Why do Muslims want to keep their woman far from sexual liberation?
Why do feminists take this as an example when there are thousands of less sexual ones?
Well, looking at west, things become pretty clear. Under the umbrella of liberation, women slowly get tempted by the evil and start ruining society. Muslims (and Christians) do understand this very well and value more the family unit than the abundance of prostitutes. Because as a matter of facts, the last building modern whores did fell apart the first day, while cathedrals are still standing.
Feminism is the destruction of the family unit. The deception of society. The corruption of children. The enslavement of the bodies and the souls of men and women. The end of reason, equality, honesty, sincerity and the beginning of falsehood, hypocrisy and superficiality.
Feminism is evil, not for what it defends, but for what it results in, inexorably.
Besides, there is nothing more sellable than pussy. Sex is the strongest pulsion of human being, and the evil (if we can say so) knows how to play with it. In fact, sex is to our ancestry tree what is survival instinct to our life. So, no doubt feminism would jump on this.
Never forget that what Iran does is just a trial to stop this before it starts:
This video is viral on Facebook, the second one doesn’t appear – at all.
And in the beginning God blessed this man…
… Until he knew it was an act. Then it becomes just despicable how the left uses fake sacrifice of men to promote very real sacrifice in the name of feminism. Sick.
Sjws always lie
To make it short, a woman came to me to show me what she saw on Facebook – the women’s/leftist bible. Of course she would never bother looking deeper to understand that is was fake. She wanted me to listen to what he was saying – implying that I should follow his example with her: “always listen to your mum… Treat women like princesses”, etc. It made me sick…
Using the sacrifice of a man for your own little comfort and to secure your little princess privileges is so egoistic, so amoral, so disgusting. Anyway, up to you to decide what kind of person would use lies to push men to give away everything for them.
In this post, I will go through some of the verses of the Genesis in the Bible and share with you few of my reflections.
3 Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?”
2 The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden,
3 but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’”
4 “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman.
5 “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”
6 When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.
7 Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.
13 Then the Lord God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?” The woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.”
14 So the Lord God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this,
“Cursed are you above all livestock
and all wild animals!
You will crawl on your belly
and you will eat dust
all the days of your life.
15 And I will put enmity
between you and the woman,
and between your offspring[a] and hers;
he will crush[b] your head,
and you will strike his heel.”
16 To the woman he said,
“I will make your pains in childbearing very severe;
with painful labor you will give birth to children.
Your desire will be for your husband,
and he will rule over you.”
17 To Adam he said, “Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat from it,’
“Cursed is the ground because of you;
through painful toil you will eat food from it
all the days of your life.
18 It will produce thorns and thistles for you,
and you will eat the plants of the field.
19 By the sweat of your brow
you will eat your food
until you return to the ground,
since from it you were taken;
for dust you are
and to dust you will return.”
Our belief dictates our behaviours
Did God really say this? indeed.
Despite what we have been told since childhood, people do have an intense natural need of belief and spirituality; and no this is not a weakness, nor a disease. As The Guardian states, researches have proved that spirituality is highly connected with happiness. But also, the NLP showed us that our belief system defines our identity and hence influences our behaviours. These mechanisms also derive the notion of natural “Optimitism bias”, published in the Time. Therefore, it is safe to assert that faith instantly influences our behaviors – for better or worse.
In this context, the Bible starts strong, and illustrates metaphorically the original human weakness. The snake is the voice that awakes the doubt in the absolute truth. The sin originates from the lack of strength to resist our natural tendency to hedonism. Faith compounds identity, and identity directs our behaviours. Nihilism is therefore the gate to sin. Cultural Marxism is nihilism, so don’t be astonished by what you see around you.
When the common narrative tends to make us believe that Jesus never existed (which is a documented lie), the instant conclusion – for most – is that all religions are worthless, and that there is no God. As Nietzsche said in 1883: “God is dead”. In such a context, many will find an escape-spirituality in a hypocrite sympathy for atheism, paganism and/or Buddhism; i.e. a superficial attachment to a human morality that camouflages nihilism, ego-centrism or hedonism. To name them briefly, I would mention the “alt-right pagan”, the “modern attention whore” and the “environmentalist”. Nonetheless, the conclusion remains the same. The failure to believe in our own God reflects the work of Cultural Marxism, destroying the roots of our identity, which translates directly in our failure of evaluating good and evil, and in the constant questioning of the non-questionable (e.g. genders, immigration, money etc.).
There are consequences for our actions, even if we think there aren’t
Adam and Eve do eat the fruit; they listen to the snake who tells them not to worry. They do so because 1) they doubt the God’s command, 2) they do not believe in the consequences of their actions, and finally 3) because they want it.
In a post-modernist era, this is exactly is the definition of “carpe diem” and “hedonist” philosophies: “don’t worry, everything will be alright. Your only worry should be not to have enjoyed even more.”. And in fact, Christianity 2.0 emphasizes these behaviors, hypocritically claiming the absence of punishment thanks to the sacrifice of Jesus. In short, there is no need for redemption. And who cares? What is the difference between a world where there is no God (Atheism), and a world where God forgives everything (Christianity 2.0)?
But the Genesis is clear. It highlights the essentiality of these elements: 1) punishment exists, 2) redemption is not always granted. In short, justice before all (another pillar of Christianity)
What you do in your life will influence your future, and eventually destroy you in some cases. This being said, injustice also exists, and it is the duty of every man to seek justice.
It is easier to influence women than men
This sentence might already be too much in a feminised world like ours. Never criticise women, that is oppression – I suppose this is what I should understand in the Marxist terms “political correctness”. But to those hypocrites minds, could you please explain me then why most advertisements are directed towards women? Why fashion is something that impacts more women than men?
Well, in fact, the truth is that women are more sensitive to their urges than men. Where the woman owns the territory of beauty and emotionalism, the man owns the physical and the intellectual/emotional strength.
The Bible in fact is very clear here, and shows that to manipulate the people, to control the families, you shall first target women for they have a weaker mind and will use her charm to perpetrate your plots. Would anyone even argue today against the correlation between feminism, divorce, women suicide, mental illness and decreased birth rate?
In a democracy, control the women, and you will control the State. Control the women, and you will control the men, for they will not fear to lose their love, but also their children and everything they fought for.
A good woman is hard to find,
and worth far more than diamonds.
Her husband trusts her without reserve,
and never has reason to regret it.
Never spiteful, she treats him generously
all her life long.
She shops around for the best yarns and cottons,
and enjoys knitting and sewing.
She’s like a trading ship that sails to faraway places
and brings back exotic surprises.
She’s up before dawn, preparing breakfast
for her family and organizing her day.
She looks over a field and buys it,
then, with money she’s put aside, plants a garden.
First thing in the morning, she dresses for work,
rolls up her sleeves, eager to get started.
She senses the worth of her work,
is in no hurry to call it quits for the day.
She’s skilled in the crafts of home and hearth,
diligent in homemaking.
She’s quick to assist anyone in need,
reaches out to help the poor.
She doesn’t worry about her family when it snows;
their winter clothes are all mended and ready to wear.
She makes her own clothing,
and dresses in colorful linens and silks.
Her husband is greatly respected
when he deliberates with the city fathers.
She designs gowns and sells them,
brings the sweaters she knits to the dress shops.
Her clothes are well-made and elegant,
and she always faces tomorrow with a smile.
When she speaks she has something worthwhile to say,
and she always says it kindly.
She keeps an eye on everyone in her household,
and keeps them all busy and productive.
Her children respect and bless her;
her husband joins in with words of praise:
“Many women have done wonderful things,
but you’ve outclassed them all!”
Charm can mislead and beauty soon fades.
The woman to be admired and praised
is the woman who lives in the Fear-of-God.
Give her everything she deserves!
Festoon her life with praises!
To support than the woman can express in the people’s assembly her disagreement with her husband; it is to imply their latent disagreement and prepare them for divorce. To suppose that the reason from the first can balance the one of the second is to go against the wish of nature, and to degrade virility. To admit, finally, to public functions a person that nature and the conjugal law have, to say, dedicated naturally to solely domestic functions, is to alter the family chastity, to make a woman a public figure, to proclaim the confusion of genders, the community of loves, the abolition of family, the absolutism of the State, the servitude of the people and the infeodation of properties.
Change, modify, or intervene, in any manner, this rapport between sexes, and you destroy marriage in its essence; from a society predominated by justice you create a society predominated by love; you fall back to concubines and flutters; you can still have fathers and mothers, as you have lovers, but you won’t have families; and without family, your political constitution, of families and free cities, will become a communistic theocracy or pornocracy, the worse of tyranny.
Mystics say that, one day, there won’t be males nor females; which nowadays seems to be, even for a crowd of educated people, the unique manner for destroying the antagonism, and therefore for extinguishing crime and misery. But would such a society survive? I would argue that this society would function a 100 times worse than ours; and, if you allow me to clarify, I support the fact that it would radically be impossible.
Society subsists by the subordination of all forces and human faculties, individual and collective, to justice.
Every woman who dreams of emancipation already lost, ipso facto, the health of her soul, the lucidity of her spirit, and the virginity of her heart: she is already on the course of sins.
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, Pornocracy or the modern woman, ed1875
The cultural Marxist shitshow “minute of truth” featured another “normal western woman”, married under the dogma of feminism. Watch for yourself:
So basically, she cheated on her husband, multiple times and she doesn’t feel sorry for it. She seems to be proud of it even! She would marry her ex boyfriend, in front of her husband. She would destroy her family, her husband, just to satisfy the temptation inside her. Sad.
Are we supposed to say “Yes” to this and forgive, even as a Christian?
Redemption comes when someone asks for forgiveness and is ready to make – profound and concrete – sacrifices not to commit AGAIN the same mistake. But here is totally the opposite. In any case, he forgiveness of the heart doesn’t prevent the strict hands of justice.
More scary, this is what society tells women to do: fuck, fuck, fuck, and get your emotional pussy aroused by any other means. And you get bored, just switch on Tinder and fuck. A feminized world without a glance of morality, nor humanity I would say.
Anyway, what really saddens me is this picture:
He tries to consolate her while she feels so “emotionally charged” by what happened. At that level of cuckery, I will just say “poor man”. I wish for him all the best, to remain strong and not to collapse under the weight of reality when he realises what happened.
People spend a lot of time on social media. Some to chat, some to watch videos, others just to get attention. It doesn’t matter what you do, it impacts your life, just like anything else.
A recent study in fact analysed the problem seriously and reached the conclusion that social media addiction is similar to the usage of hard drugs. And for a very specific reason: they create a dopamine loop in our brain, which provokes addiction. This is why Facebook, Instagram are so addictive for most people – in particular women.
The study findings revealed that when not allowed to check their texts or emails, or connect to digital technology in any way, participants developed withdrawal symptoms typically seen in people addicted to cigarettes or other substances. Many study participants said they felt like they were trying to kick a hard drug habit or going on a strict diet.
When a person uses the stimulant cocaine, it affects the central nervous system, including the brain. It stimulates neurotransmitter receptors in the brain’s reward center with a huge surge of dopamine — an organic feel-good chemical, or neurotransmitter. This release of dopamine is much more abundant than normal, giving the user a rapid rush of energy and sensation of pleasure that radiates through their nervous system. This rewarding pleasure leads them to desire more cocaine so they can sustain or repeat the sensation. The desire for more can lead to addiction in a relatively short time.
In a similar way, smartphones and other technological devices can become addictive because they activate this same neurological reflex: Whenever a person receives a timely response to a text or an Instagram post, they feel a surge of pleasure and reward — the neurotransmitter receptors in the brain’s reward center release dopamine and make them feel good. If they repeat this behavior — compulsively posting messages or sending texts and receiving the “reward” of instant responses — their dopamine levels rise even higher and their brains send the message that this is a good activity. They don’t want to stop, or find it increasingly difficult to tear themselves away from their digital world.
So yes, social media are extremely destructive. But what no-one did is to link this dopamine cycle with its actual consequences or potential use.
In fact, dopamine is also an excellent catalyst for learning and programming behaviours. This cycle is used to train dogs, but also human without them knowing it. The reward seeking loop strengthens rewarding behaviours and sanctions non complying ones. For instance, you can reward people on their belief (likes on liberal ideas) and punish them on others (dislikes on conservative content). The study summarises:
Dopaminergic neurons of the midbrain are the main source of dopamine (DA) in the brain. DA has been shown to be involved in the control of movements, the signaling of error in prediction of reward, motivation, and cognition. Cerebral DA depletion is the hallmark of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Other pathological states have also been associated with DA dysfunction, such as schizophrenia, autism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children, as well as drug abuse. DA is closely associated with reward-seeking behaviors, such as approach, consumption, and addiction. Recent researches suggest that the firing of DA neurons is a motivational substance as a consequence of reward-anticipation. This hypothesis is based on the evidence that, when a reward is greater than expected, tthemhe firing of certain DA neurons increases, which consequently increases desire or motivation towards the reward.
Add to this the natural neural learning process which is based on message repetition: repeat the same thing all the time, and for your brain, it becomes the truth. You don’t have to be a genius to understand what an addictive platform based on dopamine can do for influencing your political views, but also your behaviour. Hence the repetition of the following political messages:
Conservative people are extremists, intolerant and dangerous terrorists
All these messages have as common root “freedom through the appeasing of one’s individual pulsions and feelings”. A feminized society in short, where freedom is the absence of choice and the slavery to one’s desire. What a freedom, indeed. What a logic, indeed.
But to the extreme, these messages become radical truth for people and derive in very real terrorism, namely Antifa, BLM and hardcore Femen. They also derive in total paranoia, for instance the TV show “handmaid’s tale“.
Extract from thinking fast and slow, Daniel Kahneman:
Our brain assesses norms on the basis of its neural programming. At neuronal level absolute truth makes no sense, hence the commonly accepted saying “the relative truth”. From a religious perspective, it would contradict free will. From an evolution perspective, we could not adapt without the possibility of programming our brain.
Yet, of course, the world has its very real truth which is there and obvious. And our shitlib society inverted the truth thanks to its abundance of resources.
For example, a wife can cheat on her husband and get away with it. In nature, the truth is that a lonely female has no chance to survive. Here, in a modern society, she can. But not for long, and not happily. The disconnection between the feminist discourse and reality generates high intensity unconscious cognitive dissonance. This practically results in hysteric disorders, anxiety, bipolarity and/or depression, addiction. Same goes for men. To assert my explanation, I attach here some statistics per gender:
As you see, our society is mentally sick. Someone who never took drugs nor alcohol and is mentally healthy is today rather rare. And these social media are for something into this, by unconsciously – or willingly – rewarding destructive behaviors before all. At least that is what we can observe, but also what Cuckenberg is accused of doing.
The website “wearyourvoicemag” published a feminist article on the basis of the TV show “the handmaid tale”. The first time I saw this TV show, I couldn’t think about anything else but the impact it would have on the women I know. I already feared the consequences on me for things I don’t do nor ever done, nor support. So, I switched it off. And I was right.
Fiction is now a solid basis for protesting against a fictive oppressor in the real word. If you are guilty in a TV show, that is apparently enough for some people to condemn you very concretely – for things that you could do in a less likely hypothetical future. Indeed, let’s remind the world that feminism and the end of slavery were brought by white Christian males.
Reproductive rightsis a subject that is central to the politics of white feminism because it is the second most prominent fight that it has historically engaged with, the first being voting rights for white women. It has always been understood as advocacy for the right to birth control and access to safe, legal abortion options as part of one’s ability to plan pregnancies and families on one’s own terms. In short, for able-bodied and able-minded white people, it has been primarily about the right tonotbe pregnant.
Considering the historical context ofeugenics, scientific racism, and certain state-sanctioned violences, reproductive justice for non-whites would largely be quite the opposite. For many, it would instead be the ability to bear and nurture one’s own children without government interference or barriers created through white supremacy and systemic oppression
Until here, even if I totally disagree with this intellectual ground which is a total fallacy and a denial of individual responsibility in life, we were still at the exit door of rationality, still building logical foundation for the next discourse on the basis of virtue signaling. Now comes the fantasy:
Distinguished by their red robes and white bonnets, Handmaids are forced into slavery, repeatedly violated, impregnated, and made to give birth to children that are immediately taken to serve the interests of others. Essentially,The Handmaid’s Taledepicts cis white women stripped ofthe ability to bear and nurture one’s own children without government interference or barriers created through white supremacy and systemic oppression. This is a position that they have never seen themselves depicted in, and it terrifies them.
White feminists identify so strongly withThe Handmaid’s Talebecause it is a show about white women in slavery. They see clear connections between its horrors and the current state of U.S. politics. They see it as an omen. As a call to action.
So, as they state clearly, a TV show is solid ground for a call action – which means violence. Today’s feminists are so mentally sick, that in order to nourish their privileges, their quest now crosses the gates of fantasy to justify violence on white males.
Put it in other words, you take a camera and pay a white woman to slap a white man and write a scene. You film it and publish it on youtube. Then, a couple of days after, the government would use your video as a “solid ground” for punishing all white women in the real world.
Besides, what worries me is the impact of fiction on people – here women. It seems here that many aren’t now capable of distinguishing reality from fiction. This means that whatever they watch on TV, Facebook, etc. is very real for them. Because let’s be clear, white women are not oppressed by white extremists, who most of the time are just traditional Christian men who want a good peaceful family ostracized by a very real totalitarian “liberal” society. Haven’t we gone too far with TV and media? Maybe reducing it and reading the bible instead would prevent much violence.
When you can start punishing people on the basis of fiction, you certainly reached some kind of dogmatic idiocratic limit. Feminism has become a religion.
A STUDENT stabbed her boyfriend with a kitchen knife and bit a cop after a furious row over a radiator.
Emily Coldrick, from Cambridge, knifed her partner in the shoulder as they hosted a party at her house.
A STUDENT stabbed her boyfriend with a kitchen knife and bit a cop after a furious row over a radiator.
Emily Coldrick, from Cambridge, knifed her partner in the shoulder as they hosted a party at her house.
But when she appeared in court she admitted causing grievous bodily harm (GBH) without intent in relation to the stabbing, assault by beating, and resisting an officer in the execution of their duty.
The Cambridge News reports defence lawyer Claire Matthews told the court: “She was suffering from an extreme panic attack and the biting was taking place as they were trying to lift her. This wasn’t a deliberate attack.”
Yeah, so leftist women launch (sex) parties at their place in the hope of cheating once again their cucked boyfriend, and eventually they end up with a panic attack that tries to kill him. Remember that women are NEVER responsible. Cars, chocolate, knives, or even YOU, but never them.
Anyway, the hotter the girl, the more careful you should be. Treat these hotties like a 20MT nuclear bomb in your hands.
This is what happens to you in an multiracial society: your wife divorces you for a fat low iq unattractive non masculine black/latino/arabic man.
After annoying you for many years, making you believe that she will be forever there and the children, she suddenly doesn’t have “the thing” with you. She goes to her lawyer, where she is received as a veteran of war who fought 10 years to protect the country, and who deserves the highest form of respect. After all, why not decorate her with the medal of honor after having endured the humiliation of washing the dishes from time to time or even making a meal.
Of course, in the procedure she gets to keep the kids, get your money and destroy your children’s life. So she can get with a man ready to “bang her in front of the kids, because he does not cares”.
Hopefully I heard my family’s history. As well I saw old happy married couples. I also know what achievements realized by Western Civilization, and that is not thanks to feminism, blacks or arabs – quite on the contrary. I just hope that all of that is just a natural reaction to an extremely toxic environment: feminism, cultural Marxism and multiculturalism lead to death. In a nutshell, more of an epigenetic hell than a deterministic world.