How will Europe demography look like in the near future?

To any westerner in the EU, it is no doubt that something is going wrong. The leftists/SJW media keep saying that immigration is close to zero and that whites are simply racists, while at the same time cities like Paris and Brussels seem to have more foreigners than locals. Something is wrong and the media are lying.

In this context, we decided to make a real study over the population of some western and eastern countries. We took official numbers from the countries, hence everything that you see here is based on what is communicated. Reality might be worse. In any case, this had to be done so please share so that people start to understand the emergency for themselves and their family. Indeed, demography is an exponential concept, not linear. This means that numbers grow fast, very fast, even if at first unnoticed. Your brain reacts linearly to its environment, while reality is exponential (compare this to the sound which is heard as linear while its power is logarithmic). That means that you are going to be shocked, literally.

As you will see, we made a population growth model for few European countries taking into account the official intake of migrants, the actual fertility rate for whites and migrants, and the actual non-european population. Roughly, western European countries usually take around 1% of their population in (African) migrants a year. Eastern countries on their side take a lot of Asians (in particular Indians), at a rate increasing up to 104% a year (case of Indians in Poland). Nonetheless we limited the intake of non-europeans in Eastern countries to a maximum of 0,5%, as the current numbers – let’s call that a positive scenario.

We also chose to neglect race mixing, even if it can account for up to 20%-30% of couples in some countries such as France.

We recalculated the fertility rate of Western countries taking into account the proportion of migrants and the age pyramid. Briefly, white western women in the west have now a fertility rate of around 0.7. If you add race mixing, that means that only 1 white woman in 2 makes 1 white baby. In Eastern countries, the fertility rate is not much brighter, with usually less than a 1.5 per woman.

The population growth is therefore an aggregate of a linear increase of population due to constant migration, and an exponential growth for autochtones and non-ethnically europeans born in Europe. General formula:

P’=P0 x e^(r x t)

To approximate “r”, we took into account the fertility rate of foreign population and made an exponential regression over 40 years. The equation was solved using logarithms and existing data to verify the model ex-post (20 years).

Now, over with theory, let’s get to the results.

The results

In these graphics, which I consider to be the most likely scenarios for the moment, it is important to note few things:

  • Eastern countries are not immune to immigration, nor feminism. Their low fertility rate (less than 2 for all of them) is reducing their population fast. Also, they have a high emigration, which I didn’t add, because I believe this will stop soon enough.
  • Poland – the biggest eastern country –  will reach western situation (15-20% of immigrant population) in around 15 years. In 5 years, they will start noticing the first taste of enrichment.
  • Hungary is the most immune country to immigration, today.
  • The first important threshold of 40% of population will be reached around or after 2030.
  • The second threshold of 60% of population will be reached after 2035.

If the error margin had to be quantified, we would say that a range of 5 years can be added to these scenario. This means that the situation could become worse 5 years earlier or 5 years later. In any case, that means that you are going to live it, and it will take a big part of your life (around 20 years, if it doesn’t kill you before).

The 40% threshold

Most Islamic countries were once Christians (and whites). That was a long time ago, before Muhammad decided to start the Djihad.

Overall, when 40% of the population will be indigenous, they will control most of the cities, having there about 80% of the population in average. This implies that they will own provincial politics, rule a certain amount of public institutions and most likely have about 20-50% of the national political power.

In schools, about 8 children out of 10 will be non-white in cities. In the country side, about 20-40% will be non white.

At that stage, they will take a stand on more and more things, which will result in:

  • Reconversion of empty Churches to Mosques
  • Introduction of Arabic language at school 
  • Islamic / Arabic schools where Islam is thought
  • Introduction of respect for prayer at work
  • Initiation to Islam to all students
  • More immigration and facilitation of exchange with Muslim countries
  • More conflicts with black Africans (and return to slavery slowly)
  • Identity politics
  • Discrimination of whites for recruitment, health, money, work, public services, etc.
  • Rising unemployment of whites
  • Rising of taxes for whites

At this stage, no political solution will ever be able to change the situation.

When? Between 2025 and 2035.

The 60% threshold

The next (and final) threshold is 60%. This is when non-whites will have in control the media, most of public institutions, the politics at all levels and will detain most of position of power in the private and public sector.

At that stage, whites will face huge difficulties to find a real job (much higher than now); they will be considered openly as slaves. They will have been robbed by the financial crisis coming in the next 5 years and they won’t have recovered from it. Many whites will become poor and extremely vulnerable, just like in South Africa.

There won’t be any place to go to avoid seeing non-whites. There won’t be any place to walk quietly and in security for whites.

Violence will be omnipresent and non-whites will control close to half of the police and at least a third of the military. In particular, they will:

  • Vote law to get more privileges
  • Enslave a part of the population – but will not say it, because it would sound “bad”
  • Fight each other intensively, with ghettos and/or mini realms appearing.
  • Start seizing/buy cheap white goods, lands and houses (usage of Islamic banks and social welfare laws)
  • Take the last places of power for themselves
  • Pass deals with their home countries to increase immigration
  • Adopt Islam as national religion
  • Kill or lock white opponents
  • Restore a modern form of polygamy and make sure that whites have no wife
  • Rape, beat white women
  • Beat white children at school, teach them Islam and Arabic
  • Kill white men extensively (crime will be much higher than today)
  • Consider or establish an “Islamic Western Caliphate”

At that stage, the last stage of the white genocide will have started. The only solution will be total war.

When? Between 2035 and 2045.


The hatred brainwashing of leftists media all around the world to genocide whites has been going on for decades now. The West is in such a situation that no political solution seems to be possible. To reach 50% of a very moderate right wing party (civil activists), almost 90% of white men and women should vote for the labelled “extreme neo Nazi far right fascists” political parties in the next 10 years. Hence, it is no doubt for us that the situation will not find any peaceful (political) solution. An apocalyptic (South-African 2.0) Europe seems to be coming by 2035, with a situation degrading rapidly after the next financial crisis, and at maximum by 2025.

At this point, turn to God, read the Bible and love one another. Remember that Jeanne d’Arc saved France, and cross your finger for it to happen again.

Related image

Islam in Europe: How the media lie about it…

Debating with lefties is kind of pointless. Any obvious argument is emotionally rejected. Any fact is considered offensive. And they will throw their own so called “facts” like omens that shall not be questioned. Any fact that leftists throw can be looked up upon. One doesn’t have to be very intelligent to unveil the absurdity of it.

In Belgium, one common argument is that Muslims are “just a tiny” minority. Sometimes 5%, sometimes 7 %. “Don’t look around you, look at the stats”… Somehow all the Muslims in Belgium could be hanging around you and all your friends just by weird coincidences.

The NewsPaper “Sud Info” inform us that “only” 781.887 muslims currently live in Belgium. The so called “Expert” explains how he got this number:

« La méthodologie que j’utilise est établie au départ du nombre d’habitants issus de l’immigration et installés en Belgique depuis 1945. Des données qui sont disponibles par nationalité pour chaque commune, province et région de Belgique »

“The methodology I am using is based on the number of inhabitants from immigration and who are living in Belgium since 1945. The datas are available by nationality by district, province and Region of Belgium”

So far it seems legit to me

« Le PEW research centre permet de connaître le nombre de musulmans par nationalité »

“The PEW research center allows us to know the proportion of muslims by nationality”

First mistake. Anyone who has done Statistics 101 knows that in order to correlate samples, sets of data MUST be independent from one another. So far, I don’t see how these 2 set (Immigrants and religion in the country of Origin) are independent from one another. Anyhow, let’s keep going:

« Je reprends également des données d’une étude faite en Allemagne en 2008 auprès de 5.000 habitants qui a évalué leur laïcité. »

“I also take data from a study done in Germany in 2008 that sampled 5000 inhabitants, evaluating their secular view.

I am not even going to comment on this… The next line just trumps everything else:

Le sociologue a enfin effectué des ajustements, notamment sur les personnes qui ont émigré en Belgique et qui sont originaires de pays d’Europe de l’Ouest car il estime que parmi ces dernières, la proportion de musulmans pourrait être surestimée. Enfin, il faut noter que cette méthodologie ne permet pas de prendre en compte les musulmans belges dont les parents, grands-parents ou arrière-grands-parents ne sont pas issus de l’immigration. « Mes calculs sont donc très légèrement sous-estimés », estime Jan Hertogen.

The Sociologist did some adjustments. Notably on immigrants in Belgium but from other Western european nations. Because he thinks that the proportion of Muslims in these countries could likely be over estimated.

Moreover, this methodology does not allow to take into account Muslims of which parents, grand parents or great grand parents are not immigrants. My calculation are then extremely lightly under estimated.

First he makes an assumption that other european countries are not doing their job and just over-reporting their muslim population (without any proof). Nevermind Belgium has the highest Muslim population in Western Europe compared to its population size. Maybe this over estimation is in the 0.9% of Denmark, 1.2% of Sweden, 0.6% of Spain or the 0% in East Germany?

Then he makes the statement that 3rd, 4th and 5th generations of Muslims are not taken into account (and I don’t even see how he included the 2nd generation). This translates into a “Light under estimation”. I know a diploma in social science is not worth much more than toilet paper… but these people are not even aware of exponential functions taught in secondary schools…

Keep in mind, that the Alt-Right still holds people who can read more than just newspaper headlines and who can think rationally. With this level of absurdity, there is no such thing as a “debate”. The line is drawn between “the capable” and the “mentally retarded”. This is why they refuse debating the Alt-Right. This is why all those cucks, soy-boys and traitors never talk to anybody who sits on the right of them.