French presidency is a joke

Macron became the world champion in presidency photoshooting. I just have no word for this.

For the last picture, as TheLocal.fr says:

In the photo taken on Sunday, Emmanuel Macron is seen between two bare-chested young men wearing bandanas on their heads. One of them is givingw the middle finger to the camera.

The shot was taken during the president’s visit to Saint Martin, a year after a hurricane devastated the French Caribbean island. Macron, followed by a host of photographers, was walking through the streets, meeting locals and talking to them about how they are rebuilding their lives after the tragedy.

When heavy rain started battering down, the president unexpectedly decided to take shelter in a block of social housing flats.

This could have been a good opportunity for Macron, who is struggling to shed his reputation as an arrogant leader removed from his people, to prove his critics wrong.

He met a family, and one man told him he had just come out of prison. In a firm manner which the president has been criticised for using lately in his interactions with the public, he told the former convict not to repeat the same mistakes.

“Don’t make any more mistakes, will you? Your mother deserves more than this. Stop messing around, think of your mother. Now go and rebuild the island,” Macron told the former convict and hugged him afterwards, which left the young man’s mother in tears.

What a president!

What does the Quran really say about Jesus?

One the major argument of Muslims against Christians to demonstrate their tolerance is the recognotion of Jesus Christ as a prophet. But is that really true?

What do they say about the Christ? Do they relate his message and precepts?

And finally, most importantly, do Muslims follow the Christ or Muhammad, and as such, can we really put Christianity and Islam at the same level, or rather should we oppose them completely?

SURAH REFERENCE

2:87 We gave Jesus the son of Mary Clear (Signs) and strengthened him with the holy spirit.

2:136 We believe in Allah, and the revelation given to us, and to Abraham, Isma’il, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and that given to Moses and Jesus, and that given to (all) prophets from their Lord: We make no difference between one and another of them . . .

2:253 . . . To Jesus the son of Mary We gave clear (Signs), and strengthened him with the holy spirit.

3:45 O Mary! Allah giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honour in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to Allah.

3:46 “He shall speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. And he shall be (of the company) of the righteous.”

3:48 And Allah will teach him the Book and Wisdom, the Law and the Gospel.

3:49 And (appoint him) a messenger to the Children of Israel, (with this message): “I have come to you, with a Sign from your Lord, in that I make for you out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, and breathe into it, and it becomes a bird by Allah’s leave: And I heal those born blind, and the lepers, and I quicken the dead, by Allah’s leave; and I declare to you what ye eat, and what ye store in your houses. Surely therein is a Sign for you if ye did believe.”

3:50 (I have come to you), to attest the Law which was before me. And to make lawful to you part of what was (Before) forbidden to you; I have come to you with a Sign from your Lord. So fear Allah, and obey me.

3:52 When Jesus found Unbelief on their part He said: “Who will be My helpers to (the work of) Allah?”

3:55 Behold! Allah said: “O Jesus! I will take thee and raise thee to Myself and clear thee (of the falsehoods) of those who blaspheme; I will make those who follow thee superior to those who reject faith, to the Day of Resurrection: Then shall ye all return unto me, and I will judge between you of the matters wherein ye dispute.”

3:59 The similitude of Jesus before Allah is as that of Adam . . .

3:84 . . . and in (the Books) given to Moses, Jesus, and the prophets, from their Lord.

4:157 That they said (in boast), “We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah”;-but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not.

4:163 We have sent thee inspiration, as We sent it to Noah and the Messengers after him: we sent inspiration to Abraham, Isma’il, Isaac, Jacob and the Tribes, to Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon, and to David We gave the Psalms.

4:171 O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion: Nor say of Allah aught but the truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was (no more than) a messenger of Allah, and His Word, which He bestowed on Mary, and a spirit proceeding from Him: so believe in Allah and His messengers. Say not “Trinity”: desist: it will be better for you: for Allah is one Allah: Glory be to Him: (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth.

4:172 Christ disdaineth nor to serve and worship Allah . . .

5:17 In blasphemy indeed are those that say that Allah is Christ the son of Mary.

5:46 And in their footsteps We sent Jesus the son of Mary, confirming the Law that had come before him: We sent him the Gospel: therein was guidance and light, and confirmation of the Law that had come before him: a guidance and an admonition to those who fear Allah.

5:72 They do blaspheme who say: “Allah is Christ the son of Mary.” But said Christ: “O Children of Israel! worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.” Whoever joins other gods with Allah,- Allah will forbid him the garden, and the Fire will be his abode.

5:75 Christ the son of Mary was no more than a messenger; many were the messengers that passed away before him. His mother was a woman of truth. They had both to eat their (daily) food.

5:78 Curses were pronounced on those among the Children of Israel who rejected Faith, by the tongue of David and of Jesus the son of Mary: because they disobeyed and persisted in excesses.

5:110 O Jesus the son of Mary! Recount My favour to thee and to thy mother. Behold! I strengthened thee with the holy spirit, so that thou didst speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. Behold! I taught thee the Book and Wisdom, the Law and the Gospel and behold! thou makest out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, by My leave, and thou breathest into it and it becometh a bird by My leave, and thou healest those born blind, and the lepers, by My leave. And behold! thou bringest forth the dead by My leave. And behold! I did restrain the Children of Israel from (violence to) thee when thou didst show them the clear Signs, and the unbelievers among them said: ‘This is nothing but evident magic.’

5:112 Behold! the disciples, said: “O Jesus the son of Mary! can thy Lord send down to us a table set (with viands) from heaven?” Said Jesus: “Fear Allah, if ye have faith.”

5:114 Said Jesus the son of Mary: “O Allah our Lord! Send us from heaven a table set (with viands), that there may be for us-for the first and the last of us-a solemn festival and a sign from thee; and provide for our sustenance, for thou art the best Sustainer (of our needs).”

5:116 Allah will say: “O Jesus the son of Mary! Didst thou say unto men, worship me and my mother as gods in derogation of Allah’?” He will say: “Glory to Thee! never could I say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, thou wouldst indeed have known it. Thou knowest what is in my heart . . .”

6:85 And Zakariya and John, and Jesus and Elias: all in the ranks of the righteous.

9:30 The Jews call ‘Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah.

9:31 They take their priests and their anchorites to be their lords in derogation of Allah, and (they take as their Lord) Christ the son of Mary; yet they were commanded to worship but One Allah: there is no god but He. Praise and glory to Him: (Far is He) from having the partners they associate (with Him).

19:19 He said: “Nay, I am only a messenger from thy Lord, (to announce) to thee the gift of a holy son.”

19:20 She said: “How shall I have a son, seeing that no man has touched me, and I am not unchaste?”

19:21 He said: “So (it will be): Thy Lord saith, ‘that is easy for Me: and (We wish) to appoint him as a Sign unto men and a Mercy from Us’: It is a matter (so) decreed.”

19:22 So she conceived him, and she retired with him to a remote place.

19:27 At length she brought the (babe) to her people, carrying him (in her arms). They said: “O Mary! truly an amazing thing hast thou brought!”

19:30 He said: “I am indeed a servant of Allah: He hath given me revelation and made me a prophet.”

19:31 “And He hath made me blessed wheresoever I be, and hath enjoined on me Prayer and Charity as long as I live.”

19:32 “(He) hath made me kind to my mother, and not overbearing or miserable.”

19:33 “So peace is on me the day I was born, the day that I die, and the day that I shall be raised up to life (again)!”

19:34 Such (was) Jesus the son of Mary: (it is) a statement of truth, about which they (vainly) dispute.

19:88 They say: “(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!”

19:91 That they should invoke a son for (Allah) Most Gracious.

19:92 For it is not consonant with the majesty of (Allah) Most Gracious that He should beget a son.

21:91 And (remember) her who guarded her chastity: We breathed into her of Our spirit, and We made her and her son a sign for all peoples.

23:50 And We made the son of Mary and his mother as a Sign: We gave them both shelter on high ground, affording rest and security and furnished with springs.

33:7 And remember We took from the prophets their covenant: As (We did) from thee: from Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Jesus the son of Mary: We took from them a solemn covenant.

42:13 The same religion has He established for you as that which He enjoined on Noah-the which We have sent by inspiration to thee-and that which We enjoined on Abraham, Moses, and Jesus: Namely, that ye should remain steadfast in religion, and make no divisions therein: to those who worship other things than Allah, hard is the (way) to which thou callest them. Allah chooses to Himself those whom He pleases, and guides to Himself those who turn (to Him).

43:57 When (Jesus) the son of Mary is held up as an example, behold, thy people raise a clamour thereat (in ridicule)!

43:61 And (Jesus) shall be a Sign (for the coming of) the Hour (of Judgment): therefore have no doubt about the (Hour), but follow ye Me: this is a Straight Way.

43:63 When Jesus came with Clear Signs, he said: “Now have I come to you with Wisdom, and in order to make clear to you some of the (points) on which ye dispute: therefore fear Allah and obey me.”

57:27 We sent after them Jesus the son of Mary, and bestowed on him the Gospel; and We ordained in the hearts of those who followed him Compassion and Mercy . . .

61:6 And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: “O Children of Israel! I am the messenger of Allah (sent) to you, confirming the Law (which came) before me, and giving Glad Tidings of a Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad.” But when he came to them with Clear Signs, they said, “this is evident sorcery!”

61:14 O ye who believe! Be ye helpers of Allah: As said Jesus the son of Mary to the Disciples, “Who will be my helpers to (the work of) Allah?” Said the disciples, “We are Allah’s helpers!” then a portion of the Children of Israel believed, and a portion disbelieved: But We gave power to those who believed, against their enemies, and they became the ones that prevailed.

Sadly, but surely, Muslims do not believe in Jesus as the Christ, the son of God. This has at least 3 implications:
1. The Injil (Gospels for Muslims) are important but not reliable. The teachings of Jesus as described in the Gospels are corrupted; it is a subtile way to say that the Bible has to be burned because it is – for them – full of lies.
2. Only Muhammad is reliable. You shall follow Muhammad and fight against anyone who believes either in the Torah or New Testament as the truth (the three elements are opposed, the Torah being closer to the New Testament).
3. Believing in Jesus is not a blaspheme, but believing in Jesus Christ is a blaspheme. Wearing a cross is a blaspheme, because it represents the death of the Christ. Besides, for Muslims, Jesus was not crucified (the Christ never came and was never crucified). Therefore, Muslims do not believe in a possible redemption through following Jesus, but Muhammad, who gives opposite indications to life. The first and most important message of the Christ being “love one another”.

I will finish with some quotes from the Bible, so that everyone can estimate the discrepancy between the Christian and the Muslim belief. Keep in mind that belief determines behaviors, not the other way around.

John 3:7 Little children, let no one deceive you. Whoever practices righteousness is righteous, as he is righteous.
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.
John 14:16 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
John 3:36 Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him.
John 8:24 ESV / 56 helpful votes
I told you that you would die in your sins, for unless you believe that I am he you will die in your sins.

Buzzfeed: kill the white man

Buzzfeed is known to be a political left propagandist. They often write shitty article painted half of truth, half of shit. Lately, they stood up out of the crowd with two things.

The first one is their analysis of testosterone, which revealed that their journalist have a health condition regarding testosterone. And they are proud of it.

The second, more shocking, or perhaps a direct consequence of the above, is the incitation of killing a white man each day, for everyone. Just like you would kill a mosquito.

Replace this sentence by:

“Kill a jew tomorrow on your way to work”

“Kill a black man tomorrow on your way to work”

“Kill a Muslim tomorrow on your way to work”

Sick, right?

White genocide is not real, most likely, don’t bother even thinking about it.

Fake news shooting fake migrants drowning

By pure coincidence a tourist in Crete fell in front of the production of a mini film picturing migrants drowning. We downloaded the footage to make sure it wouldn’t go away so easily (youtube link) :

As Voiceofeurope.com states:

This follows a history of supposed migrant drownings filmed by television crews which are then broadcast by the mainstream media. Pictures and clips of migrants have been shared widely to manipulate public opinion and generate sympathy. This is one of the first times such a piece of fake footage has been captured by a member of the public as it was happening.

The question that arises therefore is how much we should trust the narrative from the mainstream media when it seems they are willing to distribute fake news stories such as these.

I don’t know if you remember, but a bit more than a year ago, they were also making a small “journalistic reportage” (read Fake News) about muslims protesting against Islam.

Funnily enough, they denied it, even with the video released. They really think we are that stupid. Maybe we should try to tell tax authorities we never received any money, even when they show the proof. Same rules for everyone after all.

So, no agenda for White Genocide?

SJW French president enjoys trans

This is what multiculturalism looks like in France.

Apparently sponsored by the SJW president himself. It could be a joke, but it’s not.

Obviously we can rejoice that the far right anti semitic homophobic transphobic islamophobic extremists neo Nazi didn’t win. Look what is considered to be a Nazi in the west today:

Dangerous people! Imagine a world where you can’t use the Holocaust to justify mass immigration and LGBT movement. I am scared just thinking, about thinking about it!

Gamma males, value and virtue signaling

You certainly heard about these males behaving and thinking like women: the gamma males. You certainly also heard about the concept of virtue signalling, but what about value signaling?

Image result for virtue signaling

Image result for hot classy girl work

To illustrate these concept, let me take a concrete example:

Three persons have an important meeting with a client. There is one manager, one woman and an expert, whose official status (and salary) is lower than the manager. The woman usually wears nice dresses at work, while the manager always suits up, even when no-one does. Right before the meeting, the manager asks the expert: what do you think we should talk about during this meeting? The expert answers with a full agenda, the key points to discuss and main output to extract. After all, he wants the meeting and the project to be successful. The woman acknowledges everything, and the manager adds no words. At the time of the meeting, the manager takes the lead and repeats everything that the expert said. The woman emphasizes whatever the manager says to show her presence, and also highlights the “diversity” and “environmental policy” of the company. The manager only makes one allusion to the expert at the beginning saying that he will be assisting them during the project. The expert has nothing to add to the conversation as the content was already his own thinking; he barely corrects politely when his colleagues show their lack of understanding the problem.

During the project, the manager shows absolutely no leadership, no skills, puts the blame on everyone but him, and avoids any rational talks. He lies, changes the topic, ignores, etc. The woman handles very little tasks, and often requires more time in support than the added value she provides in the project. As such, the expert ends up telling exactly what to do, when, and doing everything. He is not invited to any further meeting, even though the woman is, and even after mentioning the fact that he should be present. He mentions that the woman is not very helpful on this project, but gets shuts down for “sexism”.

In the end of the project, the manager gives a review to him, stating that his technical skills are “satisfying”, but that he should show “more initiatives”, “more leadership”, “more care for clients”, “develop relationships with clients”, etc. He also points his “sexism” and lack of “ethics”, hence blocking him for promotion or a salary increase. Later, he gets to know that all mistakes that happened during the project were put on him; when he was not present nor responsible. The manager and the woman both get a good bonus on the project, and he gets nothing.

What just happened? Does it sound familiar?

In case you hadn’t noticed, the manager is what we call a Gamma male. He has no leadership, but refuses to accept his position and his limits. He uses virtue signalling and value signalling to compensate his lack of masculinity and competences. On the other side, the woman is typical. She lacks, like most, technical skills and need to use someone else to go through. She won’t face nor challenge the manager, but rather stick on his side and use the expert knowledge for her to shine.

To me the best examples of Gamma males are Trudeau and Macron.

In short, virtue signalling was:

  • Take the expert at the meeting and mention him, showing care for the team (message: “hey, look how a good manager I am”)
  • Label the expert as “sexist”, signalling his support for feminism in general (message: “hey, look how a good person I am”)
  • Mentioning the “diversity” and “environmental policy” in the company in order to setup a high moral ground where in fact, all the remaining is badImage result for virtue signaling jobImage result for macron old wife

Value signaling was:

  • The manager repeats everything that the expert said in order to look smarter than he is
  • The woman always dresses sexy and classy, but doesn’t do much. She is more about “showing” than “being” or “doing”.
  • The manager always suits up, even when not necessary, showing that he wants to assert his status

Image result for trudeau suit

Image result for macron suit

What could he do?

Well, in fact the expert can’t do much in this situation. The game is setup in the company for him to be blamed. He is already checkmate since the beginning. Hence the only way not to lose the game is to get out of it. He should have left the company or the team as early as possible. Of course, the manager/the company might try to fuck his reputation up, but they will do it in any case sooner or later.

Gamma males are the real problem of our society, and today they are in control of most of the positions of power. In order to win this war, good men have to stand up together and start doing something to get this power back. It doesn’t necessarily imply violence. The crucial point to understand is that a company ruled by Gamma males, women and high diversity is doomed to collapse under its own weight. You know, in the end someone gotta do the job!

So, if the good men refuse to work these companies and instead go their own way, allying with good people, the power will naturally come back to them. Why? Because the real power is the core value that we bring to this world. Never be mistaken by who is strong. Bad people are always weak; shortly summarized by Vox in “SJWs always lie”.

What would an alpha do?

The alpha would show leadership and support both the members of his team. He would give the credits where they have to be, challenge the client when required, and put back his team member in place if necessary. He would show understanding, but also discipline, competences and honesty. He would value the work of everyone, and reward adequately each of the member. Wanna have an example? Putin when he faces billionaires and tell them how bad they are to screw honest poor people:

Virtue signalling is about pretending to be a good person in order to do something bad.

Vale signalling is about pretending have a higher value than you have in order to parasite others.

Christian values, Christianity, how you were lied to

Most people tell me they don’t believe in religions, but what they do not understand is how they are both feets in, whatever they like or not. Mass immigration, interracial relationships, feminism, forgiveness, tolerance, fornication, drinking, etc. Major topics drawing the line in the sand between left and right, but also the shape of the new religion: Cultural Marxist Hedonism, which we could also call Nihilist Hedonism. Yet, for everyone the blame goes on the Christians. Seen as guilty, stupid or as a useful idiot, the Christian is the comfortable scapegoat of the moment, since he is the only one not to hit back.

Image result for christian cuck

Before anything, I am not a priest, nor a theologian, but it happens that I was blessed with the gift of reading, and thinking! And in any case it doesn’t take a genius to note how biblical verses have been jeopardized for political reasons. Few minutes listening to most priests in fact make me nervous for their words resonate like MSM, with a touch of liberal cherry picked Biblical bullshit. In particular, the one verse every western Christian has been repeated all his childhood:

You have heard that it was said, “An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.” But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who begs from you, and do not refuse the one who would borrow from you.

In a nutshell, taken out of context, and for useful idiots Christian 2.0: “dear devil, come and piss on my head, then fuck my wife, and that’s ok, you can piss on my other cheek now”.

Image result for christian cuck

Yet…

I know that some of you are already blabbering “go fuck yourself with your Abrahamic shit; you ain’t even a native English speaking man”. Most likely clever guys who read all Roman and Greek philosophy, the entire Bible (multiple times), speak Aramaic, Syriac, Coptic, Latin, Greek, German, French, Russian etc. Geniuses who do not write a book because it would be too much for everyone. For the rest of the common mortals who are open-minded enough to read, think and discuss, they will just agree that Jesus – in gospels and in history – was much more complex that the few sentences attributed to him in satanic Churches. Indeed, there are too many historic documents, apocryphal gospels and scriptures to judge so fast. In a nutshell, using Jesus as a complete liberal idiot to justify a cultural Marxist, hedonist, or pagan agenda is either full of ignorance, either dishonest. Neither of those is Christian, nor Greco-Roman, nor Pagan. Likely, as Bart D. Ehrman describes, Jesus was not what he was described, but who cares? Because whether you believe in god or not doesn’t really matters, even for Jesus:

Therefore I say to you, any sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven people, but blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven. “Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come.

And…

According to the Epistle to the Galatians: “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. The fruit is contrasted with the Works of the Flesh.

I let you reflect on the meaning. At least for me, it is clear that the holy spirit is the spiritual representation of god, part of us and part of the world. In short, Jesus doesn’t care for who you believe in or not, but rather for who you are and what you do. A personal philosophy before all, but nothing astonishing when you know that Christianity is an aggregate of the philosophies of the Roman and Greek heritage. As Dawkins – one of the biggest atheist and evolutionist savant, opposed to Christianity but strangely agnostic supporter of Judaism – notes:

At least, the simple fact that the most powerful people in this world are religious – but not Christian, matters. And the simple fact that numerous journalists are Jewish themselves proves that the MSM critics towards Christianity are not totally objective, else equal (if not more) amount of articles against Judaism and Islam should be produced.  Honestly, when was the last time you read in a newspaper “Judaism by default is gone”. Does it sound even a little bit anti-Semitic? This being said, I don’t blame Jews, nor Muslims. Social groups, meta-programs are what they are – memes as Howard Bloom names them.

Hence, the key question here is not god but rather the political instrumentation of a philosophy of life in order to foster a change of values in society, and centralise the power/resources of the hands of the few. I intend here to show how Christian values ARE NOT the problem, and how Christianity – a traditional version – is closer to the solution than the problem. So let’s talk about Christian core values, not spiritual beliefs.

The roots of the Christian values are called the 4 cardinal virtues and were introduced by Plato in the the Republic. They are the following:

  1. Prudence: Aristotle defined prudence as recta ratio agibilium, “right reason applied to practice.” It is the virtue that allows us to judge correctly what is right and what is wrong in any given situation. In short, before acting, you should think.
  2. Justice: while we often use justice in a negative sense (“He got what he deserved”), justice in its proper sense is positive. Injustice occurs when we as individuals or by law deprive someone of that which he is owed. Legal rights can never outweigh natural ones.
  3. Fortitude: Fortitude allows us to overcome fear and to remain steady in our will in the face of obstacles, but it is always reasoned and reasonable; the person exercising fortitude does not seek danger for danger’s sake. Prudence and justice are the virtues through which we decide what needs to be done; fortitude gives us the strength to do it.
  4. Temperance: temperance is the restraint of our desires or passions. Food, drink, and sex are all necessary for our survival, individually and as a species; yet a disordered desire for any of these goods can have disastrous consequences, physical and moral.

Already here, you note that these values are quite opposed to cultural Marxism and liberalism, which open the path to nihilism, amorality and hedonism. Unlike Marxism which primarily focuses on economic inequalities and economic classes, Cultural Marxism see culture as a main cause for many different kinds of inequalities:

  • Race (Whites/non-Whites)
  • Culture (Western/non-Western)
  • Family (nuclear family/non-nuclear family)
  • Religion (Christianity/atheism and religious minorities)
  • Gender (men/women)
  • Sexual orientation (heterosexual/LGBT)

On the other hand, liberalism leads to hedonism. The breaking of religion – Christianity only in the west, since Judaism was never attacked – without its replacement with the Greco-Roman foundations leaves the door open to what is called the “devil” in Christianity. In short:

  • Prudence is replaced by consumption and impatience
  • Justice is replaced by equality, which is itself split into race-culture-family-religion-gender-sexual orientation. A good person – the Just – is therefore a liberal, and the devil is a White-Western-Married-Christian-Man-Straight.
  • Fortitude is replaced by individualism where any reason is good enough to leave the responsibility on others, and where excuses are given for not having any discipline (e.g. obesity)
  • Temperance is replaced by over-consumption where the instant satisfaction is essential and constantly increasing (e.g. Facebook, Tinder, alcohol, drugs, obesity)

The virtues were then translated into the 7 heavenly virtues in light of the 7 sins, as showed here:

As you see, Christian virtues origin from basic sins. They are called “virtues”, and to some extent are based on Stoicism. Yes, as the German theologian Bruno Bauer shows, Christianity owes more to Greco-Roman philosophy than Judaism. Hard hit for the 19th which cost him his job at the university of Bonn.

These virtues are attributes that every real Christian tries to develop inside him in order to become a better person. So, let’s go one by one and expose how the current Christianity 2.0 is not aligned with the core Christian values, and therefore not Christian at all.

  1. Chastity: this value derives from the sexual morality in the Bible. One should focus on higher things than sex, for both men and women. Chastity is opposed to fornication, a precept in fact fostered by Freud (Jewish) and Kinsey but supported today by the universal sexual rights. I believe that today everyone can see how sexual liberation has led to a world of injustice and the disintegration of the family unit.
  2. Temperance: setting personal boundaries to your own desires. It is not based on death sentence, but on free will. It is about not abusing of our physical impulses. And today is exactly the opposite. Consumption is a goal per se for the masses. Profits, hedonism.
  3. Charity: the free and individual choice of helping other individuals. As such, it is completely opposed to a system taking by force your hard earned money. In fact, taking advantage of others, taking the benefits of someone else’s work is contrary to Christian values. The same goes for usury, and this is also where Christians split with Jewish laws, where usury is allowed, but only towards non Jews. So, our abusive financial and socialist system doesn’t derive from Christianity, but in fact, is opposed to it.
  4. Diligence: hedonism encourages de facto the minimisation of effort to satisfy one’s pleasure. You should have everything, now. The notions of investment and discipline are exactly the opposite of what the western society is today.
  5. Patience: again, our hedonistic society is not patient. Companies have no leadership, preferring diversity and pretty colourful slides to the patience required to build something strong and real. Short term gains are privileged over long term investment. Like a child cries instantly, the modern woman screams and now uses the #metoo as a tool to sue innocent men. In terms of relationships, tinder, badoo and Facebook are mere symptoms of an impatient and hedonistic society. Again, Christianity has nothing to do there.
  6. Kindness: for Christians, valuing what we have and what we receive is essential. But also showing kindness to people. Yet, that doesn’t mean supporting your own genocide, helping theft or letting anyone step on you. The Christian has a duty to oppose what is bad. Ever heard about the Just War? Our society is not based on kindness, it is based on the extraction of resources from white men to others. There is absolutely no Christianity in it, quite on the opposite.
  7. Humility: a Christian respects the achievements of others. He seeks not to take pride in what other did, nor to take advantage of the weak. How does our totalitarian leftist system show humility? Through anti-discrimination laws?

In addition, these values have to be applied with consistency. Cherry picking is what Catholicism 2.0 has been doing now and then, and I repeat it: that ain’t Christian, nor Greco-Roman.

So, I invite you, Christian or not, to reflect on these values and to decide for yourself if you agree with them values or not. Think about them, and decide for yourself if you think that they represent exactly what is missing in our society. Honestly, if these values and links can lead you to personal conclusions, I am happy. I don’t intend saying here that I have all answers. In any case, Christianity is a reflection of the Greco-Roman values, and its facets are multiple. It is a personal faith before all that is NOT RESPONSIBLE for what happens now. Its tolerance was jeopardised to change it into Nihilism and Hedonism, which ARE THE RESPONSIBLES. So, hitting on Christianity won’t solve the issue, it will make it graver. On the contrary, a return to traditional values would improve drastically our social condition, at many levels.

In any case, Christianity is a (Juedo)-Greco-Roman philosophy of life that can guide us during our personal reflections, but also when we need to choose a path. Its political usage has to be distinguished from its philosophical foundations, for opposing it drastically without a sound and self-reflected alternative might result in personal and societal nihilism.

Feminist admits publicly how she cucked her husband

The cultural Marxist shitshow “minute of truth” featured another “normal western woman”, married under the dogma of feminism. Watch for yourself:

So basically, she cheated on her husband, multiple times and she doesn’t feel sorry for it. She seems to be proud of it even! She would marry her ex boyfriend, in front of her husband. She would destroy her family, her husband, just to satisfy the temptation inside her. Sad.

Are we supposed to say “Yes” to this and forgive, even as a Christian?

Redemption comes when someone asks for forgiveness and is ready to make – profound and concrete – sacrifices not to commit AGAIN the same mistake. But here is totally the opposite. In any case, he forgiveness of the heart doesn’t prevent the strict hands of justice.

More scary, this is what society tells women to do: fuck, fuck, fuck, and get your emotional pussy aroused by any other means. And you get bored, just switch on Tinder and fuck. A feminized world without a glance of morality, nor humanity I would say.

Anyway, what really saddens me is this picture:

He tries to consolate her while she feels so “emotionally charged” by what happened. At that level of cuckery, I will just say “poor man”. I wish for him all the best, to remain strong and not to collapse under the weight of reality when he realises what happened.

And the shows rolls on.

Social media and Cocaine

People spend a lot of time on social media. Some to chat, some to watch videos, others just to get attention. It doesn’t matter what you do, it impacts your life, just like anything else.

A recent study in fact analysed the problem seriously and reached the conclusion that social media addiction is similar to the usage of hard drugs. And for a very specific reason: they create a dopamine loop in our brain, which provokes addiction. This is why Facebook, Instagram are so addictive for most people – in particular women.

Extract:

The study findings revealed that when not allowed to check their texts or emails, or connect to digital technology in any way, participants developed withdrawal symptoms typically seen in people addicted to cigarettes or other substances. Many study participants said they felt like they were trying to kick a hard drug habit or going on a strict diet.

When a person uses the stimulant cocaine, it affects the central nervous system, including the brain. It stimulates neurotransmitter receptors in the brain’s reward center with a huge surge of dopamine — an organic feel-good chemical, or neurotransmitter. This release of dopamine is much more abundant than normal, giving the user a rapid rush of energy and sensation of pleasure that radiates through their nervous system. This rewarding pleasure leads them to desire more cocaine so they can sustain or repeat the sensation. The desire for more can lead to addiction in a relatively short time.

In a similar way, smartphones and other technological devices can become addictive because they activate this same neurological reflex: Whenever a person receives a timely response to a text or an Instagram post, they feel a surge of pleasure and reward — the neurotransmitter receptors in the brain’s reward center release dopamine and make them feel good. If they repeat this behavior — compulsively posting messages or sending texts and receiving the “reward” of instant responses — their dopamine levels rise even higher and their brains send the message that this is a good activity. They don’t want to stop, or find it increasingly difficult to tear themselves away from their digital world.

So yes, social media are extremely destructive. But what no-one did is to link this dopamine cycle with its actual consequences or potential use.

In fact, dopamine is also an excellent catalyst for learning and programming behaviours. This cycle is used to train dogs, but also human without them knowing it. The reward seeking loop strengthens rewarding behaviours and sanctions non complying ones. For instance, you can reward people on their belief (likes on liberal ideas) and punish them on others (dislikes on conservative content). The study summarises:

Dopaminergic neurons of the midbrain are the main source of dopamine (DA) in the brain. DA has been shown to be involved in the control of movements, the signaling of error in prediction of reward, motivation, and cognition. Cerebral DA depletion is the hallmark of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Other pathological states have also been associated with DA dysfunction, such as schizophrenia, autism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children, as well as drug abuse. DA is closely associated with reward-seeking behaviors, such as approach, consumption, and addiction. Recent researches suggest that the firing of DA neurons is a motivational substance as a consequence of reward-anticipation. This hypothesis is based on the evidence that, when a reward is greater than expected, tthemhe firing of certain DA neurons increases, which consequently increases desire or motivation towards the reward.

Add to this the natural neural learning process which is based on message repetition: repeat the same thing all the time, and for your brain, it becomes the truth. You don’t have to be a genius to understand what an addictive platform based on dopamine can do for influencing your political views, but also your behaviour. Hence the repetition of the following political messages:

All these messages have as common root “freedom through the appeasing of one’s individual pulsions and feelings”. A feminized society in short, where freedom is the absence of choice and the slavery to one’s desire. What a freedom, indeed. What a logic, indeed.

But to the extreme, these messages become radical truth for people and derive in very real terrorism, namely Antifa, BLM and hardcore Femen. They also derive in total paranoia, for instance the TV show “handmaid’s tale“.

Extract from thinking fast and slow, Daniel Kahneman:

Our brain assesses norms on the basis of its neural programming. At neuronal level absolute truth makes no sense, hence the commonly accepted saying “the relative truth”. From a religious perspective, it would contradict free will. From an evolution perspective, we could not adapt without the possibility of programming our brain.

Yet, of course, the world has its very real truth which is there and obvious. And our shitlib society inverted the truth thanks to its abundance of resources.

For example, a wife can cheat on her husband and get away with it. In nature, the truth is that a lonely female has no chance to survive. Here, in a modern society, she can. But not for long, and not happily. The disconnection between the feminist discourse and reality generates high intensity unconscious cognitive dissonance. This practically results in hysteric disorders, anxiety, bipolarity and/or depression, addiction. Same goes for men. To assert my explanation, I attach here some statistics per gender:

As you see, our society is mentally sick. Someone who never took drugs nor alcohol and is mentally healthy is today rather rare. And these social media are for something into this, by unconsciously – or willingly – rewarding destructive behaviors before all. At least that is what we can observe, but also what Cuckenberg is accused of doing.

Zuckerberg talks about hate speech

So basically Cuckenberg is baffling to explain what is hate speech:

In a nutshell: “hum Sir I have no clue about what is happening. What is hate speech? I don’t even know myself! Who created this? I am not guilty, I swear. Look at my innocent face! I always wanted to do good in this world. For example, I am against terrorists, because they are bad people. Please don’t send me to jail, I have an interracial marriage and a child. Also, I promise I will cry if you continue asking me questions.”

And here, he is baffling about censorship:

We consider ourselves to be a platform for all ideas

Bullshit!!!

graph-021

Yet, do you know who has been banned from Facebook multiple times? I have! Like many other “dissidents” from the right. In fact, I am also shadow banned on Twitter. I have been censored from many Sub-Reddit. And this man comes to talk shit like that.

Realize how many lies are coming out of his poker face mouth. And how he clearly avoids stating his opinion in public (Zuckerberg is a gamma male). Does anyone in the 21st century has had more influence than this man? Teenagers are addicted (92% of them go online on a daily basis), losing a time that could be invested in a valuable education and /or a healthy relationship. In France, many doctors raised Facebook as a “public health concern for children”, because many develop anti-social, hysteric and autistic behaviors. From LeFigaro (translated from French):

The Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) concluded that Facebook is the most toxic social media. Risks are considerable. An over-utilization of Facebook can cause depression, solitude, anxiety, not counting the decrease of school level, the exposition to violence, cyber-harassment and the increase of intimidation victims. Excessive usage of Facebook also provokes changes in sleeping habits and nutrition.

 

In fact, as of today, almost every single problem can be traced back to Facebook. Zuckerberg and his team have declared – willingly or not, and illegally – war on Western Civilization, promoting Cultural Marxism before all, and all those involved should pay for it.

Seriously, apply law and send these people to jail.