.
  • “If one’s look from one perspective only then one’s can say that melanin and Intelligence are correlated”. There is not only one study in the World that finds Africans score lower in IQ test than white or North-East Asians, … Let’s add to this that in Europe it is forbidden to profile people based on their skin color (policy pushed by the same leftists…again… HOW IRONIC)

This simple argument of the “science is not settled” is easy to win the minds of a dumb or average person. For an SJW, science doesn’t fit when it does not meet their cultural marxist agenda (i.e. race and sex equality)… BUT Science is god if it even weakly correlate one of their stupid beliefs (e.g.: man made Global warming).

What science tells on intelligence and genetics :

Genetic influences on brain morphology and IQ are well studied. A variety of sophisticated brain-mapping approaches relating genetic influences on brain structure and intelligence establishes a regional distribution for this relationship that is consistent with behavioral studies. We highlight those studies that illustrate the complex cortical patterns associated with measures of cognitive ability. A measure of cognitive ability, known as g, has been shown highly heritable across many studies. We argue that these genetic links are partly mediated by brain structure that is likewise under strong genetic control. Other factors, such as the environment, obviously play a role, but the predominant determinant appears to be genetic.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/15651931/

In addition, studies on twins seem to demonstrate factually the interdependence. Also, historically Nordic and Asian countries have out performed Africans, Indians and Arabs for thousands of years. And as described in this Stefan Molyneux expert interview, science is not focusing on any particular genes but more on a set of genes (combination of hundreds of genes).

SJWs, stop talking shit, and let the good men handle the game for you. Your time is over.

Why does my baby look like an alien?

Don’t be like this English mother, nor like Magda Pegowska. The English mother says:

“She’s getting very dark, isn’t she?” This is what one of my friends recently said about my much adored – 12-week-old daughter.

She didn’t mean to be rude. But it was a comment that struck me with the force of a jab to the stomach. Immediately, I was overwhelmed by a confusion of emotions. I felt protective, insulted, worried, ashamed, guilty, all at once. The reason? My lovely, wriggly, smiley baby is mixed race. Now, I think of myself as pretty ‘right on’. My home is on the border of the London Republic of Hackney. I’ve been to the Notting Hill Carnival, even if I found the music a bit loud. Yet now I realise what a ‘white’ world I inhabit. I am white and I have two sons from my first marriage who are both milky complexioned and golden haired. My twin sister, who I spend a lot of time with, has a Danish partner. As a consequence, she has two boys who are also pale skinned and flaxen haired. Into this positively Scandinavian next generation, I have now injected a tiny, dark-skinned, dark-haired girl. To say she stands out is an understatement. My colouring and that of my children has never really been an issue before. However, three years ago I met the man who became my second husband and who is the father of my daughter. Although born in the UK, his parents came from India in the Sixties. This makes him British-Asian and our daughter mixed race. There is another more PC term for the plump little bundle I strap to my front. She is ‘dual heritage’. It’s a bit trendy, but I quite like it. It implies a pride in coming from two cultures, rather than the less attractive connotations of ‘mixed race’. The usual time something is labelled ‘mixed’ is when it’s a packet of nuts and they’ve bulked out the luxury cashews with cheaper peanuts. I’m not sure I want my daughter to be regarded as an adulterated version of some pure original. Still, it is the most accepted description. The truth is, whatever the label, the fact there is a label proves that my daughter’s conflicting parentage matters. At the more frothy end of the scale, mixed-race children are regarded as pretty dolls — white kids with a nice tan. When I was pregnant and people asked me about the child I was having, and I explained her father was Indian, they would often coo something along the lines of: “Ooh, she’s going to be beautiful!” as if I was discussing a new rose, made from an exotic cross-breeding programme. On a less benevolent level, mixed-race children can receive a hostile welcome from both white and black communities. Being neither one thing nor another may get you on the cover of Vogue, but it isn’t an easy way to make friends. Scroll down for more… {1} But this is 2007, surely things are more enlightened than that? I hope so, but I fear not. One reason for my fear is my own mixed reactions to my daughter. Don’t get me wrong, I love her. She is the child I didn’t think I’d have after my first marriage broke up. She is the only granddaughter in our family and we all dote on her. But when I turn to the mirror in my bedroom to admire us together, I am shocked. She seems so alien. With her long, dark eyelashes and shiny, dark brown hair, she doesn’t look anything like me. I know that concentrating on how my daughter looks is shallow. She is a person in her own right, not an accessory to me. But still, I can’t shake off the feeling of unease. I didn’t realise how much her looking different would matter and, on a rational level, I know it shouldn’t. But it does. Evolution demands that we have children to pass on our genes, hence the sense of pride and validation we get when we see our features reappearing in the next generation. With my daughter, I don’t have that. Do black fathers who marry white women and then have paler-skinned children feel my sense of loss? Or maybe Chinese mothers or Middle-Eastern grandparents grieve when they see a child they know to be their own, but whose features don’t reflect that? I worry that, as my daughter doesn’t look like me, people will assume she is adopted. After all, it’s all the rage in showbiz circles. Madonna famously scooped up a black child when she wanted to be a mother again and Angelina Jolie appears to be assembling a ‘pick ‘n’ mix’ of kids from different countries. It’s all very United Colours of Benetton, isn’t it? In the real world, I fear for my daughter’s sense of self. She has a tiny foot in two cultures. How will she negotiate a path between the two? I worry that my sons will feel less of a kinship with their sister because she is different, although there is no sign of that. As for myself, there is an inescapable status issue to address. White women who have non-white children are stigmatised as ‘Tracy Towerblocks’ living on benefits, most of which they spend on lager and fags. Even if I don’t fit this profile, my daughter’s difference definitely points out the fact that my children come from two different fathers. If I wanted to pass us off as a nice, neat nuclear family, she would blow my cover at once. But it is more than that. I am frightened, frightened of others’ reactions to her, as well as my own. I didn’t think of myself as racist and yet my daughter has shown me a side of myself about which I feel deeply uncomfortable. Even admitting to having mixed feelings about her not being blonde and blue eyed, I feel disloyal and incredibly guilty. I know the obvious comment is that I must have known how a child of our union would look when I married an Indian man, but it is a wise woman who thinks that far ahead when she falls in love. I didn’t think about any of this before I got pregnant. I wanted to have a baby. Her colour and culture were immaterial then. But self-flagellation is not useful. I have more pressing concerns. I am now the mother of a ‘black’ child, even if she is more the hue of weak tea than espresso. This is a role for which I am utterly unprepared. Part of me thinks I should be playing sitar music to her in her cot, mastering pakoras and serving them dressed in a sari, but that would be fantastically fake coming from me. When she was born, pale but with lots of dark hair, I asked the midwife if her eyes would stay blue. ‘Asian genes are very strong,’ she said in what I took to be an ominous tone. No more Brady Bunch kids for me. The midwife has been proved right and every day my baby’s eyes get a little darker. Even so, when she looks up at me as I feed her, my heart melts. My love may not be colour blind, but hers is, and that is truly humbling.”

May god hear you and stop this insanity. As you see, in the absence of light, darkness prevails.

White, don’t make babies

Another trial to destroy our families and promote our genocide.

These things cannot be left with impunity. There are so many hypothesis in these studies – like gender equality – that are simply untrue and unscientific. I won’t list them, i have better to do. Just remember that every time you do not act, when you do not fight for your beliefs, you lose. Report, flag, hit, defend your individual rights.

Just know that it is not about science. If science tells that you sleep less with a baby, it also tells that without babies there is no future.

Life is not a pleasant journey on a boat under the sun. It is not a fairy tale. No it’s not. Life about doing what you have to do. Fight, do your best. Be a good woman, be a good man.

Take your legacy in your hands, enhance it and pass it on.

Life is past, present and future. Without doing what is right today, there is no future.

The Muslim rape love story

Since the peak of the migration crisis, a surprising and most certainly unpredictable – sarcastically – rise of rape emerged. Surprisingly, Muslims claim that women love being raped.

Let’s be serious. We are becoming sick of these Muslims raping our women. As Trump said “Our nation is a family, and every time they touch a member of our family, it is all of us that they touch”. The so called Muslim culture is just a collection of monkey behaviors rationalized under the umbrella of “Islam”. They talk about peace and respect, but this is how it looks like in practice:

One can’t just qualify of renegade any partisan of one’s religion to make accept everything. In practice, can someone remember me the last time we saw such things with white Christians? NEVER! And as Gatestoneinstitute points out, about only 10% of rape are reported. Hence this margin is likely to be still under reality. The rise of rapes has become alarming with thousands of white women officially raped every year in Europe by these “new europeans“. Guys, wake up… our women are being raped, and our authorities do nothing. Tomorrow might be your mum, your sister, your wife or your daughter. This is war!

From Gatestooneinstitute:

Police reports show that Germany’s migrant rape crisis continues unabated, although accurate statistics are notoriously non-existent, this in one of the most technologically advanced countries in the world. German authorities have repeatedly been accused of underreporting the true scale of the migrant crime problem in the country.

According to Federal Criminal Police Office (Bundeskriminalamt, BKA) data (page 14), in 2013, migrants (Zuwanderer) committed 599 sex crimes, or an average of two a day. In 2014, migrants committed 949 sex crimes, or around three per day. In 2015, migrants committed 1,683 sex crimes, or around five per day. During the first three quarters of 2016, migrants committed 2,790 sex crimes, or around ten per day.

But this doesn’t stop the leftist National Geographic to say:

Three-quarters of a century ago Germans were dispatching trains full of Jews to concentration camps in the east; now, at the Munich train station, they were greeting trains carrying Muslim refugees with food, water, stuffed animals, and smiles. On one German podcast I began tuning in to last fall, I heard a journalist from Die Zeit tell her listeners it was all right to feel “drunk” with pleasure at that transformation.

So it seems that whatever the amount of rapes, the migrants are good because we are all Nazi. Disgusting. But whatever they call us, we couldn’t care less, and foremost we can’t just let this go. Islam is a not religion, but a very concrete system. Their religion is a law, and whatever the amount of moderate out there, the proportion of (“radicals”) monkeys is way too high to tolerate any of them in our countries. Europe, if it wants to avoid the most violent war of human history, has to understand that there is only one solution to this: DEPORTATION.

Social Status (part 2): Why cucks get hot chicks

Ever wondered why these Spaniards, Blacks, Latino’s, Arabs get any tier 1 white chicks without any alpha male characteristics?

 


Well, for men, social status (or social proof) is a determining factor for success in modern society. It is a factor that became more and more prevalent in the last two or three decades. Not only it is a determining factor for succeeding in society, but it  dictates your “sexual market value” for finding a more attractive and higher quality woman. Not to trash the socio-sexual hierarchy, the social status is far more important than what usually people think. The importance of the social status will be covered in an other article (part 3).
Social status is a factor that will help to determine your position into society. Somehow it has always existed. Sometimes obvious (especially in the past), sometimes obscure and too often unspoken of, the social status has no particular science but the fashion it corresponds to.

 

 

 

In the past, it was almost entirely dictated by wealth, the family and the type of job a man would have. Trophies or medals were proudly worn. Titles were given: Dukes, Lords, Barons, Marquess, Counts, Knights, Gentlemen… All of these aspects gave a man higher value in the eyes of everyone. And rightfully so, medals, trophies and titles were hard to get and only the smartest, the bravest and strongest could obtain it.

viallon-destriers-Fig-1.jpg

Another aspect was the job. While knights and Dukes were jobs as well, it was reserved for a tiny fraction of the population. People then gave more value to jobs that required more special abilities and were essential to society (for example a black-smith). During the industrial revolution, engineers were highly regarded. As productivity was booming, so was their wealth and recognition.

These rules were true for our old societies, were people were roughly united under a common culture and a common racial background. But today it is no longer the case. The media industrial complex,  the fashion industrial complex  and the Hollywood industrial complex obtained a cleric position in a secular society. Competence is no longer the prime criteria for most of employers. Commercials have a role of propaganda. And succeeding in life is no longer exclusively entitled to making better life decisions, being smarter or a better man. It is what people see repeatedly that will determine their prejudice. Most people can’t help but fearing of being labelled “racist”, “xenophobic” or “islamophobic”… hence the “people of color” have a clear advantage over white people.

As mentioned before, white people have been taken off fashion commercial already. And if there is one, it will be a black haired Spanish looking men or at most a low sexual value white male. Men with brown, blond or red hair are almost non-existent while making the vast majority of the northern European population. International music is overwhelmingly sang by Blacks, Arabs and Latinos. And it is played in every single night club, bars and pubs all over Europe. Girls gets horny at the sound of Enrique. The black music triggers what they are programmed for: hookup. They can’t help it; like zombies brainwashed their behavior switches to the sheep being brought to the slaughter.

And what does all of this do? It makes you think that Blacks are better musicians, it makes you think that arabs or indians are better employees or engineers, it makes you think that Spanish is the most beautiful language. If all of this had any accuracy then history should have followed. Blacks would have had a 18th century compositors we still listen today. Arabs would have sent a man on the moon. Our grand-parents would listen to Spanish songs as well. But no.

15591090_1254968934546541_5272337204149669473_o.jpg

All of this did not happened. Because social status is no longer dictated by a rational view of the world (at least in the West). It is dictated by TVs, news-outlet, commercials through positive and negative emotions. Today, the social status is a pure illusion, the mirage in the middle of the desert.

The current criteria for social status:

  • Skin color: In the past, being different than white (in Europe) was a clear negative sign. It is now an asset. Colored people have much higher chance of succeeding in life without necessary having talent, commitment or hard work. These people have all kinds of tools (Anti-racist organization, laws …) on their side that white do not have. Their families, culture or community is still alive and healthy as they are not under constant fire from the media, fashion industry or Hollywood. They are constantly promoted and labeled “beautiful”, “generous”, “handsome”… while being the exact opposite.
  • Jobs: Today people sucking money of the current crony-capitalist system are portrait as heroes: Doctors, Lawyers, politicians, lobbyist, government employees… They don’t work much and make tons of money. Old noble jobs like engineers, scientist or military… are completely disregarded while being the most essential jobs for a healthy society.
  • Looks: If you ever wonder how a gamma got laid, here is your answer. He tried to look like the fashion boy you see on posters. Looks have always been part of social status. But today mainstream looks are far from being manly looks.men-what-the-hell-happened
  • Language, cultural background, nationality: This mostly depends on connotations, and where the media or the fashion industry puts its focus. In the past, indigenous people had a higher status than foreigners as a foreigners was less likely to succeed in society (language, cultural and environmental barrier). Today, being Spanish means sun, sea, sexy language (language constantly played on the radio)…, being Australian is sun and Sea, therefore and Australian has a higher status than a Scottish (while having extremely similar looks)

And here it goes… You are white, quiet handsome, hard working man with values and wonder why you could never have a date with even a tier 3 woman. Why didn’t you get a position that you suited perfectly in your company? Haven’t you met, even once in you life time, an incompetent Black or Arab that nobody dares to fire because…”racism”?  Your ugly kebab maker at the corner of your street is getting laid a lot more than you are (and it is not only about the game)… You now have your answer. Open your eyes, look around you. Who is portrait as the villain in modern culture? Who is represented as the “good guy”?

Social status makes people, especially women, believe in an illusion.It is a situation leftists have introduced in order to push their agenda for multiculturalism, their dream of egalitarian society and the inhalation of their prime enemy: The white man. If today’s leftists dreams were true, we would not be standing right here facing the collapse of European civilization: it would have never existed.

Social Status (part 1): Anti-White propaganda

This is a series of posts about the importance of social status in the sexual market. How men and women react and adapt to it? What are the roots? What are the consequences? This first part covers the anti-white propaganda.

But before developing all of this, taking a rational look of the current situation might not be a bad idea. For years now I have been living (and I grew up) in a hostile environment. What can I do… I am a simple Northern European… I never felt good when the black hero dude on TV is getting the white girl. I didn’t as a kid and frankly I still don’t. Yet it stuck me only recently. Why is that? Aren’t my hero supposed to be like me? Someone I could become one day?

As I walk through the streets, when I am on my phone, or turn on the TV here is what I see ALL THE TIME:

I live in Belgium. A country that has been white since…. well forever. Why are the alpha males portrayed by mainstream cultures always blacks or arabs? These are just a few examples but notice how this is almost entirely always a black or an arab male with a white female. Notice how white are marginalized and how “people of color” are brought to the center of the photo (alpha position).

Why is the apple helpline a black dude and a white female?

16466551_10211097987984157_1180138747_o

I ask it again: why always Black man / white female ?

Rock is music written by whites and for whites….what the hell do they stand there? Who put them there?

Science fiction is created exclusively by whites and for withes…

YET AGAIN…

Now take a look at how Han Solo, the typical white Alpha-male that use to arouse every white female vagina is getting lower on the picture.

And our kids keep on getting indoctrinated:

And when a white guy finally appears on screen:

16442847_10211098227870154_149886985_o

One could say it is all a coincidence after 1 or 2 times. But having a normal representation of white christian straight guy in popular culture is getting rare. This cannot be a coincidence. There is a call for white genocide, in Hollywood, in the Mainstream media, in the commercials and in our daily lives. Slowly they replaced us so that we would get used to it. Used to our own genocide.

More (UPDATE):

589403d8b31dc

img-20170220-wa0000img-20170212-wa0008img-20161223-wa0015img-20161107-wa0020img-20161223-wa0006

Being a normal white man is unhealthy, apparently

The crusade against white men continues.

No later than a week ago, European newspapers published an article with a identical fallacious title “being a macho would be unhealthy“. Lies, lies and more lies. A quick reading of the scientific backup reveal exactly the opposite conclusion.
Indeed, scientific seem to have finally demonstrated what we all already know, but after getting a lot of money – of course, what else? Macho men actually… prefer handling their problem on their own and not rely on a woman! Wow, that’s a hell of a breaking news! And despite the easy study and obvious conclusion, leftists could interprete that as “being macho is unhealthy”… In that case, being sick is also unhealthy – thanks for the news.

But of course stupidity would be the bright side. We now all know that this is a crusade: the evil white man must perish for all the bad things he has done. He shall never be masculine again – oh no! A white man should stand for himself and handle his life like a man. Never be like Donald Trump. That might be a problem, right? But for who?

Well, men are the defenders, the protectors of society. Women can barely fight, nor dictate and transmit strict moral values without a man on their side. They will rather follow the main stream – this is also reflected in primates’ society where females are the first to take on new habits launched by the alpha male. Break the man of a society, and you break families, values, direction, strength, defense. You leave women alone, and society will not be sustainable. I has never worked and will never  ever work. At most other males will take the place – that is what we see in Europe.

I know that many women understand this, and I seriously thank them. To the others, don’t fool yourself, feminism is dangerous. Killing the male side of a society is like melting the black and white of a photograph: in the end there is no picture.

Dominant genes vs natural selection

I often hear that blacks and Arabs have dominant genes. The common assumption made by Mudsharks and Camelfuckers is that their genes are stronger, superior to those of white people, hypocritically covering their abnormal sexual affinities.

Dominance in biology means that a gene overrun another statistically. Just like putting shit on you makes you very likely to smell like shit, mixing with blacks or Arabs makes white people like them (physically and personality wise – due to genetic impact of brain constitution). But does it mean that the result is more adapted from a natural selection point of view?

To find the answer, I refer to the past. Between 50000 and 25000 years ago the Homo Sapiens came in Europe and mixed with the Neanderthal. The homo sapiens was 100% black, as Africans are today. Nonetheless, Europeans are white, and if Camelfuckers hadn’t mixed them throughout extensive conquest and women slavery/rape, they would still be white from the north to the south, and the west to east.

What does it tell us exactly? It tells us that naturally, the white color and white European biological constitution emerged as the only evolution, disqualifying black color and African customs. This also draws a line between statistics and evolution.

Genes transmission are statistical while evolution is selective. Anyone can reproduce, but the most adapted survives, and that is a big difference.