#metoo has not gone far enough

#metoo is a great campaign. Really!

Originally, it was started to hunt down right winger neoNazi extremists. Every leftist has in mind this virtuous white knight dream, where he fights the bad white extremists neoNazi. Boohhh.

Yet, since their reality is completely upside down, they did the opposite: they demonstrated that most leftists leader or big figures are sick perverts. So, in the crusade against white right wing extremists… They actually ended hitting on their owns. Hopefully they kind of realize that at some level, now questioning the effectiveness of the #metoo campaingn.

Women-are-posting-me-too-on-social-media-to-indicate-they-have-been-sexually-harassed-or-assaulted.-Mihai-SurduShutterstock

This campaign is great, because it punishes perverts and the left.

It is in this context that the light shined on Aziz Ansari. Leftist, “pro-feminist hypocrite”, stand-up comedian… When seeing his face, I already knew what it was all about. Owen Benjamin tells it in details:

The #metoo campaign is focusing on people who are really guilty of women perversion. It will be very hard for this campaign to hit anyone who is on the right. And the outcome of such campaign can only be a world less sexual, where all women sexual value is diminished. So in a way, the feminist are shooting themselves in the foot.

Matthew-5-28
Remember the teachings of the Lord

That exchange program for your (cheating) girlfriend

Erasmus is an exchange program for students in the European Union and other great countries (let say… TURKEY!). Disguised as a learning or cultural exchange program, it is just a libertine and sexual exchange program.

When your girlfriend, daughter, sister goes to an exchange program or an Erasmus to South America, Spain, Italy, etc. This is what is likely happening.

Do not ever fall into the trap of believing that any exchange program is there to make people better, smarter or more educated. It is only there to waste their time, destroy their dreams and trash their emotions.

Czech presidential election: Urban areas are cancer

The first round of Czech elections gave the 2 candidates Miloš Zeman and Jiří Drahoš for the second round of election.

The first one being Euro-skeptic and against massive non-white immigration, the latter being pro-EU, pro-euro and pro non white immigration.

It is worth noting that Drahoš has a campaign budget 7 times higher than Zeman (where does that money comes from?). Yet Zeman has a clear advantage in the first round. So the second round can’t be won for truth and reality. In any case, the president having very limited power in Czech Republic, that is not the real take away here. What is interesting is how people vote depending on the regions. Let’s compare it to the 2016 US electoral map by county:

iqY216m

DTvdhfQXcAAdwM9.jpg

An image is worth a thousand words… The urban and rural areas are completely disconnected. And in this context, democracy makes absolutely no sense. Especially when people in both camps want to take radically different policies.

So what makes up that difference?

From leftist perspective, the answer is simple: People in big cities are more educated than people from the country.

From a realistic perspective: The people in the country tend to have more manual or “outside jobs”. They work with the soil. They build stuff. They have a functioning community: fraternity, solidarity… They are in touch with reality. They directly talk to one another.

While for people in cities, the reality is Netflix and Facebook. The brainwashing machines of the globalist agenda.

You choose which scenario suits you best. I will leave it with this quote from Ronald Reagan:

“It is not that our liberal friends are ignorant… it is just that they know so much that isn’t so”

#ShadowBan: More than censorship.

Everyone saw this video, but a few other details are worth pointing out.

One black, one arab, one indian, one woman… here are the people working to shut down any white uprising. While they hypocritically cry for freedom of speech and oppression.

Yet they use:

  • Computers, invented by white men
  • Algorithms developed by white men
  • Computer languages developed by white men
  • Twitter, a website that was probably (not sure) mostly developed by white men

And they enjoy the highest standard in the world of living in a country build by… WHITE MEN.

The Indian is the most awful one. This dirtbag rants about censoring whites in order to get laid with a white women. He is such a disgusting piece of garbage.

And these are considered the “smart ones”, the integrated Indians. “The example” every leftist will point out when talking about multiculturalism.

The truth of the matter is that every other race HATE HATE HATE white men. And this was clear proof of it.

What do alt-right women think about Islam?

The year 2018 should be the year that sees the beginning of the end of feminism. It is a prerequisite to take back Western countries, because women in power will generally always keep fueling and creating mess. Frankly, feminist is not only a repulsive old cat women with hair on her legs, but also the 10 in her early 20’s chasing males to aquire more resources. There are no right wing women in the alt-right. They can be entertaining, nice looking, say good rethorics, but that’s all. They bring nothing new – at all.

That women, for example, summarised much of how they think:

You see, for women (99.9% of them), the problem of Islam is not what it is per se, neither are its consequences. No. The real issue are women’s privilege. As stated, they want to travel alone (aka increase their penis counter anywhere at anytime), and they don’t want to look back at their misconduct, neither emotionally nor physically. Do you know any woman having the ability to analyse her own behavior and nature objectively, whilst correcting it for the benefits of others, and against her own self? I don’t, not even one.

Almost all women only care for nothing else but money, attention and social privileges they get. Pleasure, lust and comfort is all they want.

Moreover, what would they say if they were really against Islam?

Well, they would say:

  • Islam has a point about controlling women
  • Islam has a point about women intellectual and physical inferiority as a whole
  • Islam has a point about defending traditions and family values
  • Islam has a point about patriarchy
  • Islam is bad because it promotes violence as a cohesion rather than love and trust
  • Islam is bad because it promotes sexual abnormality, such as pedophilia and consanguinity
  • Islam is bad for Europe and USA because it destroys the native culture
  • Islam is bad for Europe and USA because it takes Western women and destroys genetic legacy
  • Islam is bad because it is based on a false prophet that was a pedophile, and an murderer
  • Islam is bad because it blocks any human enlightening
  • Islam is bad because of polygamy
  • Islam is bad because it promotes (and requires) slavery
  • Etc.

More examples?

Or “being raped is not such a big issue” – especially if it is by a constructed hollywood superior man: the dark migrant.

Actually, no feminist seem to complain about Muslim rape. And it doesn’t seem to be a priority for right wing women neither, just like pedophilia is not. On the contrary, the main issue is that women are not free in Islam. As long as they can do what they want, Islam and immigration are good things. They even recommend it! Did you know that alt-right women went black or at least on the dick carousel?

Clearly, women’s rights in Islam are not the priority – at all. I do not care if women wear Hijab. Actually, if white women are scared of Islam, that is good thing! Why would white men fight to make Islam better for white women? Is that even a joke, or just a total rip-off?

This being said, don’t be mistaken, the point is to promote rational and moral behaviors with women. I think men should act as men, setting limits but also taking care of their women. As a man, you have the right to tell them to go to hell, as long as you do your part of the job. This war cannot be won with clean hands, that’s for sure, but we ought to keep them as clean as possible and to lead by example.

Why the narrative about offshoring is a lie.

About 80% of all the electronic products in the world are manufactured in Shenzhen, China. Almost every clothes are manufactured in China, Mexico, Turkey, Bengladesh or Morocco. The common narrative for this is the lowest cost. But wait a minute, is that so true? Do companies make more profits from offshoring? I am not so sure.

Molyneux.jpg

In general, an employee in Shenzhen will make about 900$ a month, and 400$ a month when they work in clothes manufacturing. All importation taxes are reduced to zero to US and Europe (for example, just assemble everything in Norway and then export duty are free in Europe) in most cases. On the contrary, if you produce something in Europe or USA, you have to pay custom taxes to China, India, Saudi Arabia and other great democracies. Trump is right: what kind of idiot would agree to such agreement? Well, all of us when we think that salaries is the only reason for offshoring.

Résultat de recherche d'images pour

Yet, when breaking down the costs, it is clear that labor costs account for 0.12$ for a 14$ T-shirt (yet expensive!) – that’s about 1% of the labor costs. For electronics, this goes exactly the same, 1% of the total production cost!

Résultat de recherche d'images pour

Résultat de recherche d'images pour

Image associée

Let’s do some elementary maths. Our Chinese friend earns about 350$ a month, that’s barely what gets a Polish, Latvian, Estonian, Lithuanian, Russian or, Romanian worker in Europe, so let’s give in an increase to 2000$ a month. Since we multiply the salary by 6, we should say that now, the labor costs just increased by 6. So, for an iPhone, it will be a $6 increase on a $600 phone, and for a $14 T-Shirt, that will be a $0.6 extra more to pay. Sounds affordable to me! And it was not even taking out the extra cost of offshoring and shipping back the product.

One may say that white countries have fewer resources at their disposal to manage the production locally. But it doesn’t matter, because that is what trade is for! And in any case, it is almost always possible to use different resources to manufacture the same products. If not, then making higher quality products enables saving resources. Here is the US report over the world mineral resources consumed and in reserve. You can consult here the main resources required.

So, offshoring can’t be justified by the cost solely, even if all other costs would remain equal. The only way to justify American and European industries offshoring is by admitting the existence of an economic war. There is no doubt that the sole reason is to create unemployment in white countries in order to:

  1. Promote leftist policies: people with no money turn to the government as a savior, and vote socialist.
  2. Develop white guilt: our politicians point out the child labor in developing countries, telling whites are responsible for it, while also asking whites to pay to help these people.
  3. Decrease local salaries: people see that jobs are gone and are ready to accept lower salaries. For example, in France, Belgium or Germany, a young graduate engineer (the so-called rich industrial) will most likely earn between 1000$ and 2000$ max while working 50h to 60h a week.
  4. Promote 3rd world immigration: these “newly skilled worker” from India, China and other countries now have the knowledge and diploma to apply for local jobs in America and Europe, taking even more jobs.
  5. Destroy white industry and render white nations totally defenseless while a inevitable civil war is on its way.

Since salaries are not the explanation. Libertarians will point out heavy American or European regulation. And they are right (but it still does not add up for the cost). But then 2 questions remain unanswered:

  1. Why are those regulation in place? They make us obviously poorer yet are impossible to remove…
  2. Why not moving to Central and Eastern Europe? with little or no time zone difference, similar culture, smart,devoted and cheaper labor…

Offshoring is a LIE . A tool to demoralize white men through guilt and a sense of hopelessness. People need to know the evil of this policy and why it does not have to be this way.

Racism in Belgium: Bolshevism 2.0

Belgium recently made another move to get the SJW Utopian Bolshevist nightmare into place. Spreading fear into the local population. Are you racist? Have you ever felt racism at any point in your life? You are in danger, because you will be ostracized. The goal is simple, all racists should lose their job, their home, their friends, their family etc. Everything that enables them to live.

campagne00.jpg

racisme.jpg

These posters read “All racists are the same”, “Racists are not admitted in night clubs”, “We do not rent to racists”, “All racist are on hook of society”, “Racists profit from unemployment”, “All Racists are on social medias”and “Racists are stealing our jobs”. The goal is to strike fear in the so called racist. This also comes after the decision from a supreme court to allow firing without indemnities anyone who would have and does put a like on Facebook that could supposedly (even on a joke) be racist.

Do you know why Jews and Arabs can smoke under the shower?

Because they have big noses.

Don’t tell that joke, like or even smile at it in Belgium, you may lose your job, all your social rights (that you paid for), eventually end up in jail for 2 or 3 years.

The only part missing in this puzzle is of course the very definition of the word “Racist”. Really, what does it mean? The definition is very loose and while reading it, nobody and everyone can be considered to fall into the category. This is why leftist like this word, they can use this label on absolutely anyone they hate or deem politically incorrect. Exactly the same way they use the word Nazi.

All racists are the same, except we don’t know who can qualify for this category.

Or wait… All white men?

Just as a reminder you might be racist if:

  • You think immigration quotas should not be increased.
  • You believe in science.
  • You are white, straight, want to have white children and live.
  • You are not attracted by non whites.
  • You are white and Christian.
  • You believe Islam is not compatible with the West.
  • You read the Quoran and find it violent.
  • You read the Talmud and find it violent.
  • You do not give a job to a non white the moment they apply for a job.
  • You refuse a non white proposition.
  • You do not eat kebab.
  • You are proud of your ancestry.
  • You say Belgians deserve a country like Moroccans dot.
  • You read real history.
  • You say Jews killed Jesus.
  • You say non whites also commit crimes.
  • You like a joke on Facebook that they don’t like.
  • You don’t want more refugees.
  • You don’t think migrants are refugees, but economic parasites.
  • You think than the current victimhood culture is toxic and has to go.
  • You want to keep European and American culture alive.
  • You think that the current Social security is a rip-off.
  • You are a young white male with more than 500 ng/dL T

From a personal point of view, I have not met straight white males who didn’t felt into any of those conditions (even gays did make at least one comment during their life). Again, it is clear to me the left is going on a witch hunt against a very specific enemy: The White man.

It seems too simple to be true, but that is the way it is. You are white, you are a man, you are straight, Christian, you want to keep your culture and you want to found a white family: You are the racist enemy of the cultural Marxist agenda. The values your promote, the genes you transmit, the color of your skin, the testosterone you produce are all seen as poison in the eyes of the left.

I have lived in Belgium for almost a decade. And I have met hundreds of Belgians living in Belgium and from every angle of the political spectrum. Some might be more simple minded than others, some might seem rude (the humor is quite special), many of them are simply way too soft, but NONE – ABSOLUTELY NONE – of them are people whose actions or work are driven by hate or racial superiority. This racism smear campaign has no reason to be other than to chase white men who did nor do nothing wrong.

Little bonus, here are the founders of this campaign:

00.jpg

A Black, an Arab and a (white) chosen women. Her name is Bianca Debeats, Belgian politician and founder of this campaign.

Ironically, she fired one of her “Diversity adviser” of Arab Origin for one his Facebook post pointing out the involvement of Israel in the creation of ISIS. It seems that Racism doesn’t apply in every single case.

What you need to know about nazis

Nazis are all over the news today, they are everywhere except in pictures and in actual real life. I have attended a few Alt-Right meeting, I talked to hundreds of people in my life (enough to know their political position) and I have never met one in person who describe himself as a nazi or heard of anyone who actually met a nazi. Yet a mainstream news paper like the Independent is telling that 9% of Americans are actually Nazis. And yet, open up their source and it is quiet obvious that their claims are complete rubbish. The fact they have to actually lie about it shows that Nazis are just like the new iphone: Pushing for an artificial problem and then offering scapegoat.

d7Q8jCl

Indeed, just like the next generation iPhone, the demand in the news for Nazis did not exist. It had to be fabricated. There is a need for a bogey man, people to reject the fault on. The media need to give credibility to the Nazi label in order to be able to use it. And it works, both the AltLite and the Left are constantly bashing an almost non-existent ideology. This is why they did it.

And instead for looking for actual nazis, they labelled anyone who disagree with their globalist-Marxist agenda Nazi. An agenda that has caused a lot more damage and far more lives even by official WW II numbers. Their polls are completely bias and ask very subjective questions. They could instead ask question about the true Nazi ideology or even ask people if they describe themselves as Nazis. National-Socialism is a very specific ideology. It is not taught is schools nor universities. So someone will not become national socialist by mistake, that person knows what he is doing, no matter how strong you disagree with him. Therefore the polls questions can be straight forward.

The conclusion is that National Socialism is just as relevant as the people calling back the rise of a New Napoleon. If you are an intellectual have at least half a brain, you don’t waste your time on a dead ideology.

Islam in Europe: How the media lie about it…

Debating with lefties is kind of pointless. Any obvious argument is emotionally rejected. Any fact is considered offensive. And they will throw their own so called “facts” like omens that shall not be questioned. Any fact that leftists throw can be looked up upon. One doesn’t have to be very intelligent to unveil the absurdity of it.

In Belgium, one common argument is that Muslims are “just a tiny” minority. Sometimes 5%, sometimes 7 %. “Don’t look around you, look at the stats”… Somehow all the Muslims in Belgium could be hanging around you and all your friends just by weird coincidences.

The NewsPaper “Sud Info” inform us that “only” 781.887 muslims currently live in Belgium. The so called “Expert” explains how he got this number:

« La méthodologie que j’utilise est établie au départ du nombre d’habitants issus de l’immigration et installés en Belgique depuis 1945. Des données qui sont disponibles par nationalité pour chaque commune, province et région de Belgique »

“The methodology I am using is based on the number of inhabitants from immigration and who are living in Belgium since 1945. The datas are available by nationality by district, province and Region of Belgium”

So far it seems legit to me

« Le PEW research centre permet de connaître le nombre de musulmans par nationalité »

“The PEW research center allows us to know the proportion of muslims by nationality”

First mistake. Anyone who has done Statistics 101 knows that in order to correlate samples, sets of data MUST be independent from one another. So far, I don’t see how these 2 set (Immigrants and religion in the country of Origin) are independent from one another. Anyhow, let’s keep going:

« Je reprends également des données d’une étude faite en Allemagne en 2008 auprès de 5.000 habitants qui a évalué leur laïcité. »

“I also take data from a study done in Germany in 2008 that sampled 5000 inhabitants, evaluating their secular view.

I am not even going to comment on this… The next line just trumps everything else:

Le sociologue a enfin effectué des ajustements, notamment sur les personnes qui ont émigré en Belgique et qui sont originaires de pays d’Europe de l’Ouest car il estime que parmi ces dernières, la proportion de musulmans pourrait être surestimée. Enfin, il faut noter que cette méthodologie ne permet pas de prendre en compte les musulmans belges dont les parents, grands-parents ou arrière-grands-parents ne sont pas issus de l’immigration. « Mes calculs sont donc très légèrement sous-estimés », estime Jan Hertogen.

The Sociologist did some adjustments. Notably on immigrants in Belgium but from other Western european nations. Because he thinks that the proportion of Muslims in these countries could likely be over estimated.

Moreover, this methodology does not allow to take into account Muslims of which parents, grand parents or great grand parents are not immigrants. My calculation are then extremely lightly under estimated.

First he makes an assumption that other european countries are not doing their job and just over-reporting their muslim population (without any proof). Nevermind Belgium has the highest Muslim population in Western Europe compared to its population size. Maybe this over estimation is in the 0.9% of Denmark, 1.2% of Sweden, 0.6% of Spain or the 0% in East Germany?

Then he makes the statement that 3rd, 4th and 5th generations of Muslims are not taken into account (and I don’t even see how he included the 2nd generation). This translates into a “Light under estimation”. I know a diploma in social science is not worth much more than toilet paper… but these people are not even aware of exponential functions taught in secondary schools…

Keep in mind, that the Alt-Right still holds people who can read more than just newspaper headlines and who can think rationally. With this level of absurdity, there is no such thing as a “debate”. The line is drawn between “the capable” and the “mentally retarded”. This is why they refuse debating the Alt-Right. This is why all those cucks, soy-boys and traitors never talk to anybody who sits on the right of them.